Black acceptance

Have any of you faggots actually checked the source?

Attached: 1387580295768.jpg (493x639, 77K)

First step is to verify the data. Sources?

I'm 99% sure that this is just a bullshit map, made by some kike or nigger.

lmao at turks

Source is literally in the top left.

Attached: 1549379764649.png (1837x1655, 245K)

Kek. Didn't see that. But ec.europa.eu - and you know it's bullshit propaganda.

It's time to accept that the real ethnostate is hungary and not poland.
B&R

Correct colours

>Dark Green = Fallen countries
>Light Green = Countries in transition
>Orange = Countries currently under siege
>Dark Red = Black Israelites
>Red = Watchers on the wall
>White = The Ark
>Albania = Skinwalkers

The most obvious conclusion is that those receiving and answering the survey who are closest to black people are the most likely to say no.

In france those 26% are likely arab men who are mad about arab girls falling for black men.

This map is made upon the false premise that your daughter or son needs to let you marry a black person.
The question should have been: "If you could; would you prevent your daugher or son to marrya black person?"

needs you to let him or her*

Maybe the large number of them in Germany will eventually lead to them becoming B L A C K N A
Z I S.

There is a lot of beurette porn with white men and a lot of arab girls in france with white guys, but how many are with black gentlemen? I don't see any data regarding that.

White = black people

leave out everything except
>This map is made up
and your statement will be correct

Just an idea I had for europe.

Isn't it possible that all the africans and rapeugees that're being born will just turn into total neets by the time they're adult age? They wont reproduce since they dont work, their parents dont work, they live forever for free, then have no skills to actually get a wife.

TURKS ARE BLACK BULLS

Attached: main-qimg-6e00ef17b110749c7b187af1782ae180-c.jpg (720x478, 29K)

Attached: 1547581104354.png (1837x1655, 247K)

The map and the link are literally fake

Blacks aren't superior, but Whites are definitely cucks and lowly creatures in their present state.

Damn, a Jew told the truth.

Fuck niggers and fuck the west for its cuckoldry

Fuck Western Europe to be more precise.

aka countries where adult women are independent and can marry whoever they please regardless of what their parents think

Because I can not decide who my daughter marries. Anything else would be LARPing

ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&language=en&pcode=teilm021&tableSelection

It would appear to be bogus. There's not much info in the website address, so you can probably tell it's bogus just from that.

> those north African states
Really goes to show what massive exposure to Niggers does to a population

Attached: 1542626969876.jpg (238x249, 7K)

Unfortunately I can't find anything at that link as well.

>All nafris and arabs are below 10%
They are closest of all participants to niggers, so they may know something.

NIGGERS

Arabs are more racist then us, an Arab friend told me this. So seems correct

see

>brainwash people for 70 years that if you are not ok with interracial stuff you are the epitomy of evil.
>ok so now goyim, what do you think about this? Remember, if you answer no. You are pure evil and should be shunned by all humanity.
>oh look, see this is what they want!

Attached: 1549480853694.gif (500x500, 1.81M)

fake news, literally just check the source

Based and Russiapilled

>Arabs are more racist then us
Nobody in europe wanted this kind of thing, prior to this post wwII propaganda.
But yes, arabs were pretty clear on their stance on africans.
They literally considered them SUB HUMAN. And i will quote you this.
wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur'an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Racism
>"beyond [known peoples of black West Africa] to the south there is no civilization in the proper sense. There are only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings. They live in thickets and caves, and eat herbs and unprepared grain. They frequently eat each other. They cannot be considered human beings."[4]
Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddimah

>they cannot be considered human beings.

