Moon Landing did not happen

>Moon Landing has still not been disproven
fixed that for you.

No current earth-based telescope is powerful enough to resolve the surface in enough detail to see the landings

It's a balloon. All the planets are. The interiors might even be habitable.

I have difficulty buying that claim. They keep pumping out supposed Hubble shots of shit from vast distances far greater than that twixt the Moon and the Earth. Are you telling me we can't locate a copper-gold colored foil piece of shit left on an entirely grey-colored body that is also the nearest significant object in space to our planet?

>Hubble
Hubble is not earth based.
>from vast distances far greater than that twixt the Moon and the Earth
Yes, the Hubble was designed to image thinks extremely far away like distant stars, not the moon which is extremely close in comparison. It's not designed for such relatively short range photographs and was never intended to be.

nice deflection..

But what I'm saying is that if we have the technology to put into Hubble, a space-based telescope, what's stopping us from using similar technology here, on Earth, to see what is essentially our next door neighbor? Somehow it seems like 50 years after the Moon landing, viewing the Moon should be fairly easy by now.

> Can Hubble see the Apollo landing sites on the Moon?
> No, Hubble cannot take photos of the Apollo landing sites.
> An object on the Moon 4 meters (4.37 yards) across, viewed from HST, would be about 0.002 arcsec in size. The highest resolution instrument currently on HST is the Advanced Camera for Surveys at 0.03 arcsec. So anything we left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any HST image. It would just appear as a dot.

Attached: moon2.png (863x263, 58K)

What about my post is a deflection?
I don't personally know the answer to that. AFAIK Earth's atmosphere makes ground-based telescopes not that viable, hence why Hubble is in space. You'll have to ask someone more experienced with telescopes. I'm sure if you emailed one of the large telescope sites they'd be happy to answer the question.

nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html

.
Hubble is the same design as KH-11 spy satellite, except it's looking up instead of down. (Fun fact: NASA now has 2 in storage because NRO just gave them extra hardware they had.)
> Resolution and ground sample distance
> A perfect 2.4-meter mirror observing in the visual (i.e. at a wavelength of 500 nm) has a diffraction limited resolution of around 0.05 arcsec, which from an orbital altitude of 250 km corresponds to a ground sample distance of 0.06 m (6 cm, 2.4 inches). Operational resolution should be worse due to effects of the atmospheric turbulence.[32] Astronomer Clifford Stoll estimates that such a telescope could resolve up to "a couple inches. Not quite good enough to recognize a face".[33]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KH-11_Kennen

You wouldn't believe it anyway.

Cool story Owen

Due to the laws of optics, you'd need an optical telescope to be 25 meters in diameter in order to see an Apollo descent stage on the Moon. If you wanted to see a flag, you'd need a telescope 200 meters in diameter.

Nice info finnbro

Coomon Core education in action, gentlemen.
When your kids are as dumb as niggers, this thread is the result.

lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/379

What's wrong, Suomi? Jealous cause you snow niggers can't make it to space?

we can make a telescope that can see to the edge of the universe
we cant zoom in on the moon's US flag

This topic is so boring

Such a monumental effort was made to send those men there, using the efforts of hundreds of thousands of people with the world watching on.

50 years later some dumb fuck autist chooses to spit on the greatest achievement whites have ever accomplished because some YouTube video made him feel like an expert

Then you have total retards in this thread asking stupid questions, not even bothering to be intellectually curious enough to wonder why no one has magically sent a 25 m telescope into space

They set a reflector up there and proved it by showing the reflection from earth

I'm never going to believe it if I can't see it. Your argument is facile and infantile.

Hello CIA Faggot

>lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/379
Now this is really interesting. I hadn't seen this before. Are there more pictures like these?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 113K)

Yes, diffraction limit is a bitch.
This is why we had to send a probe to get a good pic of Pluto instead of just using Hubble.

