I'm Sorry. I'm going to have Jack Dorsey back on

youtube.com/watch?v=GY5W7K_Xvfc

Attached: 1537896159566.jpg (808x921, 294K)

>research all the cases on the left
like what

Attached: 763E6FC5-0ABF-4853-A2D6-F03EA0B803F6.gif (320x240, 1.44M)

Fuck off Toe Rogan

Attached: 1548174271467.jpg (918x918, 65K)

Attached: 1540194148750.png (1151x1068, 355K)

cant belive you guys bullied Joe, an nobody will thank him for shit either way
hate you niggers sometimes

Attached: 1519201913039.png (912x1103, 264K)

i unironically like jack dorsey

People get bullied out of love. They hate to see the people they enjoyed listening too become colorless and dull.

Attached: 1528261055013.jpg (1741x2920, 2.48M)

He'll have Kurt Metzger on with him and it will just be 3 hours of coked up ramblings.

Attached: 1525790731878.png (1475x1076, 853K)

Attached: 1539340099061.png (888x918, 775K)

Fuck off nigger, the majority of heat came from that faggots own fans. Now he's put the bong down long enough to realise he fucked up so bad his own drooling fanboys are calling him out he's going into damage control

Attached: 27.jpg (1024x768, 176K)

Its a shame that someone who looks so much like Mussolini is such a libertine faggot

not everyone gets mass propaganda platforms. if you're an evil shitbag, you get deplatformed. if you're a fuckface like joe rogan who shares your platform with evil shitbags, you also get deplatformed
This is the new norm. Quit kvetching.

Attached: 18.jpg (1024x768, 130K)

Sorry Joe Rogan I hate to waste your time - I guess we don't have a list handy.

Well - Jared Taylor, .. uh ... I see them all the time - people complaining about getting banned for nothing, but, I don't write them down.

Why do this at 2am? Those are highly credible pics - still ...

Why do you go into every thread spamming mark passio bullshit?

Attached: 1521598111581.jpg (1908x2126, 1.39M)

>implying people wrongfully banned for just exercising their god-given right to voice their opinions on platforms marketed specifically for anyone to voice their opinions on need "redemption"

E-celebs beings censored isn't shit compared to hundreds of millions of people being silenced so only selected opinions can be heard. All social media has been destroyed by blacklists and algorithms.

breitbart.com/tech/2019/01/16/google-youtube-search-blacklist-smoking-gun/

According to the source, a software engineer in the thread also noted that “a bunch of terms related to the abortion referendum in Ireland” had been added to the blacklist – another change with potentially dramatic consequences on the national policies of a western democracy.

infogalactic.com/info/List_of_people_censored_by_Twitter

youtube_controversial_query_blacklist

At least one post in the discussion thread revealed the existence of a file called “youtube_controversial_query_blacklist,” which contains a list of YouTube search terms that Google manually curates. In addition to the terms “abortion,” “abortions,” “Maxine Waters,” and search terms related to the Irish abortion referendum, a Google software engineer noted that the blacklist includes search terms related to terrorist attacks. (the posts specifically mentions that the “Strasbourg terrorist attack” as being on the list).

“If you look at the other entries recently added to the youtube_controversial_query_blacklist(e.g., entries related to the Strasbourg terrorist attack), the addition of abortion seems…out-of-place,” wrote the software engineer, according to the source.

After learning of the existence of the blacklist, Breitbart News obtained a partial screenshot of the full blacklist file from a source within Google. It reveals that the blacklist includes search terms related to both mass shootings and the progressive anti-second amendment activist David Hogg.

This suggests Google has followed the lead of Democrat politicians, who have repeatedly pushed tech companies to censor content related to the Parkland school shooting and the Parkland anti-gun activists. It’s part of a popular new line of thought in the political-media establishment, which views the public as too stupid to question conspiracy theories for themselves.

Attached: 1536401696676.png (940x1204, 162K)

>on the left and on the right
What a fucking tool this guy

Attached: 1528473667169.png (876x921, 141K)

foreignpolicy.com/2018/10/10/russia-is-Jow Forums-china-is-facebook/

Attached: 1539321705756.png (949x1032, 1002K)

>when we work out
fuck you joe rollover
go back to beating up jew kids that laugh at you for saying the moon landing was faked
you insane manlet

"Jamie pull those arguments against censorship."
"I can't they're already debunked."

jfc joe eat more fiber or you'll bust a brainnut while taking a shit like that

>E-celebs beings censored isn't shit compared to hundreds of millions of people being silenced so only selected opinions can be heard. All social media has been destroyed by blacklists and algorithms.
They'll only talk about Alex or some fake rightwing attention whore shit. They'll never mention all the shadowing, burring, harrassment, even the fucking president of the United States has his feed all fucked over with three harassing little shits controling opinion.

Fuck them.

Gtfo namefag

Are traps gay?

