1. Your cunt

How would you classify the victory of the allies? Can we call it a pyrrhic victory? The result was certainly a massive drawback that lasted for at least 50 years. And culturally, did they win it culturally? Global culture vs Folk culture, the latter beats the first in creativity and diversity, while global is more concentrated and powerful.

1. USA.
2. If no war had happened that would have been better.

Attached: patton-1a.jpg (448x302, 70K)

Althistory book. Maybe Hellfire.

I think everyone realizes by now that the wrong side won. Not a single shitskin would be on European soil today if Germany won that war.

I don't want the slavs to be exterminated and enslaved, so I can't accept a world where Hitler and his awful racial policies won

Attached: 1458869851558.gif (276x252, 585K)

>he believes the Generplan ost meme
Why are people so BLUEPILLED. It literally does not exist

Attached: 1538789335481.png (846x343, 37K)

Have you even read mein kampf, mutt? He wanted to end the slavization of Austria, not slavs themselves. Complete strawman used by kikes, unfortunately with some success.

1.blind cuck
2.Germany

100% THIS.

Nazi Germany is the obvious answer. Our final salvation.

Attached: 1550306990877.jpg (1024x828, 143K)

Hitler never ONCE written or said he hates slavs, not even once

Attached: 1544560117195.jpg (4000x2700, 1.14M)

Sometimes i watch around me and think; this can't be for real, the nazis didn't lose. Those behind the war was the same players, those with the most influence and power in this world. It is all a big charade to make us volkish and create a tausendjährig reich. Are the nazis even relevant for what they wanted to create from the beginning? To make Europe rule the world completely.

Attached: nato.jpg (260x193, 9K)

You're in denial. Hitler's lebensraum was one of his core values.

>1. Your cunt.
Sorry, I have a benis
>2. Would you prefer that Germany won the war or the americans?
Obviously Germany.

Attached: 1548454287747.jpg (728x5262, 1.35M)

Much better if the burgers didn't enter the euro theater early
>Pearl Harbor
>US goes full force in the pacific
>liberates (conquers) asia, occupy Japan
>Nazis stall; lock down mainland europe except bongland
>Soviets gets agitated, demand more share of euro clay
>Burgers don't trust either of them
>enter Cold War with 3 superpowers

I'm gonna copy this from another thread

>Generalplan Ost would probably be the biggest colonisation plan in history, considering the fact that they’d need to deport millions of people beyond the Urals for slave labour, exterminate the non-Aryan Slavs and keep the Aryan Slavs as Germanised citizens. This would be a plan that could take several decades as well, with what would be a constant back and forth procedure of bringing people from the East into the West to build up the Central European part of the Reich and vice versa. Such a huge plan and yet there’s no documentation at all that this is what was planned. How convenient...

Yeah, he would exterminate all Slavs in the same nonexistent Jew extermination camps.

So you're just another jew trying to d&c and make sure slavs don't pursue the third position, gotcha

Germany couldn't have won. All they could hope for is getting the Brits (lol), USA (Lol) to agree to a ceasefire (wew lad) so they could beat the USSR (lmao) whilst also having no fuel and a burned and bombed out industry that focused on superfluous tigers and jet interceptors (Oh no no no).

Firstly cite me the source that they were going to make the slav into slaves, and then consider that there a large part of those who lived in those parts were german. You would still have had a very large part of the world after that, be larger than China, the largest country in the world. Hitler drew up the borders based on historical claims of land. When one country becomes your enemy and others nations have a claim to it, you are actually entitled to take over that land with force according to the principles.

Attached: default.jpg (729x572, 82K)

You're correct, they just fled to america and south america

Who had the most power before the war? England. It's not like they are retards and suddenly wants to give away all control of their global empire. It stagnated, the problem was that you could not integrate and make the population grow or something in that direction. They decided to fund a nationalist, to combat the eastern threat, while acting like they was against it. The Royal family of England is from Hannover isn't it? What most fail to understand is that global politics is very intertwined and that the most common thing is to say something and do otherwise.

Attached: Royal_family_group_1896.jpg (2497x3291, 948K)

1. India
2. Germany
The pacifists (((gandhi))) fucked up a lot. The Indian National Army was already working with Japan and Germany.

Redpill me on Gandhi. Who were in charge before him for instance?

>the Americans

Attached: E46D9AAD-3D9E-4C9D-8CF2-A1AE7496F0B0.jpg (337x337, 38K)

1. Flag
2. Germany

But really I'd prefer that all aid sent to USSR was sent to the German Eastern Front instead.
We were always going to fight Japan over rights to the Pacific Ocean but I don't think Hitler would declare war on us if we were aiding them instead of the Soviets.

Attached: 1549992650787.jpg (530x398, 36K)

>implying the USSR wasn't an american/british jew/anglo attack dog that got put down after the war

Germany
I would prefer there would not have been a war

Are you Turkish irl?

Gandhi was a british stooge for a very long time. Its unfortunate but the real heroes who fought and pressurized the british never get the full credit.
Gandhi actively tried to hinder operations of major figures such as Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.
Even Jinnah who was the founding father of Pakistan supported the real fighters while Gandhi tried his best to crush them (One of the major reasons why he was assassinated)

One of the main reason why Jinnah (Had the support of almost all the Muslims at the time) even wanted a separate nation as because he didn't trust Gandhi.
Its mostly all propaganda that you hear about Gandhi.

Wow, Now That's What I Call Controversial, Volume 10!

Yeah, he was red as fuck. But everything for its time, one day your people will grow out of the poverty and be very powerful.

