How to explain the late development of northern europoops?

Attached: 1549138208765.jpg (1024x1024, 261K)

>balther, blather, blather
don't conflate largely uninhabitable (not able to support a large population) with uninhabitable in an absolute, un-relative sense.
No one wants to argue semantics with a idiot ethnic nationalist.

>Scandinavia is icy, barren, and isolated. They still managed to become world leaders in navigation and ship-design though.
While Rome stands on the shoulders of the collective knowledge of the entire Mediterranean.
Right, i don't want to belittle meds and their respective achievements. But it's awefully easy to build gigantic structures and things like this to stroke your peoples egos. When you have gigantic empire, massive labour + immense knowledge sharing going on. And plenty of ressources. Also scandis for obvious reasons were never about building giant structures to stroke our own ego. We have for obvious reasons been more utilitarian. And ultimately this crap is just to start pissing contest between europeans in historical context. You can clearly see that nordic countries are leading in almost every relevant metric for a good society. Which is such an outrage! that fucking immigrants are allowed to come in and ruin our 'bumblebee´ system that we just managed to finally start establish quite late in our history, after lot of struggle. from around mid 1800's. We fucking deserve to have our nations for ourselves! Not some fucking nigger come here and go on welfare which is not meant to be abused. When my great great great grandpa was introduced in labour force at age 11 and there was no such fucking thing called not working. Nigger don't want to work in their own countries, they don't want to work in ours. And they don't fucking belong here in the first place!

Pretty much.

because skin color and nationality has nothing to do with morals or abilities

>inb4 IQ
>inb4 joos
>inb4 crime rates

>idiot ethno nationalist.
It's just called a nationalist, and an ethnonationalist is the only fucking proper thing to be. Where it is your country predominately for your people. Not for everybody elses. They have their own nations for that. They should not take over others nations via immigration or otherwise.
Dumb fucking clueless american. Tell me more about things you know nothing about.

You are so stupid that you think skin or eyecolor is the only difference between people!

>It's just called a nationalis
civic nationalist are nationalists, but not ethnic nationalists. One may abhor poor work ethic, but not hold one's skin pigment or passport against them.

>Jow Forums
we need to live simpler lives like Varg
>also Jow Forums
look at these snowniggers living simple lives

> color isn't the only difference between people

K then why does everyone who says this judge by color first and everything else later

>civic nationalist are nationalists, but not ethnic nationalists. One may abhor poor work ethic, but not hold one's skin pigment or passport against them.
They are not nationalists. They are a fraud. Civic nationalism as you call it is a total betrayal. And says that all people are totally the same and the only difference between people are eye and skin color. This heinous lie also allows morons to peddle that other ethnicities should just overtake other peoples nations through immigration. Since everyone is basically the same. Thus essentially calling for genocide by pretending there are no real differences between people. And giving an excuse for why these other people should not make their own nations work for their own people. Whilst others have been having to do this all along. And those that got it working after a long time struggle to do so under not easy conditions and with next to no help from others. These assholes then want to flock to and arrogantly presume to be entitled to results of these efforts.
tl;dr you can take your civic nationalism and your libertarianism and shove it up where the sun doesn't shine. Because that is where it belongs. It is a fraudulent belief that has basis in wishful thinking rather than reality.

Northern Europe was touched by niggers and brownies last

>K then why does everyone who says this judge by color first and everything else later
Because skin and eye color tends to be atleast till very recent in our history. Be geolocation marker of what ethnic breeds you came from. Which is why it gave a visual clue in a lot of cases of what to expect of quality. But the real differences is ofcourse much greater than simply that. So the skin color and eye color is the tinyest of the DIFFERENCES. not the only or the biggest one.
People who think skin pigmentation and eye color is the ONLY difference, and manufacture in their dumb heads than all else is just trying to divide people falsely. Are complete idealistic idiots.

I have as much respect for people of my genetic heritage that i regard as degenerate as you would have for "niggers". I have as much respect for "niggers" that earn their way and contribute as I do for passport holders. The world is too important to take good people for granted. You call yourself a utilitarian but you're handicapping yourself.

fuck off fucking civicuck nigger lover

Attached: (you).jpg (547x500, 71K)

barbarism>civilization

read this user

Attached: WPP%20II%20Cover[1].jpg (480x613, 35K)

This. Niggers, NEETs and shitskins are the antithesis to a good society. Why cant we just have nice things? Why isnt this opinion held by most people? the fact that 50 percent of Danes want more (((immigration and multi culturalism))) is just sicuide inducing.

