What was the most tragic war in human history?
All of them.
WWI
The one that OPs ancestors didn't die in
Undeniably the first world war
I cry evertim
Can't keep a real nigga down
>what was the most tragic war in human history?
World Wars part 1 and 2.
It directly led to the fall of the West.
Understand the holohoax psyop and what jews have done to the West post-WW2.
Read through this thread, it's all there...
Use this info to redpill others. Redpilling normies is the ONLY battle that matters now. Redpill them and the rest will work itself out.
WWII. It may have been the last chance to turn things around.
Yea it was really strange, that war was met with near unanimous jubilation by the European masses. I think this was mainly due to a romanticization of war through daring stories of bravery and courage from revered figures like Caesar and Napoleon. War was almost seen as some grand adventure of noble endeavor. However, what these young men came to find when marched to the front was the brutal and sickening realities of industrial scale warfare where men were mowed down and blown apart by artillery. The heroic paintings of warfare gave way to sobering pictures of hundreds of men dead. It's a damn shame really, WW1 shaped the flower of European youth into a cynical generation of men who grew bitter towards the propaganda fed them and the supposed noble ideals they were fighting for. This makes it all the more tragic that an even more gruesome war would happen again little over twenty years later
yea bro gotta redpill the normies on Jow Forums
The one whose victims are forgotten and not mourned as they should be.
>Polish-Sovet War
>Russo-Japanese War
These come to mind when I think of forgotten wars at least when compared to the more notable ones.
easily 'nam. over a million vietnamese were killed in an imperialist venture that would make the founding fathers turn in their graves.
Nixon did nothing wrong
The one between Alexander and Persia.
Just think about it.
I'm thinking
ww2 for the number of white casualties and the fall of the reich
WWI
French and Germans brothers killing each other for (((them))).
The French and Germans did not consider each other brothers. They hated one another and had bad blood brewing between one another since the Franco-Prussian war in the late 1800s.
They are still brothers, at worst cousins.
WW1
Destroyed the hegonomy of european empires as well as the russian and german empire in general
World War 2 because that's the one with the Holocaust, where so many Jews died. Horrific
It's older than that
I think it started with Napoléon
Emu war
>They are still brothers
They were both Europeans and I agree war between them was a tragic misstep but they had nothing but contempt for one another for most of their history.
WW I
I bet nobody here can yet name one good reason for this war ever happening, or what good came out of it for any involved.
WWI, hands down
The French Revolutionary Wars. It started the spiral.
.t hippie
WWII, wrong people won that war
WWI
Yes, abandoned your allies in their time of need, goy. It isn't your job to be the world's police.
The one that your ancestors survived, you godawful faggot
Fuck up, nerd.
we had a few wars before but napeolon really was a dumb nigger who fucked things even more that's for sure
>The French and Germans did not consider each other brothers.
They don't exactly do that now, the language is still a divider. But after WW2, we have had a friendship program that is in part state subsidized. There isn't a German city or church community that hasn't a French partner city. We do visits and students' exchanges. I've taken part in two such exchanges where I only had to pay for the bus and was housed by the French government for five days at the University of Amiens.
always kill a traitor before you kill a
german, jimjam
This
WW1.
If not for WW1, none of the subsequent wars would have followed and Bongs would have never promised Israel to the Yees, and they wouldn't have lost their empire. And it all started over something fucking retarded, an internal assassination that other countries wouldn't let stand.
WW2 and only because it finished.
Sounds pretty comfy to be honest. What are your thoughts on the French today? Do you respect them?
civil war
World War One
Modern Weaponry + Old Generals with outdated infantry tactics = slaughter on a scale never seen before or after
1. Conquest
2. National Socialism
[x] doubt it
The presidential meme war of 2016 was tragic for hilldogs.
Does that count?
The reason for it happening is simple. Alliances that the powers thought would secure peace with a "if one of us goes to war we all go so surely no one will start one" mentality
>assassination by a radical
they didn't see it coming
rude
It was really the aftermath of the Crimean conflict and the Franco-Prussian wars, which both again have origins/links to People don't see just how bad Napoleon fucked up.
Of course I respect them. The French are nice people, and the trips actually made me lay off some prejudices against them. Prejudices it turned out I had from a prior visit to Paris, and Parisians are a bit like New Yorkers - loud, snooty, a bit arrogant. Anyway, it was interesting to see France off the beaten track, and it was good to show them around my country when they came and paid a return visit.
fuck off mate that was WWII as well. March against the machine guns boyo. Die for England
WWI was endless slaughter with little movement though. It was mainly nothing but pointless advances.
WWII was simply a war of attrition.
WW2.
It is a tragedy 6 million Jews did not die.
The deathtolls of the battles in WW1 compared to WW2 would say you are talking out your ass
Not to mention the worthless gains behind those battles.
