INFOWARS CLAIM: Timing of LayOffs proves CIA Propaganda funding End
Other urls found in this thread:
infowars.com
thecut.com
infowars.com
youtube.com
vanityfair.com
nytimes.com
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
Infowars is unironically founded by former CIA
Wow frogman is still going strong
>former
They probably have good intentions right?
Doesn't seem particularly far fetched, but things happening at the same time isn't proof in and of itself.
I think he's right on this one
They're streamlining in other words using cheap 3rd world writers and AI to replace people.
Bump
This is retarded. They have near infinite money congress gives them and they don't even have to say what its for.
>They probably have good intentions right?
I don't know. All I know is that the layoffs are the result of young persons not using traditional media like newspaper and television.
Name one time Infowars has outed the Jew.
Until then, they're the CIA puppets
infowars.com
Here's them talking about the media being controlled by the CIA, and how the recent layoffs of jurnos is associated with. But ok. Fckin Jew,
>On February 1, The Hollywood Reporter reported that Vice Media would be laying off 10 percent of its staff, or approximately 250 workers, as part of a reorganization effort;
>just hours later, the Miami New Times reported that McClatchy, which operates newspapers across the country, had offered voluntary buyouts to 450 workers.
>These reports come just one week after Verizon (which owns HuffPost, Yahoo, and AOL) laid off 7 percent of its staff, including Pulitzer Prize-finalist Jason Cherkis;
>BuzzFeed cut 15 percent of its workforce, decimating entire verticals;
>and the Gannett Company, which owns more than 1,000 daily and weekly newspapers across the country, eliminated approximately 400 jobs.
>In total, at many as 2,100 employees — if not more — have lost their jobs, or will in the coming weeks.
>Vice is currently in the process of laying off 250 employees, most of whom will walk away with paid-out paid time off and severance, thanks to their union contract with the Writers Guild of America East.
>HuffPost, which is also organized with WGAE, cut approximately 20 employees.
>And at BuzzFeed, more than 200 people were laid off over a number of workdays.
thecut.com
The layoffs are the result of young persons not using dinosaur media. I'm not falling for your disinformation campaign, kike. Jones never names the Jew, because he is one.
And I agree that it's suspect, but that doesn't show a causal relationship.
It could just as easily be international funding drying up because of sanctions or low gas prices. Maybe it's been found out that one of the major players was running a ponzi scheme and it just hasn't been made public yet.
Cant believe the whingers, here is The Monkey Kings head on a platter and its " Jones hasnt outed the Jew, until then....", no wonder they have you all under their fucking thumb. Until then.....
Mmmhhhm.
>Just happened to be same time
>Just happened to be during gov shutdown
>Just happened to be mutiple propaganda outfits
LMAO
are you sure he didn't say that in jest? that's the kinda shit you say in jest.
Coincidence
Its totes legal for the gov to operate propaganda.
See they dont need to accept the free gov money so its totes fine if they accept it with strings attached.
Having state run propaganda is “((((((((Free Press))))))))”
Decade long propaganda vectors. LMAO. Look where it got us.
According to AJ, Obama signed the 2017 defense budget, with 2 billion earmarked, under a different and novel name I assume, propaganda. It ran out just last week.
infowars.com
5.7 billion is too much spending though....
Obama was running heavy pro communist (cultural marxist) propaganda since 2012.
However they have been running propaganda since at least the 1970’s
LMAO
Films, telivision, papers, social media.
Everything you see watch and hear is propaganda controled by the United States Government.
Still think its “too much”
Yeah, and? What the leaf said isnt fucking wrong. Correlation does not (key word) NECESSARILY mean causation. While I am also inclined to believe in this case that these two are directly connected, it is dangerous to adopt the mentality that if two things are correlated that one MUST cause the other.
Are you two challeneged?
It was directly correlated with the causation. (The federal funding shutdown)
Unless you can postulate an alternate theory why every single propaganda outfit downsized at the same time during the gov shutdown.
Just wait till the free porn kicks off LMAO.
Jones is pointing at the "Global Engagement Center" (GEC) at State Dept run by Daniel Kimmage, but it doesn't seem to have spent any money, so if it is CIA propaganda funds, they must have come from somewhere else.
