16 States sueing over border wall

yes they do. It's a big waste of taxpayer dollars

So basically the founding fathers foresaw the npc meme.

Judges cant stop the US Military. Some of this will be under National Defense.

There are only 4 border states. So a minimum of 12 of those states suing have no basis to sue.
Time to stop their Federal funding.

Are these the same twelve states that use the most cocaine and slave labor?

I mean this sincerely and unironically, this is an act of war against the United States and the people who collaborate with it are committing treason. If the Democrats, RINOs, and media won't allow Trump to defend the country and the border, then a civil war is inevitable, because this is crossing a non-negotiable red line that at least half of Americans simply will not allow to be crossed. Whites becoming a minority in this country is completely unacceptable and an existential threat to us and our families, that we will not allow to be realized, at least so long as non-whites overwhelmingly hold a mentality of racial resentment, vindictiveness, disrespect for the rule of law, and redistributive/socialist politics.

Bring it
Laws on our side
Once it’s past the lib courts it’s over

How the hell can a state the wall wouldn't even be in sue over it?

>led by California

Attached: 1550203948070.png (900x900, 314K)

The SCOTUS will shut the orange man down because Roberts will vote with the liberals. He’s already said that he will vote with them in all cases where the democracy is threatened. It’s over ‘pedes, just roll over and piss yourself.

Fuck off larp lord. The court will shut your dick breath boomer down hard.

>If he can prove the funds are coming from emergency sources like the Pentagon or other Agencies and thus not violating Congress’ right to allocate spending, California has no case.

Some quick notes on early coverage of President Trump's announcement that pretty much all reporters are missing

The WH did not make one executive action today. In reality they made three, only one of which involved an emergency declaration.

First the WH announced they would be funding $601 million in wall construction from the Treasury Forfeiture Fund, relying on 31 U.S.C. § 9705. This does not require an emergency declaration.

Second, the WH announced they would be funding $2.5 billion in wall construction under 10 U.S.C. § 284 (this is MilCon $ for combating drug trafficking). This does not require an emergency declaration.

Finally, the WH announced they would be funding $3.6 billion under 10 U.S.C. § 2808. This money does require an emergency declaration.

According to the WH this money will be spent sequentially so the § 9705 money will be spent first then the § 284 money then the § 2808 money.

So depending on how fast they can begin construction, they will have to spend over $5 billion (including the $1.3 billion in fencing appropriations) before any of the emergency money is ever tapped.

The “emergency” funds may not be tapped till the other, less controversial funds are depleted. Plaintiffs may not have standing to challenge the diversion of “emergency” funds till those funds are in fact allocated."

Law suits will be dismissed without merit/standing until the emergency funding is used…

lawfareblog.com/how-congress-and-president-obama-made-trumps-wall-possible

They can't sue him until he starts using the funding afforded to him by the emergency declaration. They jumped the gun LMAO

Attached: wall.png (994x1125, 623K)

why is the none issue of making a wall being dragged around?
Its like Trump only makes walls while being president...

LAWSUITS GO TO SUPREME COURT. RBG IS DEAD.

Holy fuck. Thanks OP I think I'm a Bernie supporter now.

Trumpfags btfo

Will this trigger another civil war?

Yes, but it's yet another litigious jewish delay tactic

>led by cuckifornia
what a surprise

Attached: 1530428438361.jpg (225x225, 7K)

At least California is actually in the border, the fuck is up with these 15 virtue signaling cuck states? Why don’t they mind their damn business

Nah, but a lot of Jew lawyers will get rich. #MIGA

god i get legit fucking angry when i see
>EXPLAINED
>WHAT IS THIS AND WHY DOES IT MATTER?
fuck off

>lead by california
someone prick that faggot governor with an aids needle already, wasn't it legalized?

Attached: 1194012978972.gif (320x287, 982K)

is AZ, NM, or TX on that list? Cuckfags up north shouldn't have much say on the matter other than taxes. CA only has 7% of the border anyways

Let me ask you.

Why don't workers vote for their CEO?
Why don't soldiers vote for their general?

