Why haven't you taken the anarcho-capitalism pill yet, Jow Forums?
>right wing
>no taxation
>strong family unions
>no gibsmedats to niggers
>no rulers
>national security is upheld by nationalistic volunteers
Why haven't you taken the anarcho-capitalism pill yet, Jow Forums?
>right wing
>no taxation
>strong family unions
>no gibsmedats to niggers
>no rulers
>national security is upheld by nationalistic volunteers
Other urls found in this thread:
>Why haven't you taken the anarcho-capitalism pill yet
Useless and utopian. People that are are all talk-no-action.
More useless and utopian is left wing anarchism :^)
>anarchy becomes
>no more goverment handouts
>left wing anarchist dies to hunger
Said the commie, why don't you go make bread instead of jerking off about your utopia made by a neet living of his factory owner sugar daddy. Even the creator of your movement believed that pipe dream of yours could only be realized by leaching on a capitalist society, now go die from starvation.
>More useless and utopian is left wing anarchism :^)
No it isn't. Anarcho-communists create communes, labour unions, and thing like that. On the other hand. no functioning an-cap praxis exist, aside from pure rhetoric.
You are a salty boy, spewing nonsence and petty insults.
Marx' occupation was a scientist philosopher, and he was so successful in it, that noone in the whole human history can match him. Besides that, he made quite a lot of money without even trying from accidental things like gambling at a stock exchange.
Because its a meme Anarchism contradicts Capitalism, how can it be a voluntary society if you're life is dictated and depended on the market and you are forced to work to survive.
>>right wing
yes
>>no taxation
Until you to pay to enter every single road, get 200 insurances etc. which is no different from tax.
>>strong family unions
Not inherently
>>no gibsmedats to niggers
true
>>no rulers
false. The rich or people with the most guns will be the new rulers
>>national security is upheld by nationalistic volunteers
No one will care for the "country" which shouldn't even exist in anarchy
you are forced to work to survive even in nature? Survival is forced upon you, you have to get out there and hunt animals, gather and grow plants? And the capital system is just an extension of that natural order?
Roads are, of course, public. They aren't maintained tho, but this is compensated by the fact that people have more money to buy themselves a nice 4WD that can handle bumps as taxes are lower.
Public healthcare already sucks so why not take insurances instead. Just to make it fair so nobody has to pay 100'000 dollars for single operation as in America.
In Finland there is most guns per capita in Europe after Switzerland. People can rule themselves.
There will be natinalistic men who will uphold security, invading russians would be btfo still.
Hahaha, actually believing that. Only one truth, his influence in history is undeniable. As the inspirator for the biggest purges in human history and the creation of failed states and bankrupt ones. I hope you get your system,and you'll die a slow and painfull death in your utopia. But that wont be a problem in communism, since the only postive outcome is that communists tend to die on mass in the system. So maybe it's not that bad of the system.
I've taken the Azov pill though. Slava Ukraine!
Ansoc advocates for abolishing any central authority and property rights, strengthening unions between people governing each other and participation in direct democracy where everyone gets to decide is more optimal to a society I think. Ancap would just replace government with corporations that constantly rape the peoples bankaccounts, destroy the environment and child labor would be the norm.
when you get coordination problems (when people have to cooperate to build and share resources and infrastructure) all that happens is people comglomerate into units functionally identical to local governments, just less efficient. Its stupid
>tp
>tf
>national security is upheld by nationalistic volunteers
Slava!
Pot and kettle, memeflag.
True but there is no one else taking advantage of you and dictates you're life more than the market does.
reported to roskomnadzor
fag
Because anarchy and technology are not compatible.
>Pot and kettle, memeflag.
Nope.
Some communists and socialists are LARPers, many aren't and get shit done in epic, global proportions, no matter what you think about it. All Ancaps are LARPers who don't lift a finger to try and follow what they preach, not even at their own community scale.
BASED
cringe
I'm a landlord and real estate developer which is the closest thing to an anarcho-capitalist you can be.
First, it is not "right wing". Rosicrucianists and Jacobians both lined up to the left of the King, not the right. It's ideological root is that of the revolutionary enlightenment, and far more similar to Marx's worldview then you're aware.
Second, it's a poorly thought out utopia. The only way to "get rid of govt" would be to eliminate the institution(s) in your society responsible for writing and enforcing the law. Doing this would eliminate private property (No law, no property) and destroy the ability to engage in commerce both locally as well as internationally (why should foreign capital enter a country that has no legal method of retribution?) and thereby destroy your entire economy equal to that of any communist regime.
>B..b..but you're assuming govt. needs to operate the court system, the private sector can fill that role.
Then you haven't removed govt., merely changed its form. The institution that is tasked with the writing and upholding of the law will always be susceptible to the same corruption; your court system for hire would be no different. If it has the power to enforce the law, it is a "govt." entity, no matter how bad you wish to pretend you eliminated it.
>TL;DR
Govt. exists, and will always exist. You may think you are limiting or eliminating govt., but in reality other institutions will merely fill those roles and become "govt" entities in all but name. Case in point: Mainstream media.
>national security is upheld by nationalistic volunteers
this is why
SLAVA KIEVSKOI RUSI, NOVOROSSIYA SOSI!
Patriotism is at least respectable. Xenopatriotism is cringey and disgusting, since it's a cuckoldry in the ultimate form.
>Xenopatriotism
Ukraine is righteous heir of Rus. Fuck Putin and the cucked illegitimate state of RF.
Unless you're a Ukrainian labour migrant. You are an unironic cuckold. This is all.
>>national security is upheld by nationalistic volunteers
do I need to provide my own dorknobs?
>right wing
yeah
>no taxation
It'll just change names to rent
>strong family unions
I can see the logic behind it, an user from a balkan country in war told Jow Forums the state of anarchy that there was and what he did to survive, he had something like 14 family members, decently armed, 2 of them died, the other 12 survived
>no rulers
See image
>national security
>national
>security
>ancap
?????????????????????????????????????????????
when will you fags realize kek knows all
>im a retard and not afraid to show it