Attached: 600px-Pluto-01_Stern_03_Pluto_Color_TXT.jpg (600x600, 78K)

Well yeah America lies a lot...umm... they've got a lot of personal issues...ever since the holocaust lie and trying to make everyone pretend niggers are human.

nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/revisited/index.html#.XFi8Pi17lhE

the earth is flat look into it
youtube.com/watch?v=0BiifIW4-II

Attached: 31749492_1831364126884601_2215540235188568064_n.png (745x998, 639K)

masons are all evil
youtube.com/watch?v=2iCLykzJ0d8

Attached: mason-signs.jpg (1202x737, 228K)

cumbriansky.wordpress.com/2009/07/18/apollo-revisited/
unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?s=8a4f557dc08824ad71f0db008a3387f4&showtopic=6111&st=420&p=235420&#entry235420

They’re looking for an American flag but only find a French flag.

yeah i totally believe that something that was possible 50 years ago is impossible today

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA

How does this nonsense proliferate? What kike shill told you this proved the moon landing? It doesn’t prove anything:
>retroreflectors were set up via drone by Russia
In fact, the American retroreflectors are no longer in service
>we were reflecting light off the moon to determine its distance before ANY craft were sent
So the retroreflectors aren’t even necessary, they were deployed “for a more accurate estimation”

The fact that people continue to use the retroreflectors as a “proof” that man walked on the moon serves only to highlight their own ignorance on the matter and out them as a parrot who simply repeats what they are told without any thought.

Attached: 56FDB8D0-B6C3-43FF-8703-44D428B20922.png (645x729, 159K)

Hmmmm....

Attached: 503AF540-0AC3-4E94-BA16-615EBA265C71.jpg (1200x800, 71K)

>use fake photos to debunk fake landing
>trusting any image from NASA

Attached: nasa_art.jpg (816x465, 238K)

I dont really care dude, is the mythbusters cast "in on it" as well? youtube.com/watch?v=zPj60sy9Cfw

woops, wrong video, here it is youtube.com/watch?v=VmVxSFnjYCA

You can't leave the Earth, there's a force field around it being kept in place by Jews

just mad your flag will never be there

>be me
>mad at china and India replacing us as a space global power
welp, at least i'm not you

the stuff that is fake is random photos, cause people are retarded so why not show them CGI art that looks cool. instead of boring shit

most likely. anyway

>Earth is flat

Even Nigger DisGrace Tyrone and some random nigga can prove you're wrong
youtube.com/watch?v=hLPPE3_DVCw

It's funny that they could land on the moon in 1969 but can't do it now.

They could also build fucking nuclear rockets, and then everything has been (((shut down)))

>Having hands is now considered evidence of being part of some obscure secret society
This is why no one takes you seriously

>links total CGI artists rendition of pluto

your just mad your empire is gone, the sun boils the oceans in 500,000years or whatever supposedly so don't worry about it, scores and toys don't matter when there isn't anyone left to gloat over with it

they dont have the funding dickshit, china just did it

This thread is one of the most autistic threads that I have ever seen, its just retards trying to out-tard eachother, but this tends to happen everytime a thread related to space is created.

confirmation bias is real as fuck though, the one conspiracy theory i wont even look into is masons cause my granddad was one, it's slippery slope i just don't know how we went from Oswald didn't act alone to the god damn earth is flat or a donut or whatever the most recently joke is

Are you saying this is fake?
youtube.com/watch?v=5yf1zZFHrvU

Owen Benjamin said the moon landings are fake so that’s good enough for me.

refraction, not deflection

>the source of my knowledge is myth busters
Lmao at the absolute state of your life.
Still undeniable facts:
>man is not required to install retroreflectors as evidenced by the Russian probes
>retroreflectors are not required to laser range the moon, according to NASA itself.

They don’t prove man walked on the moon, and even after having it explained to you you STILL don’t get it.
Sad!

Attached: 46D1FDBF-80E2-4A7A-9214-9E1CE505781C.jpg (560x552, 45K)

What's with the seething? My comment had nothing to do with hating on America, I'm questioning whether NASA actually landed on the moon.

They landed a probe, not a fucking man

Attached: bare-montes-environs-labeled2-mercator.jpg (1405x1050, 639K)

good thread. needs more skitzo posting.

Attached: 1515363066472.jpg (4448x3152, 3.6M)

Attached: 1514495463452.png (483x358, 148K)

Attached: 1517076082548.png (1275x547, 551K)

They always distract from moon hoax by pushing their made up shit flat Earth

CIA, I'm CIA.

