What the over under ?

Is Norway a Capitalist or Socialist Country ?
>Pic Related

Attached: 533C0519-39FB-4D01-8572-67D40D59E4A5.jpg (794x2208, 1.12M)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norway
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>taking a picture from a thread
>making a whole tread about it

sage
You're retarded

It’s a Fucking Question Dumb Ass that’s the point I don’t even know WTF Norway is ?

Yes, socialism works in white countries. National Socialism, not kike socialism.

Its a socialist democracy

Okay fair enough but can we agree that Norway is at least a Homegenous society or has Norway been (((Enriched))) as well by (((Multi Culturalism))) like the rest of the Nord Cucks ?

Norway is infested with immigrants from middle-eastern and north african countries, but nowhere near as bad as sweden.

The africans we get are not as bad as basketball americans though.

It is considerably socialist.
It is also like the rest of Scandinavia, Denmark included, being completely destroyed.

Attached: right_enemy.jpg (960x529, 101K)

What happens when the welfare system collapses? They get a lot more gibs here than in the USA.

Attached: bait_thread.jpg (627x456, 84K)

Who has the best Africans

Take us back denmark senpai
Lets make a union and keep scandinavia strong

Retarded picture. We have Strong social democrats who fought for labor during the post war years.

The reason we look like utopia is because the rest of the world went to shit during the 70s. There where plenty of Marxist Leninist influences in Norway but most of them died off post pol pot.

Norway is a capitalist country. A fierce capitalist country as well. Imagine you are not a totally retarded government and you provide the basics and reap the tax rewards. Passing the ranks in Norways "kindness dystopia" will give you insight into how we sustain our psychopaths. Its more or less a 100$ to the general population to frigg off while the money makers are left alone.

Norway is the most capitalistic country in Northern Europe. We are far from the infamous "third option" in regards to capitalism.

It's an ethnostate

It's a capitalist country with strong welfare policies.

>Let's adopt their policies

We'll have to begin with a homogeneous country. In the states people think arresting criminals is a government conspiracy to genocide blacks, so even simple issues can't be addressed before wanting a welfare state.

The European africans are people who were generally high skilled high income people (in comparison to their own countrymen), while African americans were the lowest of the low when brought from africa(literal slaves)

Pretty sure the nord countries got rich because of free market
THEN they started robbing everyone through high taxes and shooting themselves in the foot

I'd imagine they would go back as there is no more economic opportunity here than there would be in their countries of origin

This.

Better to have an equal union (or joining a new Germany and assimilate completely). And we need at least Sweden, not current Sweden, but still. Tiny countries like ours are not at all sustainable, neither for us or things overall. And we need a robust, reliable and decently future-proof foundation reg. current and future threats and challenges, especially the Jews and their kindred and products, as well as fight for what is genuinely good and right the world over, both for our own self-interest as well as the world. Both the road there as well as the foundation will be great challenges, assuming there is any hope - we should have gone down that path long, long ago.

Attached: dont_destroy_isis_wat.png (665x610, 164K)

Having lots of oil helps too

We dont really spend our oil money.

Nigga, they white. They could make space rockets work, let alone a less ideal government system

There is definitely much more "economic opportunity" for them here than in Africa, at least in the short term, for instance reg. looting, robbing and stealing, especially for those of them that are less capable and couldn't afford to go elsewhere in either case.
>an extreme amount of redistribution
>extremely high taxes
>so much capitalist

>A fierce capitalist country as well.
>Passing the ranks in Norways "kindness dystopia" will give you insight into how we sustain our psychopaths.
>Its more or less a 100$ to the general population to frigg off while the money makers are left alone.
That's some excellent rhetoric. All the "money makers" have to do to be "left alone" is be taxed an extreme amount. And that is WITH the tax revenue from oil.

>We have Strong social democrats who fought for labor during the post war years.
They fought for labor by taxing labor extremely much?

Are you Jewish?

Attached: filter_whites.png (1024x792, 990K)

The policies mentioned where formed from principles held before the oil rush. The reason we made so much bank from the oil rush is because people from the government went out to create a national oil company to stop the Amerifats from reaping too much benefit from Norwegian territory. And our investment strategies in regards to the profits.

Oil and related fields is 25% of our GDP. Compared to other oil rich economies its minuscule. We mostly trade in engineering and higher education.

America used to be loaded with oil. That shit you guys are doing right now is just to pump numbers out, not profit. Shale is retarded. Too diverse & large of a country to do the kinds of projects we did. Lots of Americans where pissed off because of what we did with our oil industry. But the cold war was escalating and it was in NATO interests to deprive Russians from profiting with oil exports into Europe.

You think us forming this society in front of the international cabals went down quietly? People who profit from Nations natural resources despise us for the model we created. To say all a nation needs is Oil to become Norway is greatly underestimating the shitshow we pulled off to actually make the oil semi-nationalized.

