"This is a notice to Cloudflare that you are serving files consisting of 3D printable firearms in violation of NJ Stat. Ann. § 2C:39-9 3(l)(2). These files are accessible via Cloudflare's New Jersey datacenter. You shall delete all files described within 24 hours or we will be forced to press charges in order to preserve the safety of the citizens of New Jersey."
reason.com
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
palmettostatearmory.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Upload file for us to download
be a good boy and stop trying to look at printable firearms
Quick, archive that shit and move it off of the NJ servers.
>post new link when you are finished, kthxpls
also:
OY VEY! Dey're looking at 3D MODELS of VIRTUAL gunz! Next the'll be Printing ovens to throw us into!
SHUT IT DOWN!
>take file and others similar to it
>drop files into 1000 bulk usb devices ordered from wish
>distribute in public places with note for others to upload online
What could they possibly do?
Id tap dat!
Oh no, plz don't upload those blueprints onto tor, put a link into the Bitcoin block chain and post the address here.
@1.3GB, wouldn't it just be possible to imbed the zip IN the damn blockchain at this point?
>keping in mind that the last revision was 15 days ago, correcting typos and such.
Seems to me like a cryptocurrency whos sole purpose was to save data such as this would be quite valueable in and of itself. Yes / No?
A crypto backed by the data embedded in it's blockchain. Keep it in circulation to keep it alive and viable.
You know good and well that would just end up being CP-Coin
can someone explain why there are laws about printing guns but 80% lowers are legal
Because the politicians who make the laws know jack shit about firearms other than what they've seen in (((hollywood))) movies and what (((lobbyists))) tell them.
there probably is a safety risk aspect involved. the gov't can't regulate the fabrication methods and the items may or may not be of any decent quality.
but mostly not that
Na, the block chain can only send kbs of info. Enough for transaction info. The link would be inside the msg that you send with the transaction.
But in all honesty the blue prints will probs reach the dnms with time.
>implying that doesn't already exist by now.
regardless, I've seen ReichCoin come and go without so much as a whisper as to why it wasn't pursued my seriously. I'm only suggesting that perhaps it's time for a CodyCoin to emerge and be traded with seriously.
Is it not possible to embed the data in the chain and prevent further data from being added? other than typical transaction acounting of course.
This
they're hoping that you'll fuck it up and blow your damn hand off and then you won't be a problem anymore.
Since I know pretty much nothing about the use these printers, if I were to buy the crappiest 3D printer could I make viable firearms with it? How much of an investment are we talking here?
So there's not even a way to embed
>pic related
into the chain, even if I had to do so for each and every firearm / revision?
Mostly this and there would srs be a lack of quality control as well.
DESU licenses to own 3d printers should be a thing.
You'd probably have to spend the equivalent of a used car to get a printer of decent quality / capability. They are not all the same and produce different textures to prints. You'd definately have to shop around / study up on it, it's a technology that's still maturing at this point.
>A loicence for a 3D printer.
>just because of "Oy Very! da gunz!"
>pic related "DESU".
On current block chains? It's not practical. For example, ETH would require a tremendous amount of gas to read and send it. BTC wouldn't be possible cause' 1 MB block size. But even if the block size was bigger, the cost would be astronomical.
>wish
shill faggot
Why are you hating on wish? You can literally buy bulk flash drives as well as suppressors and full auto gun parts shipped straight from China
Gabbi Fisher works at Cloudflare.
so if I took image file from
and put it in a .zip and broke the .zip into approx 4x 1MB pieces and then embeded them into the chain and then recovered them later on and got the 4x 1MB pieces spliced back together into the original .zip, you don't think that would be viable as opposed to losing the ability to transfer / preserve this data at all?
The value in the coin is that the data exists and is recoverable is my thinking on this, wether it's "le bitcoin" or some other seperate unique coin is irrelevant to me at this point.
They should use ipfs as a backend storage so it can never be taken down, ever. One way that I heard you can do it is by using amazon web services free account to create a reverse proxy to ipfs repository of their files. Ipfs is the way to go to not be taken down by the government imo.