>"Galen says that merriment dominates the black man because of his defective brain, whence also the weakness of his intelligence."[4]
Al-Masudi, Muruj al-dhahab

>"Of the neighbors of the Bujja, Maqdisi had heard that "there is no marriage among them; the child does not know his father, and they eat people -- but God knows best. As for the Zanj, they are people of black color, flat noses, kinky hair, and little understanding or intelligence."[4]
Al-Muqaddasi (fl. 966), Kitab al-Bad' wah-tarikh, vol.4

"Their [Zanj] nature is that of wild animals. They are extremely black." "Among themselves [the Sudan] there are people who steal each other's children and sell them to the merchants when the latter arrive."[4]
Hudud al-`Alam, 982 AD

Hahahaha
Nicely done russky

"Like the crow among mankind are the Zanj [African Blacks] for they are the worst of men and the most vicious of creatures in character and temperament."[4]
Jahiz, Kitab al-Hayawan, vol. 2

"We know that the Zanj (blacks) are the least intelligent and the least discerning of mankind, and the least capable of understanding the consequences of actions."[4]
Jahiz, Kitab al-Bukhala (The Book of Misers)

"They [the Shu`ubiyya] maintain that eloquence is prized by all people at all times - even the Zanj, despite their dimness, their boundless stupidity, their obtuseness, their crude perceptions and their evil dispositions, make long speeches."[4]
Jahiz, Al-Bayan wa`l-tabyin, vol. 3

"The Zanj are so uncivilized that they have no notion of a natural death. If a man dies a natural death, they think he was poisoned. Every death is suspicious with them, if a man has not been killed by a weapon."[4]
Abu Rayhan al-Biruni, India, 1030 AD

"Of the neighbors of the Bujja, Maqdisi had heard that "there is no marriage among them; the child does not know his father, and they eat people -- but God knows best. As for the Zanj, they are people of black color, flat noses, kinky hair, and little understanding or intelligence."[4]
Al-Muqaddasi (fl. 966), Kitab al-Bad' wah-tarikh, vol.4

[The Zanj (African) differ from animals only in that] their two hands are lifted above the ground,... Many have observed that the ape is more teachable and more intelligent than the Zanj.[5]

"They [the Shu`ubiyya] maintain that eloquence is prized by all people at all times - even the Zanj, despite their dimness, their boundless stupidity, their obtuseness, their crude perceptions and their evil dispositions, make long speeches."[4]
Jahiz, Al-Bayan wa`l-tabyin, vol. 3

Ironically Arab in France are much more open minded, it is ok to fuck black if they are Muslim.

Helsinki.
Not ebin.

>mfw the 26% of NO are Algerians.

Attached: 13533097.jpg (819x613, 310K)

So what is the tl;dr
The arabs said that africans were.
>living in caves
>eating eachother
>could not be considered human being
>were the most evilminded people on earth/would kill eachother for no reason at all.
>would steal eachothers children and sell them to tradespeople.
>the least intelligent of mankind
>some monkeys in some instances a monkey was actually better and more civilized and intelligent, some of the individual negros they encountered
>they have no civilization except in west africa. All the rest of them are just running around naked like total wild animals.
>they behave like dumb animals.

>Ironically Arab in France are much more open minded, it is ok to fuck black if they are Muslim.
Well when they go to france they get gaslighted by jew propaganda aswell obviously. But things i just mentioned to you is their description of african thousand years ago or much less.

"If (all types of men) are taken, from the first, and one placed after another, like the Negro from Zanzibar, in the Southern-most countries, the Negro does not differ from an animal in anything except the fact that his hands have been lifted from the earth -in no other peculiarity or property - except for what God wished. Many have seen that the ape is more capable of being trained than the Negro, and more intelligent."[4]
Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, Tasawwurat (Rawdat al-taslim)
Based and Islampilled.

>Ironically Arab in France are much more open minded
lol no

Sorry meant to reply to you

i can see how theyre openminded towards their sons getting with black girls.
but you're completely retarded if you really believe any muslim father would let their daughter be with a black guy.
maybe if theyre from the ghetto, only then i can see that happen.