>The G.E.C. is, in a sense, Washington’s answer to the Internet Research Agency, the St. Petersburg-based troll factory where Russian social-media specialists worked day and night to sway the course of the presidential election. Of course, it was probably already too late by the time the G.E.C. was established by President Barack Obama, in March 2016, an alternate to the Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications. It wasn’t until December, weeks after Donald Trump had been elected, that the center’s mandate was expanded beyond combating terrorist propaganda to include state-sponsored disinformation under the National Defense Authorization Act. Even then, the G.E.C. struggled to catch up. Lacking support or direction from Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s office, staffers’ work was handicapped for much of Trump’s first year in office. With less than 100 bodies working the disinformation beat, there were doubts both inside and outside the G.E.C. that the start-up-like group could overcome the bureaucratic obstacles of a White House with little interest in re-litigating the 2016 campaign, or even acknowledging the Russian threat.
vanityfair.com
>State Dept. Was Granted $120 Million to Fight Russian Meddling. It Has Spent $0.
nytimes.com
These are both connected shill, it doesn't take a brainiac to see that.
i thought he was banned from youtube.
Are YOU challenged? Read my post again retard because I am not arguing that there isn't a direct cause in this specific case (I even went out of my way to explain that I am inclined to agree with you on this). I am arguing that in GENERAL it is philosophically wrong to assume that just because two things correlate that one is the direct cause of the other. Your first post had no content except:
>X happened at the same time as Y
>X MUST have caused Y
All I was pointing out is that in general, that logic is flawed. You may turn out to be right by chance, but it doesn't constitute as knowing jack shit about what you're talking about until you provide actual hard evidence.
That's not how proof works, user.
If you went to the doctor with a stomach ache and you ate a vegetable you don't like the night before, does that mean the vegetable is causing your gut troubles? MAYBE. Do you have proof? Maybe the fuckwit who made the burger you ate the same day didn't wash his hands after taking a shit. Maybe you have a gas bubble and it'll go away in an hour. If it turns out you have intestinal cancer, does the lack of the information proving that it's cancer mean that it was because of the vegetable you don't like? No, it just means you need to keep digging and hopefully you figure out that it's intestinal cancer before you become so butthurt that you die.
Exactly.
People upload mirrors of his content. I don't think Jones minds, because he likes having his content spread.
Exactly.
Did I once say that the two things in question are not connected? I specifically said that two things being connected does not mean that one of those things caused the other. For example, did you know that there is a correlation between increasing ice cream sales and death by drowning in the united states? Does that mean that buying ice cream increases your chance to drown? Or is it more likely that the warming of the weather increases the chances of you buying ice cream AND swimming in large bodies of water where you might drown? Sometimes, there is a 3rd option that isn't immediately obvious.
Yeah Alex just forgot about Obama, authorizing the NDAA to include the use of propaganda on the American people. Trump knew nothing about it as well so therefore he was powerless to stop it all these past two years in office.
This is literally one of the biggest reasons if not THE reason this shit show has lasted for about three years now.
What a load of bullshit people, keep watching the soap opera you are all being played at every angle.
They could be right. They were all obviously CIA whores.
This was in the NDAA and it was 65 million allotted for propaganda and pushed with executive order
>Sometimes, things that correlate may actually end with one causing the other.
WOW I GUESS I SHOULD TAKE MY ARGUMENTS BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD. Can anyone here fucking read? I have said in multiple posts that it is not ALWAYS the case that correlation=causation. Meaning, SOMETIMES things that correlate do cause one another to occur. All I have said is that it is dangerous to ALWAYS assume that correlation=causation. Seriously, how hard is this to understand?
Besides, your fucking chart with skin color correlating with IQ does jack shit against my argument. I wouldn't disagree with the fact that people with low IQ generally correlate with having brown skin. I WOULD disagree that having brown skin CAUSES low IQ or that having low IQ CAUSES brown skin. See the fucking difference?
Dont forget the Propaganda money kicked back on so they are litterally back to work here too.
Those people who seem to stupid to be real and say the most asenine things? Those are literally government disinfo agents.
Youre arguing with actual shills.
>Say "Exactly" because his post echos the exact same sentiment, posting another example of correlation not implying causation
>He assumes that I'm arguing against him for some reason
Calm your tits, holy shit.
Jones is like kindergarden conspiracy theory. The pot/gateway drug of the conspiracy world. You cant take some normie and give him the reddest Jow Forums tier pills and expect him not to throw a fit and ignore it all.
Hillary was going to use the GEC and Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act
To crack down on all "fake news"
Sorry m8 thought you were being smug with the "exactly" while posting some infograph that "proves me wrong".