Its a cliche at this point. Lucky circumstances allowed us to do the country some good.

>Whites are evil!
>Whites are not superior!
>Lets copy White countries like Norway and Iceland because they are the best countries in the world!
>Because Whites are oppressive!

He didn't even argue that oil was the whole explanation, only that it "helps". And 25%? That is an extreme proportion compared to having no oil. Denmark has also benefited greatly from oil, having less or no oil would definitely have hurt the budgets greatly.

Attached: foreskin_licking_blood_infant3.jpg (960x647, 150K)

>an extreme amount of redistribution
Which is only logical when cradle to grave is government funded.

>They fought for labor by taxing labor extremely much?
Yes? Individualists never understand redistribution models.

>Are you Jewish?
Second paragraph of the constitution denied Jews access to the kingdom. That and hitler made sure we have a negligent population of Jews.

You are aware that ayn rand and her individualism is the most jewish doctrine put to paper? Solve nepotism and you solve the jewish question. Models of redistribution are meant to solve nepotism and related injustices.

I could go point by point but you are clearly promoting ayn rand tier idiocy with that sort of individualism.

before macron pissed off the yellow vests you where the most taxed population on the planet. Is Denmark that bad? Or is individualism not all that its cut out to be?

Of course it would have hurt the budgets? 25% is related fields. Actual oil revenue is much closer to 6-7% discounting the sovereign wealth fund. We make more money exporting oil tech per year than we do from extracting oil.

Danes have always been butthurt that the price for the scandi model is more tax heavy for their population.

"10,000 blondes that grew up next door to each other."

You want to adopt Norwegian policies? Okay, start by abolishing your minimum wage and lowering tariffs.

That depends, there are different african ethnicities, with some being worse than others and somalis being the worst

It's a capitalist welfare state. There is private ownership but they tax the ever living fuck out of you so that everyone has "free" gibs.

So now I am an "individualist"? Hahahahahahaha. You spout an extreme amount of nonsense and rhetoric. What about giving money to those that are worthy of being given money, not just needy? And let it happen based on the goodwill, judgement and charity of their own group, not everyone from child rapists to non-Europeans?

>Models of redistribution are meant to solve nepotism and related injustices.
Whatever you are, you are at the very least definitely a socialist. Is "social democrats" buying votes through redistribution not an extreme kind of nepotism? Giving large amounts of money to their f̶r̶i̶e̶n̶d̶s̶ voters in return for loyalty, not because it is right? That they pretend it is right only makes it much, much worse, not better in the slightest.

You seem more and more Jewish.

Attached: hey_rabbi2___unchecked.jpg (900x770, 89K)

Let's not cherry pick Norfag.

"The Norwegian economy is an example of a mixed economy, a prosperous capitalist welfare state and social democracy country featuring a combination of free market activity and large state ownership in certain key sectors."

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norway

>Is Norway a Capitalist or Socialist Country ?
its a communist faggot monarchy

What you're saying is its neither and both.
Cant really argue with you there.

Norway is a Socialist welfare state, and no - it doesn't work.

Attached: welfare state.jpg (480x427, 52K)

extremely high trust society, thanks to ethnic homogenity up until very recent times.

we're about to pass the point of no return with regards to demographics and there is zero reason to believe we'll reform in time. the difference between us and sweden is that while sweden is headed for total collapse we'll be in a steady state of somewhat controlled decline until technology and geopolitical developments make our state obsolete

I presumed that you where an individualist. Still do.

>And let it happen based on the goodwill, judgement and charity of their own group
Yes, wonderful idea desu. Nothing that implies individualism with this post either.

Its absolutely retarded rhetoric you are spewing. I bet you are not familiar with the writings of ayn rand since you just described half the ideology while denying your relation to their train of thought.

>redistribution rant
You are not describing an "extreme kind of nepotism". You are describing an election? What exactly bugs you the most about the redistribution model? The tyranny of the majority?

The poor is still a part of the pack & will treated as so by true social democrats. Luckily for you the models are failing because of the nigger invasion, social cohesion is collapsing.

But to deny its success for Scandinavians is really ridiculous. Sure it wont survive much longer because the reason it exists is because of the "good will of people". No matter how forced it appears to you.

If you think the answer to the problems lies in creating higher inequality & the donations from a few philanthropist i wonder what sort of shitty society you envision.

Lets hope shekelstein likes how your grandaughters dance, maybe he can provide them with the childhood they need.

Attached: 1467254290592.jpg (271x186, 11K)

What a complete shitshow of an answer. See for instance picture in .

Attached: unchecked3.jpg (750x852, 327K)

Norway is.. what, 80% white? Doesn't have the ethnic diversity of this country.