Hey Pol I need your help. Why is race not a social construct...

You need to get a life. Shitposting here is one thing, but arguing with retards irl makes you a retard yourself.
>b-but i want to save the white race
Great, become rich and influential then you can save it

Attached: IMG_1292.jpg (1016x787, 117K)

Ask her why mixed race people who need bone marrow transplants can't just get some from their parents.

Shut up schlomo, it's your own fucking influence he's fighting against.

Im sick and tired of her indoctrinating us. She's legitimately influencing the next generation of voters. I will not live in a country where the greens party is in power. She has barely any power on me, I have excellent grades and i am a student leader so she can't get me in trouble with anything in school. She once called my parents and tried telling them I had very racist and sexist views, she had the shock of her life when they agreed with me.

Buy her a biology book you retarded americunt

I'm not white. I'm trying to prevent this Libtard from indoctrinating our school and turning this country into Australia SFSR

she just admitted herself that race has a biological basis right there.

Based upon their reasoning, anything they don't like is a social construct. All you need to do is tell her that race is real, there are differences, and the only artificial, meaningless social construct is the concept of "social constructs". It is laughable that the low IQ leftists pretend that reality is not reality by calling unacceptable facts "social constructs".

This.
Guys let's use this post as answer for every fucking Jow Forums post lol

She claimed that if white people moved to Africa they would develop sickle cells as well. Idk if she admitted that race has a biological basis though.

Race isn’t a social construct, white people have white babies, black people have black babies, gooks have gook babies and so on, this is biological fact. In fact anyone who uses the term “social construct” unironically is almost certainly a science denier

Remember guys, she has a PhD in ancient Roman history

She is raping you. Better report it to the police.

You cant, shoot her in the fucking head.

This is Australia...I wish. Bloody gun laws here are so retarded.

alternatively, you sexually identify as white and she is descriminating against your sexual identity by denying science.

everyone postinfo graphs for OP to present in a power point as a "hypothetical" debate

Tell her that they are social constructs that are used by the Bourgeoisie to divide and oppress the people. That her perpetuation of the divisions between races and the concept of racism only feeds those who seek to keep the poor in poverty and perpetual servitude to the middle and wealthy classes. In the future communist nation such compartmentalization of society would be abolished and those who trade in the partitions based on race will be reeducated or be sent to isolation in order to keep their toxic lies and doctrine from polluting the pursuit of equality and fairness. The revolution is coming and that she should be educating herself now to avoid any, pause for a second here, Problems that could arise.

Basically outlib the liberal. What is she going to do call you a dirty commie? She is already calling you a racist.

>not ATF

It doesn’t matter how much advice we give you because you are too retarded to think for yourself and will crumble when she follows up like the cuck you are.

That said the two most appropriate avenues to explore is the fact that “justice” is also a social construct, but has a greater impact on the shape of our country than many “real” things; and seeking “racial justice” could mean literally anything from genocide to deification depending on the social construct on which the society is indoctrinated with.

For a more brainlet conversation you can just ask her if she disagrees with race-based affirmative action since it reinforces the false paradigm of race.

Anyways, die in a fire.

You need to tell her that history is the ultimate social construct, merely a set of lies agreed upon by historians.

Well, she has no idea how evolution works, and apparently never there do you.

“Race isn’t real”. (But I hate white people). If you are going to start cataloging all the ways in which libtards are retarded you are going to be busy for a long, long time.

Human genetic clustering by Rosenberg, nigga you've never heard of it? It predicted what race people would self identify with, with 95% accuracy, based on their genes.

If race is just a social construct, why don't black people just call themselves white? Then cops won't pull them over and beat them.

Here, I’ll help you with another one. Blacks live at the bottom of society because of “socioeconomic reasons” but Jews live at the top because of genetics and intellect.

The real red pill is that racism doesn't exist. It is actually tribalism which is hardwired into our brain via survival instincts. Whether black or white. Black people tolerate white people because they live in majority white societies. Black people had the misfortune of being different in terms of skin color and not having the developments that white societies had. They were looked at as a threat from these countries and in turn had become disenfranchised.

Attached: Skin_Colour_v5.jpg (494x275, 47K)

And as far as racism goes, tell her it doesn't matter if it is or isn't racism because you're still being a bigoted asshole to an entire group of human beings based on what she believes is nothing more than a "social construct." That's absolutely unfair and wrong, racism or not.

Here's a simple one. Ask her if race is a social construct, and not biological, please explain pic related.

Attached: IMG_1149.png (602x708, 488K)

You missed a spot

Attached: heh.jpg (600x900, 78K)

Look at the face of a black person and the face of a white person. Are they different? Yes. There exists a non-random distribution of carachteristics such as those across all humanity? Yes.

19th century concepts of race are wrong. But that does not mean there are no differences among people.

>and not having the developments that white societies had
CHINA DIDNT GIVE THE AFNICANS RAILRAOD AND STEAM POWERED TECHNOLOGY

> race is a social construct

What does this actually mean?
There are no races unless there is a society?
It seems a very empty statement.

