You may only post in this thread if you defeated a superpower in a shooting war

You may only post in this thread if you defeated a superpower in a shooting war.

Attached: 4e6e9296d1a6676d7d1dbed17c92a081.jpg (1000x1687, 214K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-French_Wars
battlefields.org/learn/articles/war-of-1812-faqs
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

You didn't win, you lost for 10 years and we left, so you invaded the south. We didn't bother to stop you. It's like ISIS in 2014.

Communist russia in Polish-Soviet war, is this enough?

They killed nearly sixty thousands yanks, reunited the country under communist rule and expelled the colonists, and caused problems on the homefront for America, they achieved every single one of their goals. They may have lost every battle but they won the war.
>We didn't bother to stop you
How is that not an American failure? Your country pulled out after allies suffered around a quarter million casualties. You didn't gain a single thing.

60k vs 1m

Tell that to my big fat communist government, amatuer. Come back when you have learned to put down a force of farmers armed with russian knock offs and wooden sticks.

Yeah, come in based pole.

You were just a proxy war.

And you still had to pull out without achieving a single goal.
Heard of the CIA analysis during the war when they realised even if they continued a war of attrition gooks were still capable of replacing their losses with their massive birth rate? The war could've essentially been unending, you weren't killing enough to actually stop them. They were willing to commit the manpower, you weren't, they gained a country.

>60,000 yanks
Compared to 849,018 n. Vietnamese and Viet Cong. We definitely lost that war, but Vietnam didn't really "win".

>muh victory by bodycount
war is about more than killing, just as eating is about more than filling the belly. Vietnam was America's happy meal moment in terms of warfare; it's where we became geopolitical fatasses.

we fucked the British pretty hard tho. at the time I think they qualified as a superpower for that era.

Shhh it's important for non-Americans to believe this

Depends on whether you consider Britain in 1921 to be a superpower, since the empire was still at its height I say yes.

>Vietnam didn't really "win".
They reunited the country under communism and expelled the French, British and Americans. That's what they wanted to do, please explain to me why is that not a win?

American taxpayers financed the Vietcong?

without major help of the ussr and china?
fpbp
hope you will have an even devastating war there
>in the name of birth control :DDDD

Attached: sl01.gif (500x300, 976K)

we felt bad for bombing you and stopped fighting

>this much delusion.
Unlike the Korean war (a stalemate), you guys LOST in vietnam.

Stop crying about it, faggot, or we will bring up the time Cuba handed you your ass.

Reporting in

Our rice farmers and fisherman broke pakistan

Attached: kader.-f.jpg (721x1000, 123K)

Reporting in.

The fall of the USSR cracks me up
>Be US worried about communist domination
>Realize socialism is so shitty it can’t sustain itself in the long run
>Your mortal enemy collapses in on itself

Ez

> this slavshit general

Attached: 1549549557545.jpg (236x276, 44K)

War of 1812. I believe we burned down the white house

>Unlike the Korean war (a stalemate)
They lost the Korea, dummy. That's why it's forgotten.

Chinese human waves warded off American forces trying to unite Korea, and succeding at it, they weren't just trying to defend South Korea.

It was a weak nation back then.

Been a while since we were the underdog.

Attached: America - We will kill you.jpg (500x375, 57K)

very low iq narrative it was a draw we captured large parts of ontario. We swapped back captured territories

>It's a butthurt American doesn't even take the chance to brag about how he beat the largest empire in the world, instead claims he didn't lose against some random peasants when they wholesale slaughtered his finest soldiers, chased him.out of their jingles and annexed their target handily episode.
Cope, fat fuck.

1: Your country didn't exist in 1812, the British burned down the White House.
2: The United States wasn't a superpower until WWII.

Attached: War of 1812.png (741x1721, 93K)

feels good desu

Attached: PepeBD2.png (1349x1298, 536K)

I believe we burned down the white house sir I what parts of Ontario were you successful at invading exactly ?

Wasn't Canada founded in 1867? that wasn't a Canadian victory it was the Brits.

Akin to telling the story of the time your dad sucker punched a guy and ran away.

Does defeating France in the French and Indian Wars count?

