Can someone explain to me the psychology behind this shit

what does this have to do with their strange masochistic tendencies

Remember Oedipus complex? Electra complex is that but it's the daughter wanting to fuck the father. It takes form in how men look for women that are like their mother if they have a good relationship with them and women look for men like their father.
This can appear as in looking for domineering men because the father was typically the one that was the ultimate threat of punishment such as "wait until your father hears about this." That's why men look for women to comfort them by being kind to them while women look for men to comfort them by taking control of their life. To be from the responsibilities of adulthood and have a man take care of them by asserting total dominance is a huge turn-on for women.
Women lie about hating men because they believe it's the right thing to do, helps them fit in, and gives them attention. Attention is the center of all their actions and being a man-hater is to push away all men that are too beta to exert dominance over them.

Attached: 1534622385634.png (550x1800, 821K)

Big brain post...... I'm not used to this.

i understand the whole domination aspect perfectly, but don't get the association of domination with degradation
like i wrote in the op the women i've been liked being dominated but not degraded
ie you'd tell the what to do and slap them around and all that but they would never like to be called dirty whores/holes
that's the thing that confuses me

>why the fuck do jew'd women like being degraded like this
epigenetic memory

you aren't attractive enough OP

all women are sluts for Chad

you're misunderstanding the point of the thread

It's really not that complicated, once you accept that women are driven towards 2 opposite things simultaneously: dependable, boring, supplicating betas, and exciting, dominating, risky alphas.

They need betas because up until very recently (on an evolutionary timescale) they needed male provisioning and protection to survive. They need alphas because they want good genetics for their baby.

The struggle for women is satisfying both sides of the hypergamy coin.

The first 3 panels of your comic are when the woman is looking for beta subservience. The last panel is the acknowledgement of her innate desire for alpha dominance.

Attached: proxy.duckduckgo.com3.jpg (541x629, 63K)

this is just shitty mgtow pseudo philosophy mate

Nah, I'm alpha as fuck.

Enjoy your blue pills lad.

It's all about power. The ones that don't like being degraded typically had good relationships with their fathers didn't treat them like shit. The ones that didn't want to be degraded and treated like shit like their fathers had. It's really that simple. To simplify it even more, most of the mundane women complain about are shit tests, even if they're psychologically unaware of it.

Attached: 1517002745039.jpg (867x1000, 375K)

sure thing mate

I've spent 18 years figuring this out. I had to learn psychology AND get redpilled on multiple topics for the pieces to fit together.

Basically, women are designed, whether you believe in a creator or not, to be assistants. They attach themselves to success. Pretty much every female centric societal problem is a distortion of executing that attachment. Roasties, golddiggers, cat ladies, social justice warriors, all of it. That core relationship with success, however, requires submission to an authority to function. Otherwise the faithful sidekick goes rogue, and providing less benefit than problems, can be reclassified as a parasite. So women are naturally drawn to domineering presences, as it's fertile ground to fit in and set up their niche.

>none of them liked being called a whore
ANY woman will bend to your will and play whatever role you request of them if you know how their minds work. Any. Woman.
It's a basic instinct. You just need to know how to trigger it.

The problem starts in a post-enlightenment society where she's taught basically from birth that she's the man's equal. We know this is verifiably false, and our ancestors knew it because delusion to the contrary was suicidal. But today that delusion goes unchallenged by the non-rigors of post-industrial life and an ideologically motivated social standard. So the women grow up completely believing that they are not only equal, but oppressed for society having ever thought otherwise.

The submission instinct does not care about ideological social training. It wants its place set for it, and the conscious mind of the modern woman has been strangling her own desire. At this point, it's as simple as distance making the heart grow fonder. Submission becomes an erotic extreme to dream about and play out in dramatic displays of physical restraints and emotional dehumanization. If the woman had an abusive or even distant father, then the dog has tasted blood, and there's no going back.

The conscious mind won't accept the wrongthink of submission being a proper lifestyle, and the unconscious mind can't live without it. This you get OP's comic. You know the biggest emotion subs report after being completely dominated and used?

Catharsis.

t. BDSM enthusiast.

>i want to know what about the jewish ideology elicits this type of self hate
Women are easily manipulated idiots that will engage in destructive behaviors so long as they see other women supposedly enjoying said behavior.

>They need betas because up until very recently (on an evolutionary timescale) they needed male provisioning and protection to survive.