3D printed guns are a fucking joke anyways. Buy real guns while you still can you faggots.
Gun grabbers will be shot.
This is not a negotiation.
I read that manga recently, you know who the goblin slayer reminds me of? Alex Jones. Day in day out he comes in 'goblins(globalists)', 'got any goblin(globalist) quests', 'any goblin(globalist) attacks?' Everyone laughs at him everyone makes fun of him, but he is the one fighting the real fight, he is the one fighting humanities real enemy. He is the one consistent reliable force for humanity. Every day for the past 20 years Alex Jones has walked up to the proverbial guild hall slammed his fist on the counter and said 'goblins(globalists)?' In the manga the other heroes learn to respect the guy when thye realize he actually knows his shit despite his odd behavior. Anyone who actually looks into Alex inevitably ends up thinking, 'guys a little crazy, but hes actually pretty accurate.'
> implying regulating gun quality means gun control
There are people in this world that believe grenades should be legal and there are people that think 3D printed guns should be allowed.
Both are astronomically out of this world, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
Just as semi-autos were banned until Sep of 2004, yet everyone has an issue banning them again now.
Future bullet sponge detected
>New Jersey DoJ right now
> implying
Pathetic
We have an issue with banning them now because the ban was useless
If you do it properly, you only need a few key pieces and can replace as necessary.
Dry snitching
semi autos were not banned in the assault weapons ban.
That's hardly the part of the vz.61 where any of the stress occurs. It's also in .32, a fairly low pressure cartridge.
There is no reason to 3D print a lower receiver when you can get a perfectly legal lower receiver from PSA for $50.
palmettostatearmory.com
Maybe if you live in some other nation that bans guns 3D printing makes sense. But only a fucking moron would be arming themselves with plastic guns when they can buy real ones in the USA.
I wish user
en.wikipedia.org
> Most studies have shown the ban had little effect in criminal activity. Other studies, using sources such as Mother Jones, a report prepared for Mayors Against Illegal Guns and a New York Police Department report, have shown small decreases in the rate of mass shootings followed by increases beginning after the ban was lifted
>> small decreases in the rate of mass shootings followed by increases beginning after the ban was lifted
> and that there were reductions in America that were evident during the 1994–2004 US Federal Assault Weapon Ban.
Ok. I really posted that one the match the cartoon and it's slightly on topic.
noted. I'll take that under advisement. It's dependent on your use case/situation i suppose.
regardless, it a technology that shouldn't be banned / regulated solely because "muh gunz bad".
Not all user, only certain ones like an AR-15 for example.
en.wikipedia.org
> The Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act restricted the Colt AR-15 and derivatives from 1994-2004, although it did not affect rifles with fewer features.
The video I linked that you clearly didn't watch was an AR-15 variant sold under the assault weapons ban, einstein. If you jumped through numerous ridiculous hoops and loopholes you could still sell an AR-15 type gun.
So even the most liberal of sources cooking the books as hard as possible only find a small correlation.
Thats evidence enough for me to discard it.
AR-15s are cheaper than ever. Buy now.
> AR-15 variant sold under the assault weapons ban
> Act restricted the Colt AR-15 and derivatives
>> derivatives
>> variant
We're on the same topic and understanding the same thing.
Fuck new jersey and their stupid smart gun
It used to be a nice place full of industrial people now its all poos and welfare niggers and their "white" allies enablers
Agreed, it's a shame more sources couldn't be used for such an important statistic.
Not really, mass shootings are a mental health problem not a gun problem. Banning guns is like taking an aspirin when you have a hole in your chest.
this is what i want 56 to know. Multiple transactions strung together?
I know. The new Liberator is basically a shittier version of the original - smaller caliber, more likely to blow up, and bulkier. Slightly easier for the Average joe to make, though. I don't think too highly about the 3D printed AR lowers, I don't know how fast they take to print but I'd bet I can drill one out from an 80% cheaper and faster, until I've paid for enough in lowers to buy a 3D printer.
2004 is when flashmobs became a thing.
