Women are held back in business because they are 'squeamish' about earning large sums of money

Is that men's fault as well?

>Women are being held back in business because they are 'squeamish' about earning large sums, Liz Truss insisted today.

>The Cabinet minister urged a culture change as she said it was too often seen as 'vulgar' to talk about making lots of money.

>The call came as research commissioned by the government found female-led start-ups get just a penny from every £1 of venture capital investment in the UK. That compares with 89p that is invested in all-male founders, according to the British Business Bank. Mixed gender teams account for the remaining 10p.

>It means businesswomen could be missing out on billions of pounds in funding, as companies with no women on their founding teams hoover up an estimated £5 billion a year. Chief Secretary to the Treasury Ms Truss described the figures as 'shocking', but said women need to be less 'squeamish' about making money.

>She told the Telegraph the funding process had to be 'more open, more transparent and more meritocratic'.

>'It is shocking that in 2019 virtually 90 per cent of all funding is going to all-male teams. It's not even going to mixed teams. For anyone looking in, it looks like men have a monopoly on getting that funding.'

>She told the paper: 'The culture is it is a bit vulgar to talk about money or to say you want to make a profit, but actually it's a huge benefit to society and a huge benefit to yourself.'

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6665319/Women-held-squeamishness-earning-large-sums-says-Truss.html

Attached: Untitled-1.jpg (648x642, 89K)

>any disparity in anything between demographics must be the result of some kind of discrimination
>unless the worse off party is white men in which case it's just natural and you just have to deal with it

>wahmen are held back in business because "wah wah".

Attached: maxresdefault (3).jpg (1280x720, 144K)

This tho

>urged a culture change
How conceited do you have to be that you think you can just tell everyone to be different and they will?

Women have so many excuses for sucking at everything.

Seriously, who the fuck just gives people money like this

They sure aren’t squeamish about taking money they didn’t earn when they get divorced.

*Being held back because they actually have to work for large sums of money

It's what you signed up for wagethots.

Guys who don't wanna feel bad for using a whore without paying for it.

>Earning
The operative word. They will take your money no problem.

Hey! Those stupid cuc ks keep her chruning out porn for those of us with oral fixations its a niche and she fills it she is the thotest thot and deserves that money you commie

She doesn't even get naked ffs

>the funding process needs to be more meritocratic

sweetie...no...

The internet has infinite porn, why pay some shit tbot for some

>female start-ups aren't asking for investment gibs
>"DISCRIMINATION"
Oh the irony.

She thinks she has merit.

shouldn't she be opening up some new pork markets

She doesn't have to be naked to exploit her body and exploit the sheer natural fact that women are for fucking and men wanna fuck women.
It's whorish behaviour nonetheless.

>Women are held back in business because they are 'squeamish'
almost all of them don´t know what they are doing , they just pretend
kikery put them there, like pigs in a blanket, but without a true calling, so they have no worth they can deal with, no point of negotiation

Attached: 144414222424.jpg (1200x1042, 142K)

is this the excuse today?
why are women so pathetic, even when they are trying to insist they are superior?
clearly women want to be coddled, or they wouldn't vote for welfare and nonsense constantly

>It's whorish behaviour nonetheless.
Yea. I just don't get who pays for that. It's peak beta male behavior

also, how do these lefty rags square being someone who makes lots of money being bad but then women should make lots of money? are they trying to argue that women are benevolent constantly? even when they are the evil wealthy that the left also constantly bitches about?

Most of the top corporate women are trannies, like the politicians.

Attached: Theresa May.jpg (590x701, 63K)

Only white men are evil

>Women are held back in business because they are 'squeamish' about earning large sums of money.
My experience is that women want to earn more money but are too self centered and unwilling to work well with others.
That prevents them from making business connections and relationships that help them succeed.

there goes my dinner

Attached: 2121212185454.jpg (657x527, 40K)

It’s bc women can’t think analytically

wasn't she one of the backing singers in the Human League in the 80s

>Hmmm, they're not squeamish about spending it

This guy.

Guys who gain a lot of inheritance thinking the girl will actually like him if he donates

Fpbp

Women could control all the money in the world and squander it away in an instant. I hear no shortage of stories of women spending six figures on a crapshoot dream and being left with nothing but tchotchkies that are so worthless that they pollute half of all thrift stores in America, next to all the unfashionable clothes of last year.

>average of 70$ from each funder every month.
Any man that does this should have all his assets seized by the state.
Who the fuck does this shit? Boomers? Jews? Arabs?

>mfw fpbp

Retards, the point of the article isn’t to provide evidence for the pay gap - it’s to point out how incompetent the Treasury minister is

>Who the fuck does this shit?
Turbo betas

>article isn’t to provide evidence for the pay gap - it’s to point out how incompetent the Treasury minister is
maybe this points out there is no evidence for the pay gape