When you realize this but see how suddenly we can vote for our head of state, you realize there's a huge contradiction.

>Why don't soldiers vote for their general?
Sometimes they do, even pick the emperor.

>Why don't workers vote for their CEO?
Bad CEO can make all the people worth their pay quit

Every republican foresaw it. That's why voting rights used to be tied to property ownership in most republics. Democracy is just tyranny of the masses

Knowingly infecting someone else with HIV is no longer a felony there, so do it Califags. The worst you'll get is a misdemeanor

No, California is the only state on the southern border doing this.

Based Principles of 98. Tap rack bang.

youtube.com/watch?v=Oj0nqDs-iWg

Attached: image.jpg (700x1033, 250K)

They can say the tax money they've gathered is going for something they don't agree with, however all trump has to do is prove he's not using their money for it, which he's not.

Yep

New Mexico will join in soon. They were the first state to recall the National Guard from the border.

>defending the borders threatens democracy

Sounds like a repeat of the SCOTUS upholding the travel ban, which is consistent with the Constitution supporting the Executive's duty to protect the nation's integrity

Faggot.

Attached: 1438571254732.jpg (393x393, 18K)

hahahahahahahahaahahahhahaha

Alta California and Nuevo Mejico, my sons are always based, we never forget you.

Attached: Spanish commonwealth.png (863x443, 161K)

Are you really Finnish? It's odd to think that a European knows so much about American politics. For instance I don't even know the name of any counties or states or whatever you guys have in Finland

are any of those states on the borders?

Noice.

Attached: 1414665096893.gif (300x237, 2.66M)

Attached: Dzl8MR_WkAA8CmF.jpg large.jpg (1583x2048, 546K)

That argument also falls apart considering that California is now wasting $3.5 billion in federal funds to build a high-speed rail to nowhere, just to spite Trump

this will go to the supreme court this was a waste of time trump will win

If you actually manage to hold a piece of former American territory just what do you think is going to happen?

Attached: merica1.gif (659x609, 2.49M)

>being surprised that other countries pay attention to the politics of the most powerful nation on Earth
What we do has effects on everyone else. American politics are also extremely entertaining to watch

Powerful.

Attached: 1318653778445.jpg (500x500, 34K)

>I'm suing you, REEEEEEEEEE
It's over, they've lost, they know they've lost, at this point it's just delusional arm flailing.

Liberals
>where is trumps wall it's like hes not even trying
Same liberals
>actively stopping him from building the wall

Attached: 1307067680372.png (492x327, 189K)

>It's odd to think that a European knows so much about American politics.
I get my news from Jow Forums

Attached: almost_enjoying_my_anger.jpg (245x204, 15K)

kys shill rat

Attached: u455XgQ.jpg (450x319, 38K)

it's everyone's tax dollars that are going to be pulled to fund the wall, so it makes sense that non-border states are joining.

wrong gif some desert kike edited

Attached: merica3.gif (659x609, 1.63M)

Reminds me of that old Penguindrum meme youtube.com/watch?v=Koh04eht6Bo

this is the plan and was obviously going to happen.

at the end of the day the supreme court is going to decide this case. the supreme court will either allow the wall to be built or will not.

The States don't have any right to undermine Federal control over foreign relations, immigration, and naturalization. In general, federal courts do not even have the authority to review legislative and executive policy on these matters except with the utmost deference, as a hundred years of Constitutional jurisprudence makes it absolutely clear that this is an area of decidedly political questions, not judicial ones.

A suit like this also requires a party with standing - that is, a party that has actually been harmed or faces imminent harm by the government's alleged unlawful policy - to bring it, or it is void from the start. How exactly can 16 states claim that they stand to be harmed by a couple hundred miles of wall built out in the desert on the federally-controlled national border?

Any first-year law student taking their first Con Law class could tear this suit apart off the top of their head while being cold called during a lecture. These people are blatantly counting on an activist judge to act far outside their authority and severely disrupt the lawful separation of powers.

This is trash. Inexcusable trash.