Why can't 'alphas' provide that? Your logic doesn't make sense, unless 'alphas' are just good looking men.

If betas can provide, then they do have 'good genes'. Good genes doesn't just mean 'looks good'. What a fucking stupid and vapid worldview you must have, Christ.

that can't be the only differentiating factor can it?
are that many modern women just a product of cuckold/degenerate dads
wouldn't that mean that half of all men are actually shit dads (or rather 48%, the percentage of democratic women voters)

>Why can't 'alphas' provide that?
Too busy fucking other, younger women. Alphas don't settle down because no matter how old they get, high school girls stay the same age.

>wouldn't that mean that half of all men are actually shit dads (or rather 48%, the percentage of democratic women voters)
It isn't that high. Women inherently lean towards making the government their new daddy to take care of them. However what Jow Forums doesn't openly acknowledge is that while many women shouldn't have children, many men really shouldn't have children.

Attached: 1510022384358.png (477x744, 28K)

Completely accurate user.

Guys, we're losing our nations..

mgtow is jewish to the core mate
all these retards are literally just reactionaries to feminism
ie making some kind of autistic male centered feminism that completely casts the concept of family away
just like the right left dichotomy
chose the third position

because nobody gave them rules and structure to know the boundaries of being and feeling alive
so the thing that pushes them outside of the absolute death of normal experience of being universally desired walking holes is the only life affirmation they have
this isn't complicated psychology
feminism broke fatherhood, and with it they broke womanhood.

so i guess you mean that the anarchist type leftists would be the women that experience this type of pathology and not leftists in general?

Because they're dead inside so they like being treated accordingly.

Yes. Such as moldylocks for example. The ones on the right that experience this type of pathology likely had fathers that were on the other end of the spectrum where they tried to control their lives and weren't afraid to use the belt as punishment.

i still think that those women differentiate between degradation and domination though
thanks for the discussion mate
this sounds logical to me

other thing that's always bothered me about the psychology of women is dykes
honestly what even is wrong with them
at that point i don't even think psychoanalysis like this even applies
it might just be genetic to some extent

Lot of seemingly normal women love that stuff as long as they also really like the man doing it to them. I've dated sweet elementary school teacher who had so dirty fantasies of being owned sex slave in the bedroom that it was too much for me despite being into rougher stuff. She sexually fantasized of being forcibly branded, for fucks sake. We never did it thought, no idea if she took it that far with someone else later.

Daddy issues.
Works like a great wedge to get what you want. ;)

Attached: Korl.jpg (360x240, 11K)

>lessons learned
Thats pretty optimistic.

>sweet
>a whore

k

A cruel blackpill is that tons of women you consider sweet turn out to be like that if you make the mistake of asking them what they are into.

Men who are demanding, yet collected fit this criteria. Wallow deeper and both of you end up like slaves. Good thing you didn't.

>sure they liked being submissive and slapped around a bit

If I found out my father had "slapped around" my mother, he'd be in big trouble. Same if my mother tried violence/degradation on with my father.

You are already degenerating.

While I can't broadly explain dykes, a lot of fags in general have a history of sexual abuse. Dykes are power fanatics ramped up to obscene levels. Hence why they go out of control if one of their girly lesbians shows positive interactions with a male, the dyke in turn feels threatened. Being the "male" in the relationship with a woman is how a lot of dykes feel that they're gaining back power from their abuser.

Fun fact: Male on male domestic abuse is slightly higher than male on female domestic abuse. Female on female domestic abuse is by far the highest by a massive margin.

Attached: 1540950976046.png (498x393, 301K)

Women like to have structure and leadership in their lives, normally fulfilled with husbands and childrearing, and since socially they have been told to be independent, open and in control, all the social cues that reality is what they are tug at her, and she reacts in polar extremes of rejection in public and intimate deep dives into sub play. Denial in certain areas makes her burn harder when she can be honest, so she lives the minmax extreme of sexual submission to get the natural urges placated.

Thots in cages is the rehab society needs to walk away from the bdsm brink of sexual extremes.

i don't mean slapped in an argument but whilst putting your benis in her vagene
mainly on her buttocks

Ayo niggas
How da ya treat a BITCH while she be ovulatin and SHIT?
Is it time to take my mack level to the next level and SLAP A HO?

i knew this one dyke since grade school and i swear to god she was always this fat little hobgoblin with short hair
there must be some genetic component
i know there was a twin study on homosexuals that found the heritability to be around .4 iirc
i'd assume i'd be lower for dykes though

Sounds like psychobabble; you remind me of a balding ginger who makes sexual attraction subliminals.