>Why clinical analysis need to be adjusted by demographics like race and sex to give proper diagnostics?

well the fact of the matter is that race is not just one gene for one trait but millions of genes that arise in tandem in a statistically regular way.

I got some data right here
trust me i am science

Attached: graphs.png (1137x1108, 341K)

Africa is a massive continent. Why would a country willingly invest billions into domething unless they were receiving something in return. In earlier centuries diamonds and rare gemstones were mined and industry grew around them (see Debeers). In modern times rare earth minerals are mined for resource providers of technology companies.

this. you have to find a way and beat them with their own stick

Beautiful

I’m getting confused, she says race is a social construct, but then goes on to discuss white people as if white people are NOT a social construct. On one hand she’s arguing that there is no basis to seperate people into different racial groups, while doing it anyway

Free labour

Morality is a social construct. Ask her if rape is wrong.

You just have to debunk her logic. Make her give a definition of social construct then once she has given a definition. Let her know that what she is saying is based on an unfounded theory the same as time traveling worm holes are just a theory.

Attached: 9aa54417ebf6e76b16dda9064c5eaa0e.jpg (400x400, 41K)

No, it means race does not exist without social/cultural "programming".

Money is a social construct. It doesn't exist without an agreement about value, but it's worthless without the agreement.

By attempting to convince people of social constructs she is attempting to create a social construction. Also she is missing the bigger picture of what social construct is and is defined as. Its not the actual natural appearance of something within nature but the social role it is given by society. Such as women dont belong in factories because they belong at home taking care of babies. Thats a true social construct because women have historically been the ones at home taking care of babies so we dont see them as an iron worker or hammering out metal into shapes.

Attached: social-constructionism-8-728.jpg (728x563, 123K)

"You just have to debunk her logic"-you
It wont work

You need to fuck off

But that is inherently false because we can see race and identify people by color and features exclusive to their race.
When these topics were first discussed as a theory they were talking about the roles of race in society. Because back then black people were seen as a certain type of worker not qualified for management positions and such. So that would be a true representation of a social construct. It does not mean that race doesnt exist just because we think it does. It is talking about societal roles and that is what these new age liberals are conflating. But again social construct is just a theory anyways.

Her logic is that the actual existence of race doesnt exist. Correct?
If that is the case then she is by the very definition not understanding what a social construct is and how it used. Social construction by definition does not refer to the differences that are inherent in nature such as skin color eye color hair color. It is referring to the way society places a role on a certain being in nature. Such as a cow is food or a donkey is a work animal or dogs are now mans best friend. Those are true social constructions. She is conflating the reality of what the study was referring to by placing her own beliefs on the definition. Race as it is defined is real the role placed on certain races is not real in nature. Such as indians own casinos because theyre indians. Its just not true.

Heres some definitions used by the scientific society studying this concept.

Attached: social-construction-of-gender-6-638.jpg (638x479, 90K)

She is right, race is a social construct. How can you define race?
There are no White people, there are Caucasian people, which includes the Middle East. The difference between Caucasian, Mongoloid and Negroid people is the form of the skull.

nytimes.com/1987/04/15/garden/suicide-rates-of-teen-agers-are-their-lives-harder-to-live.html
>''Kids see their parents as hypocrites, as being unworthy
>of their trust because they're preaching about love, drugs
>and alcohol while they show no love themselves and use
>drugs or alcohol,''

you have to corner her by her hypocrisies.

Attached: 2pjkne.jpg (500x593, 73K)

>shes right races dont exist
>the differences are skull shape
Pick one

Gender is social construct is a false statement

Gender roles is a social construct is a true statement.
Liberal professors and teachers are conflating definitions to fit a narrative.
We didnt define gender by societal standards we defined it by something observable by natural means.
Gender roles were defined by societal terms.

dude same here, from day one its indoctrination, being told to support refugees, diversity is a strength etc, did you have to watch Schindlers list in history too? ive had so many mates say they say it in the same year and class that i'm starting to think its part of the curriculum...

Isn't saying race is a social construct a denial of evolution?

Sort of but its also a denial of the definition of social construct. See my previous posts about definitions of social construct.

Hope my posts helped you user. Good luck and dont let the libtard teacher get you down. Read my posts and youll have the arguments you need to blow up her narrative.

Technically, everything can be said to be a social construct. If you go hyper-reductionist, there are no clear boundaries between anything. What you should do is to reply, "rape is a social construct," and just go hyper-reductionist about where does a woman's body begin and end? At the sub-atomic level, it is impossible to say. Enjoy the meltdown.

Attached: REEEEEEEEEEEEE.jpg (900x900, 509K)

Well, she is right that old white men came up with the boundaries between races, and that they are on a certain level arbitrary, but the same could be said about our definitions of geograaphical steuctures like mountains, valleys and depressions. That does not mean that we should toss them aside, or that nothing meaningful can be constructed using our arbitrary social constructions.