I feel especially bad for the young men who had to fight in the front lines of World War One. The silent generation produced arguably some of the finest artists in the past two centuries. I suppose living through something as utterly devastating as WW1 would leave a profound impression on anyone. Thankfully this often manifested itself into groundbreaking works of art. The mutual respect between soldiers of warring nations was something quite unique to The Great War as well. The ethnic hatred and utter cruelty of WW2 wasn't seen nearly as often in the first World War. In fact, I've read instances of unofficial cease fires between enemy soldiers on large sections of the Western Front. It sometimes got to the point where men had to be disciplined and even forced to engage the enemy. I think the mutual respect between soldiers was best described by Ataturk
>Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives ... You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side here in this country of ours ... You, the mothers who sent their sons from faraway countries, wipe away your tears; your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well.
this
exept Roman colonial wars
at least Romans teached barbarians to poo in the loo and gave them law and shit (today's France's civil codex is copy of Roman codex)
>implying it wasn't the crusaders
I'm going to say the Mongol wars of Ghengis Khan and Tamerlan. They killes so many millions of people that it caused a change in the world's climate that can be seen in bore cores taken from Antarctica. They destroyed entire civilizations and threw us back in development about 400 years.
Fuck Mongols.
That's good user it's genuinely amazing that your two countries can become the best of allies despite the years of miserable bloodshed between the two. As a Bosnian I hope one day we can make the same sort of peace with the neighboring Serbs and others but unfortunately it seems our countries will never reach such a point at this rate.
I couldn't resist.
Romans had the right idea. They completely destroyed the conquered's culture and implanted their own.
>fight Rome
>lose to Rome
>Become Rome
It's ok user Jesus loves you and so do I.
If Alexander hadn't invaded Persia, It wouldn't have been the shitstorm we know about...
Stop shilling so shamelessly
The one where the nazis lost.
(You)
Then they became bleeding heart faggots seeing lessers as equals and burned. Our country is going out the same way.
They had a discipline so cruel even Romans' decimation was a kid's game next to theirs.
Not wrong.
The men who build great civilizations will produce children who grew up soft because of their fathers work.
If Rome never lost her edge. This planet would be in the stars by now spreading SPQR
The whole hard men make good times thing is a meme in my opinion. Hardly a general rule of history
The key is the chinks. Their lack of empathy must be carefully studied and harnessed, if not replicated.
>defending Romans
Liber...
probably some yellow chink spray shit
>if not replicated.
Nah I prefer having humanity thank you
wasps and chinks and chinks and wasps
chicken and the egg
I dont know how you can say that. The rise and fall of most empires can be attributed to weakness of the subsequent generations. Weakness of character that gives rise to corruption.And of course the loss of the stomach for war.
No shortage of that these days. Also gay.
I defend the idea of what Rome was at its peak. Not the weak rulers who took it and nose dived it.
I just don't think it's a general rule. Take the generation that fought in WW1 for instance, an even more brutal war followed little over 20 years later despite these hard men who fought the war being largely in charge of the societies in which they inhabit. It's one of those things that sounds right when you read it but it's difficult to find any real instances of it throughout history
The gap between WW1 and WW2 is nothing in the long term timelines of civilizations.
Rome didn't fall in a generation. It took many.
Besides Rome look at the monarchies of Europe.
France is a good example of dynasty being taken down by a weak King.
>The gap between WW1 and WW2 is nothing in the long term timelines of civilizations.
It's more than enough time for a generation to reach its maturity and dictate the course of society though
context?
Lets think of the generations that followed WW2.
Their kids grew up to fight in Vietnam or be hippie protesters
This lead to a volunteer army mentality for the US. As a veteran myself of Afghanistan I do like this.
But imagine a time when they need to draft our youth of today. Thats an army thats going to get shit kicked. Kids today are soft.
The war of the Egyptian priests/priestesses and their merchants against the true God bloodline, the freeing of the slave race known as the Negros and Jews.
Life has been tragic ever since.
based
checked and kek'd
>It directly led to the fall of the West.
oh no
I was a soft kid. I hardened the fuck up. Rome didn't fall because the soldiers were soft. It was a myriad of instability, civil war, economic issues, and manpower issues.
The boys of any (white) generation will harden up. It's always the supporting classes that fail. Rome still pulled off amazing victories even during the fall. I'm confident if American kids were faced with a winnable objective they could pull it off, but I'm not sure of our economy, and divided leadership. I without a doubt believe American white kids are soft because lack of direction because of lack of direction, goals and soft leadership. We can do it. At the root of the problem is we realize it's all for bullshit goals. As long as dems and neocons are in power we will be soft
More people died in WWII than any other war. And the British generals and high command were essentially the same people. With the same ideas. Pit infantry against tank forces, battery emplacements and machine gun nests. Do you even fucking history?