You're just not doing it right then. I don't mean that as in insult but if women think of you as dominant they will all do this. Every single one of them. Even the ones who don't think they would will call you "sir" or "daddy". Like the timid ones, you start a little simple like reaching your hand up the back of their neck, gently grabbing their hair at the scalp and pulling their head back. Get your hand up near their throat but not choking. Next thing you know they'll be asking you to, "Please spit in my mouth, daddy". They're seriously all like this. Women like to feel like they have no control. Think about it. Women like dominant men and a woman's biggest sign of her own self worth is the status of her man. You think Chads treat women well? They like to be mistreated in bed.

I've found that how dirty or gentle my wife likes it coincides with her monthly cycle but even then we're not talking slow and soft, just dirty vs less dirty. That goes along with a study I saw once that showed women are attracted to betas or alphas depending on their cycle and their use of birth control or lack thereof.

Likely due to being bombarded with way way too much agency in their lives compared to other times in history, a mother who kept the home didn't have to worry about career choices, dating, makeup, debt and so on. Being violently degraded is kinda removing most of that agency, if you are nothing but a hole to fuck you don't have to worry about your next credit card bill so it feels good.

this is literally jewish pornography that has no basis in reality
in my language a woman does not call her husband daddy
this is jewish to the core and i do not know how on earth you were this subverted

its nice to be dominated by a strong man

so you like being called a dirty whore/hole?

yeah

What if you express distaste for slapping, choking, spitting, so on. Are you not dominant anymore :^) I don't see myself going further than light neck holding, constraint and occassional spanking.

It's not "daddy" like "father". It's not meant as an incest thing. I've never heard a single woman say anything that alluded to it being an incestual thing. In the 50s popular slang for a male was "daddy" or "daddy-o" and used to signify the status of being in charge. When I've heard women refer to it in bed it becomes a way of signifying the dominant male is also providing and kind, a sort of opposite of when a woman calls you "sir" in bed. Women have always been into being dominated. Don't think of it like the incest shit they're pushing in porn nowadays. You need to realize all women are into this and if you're not doing it to her she's fantasizing about someone who will. Women's nature is not that of a man.

what makes a man dominant is he does what he wants

Jews understand what women are capable of in that they can destroy countries and societies from the inside out if left to their own devices. So jews give them a platform to act out their base instincts and in so doing gets you what you see today. Rampant feminism, "sexual revolution", race mixing, etc. All in the name of female empowerment. But being as a women you never truly know what you want and this causes disorder and chaos. All this stuff you see is one giant shit test to get men to act out how they should on them. Like we always have done since time immortal.

They never actually want to be "empowered" they are just like poor children led astray with false promises. The only way we can get our women back is to remove jews from our societies (and by extension muslims as well).

Attached: women shit test.jpg (640x1185, 162K)

you know the rules whore

I have same exact output from my own experience. Blessed trips also confirm.

t. Fellow hobbyist of S & M.

panel 4 especially

"I've fucked girls"

Wow that added so much to your post. Thank you so much. That wasnt a pathetic attempt at a subtle brag or anything. Thousands of people gained so much by you adding that. Please continue to add useless noise to your posts instead of getting to the point. People don't come on the internet for info, they come to learn how fucking amazing your ego is.

84838388 UPVOTES

All women like it and they always have.

It's called hyperbole, a literary technique. No wonder you've never heard of it, Macedonia.

the connotation is still there
try calling your wife mommy to see how it's viewed by non kiked peoples

I've done light slapping on occasion but yeah, I'm not doing some of that stuff like whips or anything. You don't have to take it that far but if you really want a woman to look at you with primal lust in her eyes you need to fuck her in a way that signifies you're in charge. Maybe just pin her hands down at her side on the bed and go to town. You can be dominant without being abusive. It's just surprising how many women want you to be a bit abusive.

is it anything like the superbowl? :^)

Here's some gold, pal

EDIT: whoa, I didn't expect to get gold too; thanks, kind stranger!-

its not though its more like saying he’s the master and takes care of you

Not here until they started pushing more incestual shit in porn. It evolved from a slang term that didn't imply actual familial relations but the status of being in charge. At any rate I understand your aversion to the real behavior of women but you need that illusion shattered sooner or later. Women like it dirty. It doesn't have to be whips and chains level but if you really want a woman to submit to your leadership outside of the bedroom you have to be in charge inside of it.