Map is fake, the link is to some other unrelated data just to make it appear real to anyone who doesn't check the "source"

F A K E
A
K
E

Europeans had the same stance. And you need to understand, when europeans bought african slaves. Arabs had this stance on africans, and AFRICANS also had this stance on other africans. Basically. If you want to find out who gave the europeans the notion that it was ok to have blacks as slaves. it was the africans, and also the arabs.
>we sell africans here, it is no problem it is natural, these africans are stupid. For one time price he is yours you can do whatever you want with him. Just give me my money.
Africans didn't even consider it immoral after europeans had second thoughts and abolished black slave ownership. it continued in africa as late as 2007.They got angry with the british for trying to stop it by having warships off of west african coast with orders to unshackle the black slaves on slave transport. Africans invented slavery of eachother. Is why they became considered as natural slaves. Because that's what they peddled themselves.
Europeans and others had been slaves throughout history themselves. And resisted it like the slave rebellion under the romans 'i am spartacus'. But here was a people (africans) who dedicated themselves to enslaving eachother and selling eachother to others and saw no problem with it. So the notion was developed that they must be natural slaves then.

You retards, the link is to random shit, but nobody bothers to check the supposed "source"

What makes you think that data is honest, or even legit at all? It is socially unacceptable to say NO in Europe these days.

public vs private oppinion. Also probably a very very small poll if that is even remotely accurate to begin with.

I think even more Poles would be ok with their kids marrying a black person, but this black person to be really accepted in society would have to live by the rules, by breaking a socially accepted law as foreigner (exhibitionism, being impolite to girls, being impolite in general, stealing or agressive behaviours) a person is becoming a "wothless gypsy kind of a nigger" doesn't really matter what your skin color is.

And no one would let his kid to be married to wothless gypsy kind of a nigger.

We hate white skinned wothless gypsy kind of a niggers just as much as vanilla gypsy rome, brown, black or asian...

fuck niggers

In Germany it's practically illegal to say no so it's not an accurate number. It's way to high.

Also interesting is that in this map 74% of the Israelis say yes while only 3% of the Jordanians do. I think there must be something about how the questions were phrased or the survey carried out that is giving funny results. Israel and the Jews are the most racist on the planet.

>In Germany it's practically illegal to say no so it's not an accurate number. It's way to high.
Right, it's manufactured consensus and attempt of coercion, as i have gone over earlier. Historically no europeans wanted this before the propaganda started over the last i'd say 70 years.

Basically i just write it again.
>>brainwash people for 70 years that if you are not ok with interracial stuff you are the epitomy of evil.
>ok so now goyim, what do you think about this? Remember, if you answer no. You are pure evil and should be shunned by all humanity.
>oh look, see this is what they want!

So basically they ask you a question. BUT if you say no, you are told you are evil and should be shunned by all humanity. So then when you say yes they say. Ah so that's what they like. BULLSHIT. This is what leads to public oppinion is one thing, and private is a totally different one.

What do you think the response is if you publically said. I don´t want my son or daughter to marry a black person.
They'd fucking crucify you!
>ok i don't want that but i'll answer yes to show i am tolerant. So they don't go after me.
Is obviously what occurs.

FAKE MAP no proof
Source is FAKE

Yes so it's like. They make it so you can only have one oppinion. If you have the other oppinion too publically they'll fucking try to ruin your life.
So you can say, yes or yes. You can say no. But if you say no, bad stuff will happen to you if you do it too publically.
>says yes
AHH THIS IS WHAT YOU WANT. I GET IT.
No you don't get it.. hahaha.. don't get it at all.

I think you are right.

Attached: 1526340537739.png (1362x530, 18K)

So then if you get some poll. Well i'm going to do the safe thing about this and say yes. Then i'm on the safe side. That's what that is, if the above is even remotely accurate. Nothing else but that. This is same fucking reason why people virtue signal so much. Do you really think a lot of these people even believe half of that shit themselves. No they think that is what others expect from them to say! It's not necessarily what they actually mean! And they think if they say otherwise, they get in trouble!

