Amerifats support tax cuts for millionaires, billionaires and corporations

Maisie a cute

why do paedo's think they're safe on Jow Forums? just because b accepts doesn't mean we do. You will be the first to die on the day of the rope.

ROLLING

Right wing cucks who will never be millionaires have been brainwashed through and through by actual billionaires that there are people (aka muh ebil socialists and commies) out there coming after their minimum wage tier money. They leave them fighting and wasting time over this shit while they get on their private jets and fly off to their lolita islands.

Based. Praying for a 2

If you're not attracted to that then you're either not a man or gay. Doesn't mean you have to act on it though.

rolling

We'll see about that bigot.

Attached: Pedobear_Punch__4fedd46b2bd97_1024x1024.jpg (1024x942, 96K)

I support totally dismantling the federal government, so cutting federal taxes (to zero) are a natural consequence.

3 for ME

The term "trickle down economics" was invented by democrats, not economists. There is no such things as trickle down economics in any economic textbooks. What you may be looking for is "supply side economics", an economic philosophy whose effects are not instantaneous. In fact, nothing has instantaneous effects in terms of policy prescription. Even the Clinton's fannie may and freddie mac took almost a full decade before they imploded the economy. If you are looking for instant gratification in the economy, you will always be poor and you are a gambler, not an investor and you should probably stop voting as well.

plz no mudshark

>and corporations
Europeans don't understand the US at all. before the very recent cuts passed by the republicans and Trump, the US's effective corporate tax rate was the second highest in the developed world (after New Zealand). The nominal corporate tax rate was one of the highest in the world. Those cuts brought us down to the average effective rate (not substantially lower than other countries).

>trickle down economics
is a leftist term, no serious economist or half-decent capitalist would ever use the term.
There is no such thing as "trickle down", it's a natural process of goods exchanging hands for currency, trade agreed to by two parties, a continues cycle of investment and consumption. If there was a "trickle" there wouldn't ever be an incentive to hire new folks, as you would just be constantly exposing yourself to less paid but under-experienced individuals trying to sift off the system to make it "trickle" more.
A common normal employment and inflation-driven wage increase over time leads to an self-generating cycle of changing of hands, causing the expenditures to be the cycling factor and the inherent "thing" that is the "trickle down"-joint, but it's not a "trickle" it's a normal flow.

The economic system as a whole functions like rain, ponds and rivers that lead down to the sea, economic-prosperity is the effect of the heat that causes humidity and evaporation, and the evaporation sends the funds into the cloud of moving transactional money, and then rains down on the most optimally adapted locations at a given time depending on the economic weather. Millionaires are the ponds, Billionaires are the lakes, runoff happens, but not investing it through the runoff will only cause evaporation to happen and not putting value to holding onto it unless it keeps an internal ecosystem cycling through the lake, causing a return from use and expenditures.

For something that doesn't work, it always outperforms welfare state economics.

shoo shoo back to /tv/ with you

Do we? As far as I know the government does whatever it wants.