>we actually didn't care if we win or not lol
Is this what they teach you in high school?

What I am getting at here, Boris.
American historians consider the Korean war to be a stalemate rather than a loss but they all resoundingly agree that Vietnam was a loss.

Canada/Britain same thing back then homie but it's OK to lose sometimes friend

Hello Russians

deserves respect

The US are our allies now (for various reasons, mostly because 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend'), but otherwise - you're cool

you guys should have many looted Hendrix and Jefferson Airplane original pressings. y'all should set up a discogs account and sell it for a fortune

be proud, Vietnam, you BTFO the fat fucking big mouth burgers, french and brits.

>They lost the Korea
this, wave after wave of zerg wave was 2much for the Americans
>p-please let me nuke the chinks, please

>The Australian battalion has been described ...as the safest combat force in Vietnam... It is widely felt that the Australians have shown themselves able to give chase to the guerrillas without exposing themselves to the lethal ambushes that have claimed so many American dead...

>Australian patrols shun jungle tracks and clearings... picking their way carefully and quietly through bamboo thickets and tangled foliage... .It is a frustrating experience to trek through the jungle with Australians. Patrols have taken as much as nine hours to sweep a mile of terrain. They move forward a few steps at a time, stop, listen, then proceed again.

Vietnam sucks.

>Russian knockoffs
They weren't tho. The PAVN was using state of the art Russian tech for the entire war.

Attached: Oof!.jpg (502x243, 82K)

The salt is palpable

The state of the muttlonia

Britian in War in Independence (1919-1921)

Theres millions of Viet colonists living here. We got rekt, rather the Boomers did. The damage control just makes you look like a butthurt kike.

Attached: 6cb4681b1da6a70e9c7dfef587142291d8d1427b309dca3464aa365d56ea62b6.jpg (500x500, 69K)

There isn't much taught in between holocaust classes, you can't blame the burger for being like this

I was referring to consensus amongst american historians.
They debate about Korea being a stalemate or a loss but they agree that Vietnam was a loss

Yes, Korea was a loss but I don't think the Americans can take that much losing.

Waiting for the world's most powerful empire to help you fight to a stalemate against a rebellious colony with no industrial base doesn't count as beating a superpower.

The only time England ever beat a superpower was when they took down the Spanish Armada.

Exactly zero Canadians were present in DC. They were British regulars literally fresh off the boat from Britain.

So does the American revolution not count for you guys since France helped ?

Oh yeah, technically the political goal ended in a stalemate, so the war is considered so. They had their shit pushed in hard by chinks using pre-medieval military tactics. Pretty embarrassing for burgers

Showin us the trufax right here

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-French_Wars

you got some reading to do

Is the German really talking shit about winning wars?

What superpower did you beat Hans? You trying to take credit for Atilla smacking around the Romans?

Attached: Patton bemused.jpg (446x974, 74K)

Wrong British loyalist from America and Canada also helped mutt history education lol

>The only time England ever beat a superpower was when they took down the Spanish Armada
why do burgers even post in history threads

This is actually true. We, not Canadians burned down the White House. Apparently the events were inspired by a drinking bet.

I thought Canada didn't exist yet pick one faggot

Americans murdered Patton.

>Apparently the events were inspired by a drinking bet
lol really? just like Thais convincing Alexander to burn Persepolis

It did, it was Upper Canada and Lower Canada, then there was the Maritime Provinces and Rupert's Land.

Literally who. Which fucking Canadians were being trained as soldiers IN ENGLAND? Literally no historians claim Canadians had anything to do with it. The only very distant claim you could possibly have is some of the soldiers settled on Canada long after the war ended. Fuck off with your revision

They were British not Canadian though

Well, it was burned down by drunk navy sailors so that is the logical conclusion.

I have had the chance to troll americans (in person) about the vietnam war. I usually mention Korea, let them get desperate...then bring up vietnam...it still hurts them to this day.

