Can you give one logical argument against relatives having sex that doesn't involve "muh feelings"?
You would think post gay marriage legalization we wouldn't have such barbaric laws that prevent people in love from not only marrying each other but from having sex too.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
It's gross and that's all I need as a reason.
>two people you don't even know having sex offends you
Why?
perfectly normal. rape that bitch if she denies you.
White people all look the same and that is why they have to get horny for literally everyone (incl. their dads and mums)
>Can you give one logical argument against relatives having sex that doesn't involve "muh feelings"?
>love
Are you literally a fucking retard? i mean what's going on here?
Me on the right.
So u basically mean incest in a way?
From a biological aspect, if you don't knock her up and make retarded children, i don't really have a problem with what u do in your private time.
From a psychological standpunt, as long as it doesn't mess you up mentally, same answer as above.
my cousin is hot as shit. I'd give her a retarded baby.
I've watched all sorts of wincest porn, but never wanted to bang my closer relatives, but even my GF has a girl crush on my cousin.
It's basically this but different relative. youtube.com
Also, TFW you're from Alabama, but also have a REALLY hot cousin
>she is has tiggo bitties
>facially attractive
>6 figure salary with no husband
roll tide famalam.
You're just pretending to be a redditor, right?
Pics for proof.
I get on reddit a lot, but I was on /b/ way before i was on reddit.
Reddit spacing is dependent on the spaces after a period, fyi.
We are evolutionarily predisposed to be disgusted by our own relatives when it comes to sexual attraction.
It is quite literally a natural law. Breaking it disrupts nature and leads to the destructin of the genetic line and failure of the species.
Call it God call it nature call it science, it exists.
Inb4 "but what if I just want cummies with mummy and no children?"
Same law different method. You're not contributing to the continuation of your genetic line. You're fucked in the head, you're spreading derangement and contributing to the degeneration of the entire human race. And nature demands you die for it. Be that sooner or later. Your genetic material will not go forth and multiply.
lmao hell no, get your own hot cousin.
The reddit spacing isn't even why I think you're a redditor
Then there is an argument against objective beauty and you're playing into the idea of feminist beauty standards....
What the fuck is wrong with you you mentally ill debilitating disgusting mutt
Op should fuck his sister and post pics
Dude my cousin was hot before reddit....
I'm super proud that's in my blood line desu. I both feel bad for my uncle and am proud of him at the same time for making kickass family
Because her husband wants to kill me now that he knows what happened. If I wasn't her brother, there's not much he could do about it. But she had to go and tell him every detail about how we "dry" humped in the swimming pool. All I can tell him is that at least the chlorine prevented her from getting pregnant.
It's really not pragmatic in the long run as family relationships are complicated enough without adding sex into the mix. Generally the question you should be asking why you would bang your relative, rather than why you wouldn't.
You soon realize the only reason why you would is "muh dick will feel good" which doesn't really justify the risk of retard babies and potential familial disharmony, especially when you literally can bang the rest 99% of the human population.
We all have that one relative that is hot as shit and you want to fuck the shit out of
There are scenarios where it could be OK.
>repopulating the earth after nuclear war
>oedipal journey without knowledge of relation
>she wants the D and lives in new york
>especially when you literally can bang the rest 99% of the human population.
That's where you're wrong, friendo....
... :'(
You never SHIT in your own kitchen.
Same principles behind NO FUCKY FUCKY at work. Because when it ends it NEVER ends well. Enjoy EVERY holiday with the family after youve been outed & accused of "Muh sex FIEND"
All you disgusting mutts need to stop thinking and masturbating about aunt Nicki's feet.
The fuck are you on about? How did you get objective beauty standards fron any of that?
you also never install a pocket pussy where the garbage disposal would go.
This is false. It comes down to your exposure to a relative when you're a child. If you have enough exposure to a relative when you're young enough then you will develop a sexual aversion to them. But if you arent near them as a child then you may develop a particularly strong attraction to them due to the fact that we're often attracted to people that possess similarities to us.
Ok let me lay this out simply:
1. Objective beauty would be beautify regardless of personal circumstance
2. If personal circumstance can render beauty disgusting, it is not objective
3. Therefore beauty is subjective
A. Feminist beauty standards claim beauty is not objective
B. If beauty is subjective, freminist beauty standards are valid
4C: biological disgust allows for feminist beauty standards. (aka plays into the hands of....)
Do yall like my vector format for argument breakdown?
I like you formate but I think beauty is objective. Look at mongoloids. They bred women like that so demons couldn't enter the slant eyes of their women and the flat face was to represent the full moon, an aspect of femininity.
False equivalency.
A person can be beautiful without being sexually attractive to you.
Subjective experience exists it does not mean there are no common standards of goodness.
if beauty is objective, it's not weird to think your relative is hot.