Attached: banepost (2).png (524x941, 414K)

Electrician here. Seems legit. I wonder who had a ladder tall enough to hang all the lights in the sky? Do the sun and moon light share the same circuit? I wonder where the panel is for all the sky lights, we should turn off the sun during the day to save power, we only need light to see at night time.

electrician can't in2 electric universe

your source is a tard on youtube, they put it up on a later mission to prove it to guys like u

Western civilization really needs to get rid of you chimps.

>pluto's face on pluto's face
>hexagram/cube on saturn's pole
>Saturn/black cube worship prevalent in history by Jews

all a coincidence goyimites
it's all a coincidence

Attached: 1515230784457.gif (500x500, 949K)

Attached: site d'aterrisage Apollo.jpg (1427x1600, 534K)

...
My source is NASA...
You don’t trust NASA now?

Nasa's rationale for lying?

Attached: IMG_0179.jpg (482x540, 89K)

When did I say they lied? I just told you they were the source of my information.
Are you pretending to be retarded? You don’t know about the Russian retroreflectors?
You don’t know that MIT successfully used a laser to range the moon before any retroreflectors were installed?

How is this not getting through your thick skull? Men are not necessary to place a retroreflectors and retroreflectors are not necessary to range the moon.
The idea that retroreflectors on the moon prove man walked on the moon is illogical and asinine.

low res pleb lmao

> kike symbol for Saturn is hexagram
> hexagram can only be seen from Saturn orbit
> meanwhile, Saturn has fucking obvious rings
> literally the first thing Gallileo discovered after he built a telescope
> yet, no ancient culture mentions that Saturn has rings
> despite evidence of past advanced civilization having clock and shit
> nobody knows how old the rings are, but they appear to be young
> what if Elohim took kikes on rides to Saturn BEFORE it got rings
> what if later some moons were nuked forming the rings

>> yet, no ancient culture mentions that Saturn has rings
maybe because they didn't have telescope

OP why are you so mad that we landed on the moon?

You stupid ass, the Earth isnt flat its hollow. The government is pushing the flat earth meme so that tards like you dont realize that if you dig down about 10 ft you find their fucking facilities

>find it funny
>3 Posts by this ID....

No.
I find it funny how kikes think.

All pyramids in the world are on the same great circle, which means they could measure longitude, and this requires a clock. A telescope is roughly the same tech level.

they don't have lenses in clock, prehistoric men studied the sun position while living in dirt hut, and the maya could predict ecclipses and didn't invent the wheel

You could use a good lobotomy.

The public facing footage was done in a sound stage because once they got there they realized that they wouldn't be able to show anyone the actual surface. Vitrified by the sun.

Shine a flashlight at a rock, how much light does it reflect back? Now shine your light at a pile of pulverized glass... how much light is reflected back??? Why do you think the moon is so bright!!!!!!??????

It has already been melted by the sun at least once...

How does someone actually get this stupid?

NO, THE MOON IS MADE OF SWISS CHEESE.

youtube.com/watch?v=wvjJqIXYT1w&list=PLHSoxioQtwZfY2ISsNBzJ-aOZ3APVS8br

LEARN!!

How does it wave where there is no air? It was off the shelf flag
>In fact, the flag was never intended to last long. It was purchased from the New Jersey-based flag company Annin for five dollars and fifty cents (which is about thirty five dollars today). (Annin has been making flags since 1847, making them the oldest flag manufacturer in the US today.) The flag was made with basic, ordinary nylon with no intention of existing on the moon for very long, much less for decades or more. In 2008, Dennis Lacarrubba, an employee of Annin, told Smithsonian that he couldn’t “believe there would be anything left. I gotta be honest with you. It’s gonna be ashes.”
todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/06/ever-happened-apollo-flags/
>Moser started with an off-the-shelf flag that cost $5.50. The technical services department at the Johnson Space Center then developed a collapsible flagpole with a telescoping horizontal rod sewn in to a seam on the top of the flag, to extend it outward.
abcnews.go.com/beta-story-container/Technology/Apollo11MoonLanding/story?id=8113235&page=1

Die

Swiss cheese contains water, water boils at 0atm at any temp

American Rocket technology was taken from German labs after WW2 and Nazi scientists were Shanghai'd into American research teams. Either the moon landing happened or Nazi science wasn't amazing, contradicting this board's frequent assertion. Pick one Jow Forums

Attached: C70083B2-1B46-4595-A72E-A98874B701F8.jpg (847x499, 119K)