When it was first posted, it showed some unrelated research
This map is mady by some kike trying to meme lies

*made

AHAHAHAHA wtf happened to Israel and Turkey???
The West has 24/7 propaganda and police intimidation employed to achieve those kinds of results so you always have to take that data with a pinch of salt but, wtf is going on with the Turks and the Jews??? They have absolutely nothing like that working against them, they are raised to believe they are most important things in the world and that their bloodlines are sacred. Racism is not only accepted by their cultures but encouraged.

Wtf is going on with you guys?

Since those numbers are bullshit change Poland to 99%

52% is because black women are allowed and accepted in Estonia :)

this is true map!

Can confirm. Hungarian gf. And she’s ready to go full 1488 death squad mode. (She grew up and had friends gang raped by Muslims). And her villiage got all of them either killed by locals or deported

I hate western europeans

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/202012760/#202014717

Attached: 1549239864938.jpg (1320x806, 202K)

are you white ?

heard on the mango line the aliens the mayans were chatting to built a genetic backdoor/weapon into blacks allah it only gets triggers when humanity developes nukes.

thats why obama managed to place the usa under alien occupation even before he became president in 2005(year of occupation)

>western europe are assholes
It is not our fault, why you think they are going after us. Consider yourself lucky in comparison asshole. It's like a chilling campaign.
>look you can have whatever oppinion you want
>except you can't if you don't want your life ruined.
and then turn around and say.
>look this is what they want, what assholes.
This thing is giving you a false perception. Very false perception, just want to point that out. You have no idea how pissed of swedes are in private for example. No idea!!!

Do you think these people who are doing this, give a damn what we actually want. No, it's about forcing us to think in a certain way. Or you get the cattleprod.
>evil racist blablabla.

Fake and gay

>Ashkenazis are fucking retards on race, they will accept a nigger over an arab
I thought you guys were all for keeping your blood pure

I find it pretty fucking unlikely that they had a serious enough study to come up with 95% for Norway. With those numbers, you'd believe this is the coal burning capital of the world when reality is something completely different.

this map is just a measurement of liberal individualism, not necessarily an approval of niggers

Also think about this term racist, and what it means. If racist means that you don't want to be minority in your own homeland and gradually dissapear as a people in your own nation. Then yes i am a racist. But how is that a bad thing. They don't have an answer for that. Because there is no good answer for why that is bad and evil!

Let's say hypothetically if a kenyan says. Well i don't want my people to gradually dissapear in kenya, and be replaced by other people. Would you call him an evil racist?

The only way he could not be a racist is if he would advocate for his own peoples gradual destruction? So i think it's quite disingenuous to say that is evil. Isn't it more evil to say that kenyans shouldn't exist in kenya? Where else are they supposed to exist? They can't exist? Well if you say that, you can pretty much forget about pretending to stand for nice things.

AND THAT'S THE POINT. If you would only realize that this is the whole POINT of this term 'racist'. Is that they want to make it negative to say i don't want my people to get gradually erazed in my own country. BUT THIS IS WHAT YOU SHOULD SAY. But they want you to advocate for your own destruction. Because that's the only way to NOT be a 'racist' is to advocate for your own destruction. And they socially engineer and cattleprod you in that direction. And try to ruin your life if you don't. Do you see how evil that is.

You really need to decode what that social engineering term results in!

Infact if you point that out. The only thing they can do. Is the predictable. They double down and call you a racist again. Because they don't have an answer to that question is how is that bad. Infact those who peddle that term. THEY are the evil ones.

Show your flag faggot, most Arab in France live in the ghetto with black, they considered each other as brother.

>I find it pretty fucking unlikely that they had a serious enough study to come up with 95% for Norway. With those numbers, you'd believe this is the coal burning capital of the world when reality is something completely different.
The point of these things. is to have in your case norwegians believe. That this is what you should believe, this is the acceptable oppinion. It's social engineering! But they know very well, that if you dare to have another oppinion. They try to ruin your life if you are perhaps too public with it!
Just remember this term. SOCIAL ENGINEERING. This is what these things are.. prodding you in a certain direction, and try to destroy you if you don't want to do it.