Attached: viet.jpg (1790x2150, 755K)

>not a single british colonist from the territory of upper or lower canada was involved in the war
oh fuck off mutt, it's genuinely pathetic how hard you rewrite your own history. Who fucking cares that the British spanked you when you were a weaker nation, grow up

My grandpa fucked your grandpa with bamboo sticks and how he has to squat when he shits
*cackles in vietnamese*

Attached: 898B106F-9396-4141-9616-63012C77BCA1.jpg (1200x873, 206K)

Mostly American Loyalists settled in the Canadas. They were among the first Anglo-Canadians.

You aren't Vietnamese.

Just saying they fought in the war of 1812 not that they specifically burned down the white house .
battlefields.org/learn/articles/war-of-1812-faqs

>You will never look that good
Damn feels bad man

why would they take offense from what a brazilian had to say?

The Canada's lol WTF do they teach you in bong history that all of upper Canada was loyalist pretty sure the French were here long before you .

Aren’t you the losers we ruined in 2 straight world wars? Yea, yea you are. Where’s your women at, Hans? I’m gonna fuck em on top of your corpse.

>there were no British soldiers in the British colonies of Upper & Lower Canada
what are you even trying to argue? Why does it hurt you so damn much? What difference does it make if the Soldier came from Ontario or Sussex? Your white house was burnt down, and the war actually ended slightly in your favor, with Britain recognizing your naval rights and so forth. Stop being such a salty nigger lol

We had 200 years of everybody else being the underdog. Report back when you get close mutt.

>third worlders who fell for the reddit and Jow Forums memes

How's Brexit going for you faggot?

Are your EU masters going to let you keep Northern Ireland?

Attached: England ball then and now.jpg (851x630, 287K)

they can't take the fact that they lost to vietnam.
The boomers make sure to REEEEEEE every time somebody brings it up.

They blame everybody for the loss however when you keep them going...you can see the stages of denial ....until acceptance finally kicks in.

Burgers are fucking demented about their military.
Afghanistan and the middle east will forever traumatize them.

We taught the Ottoman to fear the Australian. We taught the Japanese to fear the Australian. We taught the German to fear the Australian, twice. We taught the Korean to fear the Australian. We taught the Vietnamese to fear the Australian. We taught the Arab to fear the Australian.

Imagine if the Romans started celebrated their "victory" after Crassus got rekt by the Parthians, or after Hannibal raepd them at Cannae.

This is what Americans do with every conflict lol

The Australians fucked them up pretty bad though, The Americans just had no idea they where not welcome there and that the people they would be fighting where plain clothed villagers who would literally stab you in the back

Gooks in self-made poverty are desperate to believe otherwise. Had Nixon not resigned, the South factually still would have been funded, because the North and Cong publicly surrendered

>The only time England ever beat a superpower was when they took down the Spanish Armada.
Hard to beat superpowers when there aren't any. See if you can stretch it out as long as we did mutt.

>if
>if
>if

>when even your historians (US) admit that vietnam was a colossal loss.

loses for the US:

Red Cloud's War. (fort laramie treaty, USA)
Formosa Expedition (Taiwan)
Russian Civil War
Loatian Civil War (that is why you punished them during vietnam REEEE)
Bay of Pigs (cuba)
Viet-fucking-nam

6 clear military defeats

fuck you bitches, long live gavrilo alpha princip

Fine thanks mutt. Watch the europoors squeal in 49 days time.

>African sub-human thinks he knows history

Vietnam lost to USA in the military field and got defeated in almost all major battles. It won the war solely on politics as it broke the paris peace treaty and the american senate was too much of a pussy to honor the promise they would return to defend South Vietnam should the peace treaty be broken.

I know, but French Canadians are the enemy and bad subjects so I didn't count them.

Super power by 2020 shit themselves in 2001 against Bangladesh

Attached: download (1).jpg (274x184, 10K)

I mean they lost, but we all live in the americas shadow. Also the coolest american is james stockdale was in vietnam.

Doesn't matter how I manage to fuck your mum only that I did.

Sure...all around the vietnamese got fucked by Australians, french, brit and americans.

But in the end, vietnam was victorious in getting a united independent country.
People also seem to forget that Laos had a similar victory against colonial powers.

In Africa, Ethiopia is the only country to remain unconquered despite a few years of Italian occupation.

that is what happens when you underestimate your enemy

the Jew american shadow at this point.
It started out very cute but is now a nightmare