he wont win, this is the age of rage not humanism. he cant mobilize anger. in a word: he's civil
He wont win, this is the age of rage not humanism. he cant mobilize anger. in a word: he's civil
Isaac Gomez
Leo Gutierrez
humanism and rage can easily overlap.
#Bernie2020
Nathan Morales
if he gets elected the left will go to sleep, Trump gunpilled the left. he gave us based bikelock professor. lefts militias are on the rise. all that win be lost if that old politician wins.
#MAGA2020
Henry Parker
Meme flag faggots
Anyways, I think he lost a lot of support for cucking, and right now there's a bad taste for socialism, so he won't succeed as much as he did last time around.
Joshua Mitchell
Can a socialist win the election? Do enough lefties want to vote for an old white man? Can he secure the younger vote?
Anthony Ross
hope you're right leaf. feel sorry for all those poor souls who gonna shill for him 24/7 instead of joining RedNeckRevolt and learning how to shoot or joining ANTIFA
this guy threatens to normalize the alt left. and if he wins the right wing militias gonna explode in size. stupid leftist career politician ..... fuck all celebrities
Angel King
>high % of women
kek
Justin Morris
I don't see him having the same level of support as last time, after he took everyone's money and rolled over for Hillary.
Henry Martin
the're a move to left within liberalism. people are going from identity politics bullshit to a critic of capitalism. so yeah, he might win unless the democratic party sabotages his bid by some dirty trick. and Bernie is a cuck, hes not like Trump. Trump threatened to split the Republican Party if they were to undermine him or even lost without dirty tricks.
Bernie is a career politician old dog. he's civil. a cuck
Jose Edwards
Well he cucked to Hilary, I think even his base knows he a shill.
Ryder Campbell
Sanders leads in all polls of lefties and young people. The left unironically care about identity the least.
Zachary Hall
>What then might we expect from conventional politics? Wider swings, ever more volatile, as the center which has already ceased to hold now ceases to exist. We will not be surprised if the next Democratic candidate is to the left of any in our lifetimes, the next Republican after that a contender who makes Trump seem mild. Neither will prove victorious in the sense of providing a political direction. Volatility itself will hold sway, and will not be seized at the ballot box. There is a reason that nearly one hundred million people did not vote in the last US presidential election. One might take that as a sign of ruin, apathy, political defeat. We take it as the opposite. It is a political truth of the moment. All the data agree: non-voters are poorer, younger, less white than their voting peers. In main they are less likely to own homes and tend to lack other forms of investment in the value of property, of stability, of the status quo. This situation can only intensify; our world produces such alienations as if it cannot wait to end.
Matthew Ortiz
Imagine liking Nigger and Trannies, and them also making up most of your base
Adrian Rogers
No, he is a filthy lying hypocrite jew and you are retarded, lmao.
Luke Gomez
ill roll with blacks all day everyday..
make Ferguson nationwide again
youtube.com
Tyler Robinson
he can mobilize retarded socialists like you, just enough to sink the party's chances again. Thanks Bernie bros! Truly Republicans' greatest ally
Carson Jones
yeah that was what the democrats said about Trump in 2016. you people dont get it - you opened Pandora's box with Trump. the gate of political polarization and radicalization is wide open. from now on everything becomes possible. this is our times. the times of EU tanks in the heart of Paris, times of riots, blockades, street clashes between citizens etc..
Jose King
What a dumb kike, niggers are useless. Look what happened to Rhodesia once Ian Smith was forced to resign due to the kikes in the UN.
Zimbabwe became a utter commie shithole
Joseph Smith
Who ever is elected will not matter. As we write states are disarming their citizens and no one speaks out. California leads the way. As California goes, America goes.
Jaxon Hernandez
>And seriously, who wants full employment? On the list of things we might demand, if we believed demands made any sense, this does not even rank. Wage labor is a misery. A democratic collective where you elect the guarantor of your misery is a cruel irony. That you would sacrifice your human capacities toward some productivity level required to keep your “full employment” in the US while the shantytowns of São Paulo molder is…still a misery, north to south. And yet this is the admirably humble program of democratic socialism at present. Its essence is “radical democracy,” per one of its leading lights, Bhaskar Sunkara, but not too democratic. We’d still work under conditions of market competition and all that entails. It would be “state-regulated,” but what can this mean? Competitive markets can only imply that your firm must be more productive than the next one over, compelling your boss—democratically chosen or not—to make you work harder or else to replace you with a machine. Still, we are promised the glorious horizon of “a world where people have the freedom to reach their potentials, whatever the circumstances of their birth.” Equality of individual opportunity! It is a rousing claim; you might recognize it from capitalism, that being its best-known selling point.
Chase Allen
>expecting socialists to put in work to get you elected
In theory they will be mobilized, but in practice they are busy getting HRT injections
Xavier Hernandez
>he won't win he can't win
>he might win
>he won
so much cope
Chase Nelson
>too left for corporatist neo liberal war hawks
>too cucked for radicals and progressives
>90 years old
He won't win. He'd have a chance if he didn't lick Hillary's boots in 2016. But he did, and now everyone saw him for the weakling he is.