>Reverse racism is RARE compared to examples of racism against historically marginalized groups
Jow Forums utterly btfo
archive.is
Reverse racism is RARE compared to examples of racism against historically marginalized groups
Other urls found in this thread:
there's no such thing as reverse racism, any and all racism is inborn and completely natural
Black people are the most open and hardcore racists you will ever find
rare eh?
are these "economist" sodomite jews also retarded?
>even faggot lefties can no longer deny anti-white racism exists
I'll take it. Baby steps.
nah Covington.
When every powerful person is ganging up on smiling white kids you know it's systemic :)
Op is a faggot
>okay we concede. You can be racist against white people. But its RARE
sometimes i do wish all white disappeared overnight. the chinks and spics would exterminate the niggers the following day
Every Race and subdivided Ethnic Groups looks out for their own ,
EXCEPT White People and that’s primarily because of One ethnic subdivision of the White Race
Reverse racism does not exist.
Racism is not something that is exclusive to white people. If you believe it is, you're racist.
How is something like this even possible to prove? You can't keep track of all racism.
>Reverse
tiresome.png
Who's saying it's exclusive to white people you fucking retard?
>Reverse racism
>The term is self is not prejudice in its own ontological context.
This level of ignorance.
.
They want to Holocaust white people and I'm really sad because every day it becomes more obvious.
Reverse is such a sophist way of conveying the message you would never call it reverse rape if a girl raped a dude or reverse theft if a white robbed a nigger. Can we start doing this pol to get these blue pulled kikes to stop.
Every leftist.
His finger is awfully close to the trigger, especially considering the fact that it’s a rocket launcher
what happened to you Economist
you used to be cool
"Reverse" implies that there's only one source and one direction of racism.
Many diverse groups throughout the world fuckin g hate the shit out of eachother and would like nothing better to eradicate the other in a massive bloodbath, as has happened on occasion.
And, being diverse these groups contain no whites.
So in summary, don't talk shite.
Reverse racism is used in a context of anti white, this article is just bait for faggots like you to imply that because the all mighty objective authority of an economy based news outlet finally admitted in a very minor way that it cuts both ways. That its some how clearing the giant fucking elephant in the room of basically the majority of left leaning people.
No one said anything about absolutely all, no one ever said anything about absolutely none. Stop making strawmen faggot. You know global 1st world politics, you're in a country that drives them. Stop feigning ignorance to project your shitty narrative.
>saying the exact same thing they've always said from the very beginning
>Jow Forums btfo for sure this time!
You'd think they'd get tired of saying the exact line they've been saying for the last decade +.
were you born yesterday?
Using the term "reverse racism" and not just racism is already buying into their BS. You've already lost if you are arguing how often reverse racism occurs.
Reverse racism?
So like not being racist?
Are you retarded?
you should be glad they're being more obvious
>reverse theft
fucking lol
(((The economist))) Rothschild owned
He acts like whitey doesn't get mugged by dindus every day
>Gift rape.
i audibly kek'd
I misread the post. You guys are right.
Thanks for having humility, it improves the board m8.
>(((economist)))
Reverse racism doesn't exist. It's called racism
This fucker just blathered on without providing any evidence to back up the statements. The stats to show that "revere racism" (a bullshit term) is real and that whites are being destroyed by non-whites and with full support of (((governments))). You never read anout the black on white crime. You never hear from whites and their experiences being discrimnated against. Whites are part of those historically oppressed groups the writer talked about. There were literal signs on places that said "No Irish allowed" for example. This article is also a perfect example of "reverse racism"!
Favor, much like disfavor leads to shock.
When it comes down to it racism is shocking to the party that is being prejudiced against. But favor can also lead to shock as they can be unfair for the others. Racism is just a specific form of disfavor.
Positive affirmation a form of favor that disfavor others, nigger fetishism too on top of implying a very defined view of your own of niggers, a positive one perhaps but a well constructed by you none the less.
You're a faggot.
don't these people love saying that "an injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere"?
Next time you pick up the (((Economist))), check out the article titles. No author's name is given. They're literally written by think tanks.
Kek, this. Wonder what made them give an inch though
>Reverse racism
Why the fuck is it called reverse racism if theyre still being racist
Stop excusing your poor behavior.
"Reverse racism" is hard to reject because if you say "it doesnt exist" they take it to mean that you're saying "racism against whites doesnt exist"
Pretty slippery cunt
In the OP article it even states "is it possible to be racist toward white people" so you can't claim it's a general concept, its synonymous with white
>racism against historically marginalized group
What groups have been discriminated against in their homeland?
I'm not be a cheeky cunt, I know it's happened. EX: non Muslims in Mulsim-conquered lands
"reverse racism" doesn't exist. There's just racism.
reverse racism don't exist because its applied to any race,unless you designed that word for a specific race...
HMMMMM
Interesting observation. If you look closely, you'll also notice that he's a nigger.