Attached: blairtrap.gif (360x201, 3.1M)

I wonder what kind of shit the guy will say to weasel himself out of this one. Katy Griffin literally played pretend murder and then called out a bunch of kids, and she isn't even isis. Twitter helped fuel the arab spring and what have you. There's so many layers of contradictions to this I'm honestly just curious about what he he thinks he could say to make sense. Meanwhile I'm not sure what Rogan thinks might happen if he doesn't really manage to ask tough questions next time either, which won't happen because now he forced himself into position where everbody is ready to jump on him. Game over dude. Tap out.

only retards watch joe at this point

Joe says the banned can be redeemed like they deserved it. Already framing the narrative, aren’t ya, Joe?

ask him about the weed, dude
talk more about weed

> muh Jews
> muh wokeness

all that this shill, piece of garbage will do is provide dorsey with a platform to conveniently explain away their draconian bullshit and tell everyone "well, there it is, twitter was just trying to prevent hate speech". rogan is a scumbag, controlled lap dog of the deep state who "investigates" potentially dangerous topics for the deep state and always finds a way to portray it in a positive light for his masters. what a fucking cunt of a human being.

Joe's sponsor is (((23 and me))) lol

I FUCKING DARE YOU. Because it's under every god damn tweet Trump makes.

Attached: 21324354.jpg (1029x1248, 189K)

>road to redemption
For the people who were banned for the heinous crime of wrong think?
Fuck Joe. I hope that Soros money was worth your soul, you degenerate fuck.

ask him what the kikes have on him to keep him in their pocket

live stream Edward snowden to ask questions. he's on twitter funnily enough

AJ called Joe a little demon and:
6:37
"I just want to be away from that whole leaking butthole that you are."
youtube.com/watch?v=SjZdNOdIqRE

Dont forget to ask about all the massive pedo groups on twitter not being censored while they coordinate.

>Twitter helped fuel the arab spring and what have you.

Attached: to hell with you.jpg (600x411, 90K)

>a road to redemption
Oh man yes he's gonna have him back on to spin spin spin shit like he did in Congress or just outright lie, play dumb, etc. We all know how this is gonna go.

Alexander Emeric Jones

...and not a bunch of sad, softball sandyhook sandyhook sandyhook bullshit either because thats just a talking point strawman.

Attached: obamayouwickeddevil.jpg (546x551, 28K)

Why does Twitter allow "verified" accounts to incite violence?
Why is anti-white rhetoric not banned if anti-black/trans/immigrant rhetoric is?
Why does shadow banning exist?
What does his wife's boyfriends cock feel like?

This looks like one of the talking heads from fallout

AJ is a zionist as well

>A road to redemption

Joe/Jamie, unless someone breaks the law, they should not be banned at all! Seriously, if I can say something in public without getting arrested or breaking the law, then it should be the same on social media. The biggest problem is twitter gets to control speech, this is wrong. If twitter is the new public square then the same rules must apply that would apply in the public square in real life.

Once Jack or his minions start to decide what is acceptable speech and what isn't, it's a slippery slope, as we've already seen.

If he truly believes that everyone has the right to use his platform (I personally don't believe he believes that) then same rules as in real life should apply. No more social engineering.

Also the dirty underhanded shadowbanning needs to go, that's worse than banning someone.

>what are some double standards

Attached: dumbass fucking white people.png (735x343, 62K)

Looks like they didn't fall for it Joe, let's do this again until we convince them. Same payment as last time.

Attached: 6615771.png (1200x1042, 247K)

Only anti-establishment, anti-war and anti-progressives on the left get banned.

If you don't conform to the church of progressivism than you're gone. That needs to change, progressivism poisons everything.

fucking kike puppet

Attached: joe_rogan.jpg (1996x860, 374K)

Attached: (((best buds))).jpg (960x960, 113K)

Why is Kathy Griffin allowed to call for the Doxxing of the smug MAGA hat kid, and all the people who called for them to be beaten/murdered without repercussions? If right wingers said that about the left, it would be all over the news and the right would once again be vilified. Seems pretty unfair.

Thanks for censoring the YouTube video comments Joe and Jamie. You flip flop between opinions/sides based on who's on your show. I know you need to cultivate an environment where anyone can come on so you can make the moneys, but honestly it appears dishonorable to me. You should just play the centrist role instead of pretending to be right or left depending on who's on.

You should come out and state your political beliefs and talk about what you like/dislike about both sides without picking either side. Neither side is perfect and neither are any of us here (or you for that matter). Honesty is the best policy. Now that you're in full damage control mode, just be honest with everyone. I understand you need to protect your family so just do the best you can!

Love: A Canadian pleb

Ask him if you could just suck his cock on your podcast to get out of the unholy
deal you made with him. It would probably be less unpleasant in the long run than what you’re about to go through. Lol. You deserve it though, shekel boy.

