/AC/ AnCap General - Angry spic edition

>What is exactly wrong with a corporation. If you get rid of the special privileges aren’t they just a company with about 500 different owners?

The executives and shareholders need to be liable for the damages they cause.

May as well put this here

Attached: 28521bd12b231794f5e470c568f5d228b7d6aa1051aa1b608bfa39e84903cc65.jpg (2426x2676, 1.45M)

As I said. “Without any special legal protections that they get” what is wrong with them.

cheers

Attached: b70038e363bfa2158fd3ef503.jpg (1589x2000, 730K)

>May as well put this here

Attached: 1522708951178.gif (1100x450, 347K)

>As I said. “Without any special legal protections that they get” what is wrong with them.

What defines a corporation is the special legal protections that it gets. It is no longer a corporation without them.

If we agree on this point, we can grant the rest and have an acutal conversation.

Thanks. Also, all of Rothbard's early work. Before he became a statist.

I don’t agree with that point. Because what I was taught is that a corporation is a firm where ownership can be bought and sold in the form of shares.

What happened to /lrg/

Why did he become a statist

Discord mods killed the discord plus it just died. If you want an Ancap board you should come to /liberty/ on 8ch

>Because what I was taught is that a corporation is a firm where ownership can be bought and sold in the form of shares.

Sauce?

SPECIAL PROTECTION FROM LIABILITY GRANTED FROM THE GOVERNMENT IS THE ONLY DISTINCTION BETWEEN NON-INCORPORATED BUSINESS AND INCORPORATED.

AND ITS A BIG DISTINCTION.

>Why did he become a statist

He technically didn't, but he did move toward right-wing retard after the split with the new left.

Ancap is incomplete
Propertarianism is basically ancap expanded

It was in my Introductory Buisnesses textbook. I sold it back to the school after my class ended because it sucked.

Can you link me or post a better definition?

>If you want an Ancap board you should come to /liberty/ on 8ch

>8ch

c4ss.org/content/51110

no thanks

investopedia.com/terms/i/incorporate.asp

I can do better. Just give me some time.

I'VE HEARD ABOUT THIS. WHAT IS NEW ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM?

GIVE ME A QUICK RUNDOWN

/liberty/ hates Jow Forumstards

Basically, the definition of property is expanded to "everything you want to defend", as an average IQ of the country, and lying is considered another form of thief.

these are based threads, keep em comin

it isn't anything that adds onto Ancap, it's just the delineation of what would happen (condominiums, the formation of homogeneous neighborhoods enforced contractually, etc.)

You can check Curt Doolittle

AHEM... MAY I HAVE EHERYONES ATTENTION!

EVERYONE in this thread is a mem flag posting jew and or neocon who likes taking it up the ass from corporations.

Capitislim and communism are two sides of the same jewish coin.

BASICALLY INCLUDES YOUR CHILDREN AND FUTURE STATES OF THE PLANET?

COVERS GENETIC MODIFICATION BECAUSE THEY WILL OUTCOMPETE YOUR CHILDREN?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

WE ALREADY BTFO'D CORPORATIONS LAST THREAD NIGGER, TRY AND KEEP UP.

Ignore this faggot. He is definitely retarded.

Attached: 1523065542918.gif (250x190, 1.98M)

nice try, Jewish tranny goblin Commie faggot, but we're onto your d&c tactics. now go take your HRT

>inb4 hue

shut up statist nigger, what the hell else do you suppose we do

>mem flag
>epic Hitler quote

Attached: 1549231182509.png (1000x432, 165K)

Thanks bro.

I don’t know how I got mixed up.

Attached: 4A0A346F-3E17-4725-8B19-4B14B4B7F7CA.png (656x759, 198K)

Attached: 1546296815400.jpg (515x790, 111K)

>He doesn't know most libertarians disagree with rothbards position on children

>ancap a funny way of spelling kike

So who's going to stop them from selling children?

U CAN ALREADY DO THIS... DUHHHH WHAT IS "ADOPTION"?

YOU PAY THE GOVT FOR A CHILD. LMFAO HOW UNEDUCATED AND STUPID ARE YOU????

we only accept Dogecoin in my ethnostate

Attached: Dogecoin-Cryptocurrency-Gambling.jpg (300x309, 111K)

misinterpretation of Rothbard. he meant the possession of the child's custody, not the possession of the child itself. also, there already is a "child market" insofar as there is adoption, the only difference there is that the price isn't directly monetary, it's by proving your stability as a child raiser. in a free market society, it could very well be the same.

rid yourself of the memeflag, tranny commie Jew.

Are pedophilic relationships OK if they consent?