They want you to believe, that if you don't have that oppinion. Well then there's something wrong with YOU! and YOU should find out what is the problem with you, and try to change your mind and go against your own convictions, because then there must be something wrong with you. Because that's not what others believe in. See how that works?

And what they ofcourse don't say is, that you are barely even allowed to have any other oppinion or they'll try to ruin you. So then it's manufactured consensus. And people just go along to not get thrown under the fucking bus. Because those who try to cattleprod you will then target you if you don't. And try to ruin your life. Till you 'change your mind' and say. Maybe i was wrong. I should totally let my son and daughter marry a black person. Infact i should ONLY let them marry a black person. I totally get i had some kind of mental mistake. That i thought maybe they marry a nice norwegian girl or boy. But now that you try to ruin my life, i see the error of my ways. HAHAHAHAHA

I hate niggers and I would say yes.
It's not my right to chose whoever my son wants to bang.

Yes it is. Bad parent. It definately is your right to say who your son or daughter should marry and have children with. You have every right to do so. My sis at one point was with some other ethnicity for short period. My dad was like. No you fucking don't.
>but dad. I really like him
>no you fucking don't. He's not good for you at all.
And he wasn't. My dad was totally right.
And i was naive back then, but man if she had done so she would have bit the bullet. Due to his occupation and other things. And been miserable, and probably divorced single mom.
Now she is married to a very nice tall and handsome german guy and they have 3 beautiful children. And she's very happy and they love eachother.
If you don't care about your kids at all, just let them do whatever they want. Parents have 2 responsibilities. Raise your kids so they are capable and independent so they can 'fly off the nest´and take care of themselves. Number 2 comes later. Who they marry. You make sure they don't fuck themselves up. Not force them to marry a certain person. But make sure they don't make a huge fucking mistake in their selection also.
This social engineering like in the OP is trying to manufacture a consensus not only that the parents shouldn't protect their children from bad marriages. Since if you are a parent you know a thing or two about that, that your kid doesn't. AND not only do they want to remove that. but try to manufacture a situation where you go and marry someone who is so different from you that it's very likely that it will result in bad things. Not to mention that you and your childs traits, are not carried forward either. Thus you piss on your own ancestry. And they are rolling in the grave going.
>what the fuck are you doing. So we went through all of that and you are a good person, and you just piss it all away because some fucking jew tells you that everybody should marry niggers now. Why should niggers not marry eachother? AND it's in our own country.

>what are niggers doing in our own country, don't they have their own. And then they are in our country, and they can'´t even marry their own? is that it? thank you very much, we should´ve just shot ourselves in the face instead then. What's the point. Idiot..

>Yes it is. Bad parent. It definately is your right to say who your son or daughter should marry and have children with. You have every right to do so.
I have every right to say I disagree with the union, I have every right to refuse supporting them, but I sure won't FORCE my son to do anything regarding that. Especially if he is a major.

>I have every right to say I disagree with the union, I have every right to refuse supporting them, but I sure won't FORCE my son to do anything regarding that. Especially if he is a major.
No i am not telling you to force them. And say marry so and so, period. But you have a right to lay down a veto. She or he can choose not to follow it. And you should only lay down a veto if it's really bad. Not because you want to force them to marry a specific man or woman.

And again we just disagree on that. But the point is. These kinds of oppinions, they want to totally outlaw by social engineering. And then try to literally manufacture a case where people should be encouraged to have a black person.

Part of what you are saying if you think about it is a bit virtue signalling, bit subconcious. You make a reply and you want to look good in what you say. I get that. But i don't think you are perfectly honest in that you just want your son or daughter marry someone that you know is just totally bad for them if you know there's no doubt about it. that's what i'm saying. You have a right as a parent to do a veto in bad circumstances. It's your right and obligation as a parent imho. To do the best for your child.

>You make a reply and you want to look good in what you say
I don't, I hate niggers. I'm not an authoritarian. I don't believe my children to be my possessions and that's my main point.