It's hard to grow food in the cold. Less food means a lower population and a lower proportion of skilled workers. Italy had far and away the highest population in europe until like the 15tj or 16th century.

>I have as much respect for people of my genetic heritage that i regard as degenerate as you would have for "niggers". I have as much respect for "niggers" that earn their way and contribute as I do for passport holders. The world is too important to take good people for granted. You call yourself a utilitarian but you're handicapping yourself.
Ofcourse you do. You are totally blind and have no problem with niggers or others hollowing out your own ethnicity and culture and values. And it never even entered your heads that these people come from their own nations. Which you don't expect them to get to work at all. Infact they are so arrogant that they demand we through foreign aid and other things should be obligated and forced to help them in their own nations, to try to get them functioning. Whilst having to run our own countries at the same time for our own people.
You have no respect or understanding for your own people, and you don't even want to make a distinction between who is your own people and who isn't. And don't even care that they dissapear or not. In other words you care more about people NOT like you than you care about your own people. That is why you are this cancer that is called civic nationalists.
It's not about that i don't have respect for niggers. I have great respect for africans in their own countries. I don't have respect for those who presume they should be allowed to come to our nations and gradually should be allowed to take them over. Instead of improving their own nations. In a very real sense the opportunities and systems we have created for our own peoples here. They in a real sense are not entitled to whatsoever. They just come when they are there. And pretend that they should be entitled to it. Rather than developing similar in their own nations for their own people.

I guess it would be wrong to hold murderers accountable for their psychotic behavior too. It's out of their control after all. Thanks user you've opened my eyes. We should always be tolerant even toward people who are nothing like us and incapable of integrating in our societies

Before muslim incursion, greeks, italians, and iberians were as white as germans, franks, normans, and scandinavians.

show flag
happy hanukkah
>all fields
>hide thread

There is no nation without blood. You are a civic statist.

lack of contact with other civilizations outside of far off trading and raiding
show the differences now between Greece and Northern Europe

>wrong to hold murderers accountable for their psychotic behavior to
What kind of idiot would punish a society or ethnicity for a individual's action? Your sarcastic comment is unamerican and an insult to our rule of law heritage.

>no nation without blood
Before and after the era of nation-states there was/will be empires.

Same reason that a dark haired man convinced blondes to follow him just by playing on their ego. They were never the brightest.

What kind of idiot abandons his own pattern recognition?

> Your sarcastic comment is unamerican and an insult to our rule of law heritage.
Americans were ethnonationalists as much as possible on purpose till the 60's, almost exactly like the respective european nations who ofcourse were it slightly more since that's from where americans came from. You have no idea of your own countrys history.

And some of us believe Empire is superior to nation state... Just saying...

Because Nords were still in the Holy Land before migrating into Northern Europe
Northern Europe was Barren before waves of Scythian and Cimmerian migrations settled and multiplied.
>Herodotus describesa barren and unpopulated Northern Europe (5. 9-10, et al.)
The Hebrews who finally got liberated from Egyptian Captivity settled in Greece, Troy, and the Holy Land led by Moses himself, and the Exodus is confirmed by 4-5 Classical Ancient Writers which i have proofs too.
The Israelites who entered Assyrian Captivity around 800-700 BC, were placed in Northern Assyria close to the Caucasus. Decades later these Israelites whom the Assyrians called the, "Gimirru/Gimmira" , and whom the Babylonians called the , "Kumri/Cymry", fled through the Caucasus and migrated to Europe.
They became known as the Scythians, and Cimmerians in history, and from these we get the Germanic and Celtic Tribes, the Italics came through the half of the Hebrews who settled Greece during the Exodus led by Danaus/Darda/Dardanus and his brother Colcohl , both sons of Zerah, who was a son of the Patriarch Judah.
AMA

WE WUZ HEBREWWWW N SHIEEET

Attached: 1514996682735.png (2016x1492, 2.79M)

you want, I should gratz you for your doubles?

>You have no idea of your own countrys history.
the US never conformed to the wesphallian model. 1. we were always a republic, 2. religion was always free, 3. there was racism at the civil-social and occasionally in law but there was never any pogroms or wars against it

>Before and after the era of nation-states there was/will be empires.
Do you care to know that they were ethnically based?