If not, who will stop them?

Attached: 1479944429545.png (414x441, 184K)

In ancapistan I'd create a currency called cryptoshekels desu

Omg how do the police stop them? Do they install cameras in your house?

but it wont have the doge on it!

Attached: 1531868171881.jpg (250x249, 8K)

1. the parents, you mongoloid nigger. 2. whoever is interested in the safety of children, aka everyone who isn't a pedophile

a kike projecting once again they never change

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Tann

"Tann's crimes were accomplished with the aid of Memphis Family Court Judge Camille Kelley, who used her position of authority to sanction Tann's tactics and activities. Tann would identify children as being from homes which could not provide for their care, and Kelley would push the matter through her dockets. Kelley also severed custody of divorced mothers, placing the children with Tann, who then arranged for adoption of the children into "homes better able to provide for the children's care." However, many of the children were placed into homes where they were used as child labor on farms, or with abusive families."

Rothbard was trying to stop shit like what is stated above. That doesn't even begin to scratch the surface on how fucked up the adoption system is and how the state perpetuates the human trafficking market by giving gangs and cartels entire markets in drug dealing through which they have built smuggling empires to make such horrible crimes possible.

Not an answer.

Not an answer. Are these relationships okay in ancap land?

Breaking into someones house and trying to break up a consensual relationship would violate the NAP and would allow the pedo to blow your face off

Attached: 1480286636140.jpg (640x480, 41K)

WOW EASY ON THE PROJECTION THERE BUDDY...

WHY DO FAGS FILL THESE THREADS AND TALK ABOUT FUCKING CHILDREN? ITS DISGUSTING.

IN FACT ADOPTED AND FOSTER KIDS ARE SOME OF THE BIGGEST VICTIMS OF CHILD ABUSE. I WONDER IF ITS BECAUSE THE GOVT ISNT A GOOD JUDGE OF CHARACTER WHEN THEY DECIDE WHO GETS TO ADOPT?

should ancap threads be on Jow Forums?

Attached: 1529007388366.gif (245x260, 1.26M)

>Are pedophilic relationships OK if they consent?

>muh child "consent" strawman

Children are not capable of consent. Only LARPing JIDF stormfaggots say otherwise.

Is Jow Forums mostly libertarian? They really love crypto

LOL YOU MUST BE JEWISH CUZ YOU'RE STARTING THE STORY IN THE MIDDLE.

IF THE PEDO IS ABUSING THE CHILD, HES BREAKING THE NAP, AND NOW IS OPEN TO INTERVENTION.

NICE TRY WITH THE JEWISH TRICKS, SHLOMO.

Further explain. Who's child would the pedo be exploiting? Their own?
If so it's still aggression because a child is not capable of consent

children cannot give consent, he'd be violating ethics and it's ok to put him down

ACTUALLY YES, YOU'RE 100% JEWISH CONSIDERING YOU'RE BOTH:

-STARTING STORY IN THE MIDDLE
-PROJECTING YOUR DESIRE TO ABUSE CHILDREN ONTO YOUR IDEOLOGICAL ENEMIES

>should ancap threads be on Jow Forums?

Well, the "an" in "ancap" makes it political.

rid yourself of the meme flag cuckold

>Withur We - Matthew Alexander
search for it . pdf

i think Jow Forums is already ancap infested. the only crime there seems to be destitution

>should ancap threads be on Jow Forums?
they should be everywhere

they never stop

Let's go ancap anime

Attached: FB_IMG_1549069868541.jpg (1360x960, 134K)

Not an argument or rebbutal
Strawman non-argument
A child sold to him by a family who can't afford to raise it.
>If so it's still aggression because a child is not capable of consent
Says who? a 10 year old can fully understand the concepts of consent. Regardless it's not up to you to decide to regulate the age at which they can or can not.

You fail to see that you are trying to arbitrarily enforce a law even though it doesn't interfere with the NAP.

Two consenting parties having relations is totally fine in Ancapistan.

Attached: 1488407338750.png (496x640, 307K)

dogecoin.com/

Dogecoin already exists.

Attached: 1548199289395.jpg (493x1024, 55K)

just link this post in response. hes a jew pedo shill. or >hide all posts by this id

>Says who? a 10 year old can fully understand the concepts of consent. Regardless it's not up to you to decide to regulate the age at which they can or can not.

Stormfaggots actually believe this.

Attached: 1521594416008.gif (1280x640, 155K)

oh lawdy

Attached: threeDogers.png (1600x900, 624K)

Non-arguments

Hopefully everyone with room temperature and above IQ who reads this thread realizes this stupid fucking ideology is a Jewish meme.