Let me give some real facts not propaganda here. If Germany had won, they would have rebuild the factories after the war. But US came at the end, and destroyed every single factories around here "in case" the enemy would get to them. And they kept blowing buildings even when Germany was on the verge of capitulation. Why ? because the US knew this was now or never, this was the perfect opportunity to get rid of the mighty Europe, which ruled for millennia and colonized the earth. So they destroyed it to the ground, and after the war they came like saviors with the marshal plan to make us eternally in debt. After that, they continued to act like warmongers to "free" other countries (ahem oil ahem).
If Germany had won, I'm not sure the world would be worse than it is today, but at least there would still be factories instead of ruins and museums.

Aka not winning ww1.

*assassinated
Call me when new swabia actually comes.

You forgot that they internated and made 5 million germans die in peacetime. The most passionate, the most nazi, the best built with the blondest hair, they killed. And then we have not even counted in what the USSR did.

1.occupied ZOG territory
2.Germany

USA
I'd have preferred wed not gotten involved at all. Without US support Britain would have negotiated a peace with in a few months of Dunkirk.

You were maybe the ones who began the war behind the scenes. Muh niggers.

Jews did.
Go against the banks and freeing your people war is inevitable. Look how many leaders died who dropped the dollar or went hell with the banks.

Britain
Yes

This.

But can we agree that russia achieved more than US in terms of production, tabk design and militsry effectivness considering tgeir starting population and production capacity

If you just knew.. how it really is. Haha, i think it actually would blow you out of the chair.

US
Germany

Sorry gramps

What actually happened then

>country
Denmark, obviously. What kind of question is that on a board that has geo-based flags?
>WWII
Germany. We were on amicable terms with them despite the occupation.

Typing it, saying it, you would take me for a lunatic, because there is nothing in your world that you can relate towards.

oh, you're a worthless stupid animal, it's sad that i replied to your cutdick brain damaged thread.
and everyone else is just as fucking stupid and useless as you

WW3 can't come fast enough to wipe you all out

That was just a troll post to make the russian angry and attract righteous americans.

1. America
2. Reichzeit, bitte

Attached: 4thReich.png (1000x666, 16K)

Lurk more before you post your brainlet opinion here

You're a brainlet if you think slavs would live along side Germans in their new territory.

>Hitler wanted different peoples to live together on the same territory
yep, literally a brainlet

Learn English and reading comprehension before you post here

>Would you prefer that Germany won the war or the americans?
Both lost the war.

A world where Germany won cannot be worse than this.

1. US
2. Germany

what "new" territory are you talking about, tard?

1) Nationalist Spain
2) We should have helped out recovering from Civil war or not.

Fuck off Russian bot

Germany

Germany knew what was going on in the world at the time

Fun fact: according to a poll taken immediately after Germany's surrender 57% of people in France believed that the USSR contributed the most to the victory. 20% said it was the USA. But when asked a similar question in 2018, 56% chose the USA and only 15% chose the USSR. Goes to show to what extent America has dominated every type of media throughout the West over these 70 years.

Also 50% of Brits said it was the UK (in the 2018 poll). Cringeworthy.

Id prefer if america won the war, but that Hitler survives and gets a redemption arc

Source? Not saying you're wrong, but having actual data to throw into burger faces would be nice.

We shouldve not taken sides with the russians and after the krauts got fucked we should've nuked moscow. We shouldve taken japan, germany and parts of russia as rewards for our contributions.

Yes!

There was an image of that circulating all over the internet i'd love to see it again too so i could save it for the same reason

if our country had any balls it at the time we should've taken over the world. or the parts that mattered at least

Canada
Germany.

england
no war

Attached: causes of ww2.png (481x695, 402K)

bluepilled kangaroo

my nigga hitler shoulda taken the W

1. United Kingdom
2. Hitler did not want war with the UK, he wanted a community of nations with germanic blood. I would have loved for Germany to win, preserving the British Empire and allowing white nationalism to rise.

1.flag
2.croatia, i wish we developed nukes so we could bomb the shit out of berlin, washington and especially moscow

1. Canada
2. Japan winning and turning on Germany after the Allies were vanquished

At least Japan didn't allow foreigners to flood their country in the long run

That's a kiwi dumbass.

>flag
>Germany

LEARN YOUR FLAGS IDIOT!

LOOK AT THE BRIT'S FACE

Nobody appreciates the kike.

No war is ideal - but I'm sure you'd want the lebensraum and other necessary reclamations to undo Versailles?

1) Bavaria
2) I'm glad America won

Attached: germany poland.jpg (1024x2836, 500K)

Cucked. Poland is not comparable, how could you attribute everything to migrants?
Germany today has passed nearly all its effective power to the EU, within a few decades "Germany" won't exist, it will be a region. Mark my words. And then you will want the Fuhrer back.

>within a few decades "Germany" won't exist, it will be a region

Good.

Attached: eu superstate.jpg (800x420, 64K)

1flag
2 yes

Nice, instead of a community of nations you want globalism, because that's what the EU entails. The Anglo-American establishment ran by Jews who are, in the long term, pursuing a Utopia, one that will take great bloodshed to achieve.

The Globalists are using migrants to drop labour costs, its got nothing to do with racial equality, rich and intelligent people at the top don't care about that. It's about centralization, manpower, and ultimately a white/Jewish agenda way down the line. Probably. In effect you are supporting a different version of Hitler.

You wan't your grandchildren to live in a muslim country?

Germany should have won. I mean, I think that it's pretty obvious when you look at society today.

What is that second picture? Berlin was still a bunch of rubble piles 10 years after the war. It definitely didn’t look like that.