>What kind of idiot would punish a society or ethnicity for a individual's action?
That's what I'm saying! People like Jeffrey Dahmer just have a bad rap. Got genes that put you at odds with the rest of society? No problem. Individual rights are above all. #notallcannibals #pedorights #americanvalues

>the US never conformed to the wesphallian model. 1. we were always a republic, 2. religion was always free, 3. there was racism at the civil-social and occasionally in law but there was never any pogroms or wars against it
You are a total fucking moron. USA was ethno nationalist on purpose to preserve the people and culture and heritage. It was primarily british settlers, then part german and a few sprinkles and a bit others. It was almost impossible to become citizen unless you were west european. And they had european first immigration model till 1960´s. This is precisely why americans were angry with the black being given citizenship!
They didn't think people were dumb enough to lose their ethnic majority there. Since that was such a total given which is why they were not so many laws on the books on it in USA or europe. Because it's totally common sense that you shouldn't let foreigners take over your own country and people! You are living a lie in what you believe in!

Language was always superior to skin color in this regard, mate. Meaning, if you can speak the language, you're a respectable person, if you can't, you're a barbarian.

>they were ethnically based
wrong, not once, and not even in Scandinavia.

>Individual rights are above all. #notallcannibals #pedorights #americanvalues
Your individual rights end well before the end your your unilaterally consenting dick or another's life. if you said this to my face i would beat you then spit on you.

>Language was always superior to skin color in this regard, mate. Meaning, if you can speak the language, you're a respectable person, if you can't, you're a barbarian.
No. Wrong. ethnicity was always superior to anything else in this context because it's about preserving your own people culture and values. Which stems in a lot of ways from biology and traits of your people. If mukebe come from kenya to france and speaks perfect french. He's not going to be an ethnic frenchman. Ever. He will always be african living in france. This is cope because of all this multiethnic situation currently. But this multiethnic situation is total anathema. Infact these people except in very very minor sense. should be in the nations of their own ethnic group.

>wrong, not once, and not even in Scandinavia.
HAHAHA. WRONG. WRONG. WRONG. Both empires aswell as nation states or tribes were always ethnically based. Always. Only in the sense of if you had an empire that spanned other ethnic areas. Those ethnicities were held in tribute/paying tribute to the empire.
You are really in a real way trying to argue that nothing was ever ethnically based. Because that's what you want to peddle now. But it was and still is to a very large extent, for totally logical reasons. Since different ethnic groups would like to preserve their own people in their own nation. Since other ethnicities are very different from them in thinking and values traits and all kinds of manner of things. Multiethnic societies are a disaster because you have pulling in different directions internally in the nation. And the compromises makes every ethnic group dissatisfied, especially the one who built that nation and is being hollowed out to cater to foreigners who come from their own nations they don't want to improve for themselves!

What? My point is that some behavior is genetic and everyone easily agrees that these people should be discriminated against for the greater good. It doesn't matter if they're gun owners or they pay their taxes or vote republican or what the fuck ever. Murderers, pedos, and shitskins fundamentally are at odds with the rest of society and their positive views of the first amendment don't change that, so they're not worth keeping around. The US had white only immigration for much longer than it had open borders.

I hope you're just whistling dixie. The Confederates weren't citizens of America, rebelled as traitors, and lost all right to complain as a rule of honor and the legal terms of the peace.

>inb4 legitimate reasons
why do poor black towns have astronomically high crime rates while poor white ones do not?

>I hope you're just whistling dixie. The Confederates weren't citizens of America, rebelled as traitors, and lost all right to complain as a rule of honor and the legal terms of the peace.
How fucking clueless you are. Americans like you today are simply some of the dumbest when it comes to basic common sense of ethnonationalism in the world, you don't even understand your own nations history. Literal cancer to listen to you talk about how nations should or should not operate. Whilst you betray your own nation and people at the same time.
It's all just
>muh foreigners deserve everything my people worked hard to achieve in opportunities for my own people.
>they don't have to make their own nations work and develope this themselves.
>if you say otherwise. You are mean idiot. Nations should not be ethnically based predominately. Because HOW DARE people who multigenerationally for centuries/millennia to gradually develope things in these areas, through lot of struggle. how dare they say they are entitled as a people to those multigenerational efforts. Why can't some asshole just see oh that nation works nice. And just come there and pretend he has same entitlement to what others multigenerationally developed for their people in mind.
You think you argue fairness for arguing against what you call ethnonationalism. But what was simply nationalism. that is total common sense and natural. But you argue unfairness infact, by arguing against it.