>that bluepilled normie witnessing his first black pill

i never implied that women do not like to be dominated read the op
i'm saying that this normal female trait is co opted by kikes an misshapen into some pervert semi incestuous ritual that is more centered around degradation than domination
most likely to degrade the family unit even more with this obscene shit

that's not true
it historically has had familial relations associated with it
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dad

not only that but the swear words that are used to call out promiscuity in english are debased almost at this point
here it's a proper insult to call a woman a whore
like one where'd she'd stop talking to you
not something you'd throw around lightly

I agree that when it's taken too far it's definitely not healthy. Some of the shit they're putting out there in an attempt to mainstream it should have had them strung up from a tree in a sane world. I'm only clarifying that specifically in regards to the word "daddy" in American slang until the recent push to normalize incest porn it wasn't used with a familial connotation.

Attached: ThingsWereBetterThen.jpg (600x400, 84K)

see

When it's done in the bedroom it's different. I wouldn't call my wife the things I call her in the bedroom outside of it. Even then it's usually that they'll say, "I'm YOU'RE dirty whore." Polite society doesn't acknowledge the things that goes on inside of the bedroom so the real sign that we've slid downhill so far is that these women - I wouldn't call them 'ladies' - so publicly discuss such a thing.

>i'm you are dirty whore

Yeah, I know what the word "dad" means. I'm saying it became a thing here when "daddy" became a slang term for a dominant male in general. Usually when used in the context of fucking she's implying that you're in charge and she knows you're going to give her what she wants if she does what you want, because you're the one whose approval is needed.

You just cant understand it because its slang. im sure you have some word in your language that isnt so straightforeward in english like calling someone a pond turtle or somthing.

Sorry, I'm phone fagging. My ssd died this morning and I have to RMA it.

For me it was just that I like having a role. A defined role. I don’t want someone to have to sit me down like I am five and tell me what my expectations are. That would irritate me and I don’t want a relationship built upon that type of dialogues. But I have total freedom to do anything I want. So I want to do whatever I feel like but I also would like a role. Nothing truly degrading. But it’s fun to pretend.

>why are things acceptable in the bedroom not acceptable in public, formal setting?
are you fucking retarded? it's like saying why do people go to work wearing suits it they wear sweatpants at home

Hahaha stop letting your wife peg you, faggot.

Women want to submit to an alpha male, it's that simple.

It might be cringe but you guys need to watch some videos on how women operate by Corry Wayne or someone of the like. Once you know how to check them and keep them in place, they are submissive by nature and will do as you please.

it's all about the menstrual cycle and how attractive you are.

also i would argue that what goes on in the bedroom is a reflection of polite society more than any biological imperative
think of all the absolutely insane fetishes that exist in the modern day that would probably kill you if you lived before penicillin existed

Ti si peder, OP. Ke te najdam i vo gazeto ke to ebam, k

Attached: pat.jpg (470x470, 25K)

i've still seen movies and stuff mate
i can speak english without any accent
i think i would have seen it that way if that connotation existed in the current day
it could be a case of an archaic term though i guess

I know a chick that had a pretty normal dad as far as I could tell but she still grew up to be a complete psycho who wanted to fuck her own father. Didn't even have to find that out the hard way, she'd dump her emotional baggage and life story on me just because she thought everyone who was her friend automatically functioned as her fucking therapist.

no u mate

like literally wanted to or figuratively?

its more a modern term than anything.
You can get really good at learning a language but you will never completley get it like a native speaker unless you live in that culture for an extended period of time. we cant even understand most british slang. Daddy as a term of affection is absolutely different that calling someone Dad as a parent.

you're underestimating the cultural hegemony of english as a language mate
honestly my vocabulary is way bigger in english
the internet is most likely the largest reason for that

According to her she developed literal sexual desire directed at her father, for which she had to see a therapist. She also brought up to me and another male friend in our circle if we would "theoretically" sleep with a female friend as a one time thing. We both said no, and could immediately see through her horseshit.

was she hot?
also she was fro some really rural place right?

The last time I had sex it was with my ex and he called me a slut during it. I hated it so much I haven't been able to feel aroused since, haven't had sex since and I feel stupid for being this sensitive.