Attached: 1543931931201.jpg (778x1018, 140K)

>9th circuit says no
>Supreme Court says yes
>RGB dies

>RGB
Is this a meme, or are people just retarded?

>>Supreme Court says yes

You mean RGB's 23 year old staffer says yes?

OH NO

4D chess.

>Ruth Gader Binsberg

>Why don't workers vote for their CEO?
Technically he's there by shareholder approval.

> Why don't soldiers vote for their general?
You're onto something, but during the Boer war, the Boers voted for theirs too.

I agree with you btw.

And paying 1 trillion a year to spics and niggers isn’t?

Oh and it's from Lawfare. That's one of the most anti-Trump sites who actively work to undermine him.

Almost as if the national emergency is just theater.

Workers vote for board members or directors. Directors select Officers. It is republicanism.
same thing for generals.
We don't live in a direct democracy

It only blocks about 3.5 billion from the military budget of the 8 billion he has moved for the wall.

The rest cant be blocked on legal grounds.

>only 2 states on the border
>the rest are fellow commie states that follow California
>"LOOK, 16 OF US ARE ANGRY!"

>Shareholders vote for board members or directors.

ftfy

Interdimensional Parcheesi?

Tear down the current wall on California's southern border and use the material to extend the wall across it's eastern and northern border.

Attached: 679671ea3704dcaa5e628f5486d36cb0.jpg (500x482, 49K)

Hows it going (((circle)))

Attached: 1550626106930.png (768x768, 21K)

its gonna be funny when the opinions literally cite build the wall chants at trump's campaign rallies

the infustracture would slip into some decay, every sector of the economy would be run less efficiently, and crime and cartel presence would skyrocket. It would really just be a waste, because there is no way in hell Mexico could run any US soil as safe and efficiently as US citizens and the government does.

This is why the democrats don't want a wall.

Attached: futuredemocrat.png (455x447, 216K)

>lead by california
Based. Feels good leading the fight against tyranny and zion don. Any Calibros know this feel?

Attached: 1525782975189.jpg (1120x744, 302K)

The current Court goes 7-2 on this sort of thing, user. Immigration questions are decidedly Political.

Which would be a good argument if the EC didn't exist. As far as observable reality is concerned, read a fucking book.

Attached: Bruce Campbell XD.png (861x90, 6K)

this is cool and fuels my life boner

we have a winner, the military already saved $25 billion for the wall

GOD DAMN IT TRUMP YOU SHOULD HAVE DONE THIS AS SOON AS YOU HAD THE COURT, DAY ONE. WE CAN'T WAIT FOR THE COURT TO DRAG ITS FEET

Attached: krusty.jpg (500x375, 14K)

Why am i expected to get alone with garbage like this? Mirder needs to be legalized. Some people just dont know when to shut up.

Attached: Grab them by the.png (500x793, 185K)

This is what the fuck I come here for.

When the fuck will the race war start? I want to go on a suicide mission into the ghetto.

All it takes is defeating one of these suits in court, then issuing an injunction nullifying most, if not all, of the rest.

Attached: 1543024236167.jpg (407x500, 44K)

Ill splatter your fucking babies brains on the concrete.

It’s not even clever or anything.

Wow totally unexpected.
You mean Trump delayed construction of the wall only until the point where doing so would mean it would be delayed past 2020?
Get out of here. I am shocked.
Oh, and what's that, do you mean to say that since the people suing him have no standing to do so he could ignore them entirely and go ahead with building?
Well that's good, right?
Oh. Oh, what do you mean Trump is going to put everything on hold anyway - okay he never started to begin with but you know what I mean.
Its almost as if Trump doesn't give a single fuck about securing the border, and is only using the issue to appeal to his most desperate, lowest iq supporters.
Because anyone with half a brain? They already know Trump is a fag enabling liberal who sold his children to kikes and his entire country to Israel.

It's going to be the US military in part. No court controls national defense.

They can't do anything. Literally can't. Trump has executive power and the American president can be a tyrant only in time of extreme need. They cannot sue the hand that feeds them. They cannot and those who make the laws will stop them. It's over liberals its over.