Jow Forums proved this weeks ago....
any watchful user could have told you this
They had 2 years to oust trump before the next election but now that obama's final bill funding has ended they have to try again in 2020 or go forward without as strong of a internet media presence
Go to bed.
years ago
That was posted on here like a week ago. An user laid it out nicely. It was probably just some anons theory that infowars plucked up. Maybe someone decided to come leak it on Jow Forums in shitpost fasion then they decided to leak it to Jones, but it was probably just an user shitposting.
Alex Jones confirmed Jow Forums browser
>It will happen when the weather cools
>It was probably just some anons theory that infowars plucked up.
He's got the documents. Said he was telling the President two years ago about it. Watch his show.
Every member of the CIA needs to be thrown into pic related.
Keep in mind the CIA is known for funding propaganda media outlets.
"RFE/RL received funds from the CIA until 1972."
>en.wikipedia.org
why can't americans argue without flying into a frothing rage?
It seems much more likely to be a simple master of:
>they had too many workers building up wages over the years
>meanwhile people will do these jobs for free, or as cheap internships, or as cheap foreign labor
>they had been floating on investments and fake ad money
>it came out a few months ago that view numbers on all these sites are massively made up, and it's all bullshit
>ad money dries up and investments dry up
The only thing that doesn't make sense is why they would wait until after the new fiscal year just started. Don't you usually want to do the opposite if you're going to be laying off so many people?
They could've been waiting until they financially pulled out before torching the whole thing.
>The CIA is behind useless clickbait
I wouldn't even put it past them. They definitely want to control media sources and I think they've proven to themselves how futile of an attempt that is.
They dont need add money. They get guv bux.
The propaganda is too uniform, too cross platfrom, spanning timeframes that are too long.
Think of all the IP addresses they could get from the clickbait and alot of those stupid quizzes are integrated with facebook so morons link them up to their real name
Wasn't there a law passed by obama that ended that funded the news organization?
Keep in mind, that while many people fired are garbage clickbait writers and editors ("gender writers," "Master of Quizzes"), that doesn't mean those were what was being funded. Buzzfeed's news arm was big in countering Trump. They pushed the piss tape dossier, that recent article that got cucked by Mueller, etc. Once they lose out on funds, though, they would cut what is most easily replaceable.
We already know these organizations coordinate via email and with the DNC and such, though. They don't need to get CIA money to push that. It could just be laziness, donations outside of this fund, and other interests of the wealthy news org (((owners))).
>didnt didn't watch the video
larp aside, that would indicate fall, not midwinter.
>CIA covert operations
>CIA caring about laws
Stop being so goddamn naive.
Just a reminder to you goddamn room temperature IQ morons who either are completely goddamn clueless or just willfully ignorant on "US intelligence" funding of media outlets to look into the CIA covertly funding of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty across Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. I know many of you are just ignorant fools but just a few second of reading could salvage some parts of your worthless brains.
you niggas are retarded the CIA would have nothing to do with how the money from the countering foreign influence act was distributed. since the funding seems to be congressional in origin would there be a public record to show how it was distributed?
Go Alex!
I didn't think of that but I'm glad YOU did because that's also a good talking point too. How easy those clickbait articles made data mining. If private companies were/are doing it, the CIA definitely is.
Yeah I get that, it's even more insidious when you realize it's the government trying to oust an elected official. The Enemy Within.
We already know this and us not saying it 100 times in thread isn't an excuse to insult anybody.
You sell more with honey and not vinegar...
hes litterally bill hicks.
not a bad guy but also not on our team.
>We already know this
Bullshit. You goddamn niggers do not know a goddamn thing. Both this thread, Jow Forums in general these days, and every goddamn site beyond Jow Forums.
>You sell more with honey and not vinegar...
I have no interest in sweet talking you goddamn brain dead morons. You fucking buffoons are going to remain ignorant either way so I might as well speak my mind.
Wait wasn’t operation mocking bird government agents infiltrating journals to push narratives? AJ is probably right
I agree. There is some blood in the water in alphabet soup world.
Michael Hastings went to Buzzfeed and was set up for assassination before he could publish his story on Brennan.
Everyone from his bosses to the reporter to the guy with a water hose has echoes. What are the odds? This was a Mossad/CIA hit.
youtube.com
Serves him right, he trusted Buzzfeed Jews
Vice and buzzfeed are "dinosaurs" now? Laughable
> muh wikipedia
great pic related, it'll expire before drumpf is out! perfection