Where my DemoChads at?

Attached: 0AEC8BCB-C459-4DEF-8B44-3321D4273A5F.jpg (750x902, 433K)

>that Negro female making the typical "sassy black bitch" face

Beyond parody.

Yay brown women!

Congressional hand jobs, about tree fiddy

All of them except for the one on the chair are negros, no?

Cringe

i would fuck the one in the middle she has a that typical gilf face

Also ready for what exactly?

I really wonder what I'm missing.
Are they this retarded? Do they actually believe the shit they're spewing?
It's over man, people don't buy their racist identity politics shit anymore.
>Anti racist
>Anti sexist
Make everything and I mean everything about race an sex.

People get angry because there are real issues that aren't solved.
>RAYCISS'
The only thing they get out of this is disillusioned voters and brainlets playing the identity game on the opposite side.

Attached: 1546039701809.jpg (994x725, 115K)

Oh NO you di-int!!!

She's right, nobody in her picture looks ready

Attached: HisCock2.png (125x125, 8K)

wrong on both accounts

Attached: 1528962822785.jpg (400x388, 61K)

Dem OAC titties.

>they ain’t ready
She’s so honest in her tweets

That's a lousy shoop of bin laden on that painting.

Attached: Tony Rodham.png (445x643, 443K)

MMMMMHMMMM

Imagine the smell

For their drama theyre going to cause and attention theyre going to demand, then once someone noticed them they start screaming, SCARED OF A WOMAN WITH POWER!?!?

>far right
I didnt know we already had our first trans in office.

the ones all the way on the left and right are white.

Attached: AOC BRAP.jpg (608x960, 49K)

oooh myyy

Attached: 1548293138494.gif (590x333, 124K)

We takin’ yo country wh*te boi!

Attached: 1D90C75D-93D2-4BDE-B3F5-BE0DF4F554C7.jpg (1125x2149, 1.14M)

So powerful.
Much bravery.

She is right. None of those women are ready.

is this actually that cunt?

Every time I think the Democrats can't come up with something to increase the cringe they surprise me. The non-stop cringe party.

NO ONE READY FOR KAHNS REVENGE !!!!!

Attached: Genghis_Khan_(CivRev).jpg (700x608, 67K)

>As long as my neoliberal oligarchary is brown and women I’m good

are you looking at a photo negative somehow?
might be a symptom of a tumor. go get checked out.

Right here

#DemoChads2020

Girls have it so difficult

Attached: 1549923801495.png (712x998, 136K)

I am 6'6, but my dick is 6 inch long and 6 inch in circumference.

only one with a smirk is black lady to the left the other's have faces swelled with pride. sorry bout your assbergers

So fuckin hot

uppity black bitch

Look at all that pussy...

Attached: 1532852397125.jpg (267x323, 13K)

The cunt clan

I had used all the porn on the internet, so I turn on the TV, and there's a marionette called Diane Sawyer interviewing 20 female Senators, the most in history, applauding and giggling as if cold fusion had finally been discovered. Of course it's a "good thing" that women are Senators in as much as not allowing them to be senators is the bad thing, but other than that, what does it mean? That women are finally brave enough to run, or America brave enough to hire them? It's not like the Capitol Building was turning them away, so why is this important? I knew I was being scammed because I was being told this was a historic accomplishment by the ABC Network. The ABC demo is not ever going to be a Senator, I would bet ten bazillion dollars they couldn't even name one of their Senators and gazillion billion dollars they have no real idea what Senators do, so why is this on prime time ABC?

I think the answer is supposed to be "it's empowering to women," but you should wonder: when more women enter a field, it means less men did, and if the men stopped going there, where did they go? Why did they leave? I assume they aren't home with the kids, right?

I don't want to be cynical but boy oh boy is it hard not to observe that at the very moment in history when we have the most women in the Senate, Congress is perceived to be pathetic, bickering, easily manipulated and powerless, and I'll risk the blowback and say those are all stereotypes of women. Easy, HuffPo, I know it's not causal, I am saying the reverse: that if some field keeps the trappings of power but loses actual power, women enter it in droves and men abandon it like the Roanoke Colony. Again we must ask the question: if power-seeking men aren't running for Senate, where did they go? Meanwhile all the lobbyists and Wall Street bankers are men, isn't that odd? "Women aren't as corrupt or money-hungry." Yes that's been my experience with women as well.

This works in reverse, too, take a field traditionally XX-only, like nursing, and huh, what do you know—at the time where nursing is more powerful than it has ever been there are also more XY in it than ever. But who made it more powerful? It wasn't nurses. And if you're playing that game, ask if the reason "sexy nurses" as a fetish dropped out somewhere around the 90s had nothing to do with females finally getting control over their sexualization but exactly the opposite, men came in and unsexualized the joint. "I'm not gay." Easy, Focker, no one was implying anything.

I know to a woman it must feel good, "yay, I'm a Senator!" and I do not minimize the individual accomplishment of a woman becoming a Senator. But for everyone else, what is the significance? One of the Yay-Women Senators suggested that the government would benefit from all the make-up because "women's styles tend to be more collaborative," and at that exact same moment she repeated the conventional wisdom's horrible banality she simultaneously got married to the head of a lobbying firm. That's progress, I guess.

The problem isn't with women in the Senate, but rather its celebration, which these dummies blindly participate in. Is it putting on a face for the American public, the way the first face I see on Goldman Sach's website is a black woman? Is it cosmetic? She's probably proud, she should be proud that she made it to GS, but for the rest of blacks and women, what is the significance? It may be regressive to ask this, but it is illuminating: "hey... why did they let so many of us in?"

This is part of a larger, systemic problem with the way power has shifted not from Group A to Group B, but from the ground up to the top down, and top down works in a very specific way: it concedes the trappings of power while it retains the actual power.

In this case, you are seeing a shift of power repackaged as a gender battle. And it's quite apparent that power is a generation or so ahead of you, so in 1990 a 40 year old who grew up around successful lawyers then says to his 5 year old, "Daughter, you should become a lawyer!" and she probably at one point decries the lack of female role models, and then by the time she graduates law school she discovers she's a dime a dozen, power has been withdrawn, one step ahead; and at this rate I fully expect 2013's Aspirational 14% to nudge their 5 year old daughters towards investment banking so they can be part of the big Women In Investment Banking conference of 2033. Don't bother, it'll be in Newark.

I can't predict the next field of power, I'm happy to hear your projections, the point for now is that while power moves ahead of you and your family, it leaves behind the appearance of a gender (or racial) struggle; and the immediate result of this is that people consider it a societal achievement that they are merely playing, even if what they are doing is ultimately meaningless. So while women (appropriately) fought for, and got, equal access to college educations—and now women even outnumber men in colleges—today we find that college is irrelevant. Huh. Note bene: what women did not fight for, and this is to my point, is the specific power of being taken seriously without a college education. "But how will the world know we're equal?"

What exactly are these females doing?

And what in the hell are they trying to accomplish?

Your elected representatives, doing important stuff right?

Women only enter politics for attention. Look at them posing for photo shoots like they're on America's Next Top Model.

god i cant wait for 2020 re-election day to see these cunts in tears

Pic related is why women should be banned from politics. They care more about appearance than anything else

can someone decipher this comic for me

I wonder how many people would believe this shit if it was posted under a trump tweet

>m-hmmm

Why aren't you able to prove you didn't marry your brother again?