Every mainstream figure pushing Libertarianism is either Jewish or working for Jewish interests.

Attached: 1488490484557.png (350x373, 121K)

i thought all sex was rape

Attached: 1528608690231.png (1000x1000, 264K)

lmfao yea look hes got all the molyneux pics queued up.. he got BTFO on his first post, but has like 5 more pics so he needs to keep going

ahahahahahahahah

>Says who? a 10 year old can fully understand the concepts of consent
Fucking pedo.
>You fail to see that you are trying to arbitrarily enforce a law even though it doesn't interfere with the NAP.
Aggression is a violation of the NAP. A child cannot understand consent. It's a violation

Attached: 1549229847778.jpg (728x728, 246K)

>Non-arguments
>Hopefully everyone with room temperature and above IQ who reads this thread realizes this stupid fucking ideology is a Jewish meme.
>Every mainstream figure pushing Libertarianism is either Jewish or working for Jewish interests.

wew lad

Attached: Stormfags_are_JIDF_shills.png (1042x609, 887K)

ok its bait. thank u based ancap user. you are playing devils advocate. I respect that.

>da joos
dismissed as a non argument.

>A child cannot understand consent

Under what statute in Libertarian ideology does it state a 10 year old doesn't understand consent?

Keep dodging the questions lolbertarians, i'm waiting

Attached: 1549228765010.jpg (917x940, 61K)

lol you ignored every single point that refuted your premise, kys

>libertarian
>statute

pick one

Based on psychology moron. Teens and children don't have fully developed pre frontal cortex especially children who can not consent because they cannot think of any consequences nor do they know what they are consenting too

so blacks cant consent?

>Under what statute in Libertarian ideology does it state a 10 year old doesn't understand consent?
>Keep dodging the questions lolbertarians, i'm waiting

praxeology.net/libertariannation/a/f43l2.html

"The fact that the guardian-ward relationship depends on diminished capacity has an important implication for children's rights. Diminished capacity is a matter of degree; a 13-year-old's capacity for rational decision-making is not as impaired as a 4-year-old's, which in turn is not as impaired as a newborn's. So it is unrealistic to have an absolute cut-off age, below which a child is completely under his guardian's authority (and unable to engage in any binding financial transactions, from buying a house to buying a pack of gum) and above which he is suddenly a fully responsible agent. The older a child is, the stronger the presumption becomes that a child's expressed will is an accurate reflection of the will he would have if unimpaired. So, for example, a teenager's desire to have an ear pierced has to be given more weight than a toddler's desire to have an ear pierced; and a rational capacity that is not up to giving informed consent in the case of purchasing a house may be quite up to the task of purchasing gum. These sorts of grey areas could probably be handled better by evolving court precedents than by statutory fiat."

Important additions to this reading list:

>Machinery of Freedom - David Friedman
daviddfriedman.com/The_Machinery_of_Freedom_.pdf
>Anatomy of The State - Murray N. Rothbard
mises.org/sites/default/files/Anatomy of the State_3.pdf
>Democracy: The God That Failed - Hans Hermann Hoppe
b-ok.cc/dl/945763/e8754c
>Human Action - Ludwig Von Mises
b-ok.cc/dl/720452/038d8f

Collectivist strawman lol

you just collectivized preteenie cuties so i might as well mention other groups with said mental disabilities

Attached: 1528604572203.jpg (709x550, 205K)

Ah, interesting .. 10 year olds don't understand consequences.

There are potential consequences in everything, from riding a bike to walking on the sidewalk.

Using your own beliefs, children should be locked away in a room with a helmet on 24/7 because they have ZERO understanding of consequences and must wait until their pre frontal cortex is fully developed

Attached: 1548721531600.png (964x940, 1.94M)

>Using your own beliefs, children should be locked away in a room with a helmet on 24/7 because they have ZERO understanding of consequences and must wait until their pre frontal cortex is fully developed

Now you're just shitposting

read again

"So, for example, a teenager's desire to have an ear pierced has to be given more weight than a toddler's desire to have an ear pierced; and a rational capacity that is not up to giving informed consent in the case of purchasing a house may be quite up to the task of purchasing gum."

Jesus fucking Christ, mnn. Read the post you're responding to. He literally said in the quote "Diminished capacity is a matter of degree". How the fuck do you get "children should be locked away in a room with a helmet on 24/7 because they have ZERO understanding of consequences" from that?

Well I was using averages plus as an adult no matter what race 99% of people will be able to consent to something and they are able to think about the consequences.

bump

Attached: Nazis_Are_JIDF_Shills.png (688x1251, 549K)