Why aren't feminists pro guns? If a strong violent man wants to break down the door of a woman living alone...

Why aren't feminists pro guns? If a strong violent man wants to break down the door of a woman living alone, overpower her, rape her and beat her around the head with a stick until her brains are falling out and she is dead he has this power. It happens. I'm not saying it can't happen to men as well, or that all women are weak, but these scum will target someone who is half their size and has what they want between her legs. Don't underestimate the strength difference that is there more often than not in these cases of violence by coward rapists and killers.

If they are convinced they need no man of their own to protect them in this world, why aren't they as a group more generally supportive of a right to be armed for self defense? Is it a confidence issue, they don't think they can handle themselves even with a gun? Is it a doublethink when they count on a strong armed man from the police getting there on time to save them? Are they underexposed to strong moral men in general and secretly waiting for one to look after them, teach them how to shoot, but have their back?

Attached: glock.jpg (434x235, 34K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=AH6KYJRbYMg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I think radfems are pro-gun. The normal everyday NPC feminists are just too stupid to think about things for longer than a few seconds anyway.

perhaps they see it issue by issue without looking to build a coherent institution behind governance. however this is an improper way to look at it because the institution is composed of the parts and it is only good as the sum of all the parts. however these parts must move together and function in a way that creates a coherent framework

They really, honestly don't have the capacity to think beyond the next tragedy that passes between their ears. That, and the hyper-shitlib nature of most feminists precludes them against guns-- they actually think that the only people that should be well armed are the forces of the government and the state and that these things will always act in a benevolent manner.

>thinks feminism is pro-women
>thinks feminists don’t want to get raped
>thinks feminism is anything other than a plot to wedge the sexes and limit men’s freedom

Attached: right_to_choose.jpg (960x830, 86K)

Attached: 18E3256F-4C72-46D5-9DDD-DD1362C2890F.jpg (1242x1310, 271K)

Attached: 10minutes.jpg (564x564, 54K)

Attached: woman_shoots_robbers.webm (640x358, 2.08M)

Of course it's niggers lmao

Some of them might want to be "raped" by chad in the toilets of the bar after they got drunk and invited him in there but I'm sure they don't want their home invaded and their brains beaten out of their head with a bat

>(((feminists)))
that's why nibba

based chink

The women who call themselves feminists these days are really just commie leftists. They bash non-leftist women all day long.

Feminism is not about physical power struggle. It's about daddy issues.

Wrong, its because women are retarded.

Modern feminism is nothing more than a progressive club that toes the far left line. They don't care about promoting sensible things like self defense for women.

You are implying women want to be empowered. Being empowered means you lose access to your victim card. Can't have that, now, can we?

Women are never going to be capable of effective self defense, guns or no guns. They rely on the protection of the state.

>Feminists demand gun grabs by daddy government and mommy media
>Feminists claim only government that does their will should have guns
>Feminists claim guns are phallic replacements for inadequate men

So when mashed together - feminists want big daddy to take everyone's penises so only daddy will use the collective penis for her benefit.

>Why aren't feminists pro guns?
Why aren't feminist/#metoo freaking out over the Lt Gov of Virginia not immediately resigning over rape and sodomy allegations?
>fake fraud phony
>leftist marxist front group

This is an excellent take that I also read in a gun magazine editorial opinion some years ago. A gun empowers the potential victim to resist and prevail in the face of a predator or instrument of political tyranny. Women should be the most vocal supporters of gun right. The fact they are not is a testament to the effectiveness of targeted audience perception magagement.

Women are so fucking entitled that they don't even want to use weapons to defend themselves. It's men who must always protect them.

because they know they will be the first ones who will be shot for being too damn annoying

^^^ this is a bunch of pseudo-intellectual babbling nonsense... you sound like you smoke too much POT? and are trying to sound intelligent? and failing miserably...

It's happening

guns make loud noises and women are too weak and frail to handle it

that's literally it

youtube.com/watch?v=AH6KYJRbYMg

Attached: girls love AR.png (720x584, 414K)

>Should be women stabbing their husbands, fathers, brothers, and sons in their backs.

In mexico we are but its illegal. we carry at least weapons like teasers , knives and pepper spray, we train and teach each other self defense. State here is useless and we cant rely on justice
American feminist are fucking meek
And mousy push overs, expect the radfems.

I read of one village that kicked out a cartel with guns and the army came in an disarmed the people.

women like getting raped. it gives them both sex and victimhood.

There was a big vigilante movement on the rise a couple if years ago in certain states but it was crushed by the government for being illegal. But thats not even the problem , the things is cartels and government are often the same. Police is extremely corrupt .

>If a strong violent man wants to break down the door of a woman living alone, overpower her, rape her and beat her around the head with a stick until her brains are falling out and she is dead he has this power.
but thats exactly what feminists dream about everyday