3D printing isn't free. Quality filament isn't cheap. If you live in a country that allows buying an AR-15 legally there is no reason not to buy a quality machined forged aluminum receiver. Especially considering how low prices are right now. I'm tempted to drop like $500 and buy 10X stripped lower receivers just so I can have them for when they inevitably become banned again.
I suppose for archival purposes, maybe.
the filemane + timestamp would have to be in a proximity to make sense of it all. I agree with :
about utilizing some form of ipfs as a complement / redundancy backup.
My initial idea was that somehow the data could be shrunk to a reasonable size / chunk and merged into the chain and that it's recoverable presence would be what makes the crypto have it's own inherient value regardless of it's IRL conversion rate. Even after the data is exrtracted, it's circulation would "fund" it's archival value over time.
In an of itself, the 3D print is at best a temp soluition. At worst it's a step in a larger process to making one without access to a machine forge.
(aka. backyard forge.)
It has a purpose and a value that's been tested and demonstrated for 2nd Amendment purposes, which is only what I'm concerned about at this time.
Technically it was never against the law federally, the Obama administration threw a shitfit and tried to apply ITAR to Defense Distrubuted to make them take the files down. DD sued and the Trump administration settled with them but the liberal states and courts chimped out and halted it.
Basically it was always legal to 3D print firearms (as long as you can legally own firearms and you put a certain amount of metal in it), it's the distribution of files they've been trying to stopping.
I know. I was talking about the economics, though I'd imagine you'd have to buy the 3D printer material by the shipping container to break even on cost/service live vs aluminum.
I have seen interesting uses for 3D printing where you can use a 3D print as a "lost wax" like method for casting metal parts. This could be useful in making metal guns as you can make a precision shape out of plastic and then cast it in metal.
The real trick in making a quality firearm is the barrel. That is not something that can be 3D printed or done easily at home.
barrels can be made, but it might be cheeper to buy that particular part. probably buy the rest of the pieces as well and just do this:
youtube.com
>The real trick in making a quality firearm is the barrel. That is not something that can be 3D printed or done easily at home.
If you’ve gotten to the point where firearms are so illegal that you’re home-casting receivers, then you might as well just be making FA Sten guns with unrifled barrels
this.
obviously.
but in the meantime, before we get to that point in time (God forbid) there's always this:
youtube.com
>preserve the safety of the citizens of New Jersey
A kike wrote this.
Absolutely this.
>other studies, using sources such as mother Jones
Yeah, I'm gonna stop you right there. Its like expecting me to read a study funded by Philip Morris stating the cigarettes are actually somewhat healthy.
Quick, somebody buy FuckGrewal.com and host the files there
Wouldn't that be an SBR? Law still applies even if it's a ghost gun, but under 14" with a stock? Is that illegal
AYO HOL UP
Fuck New Jersey. And stay out of Florida you guinea fucks.
That doesn't have a stock though, so it is a "pistol"
Is this even real lol
dunno and don't care. I only collected the pic and posted it because of the earlier one with the crab handing them out. LOL.
>not_serious.jpg
To me most of this is Proof-Of-Concept anyway. If America a genuine and serious this would've been a Government sponsered program and every LEGAL citizen with a CLEAN record would be trained in this and mandated to possess ONE for the purposes of defending the country angainst enemies foreign and domestic.
But then again this is Jow Forums and /we know better than to expect such reasonableness from the big "G".
In my verson of MAGA, I'd have everyone assigned one after a class, same as driving a car. You get the training and certified and YOU make your own under supervision for quality control puropses. Everyone that carries / possesses is like a bee in a hive with a stinger, ready to swarm on any stupidass who fucks around. Cops can't be everywhere, as we've seen lately from all of the gang violence / facebook guy driving around shooting old dudes walking home / school shootings / theater shooting, etc. etc.
Shit, If I had this plan up and running the way it should be, half of this shit wouldn't even go down the way it did. But, you know, ((( muh gunz bad ))) right?
>a ghost gun
I hope you're not using that nonsense name seriously.
that's for if you live with a bunch of no-gunz assholes.
I'd prefer :
>pic related
Shoot and Smack.
>Bring back the bobbies.
Is that what I think it is?
Because if so, do want.
>not blocking your applications on the firewall