>Those ethnicities were held in tribute/paying tribute to the empire
Empire only functions to the extent that there is social mobility across the pecking order. Rigid ethnic nationalism incites rebellion, quashes innovation, and undercuts manpower.

We literally were you stupid nigger.

your that stupid pagancuck argienigger that's acting like a retard in another thread i'm in

How do you explain the hordes of non-romans serving in the legions, or the vast numbers of non-romans that got citizenship? If you can speak latin and are realtively well off, you're pretty much in.

You don't understand. I'm not talking about ethics and fairness. I've only ever spoke of utility and function. My way is the way of the strong. Yours is the way of the weak, snowflake.

>Empire only functions to the extent that there is social mobility across the pecking order. Rigid ethnic nationalism incites rebellion, quashes innovation, and undercuts manpower.
Is why most empires were either very brutal or very short lived including in europe. Since the ethnicities they lorded over. If they were mistreated. They eventually had enough and rebelled and returned to ethnic self governing areas.
Also your idiotic notion of empires totally neglect to mention. That mostly it was ethnic areas and nation states instead. Because that's the natural thing. That each ethnicity has a certain area where they work hard to make better for themselves.
The literal strawmans you try to create in your own mind in order to excuse mass immigration to your own peoples area. Is truly amazing. America is also not an empire. It's a nation. And to the extent you want to call america an empire. It is influence over sovereign nation states! Thus yet again ruining your argument.
AND what made the USA powerful is that it was very monoethnic which like till 1960's nearly 90% west european even whilst having like something 6-7% niggers. Who weren't even supposed to be there in the first place.

> other whites serving under a white empire
The Roman Empire was White and it subjugated only Caucasians
You niggers push your civicuckism because you want to flood our nations and leech off of us

Fuck off Jew, piss off with your divide & conquer! You are literally unknowingly causing you own destruction!

Attached: Whites.jpg (1373x1220, 669K)

>You don't understand. I'm not talking about ethics and fairness. I've only ever spoke of utility and function. My way is the way of the strong. Yours is the way of the weak, snowflake.
Your way is the way of stupid, because you don't even understand that all the things you think were not ethnically based. Their strength was being ethnically based. Because they then stood for and fought for and protected their own people in their own areas. Ethnic loyalty to eachother! But please don't spread your cancer to european nations in the form that you peddle that we shouldn't be ethnonationalists. Just because you want to lose your own nation to central and south americans! Which will produce a VERY VERY different situation in USA. I can assure you. If they combined become majority there. You might look at their own nations where they come from, as a qualified guess for the sort of thing you might expect.

This just became an /msg/ thread

Attached: IMG_0381.jpg (602x819, 167K)

Are you sure Jews were whites back then?

Don't argue with these civicucks, they are either t_D boomer nigger lovers or actual shitskins who want us to throw away our Ethno-Nationalist views and accept them as BASED BLACK MANGS.
The Civicuck meme was literally BTFO during the 2018 Mid-Terms
Demographics is Destiny and shitskins will never be based nor redpilled because they are our enemies along with the kikes

Attached: civicucksrekt.jpg (800x1100, 142K)

>tfw white
bow down to superior genetics you mongloids

Attached: 1549009565821.jpg (500x370, 71K)

>You don't understand. I'm not talking about ethics and fairness. I've only ever spoke of utility and function.
And now you want to lie aswell. Because you were fawning about how you shouldn't say that a nigger or someone else with a passport is just as valuable as your own people in your own country. LET ME QUOTE YOU.
>I have as much respect for people of my genetic heritage that i regard as degenerate as you would have for "niggers". I have as much respect for "niggers" that earn their way and contribute as I do for passport holders. The world is too important to take good people for granted. You call yourself a utilitarian but you're handicapping yourself.
Wops? Did you forget what you wrote.
Also if you think these foreigners are so strong. They had best be in their own nations making them work! Their own people would thank them for it!

>Because that's the natural thing.
Hobbs and your history would disagree with you on Nation-states being the natural order. How can a antiquated trade republic function without intermarriage sealing deals, how can a modern state serve both its ends and a skin pigment?

Your first post was the closet to understanding the reality of the difference. your stupid moral and stupid functional defense of ethnic nationalism deserves scorn.

There was no late development. The "roman roads" predate the romans in gaul, the romans copied and improved upon gaulish designs. The gauls themselves had 10 million people and urban centers of their own, with their own written language, academics (druidic, like the irish) and could muster armies in the tens of thousands equipped with fine armor and metalwork.