Anyone actually from the Gold Coast who knows this slag? I need more pictures
Wants to know why you shouldn't fuck family members as long as you don't knock them up doesn't want to know how watching Jewish porn with incest titles brought about the whole "moral" question in the 1st place
Oh them kikes really did a number on you user
double false equivlency. The argument was against finding someone "disgusting"
Fuck off to Jow Forums
>10/10 blonde bomb
>slag
give me a break
because our socialist society will force the rest of us to pay for your inbred children's healthcare and guarantee that those inferior genes stay in the pool for centuries
if you want to fuck your sister at least have the decency to chemically castrate yourselves
hahahaha you don't know Gold Coast girls. She's a slag, trust me.
>almost 50 posts in and still no good stories
Waste of a thread
Slag doesn't mean you can't be hot as fuck however
The better way to phrase this would be between two choices in a would you rather style:
A) Fuck your relative with a chance of having a retarded baby
B) fuck a rando with 100% chance of having a retarded baby
There's technically nothing wrong with killing a dog however we intrinsically feel it's wrong to do so. Even if morally, it isn't wrong. Feelings don't always bow to pure logic, humans are a creature of both emotion and logic. That's what makes us special
>roll tide famalam.
saved as "technicallymoral.jpg."
Because if you normalize it you ruin the taboo aspect of it and it no longer becomes as exciting
What are you fuckin retarded?
I don't find my female relatives disgusting to look at. I find the idea of engaging in sexual Intercourse with them disgusting.
Daily reminder that muh inbreeding is spook to make you dilute your genes and breed with niggers.
Because inbreeding leads to muslims.
Besides, who'd want to? You've seen you mama. Would you really hit that?
'...to boldly go where every niggah has splooged a load before...'
In elementary school, they separate similarly aged siblings/cousins into different classes so they can actually learn to talk to other people and not be socially retarded and codependent their whole lives. Gene diversity. Pregnancy and further retardation. Your other relatives don't want to have to explain that. Also leave your fucking property for once your sister is ugly af
you will never have peace apart from obedience to God
>Bradford uk
>highest population of mudslimes per person in the UK
>highest rate of inbreeding
>highest rate of genetic deformity
Not much thought required here
Then we are having two different arguments.I think I am too drunk for this desu....
However; can you find an example where beauty is objective in the context of humans, without sexuality coming into play.
The only argument against it, to my knowledge, would be to argue that beauty has some other meaning, which both falls upon semantics and renders beauty subjective
Even if you devolve the bible to a collection of stories to exemplify morality, there is reasoning for moral incestuous relationships.
The best answer would be, in my opinion, is to say that even though immoral actions can be justified, doesnt mean they should be exemplified.
It is moral for someone to kill a man in self defense, even though it is always wrong to kill another human. Does that mean we should condone killing another man in self defense? Of course not.
There is both a moral argument for fucking your family in some extreme situations, but on the whole it is wrong to encourage such actions.
Everyone wins, you don't get to fuck your sister just because she's hot, and we still get to abort the retarded babies.
holy shit he actually is a lot more political than I remember....
You're having 3 different arguments all nested in the larger debate over subjective experience.
Being is not as simple as this is what an attractive person is. Have you noticed some people like big tits and others like small?
Objective experience is a boring world consisting of meaningless matter bouncing off other matter. Conscious experience interpreted through subjective experience is how we exist.
That does not mean there's no such thing as ugly or beautiful. The perfect representation of what a thing is, say the chairiest chair, is a beautiful chair. If it fails to fulfil the basic requirements of a chair it would not be a beautiful chair. But in order to interpret what a chair is good for we must experience it and the only experience we can have is subjective.
A fat unhealthy delusional feminist who doesn't believe in standards does not have the market cornered on subjective experience. They take a banal silly interpretation of the term and warp it to mean everything is anything at all times because I create the universe and assign value as I see fit.
That is an insane belief. It's just nonsense
Humans have 4K genetic defects in them. The chances of your defects being the same as your siblings / parents defects hooking up if you got your parent / sibling pregnant will guarantee a fucking retard.
Honestly why do you think the west is being invaded by immigrants. Europe has tragically low genetic diversity given how fucking brutal things were for a long time. Christianity caused it to bounce back but we're still fucked. We need fresh blood or we'll all be getting jew diseases soon.
Post her feet.
Yeah fucking look at pakistan
Also, this
The world of Adam and Eve is gone. We are living on a junkyard. Sin corrupted human DNA (don’t ask how I’m still trying to get an answer for that). Adam and Eve were perfect. They were the first therefore they’re offspring could reproduce with each other and not worry about producing a race of West Virginians .
You had me, then lost me. I'm not sure how arguing for subjectivity can do anything but necessarily play into an argument that necessarily depends on subjectivity?
The argument you're making seems to depend on how subjective the feminist argument is, not whether or not it depends on subjectivity.
Genetics and tarded children.
Also, If you claim I have three arguments, it may be prudent to lay then out with numbers....
What the pastafarian said
Go ahead and fuck your sister, I’m not gonna judge you, God will.
God who?
No argument against incest sex, as long as there is consent and no baby its perfectly ok
Inbreeding and rape are a very bad things tho.