>woah you goys err guys sure are worked up about this!
>wouldn't want this to continue
>please tell me all the good controversies and examples of censorship and hypocrisy so when I have him back on I can really grill him
>I promise we wont sift through and give his PR team the ones we prepared for in advance, and make sure to exclude the ones it'll be hard for them to spin
>the do over certainly wont be prepared answers meant to barely appease you while changing nothing

If you believe this will be anything else...

>So you got this Jack Dorsey, this degenerate filth, this nobody, this DMT prozack-head, drug addict, micro-dosing, LSD, MDA, drug addict. OK? So you got this scrofulous rotting creature.
-Alex

lol

Attached: 214256445342234.jpg (431x365, 104K)

youtube.com/watch?v=ts6FPBTWwcM
Where the FUCK is ALEX JONES's redo ?

Ask him how it feels marrying a woman with a nigger kid

This!

Its not that we want to see anyone banned, but the hypocrisy is what pisses people off!

If you're gonna ban people just for calling a faggot or a nigger, but not ban someone for openly calling for the dox of children or someone being racist towards white people then that's where the problem lies.

Again, and I can't stress this enough, unless you are breaking the law then what gives anyone the right to ban you in the "public square"?

Yeah, makes no sense. Free Yannipolos.

Someone shooped out his faggot ass nose ring in the OP image

Attached: C2524F92-25EE-4505-843C-F8BECF3B5960.jpg (642x880, 108K)

How can a verified account just lose verification randomly? If certification is to verify that the person actually runs the account, then most politicians shouldn't have it. And wrong think shouldn't be grounds to lose it.

Oh yea FUCK YOU JAIMIE FOR FUCKING KEK FAGGOT!

Jamie is a bad influence. I can't stand that guy. Doesn't seem genuine to me like he's an archetypal redditor, like what Jow Forums used refer to when complaining about r e d d i t

>One thing I really liked that Jack said was that he felt the ability to communicate online was a right that we all should have
>Jack
>admin of twitter
>the site that bans people on the right quite openly

JACK IS FUCKING BULLSHITTING YOU JOE.

Attached: 1542052302565.webm (720x720, 1.55M)

Go thumbs up this comment.

twitter.com/getongab/status/1092308186667704320?s=19

Attached: Screenshot_20190204-000925_Twitter.jpg (810x1548, 364K)

Jack Dorsey looks and sounds like a faggot. I’ll bet his breath smells like sweaty balls and ayahuasca vomit.

You should think about the checkmark more as an indicator of corporate endorsement.

Aha, so that why he connected so well with dorsy. He brought him drugs.

*like

Basically it comes down to this, Jack has this private platform of speech that millions of people use. Does he believe in adhering to the principles of the first amendment or not, even if he's technically not obliged to. And if he doesn't believe in the principle of free speech (which is evident based on twitters rules), why not?

Implying this is Joe Rogan.

I wish someone would ask Jack why the fuck, people were allowed to dox the covington kids and not get their shit banned, when Twitter banned people for the learn to code meme. I mean look at that massive lawsuit that's about to happen against all of those fucks. Then we have, Hell Joe should just talk to fucking Tim pool and watch the videos.

He doesn't seem that bad, maybe a little sheltered or misguided

And wtf were you doing deleting peoples comments from your video. Thats low man. Not cool. It comes off like you can't handle constructive criticism, especially when the comments do not contain any abuse...

And the way you pussy footed around with Jack was disgusting, especially after the way you treated Nick Di Paolo, Crowder, Owens etc etc You seem to give people on the left a free ride while raping anyone in the centre or on the right. We notice these things Joe.

And you said your not a politician so you dont need to be consistent with your views/beliefs... No no no, thats u need to be consistent Joe, just like everybody else in this world. Consistency is the key

Joe Rogan, look at the replies to Donald trumps tweets and tell me that is not targetted harassment and shadow banning of his supporters.

Yeah regarding Covington, has the Disney (?) employee who called for the kids to be murdered in a woodchipper been banned?

Attached: 20190204_021609.jpg (1098x1231, 436K)

All the retards will forgive joe after this.

how many ladders does he own

Some TERFs got banned for opposing transgenders. Can't think of any other cases off the top of my head.

I like how you put science VS religion there. Same science that says there are millions of genders. Same science that lies about circumcision, doesn't let people research iq in adult males and females. I don't need to be a republican to know abortion is murder and faggots should be hang on the trees. Your collage is bullshit. There is no other way, either you are awakened to reality or you are some sort of a hippie faggot socialist and everything in between that wants dead children.

No, none of those people were punished for literally calling for that kids death

Science and Religion are both tools for control that distract from OBJECTIVE TRUTHS

Attached: sorossweetie.jpg (1200x911, 164K)

Didn't the supreme court say if you're a baker you have to take gay customers? I don't see why twitter should be treated differently or how Jack Dorsey should be the one to decide what's free speech and what isn't. If he wants to he should be considered a publisher and held liable for what's being published on his site. Also he should be forced to hold the same standards to everybody without those ladida wiggle room and being held accountable if he shows bias by selectively enforcing rules.