The "uncivilized north" meme came first from salty romans since brennus and the celts had repeatedly given the big ginger dick to short brown med women, which raised the collective IQ of Italians enough to form a civilization by copying the greeks and gauls. In the modern era Gaulology and other studies of Northern European ancient civilizations are stifled by Jews who seek to perpetuate a meme that Yurop was always shit until Africans arrived in Italy and created the Roman empire using their egyptian knowledge.

Crispus Attucks was more American in terms of values and service to the country than Robert E. Lee.

Because niggers are fucking ugly, so are indios and mestizos in the new world.

Gooks are probably the only "desirable" non-white race since the rest have fugly faces in one way or another.

>pissing contest

It's more like modern Italians and Greeks are salty they are economically shit-tier and have been for the past several centuries, and it's been 1500 years since political weight moved from Rome to Northern Europe with the ascent of the Franks. So modern Meds are pretty irrelevant and all attempts to not be irrelevant have ended in hilarious failures.

And then there's Iberia, which somehow managed to produce an entire race of halfbreeds who are violent and stupid.

The Med world just doesn't win anymore. Salvini needs to annex Greece and then make it all great again.

This is very true. I am moving to Norway myself. Completely changed my life and income, learned Norwegian etc. Simply because I recognize the best chance for my offspring is re assimilating with my people. My family is German/Swedish decent. I didn't choose to be born in this country, but if I can return to secure a home, that's what I will do. The United States will fail. States that allow them to flood in will fail. I'll be there this year. permanently.

>Don't argue with these civicucks
I think i have really shown how idiotic civic nationalism is in the first place. And that it's mostly just cope to this current situation that those nations should have never been in in the first place. And was a betrayal to those nations and people. Who they then try to do damage control for by arguing to go all the fucking way and just mass import even MORE!
>Your first post was the closet to understanding the reality of the difference. your stupid moral and stupid functional defense of ethnic nationalism deserves scorn.
No YOU deserve total fucking scorn you piece of shit. You arguing unbenknowns to yourself for total unfairness and genocide of other ethnicities via mass immigration. Rather than asking these immigrants to please go back and improve their own nations. Rather than they expect to punish the few who got themselves to work. By trying to go there and take them over demographically. Whilst you do damage control for this heinous thing as a civnat bastard.
>How can a antiquated trade republic function without intermarriage sealing deals, how can a modern state serve both its ends and a skin pigment?
You can talk about modern all you want. As in right now. But the fact is through history it worked quite well especially taken into consideration the low tech and other things and general low living standard. Those nations who worked very dilligently allowed themselves higher living standards. And then other people who didn't do the same. Want to flock to those nations instead of doing similar in their own nations!
> How can a antiquated trade republic function without intermarriage sealing deals, how can a modern state serve both its ends and a skin pigment?
You seem to think it has to be 100% one ethnicity per nation. Or you can't have it. I never said have totally 0% foreigners not like you. But it's fairly easy to maintain operation of an ethnic majority nation. Don't allow mass immigration

>values

No one valued niggers, the founders specifically excluded them from citizenship.

>comes to Jow Forums, shills a post-Kike interpretation of "American values"

Fuck off, unitedstatsian.

>moving to Norway
>"my people"
>German/Swedish descent

Attached: 1496557938542.png (1000x1000, 66K)

>Write long greentext explaining my theories on this
>Pour my heart and soul into this greentext
>Hit post
>Forgot to Captcha
>ohshit.jpg
>Hurry to copy and past before next page loads
>youretooslow.jpg
>FUCK!!!
>...
>One last hope...
>hit [return]
>greentext didn't save
>...
>The jews win. I'm going to bed.

cont..
Because the reason people are ethnic majority in their own country. Is because it was pretty much only those people there! They built it. People who immigrate and call themselves minorities to argue for pity and preferential treatment. Well they are in another ethnicitys territory! They certainly should not be allowed to ethnically alter demographics in another nation simply out of pity.

Civicucks are race-traitors plain and simple, they don't care about the White Race, they would gladly flood white nations with shitskins aslong as they wear MAGA hats
No redpilled White person would advocate for (((Civicuckism)))

Dude, nobody wants be a hebrew

>you arguing unbenknowns to yourself for total unfairness and genocide of other ethnicities via mass immigration.
I think you're putting a lot of words in my mouth because you're getting very mad. You need to check your premises and see that i'm correct about the narrow subject of civic nationalism being superior (in terms of function) than ethnic nationalism.

when it's -20 outside you don't give a shit about art and architecture

Urban vs agrarian. /thread

Vikings literally travelled the earth first, came to the realisation it was mostly niggers and decided to stay home.

Stonework only makes sense in sedentary communities with a strong agrarian base

>I think you're putting a lot of words in my mouth because you're getting very mad. You need to check your premises and see that i'm correct about the narrow subject of civic nationalism being superior (in terms of function) than ethnic nationalism.
No you are not. You are so frustratingly incorrect and refusing to admit it. Because you don't want to let this idiotic ideals of yours go about multiethnic bullshit nationalism. So you are willing to just spew lies about all of history. Including even the short history of your own country. To try to fabricate in your mind that you are right.
Tell me something. Let's say if kenya. It started mass importing all kinds of non african ethnicities. So kenyans became minority in their own country. You would probably think that's great aswell. OOPS.. where did kenyans go? well, practically gone then huh.. What about the immigrants that came in. What happened to their ethnicities? WELL.. they are back in their own nations with like a let's say 90% ethnic majority.
Who do you think you are helping in america by saying that white americans should just give their country over to foreigners? And let's say hypothetically white americans become like a 15-20% ethnic demographic in USA. All these foreigners that then take over USA and everything those previously majority white americans (on purpose since it was their nation them that made, it for their people to create opportunities for them.). Well all these are ethnic majority back home in their own nations! You seem to TOTALLY forget that.

for all of you >muh white nation, and >white supremacy idiots i'll just leave this with the reminder that the first casualty in our war for independence was a black man
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crispus_Attucks

kek fail

so...Europeans are the lost 10 tribes?

-declining ice cap after ice age resulted in later development
-not enough populated for creation of cities when there were already first "ancient" civilizations around middle east
-less competition resulting in lack of needs for faster development
-lots of wood around as main building material which resulted in mastering easily destructible architecture(as again at the time of ancient civilizations they didn't have any serious threats in this shithole except for wolfs and bears) so it didn't have chance to survive as long as roman, greek or middle eastern architecture.
-Romans were are talk and acting fabulous so they got fucked up by northerners eventually when they caught up with advanced world a little

because they were so utterly based they knew Rome was going to lead to race-mixing, allow a semitic cult into europe, and was going to fall anyway, take the barbarian-pill guys

Wood isolates better against freezing winter than stone.

They didn't have electricity and running heat from power plants back then.

Attached: please reconsider.png (824x720, 430K)

>for all of you >muh white nation, and >white supremacy idiots i'll just leave this with the reminder that the first casualty in our war for independence was a black man
HERE WE GO. This is why this idiot is trying to fabricate all this!
>muh white nation.
It's NO DIFFERENT from that kenyans want to remain majority in kenya. If they had a situation where this was threatened.
>white supremacy.
This is what you call let's say french people want to remain majority in their own nation. So they don't lose their own nation and people to foreigners. Where are french people supposed to be majority if not in THEIR OWN FUCKING NATION.
So there´s really no difference between that and say people of Uganda, whatever. That they if they are black supremacists! Because if ugandans were threatened with not existing in uganda. They'd not be happy either.
It's just ridiculous buzzwords that are fabricated as excuse for why we can't have our own nations for our own people. And trying to demonize that. Eventhough it has always been like that. And for very good reason to preserve our own people culture and values and everything we have multigenerationally created. Everyone else also have their own nations for their own people. BUT.. they can have it but white/europeans peoples can't. Because??? well because other people want to go to their nations, rather than improve their own. And then want to argue it's unfair if they shouldn't be allowed to. No it fucking isn't. What is unfair is saying they can't have their own country they built.
And now i ofcourse realize that you are more than likely a black american. The most unfair fucking bunch in USA by far. You very well damn know a) you weren't supposed to be in USA b) ancestors were sold by other africans to 1% of americans. And then want to argue that those 99% should be minority in their own nation. so that YOU can arrogantly be catered too more. So you feel like USA is more your nation. It's all about you! Right.. Idiot.

>fabricate
you say that like numerous primary, contemporaneous sources aren't linked in the article i posted.

It's clear that you can't be reasoned with, that you're too emotionally invested in the argument, and may as well be the politics equivalent of a flat-earther. Good luck in life. i'll be praying for you.

Literature? I'd be interested in reading the books you read.

vikangz btfo

>inb4 we wuz romanz and shiet