The biggest societal crisis in the West is the lack of stable marriages

Especially clever women compete for an ever dwindling pool of successful, educated men. If the solution is not to have then lower their standards, what is the solution?

Attached: 93198F6F-EC87-4AD3-B009-2A1FEB8EAFF7.jpg (1348x1078, 270K)

Other urls found in this thread:

telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/10249494/Why-boys-are-better-at-exams-according-to-Oxford-University-chief.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

polygyny

>educated
You spelt indoctrinated wrong. Women are good for nothing other than having kids

sage

>Implying that having a degree in feewings means you are "clever"

yes it does

If they wont adjust their standards to reality they wont find any man. Simple really.

>Bitches being picky
They cause their own pain

depends on the degree and school.

It's been well documented that women do poorly overall when courses are judged on a few assignments, but do better when there is busy work to pad their grade.

The number of men who are really succesful and are educated is not dwindling at all, its just they refuse to settle with a woman and remain monogamous; using their status to get more pussy. The old way to deal with this issue (since high class women existed prefeminism too) is arranged marriages, you marry intelligent women with even more intelligent men and the supply will always exist if the culture permits it

It literally does.

If you think polygamy is the answer, that's a recipe to just create societies where you have huge pools of men with a lot less to lose and they're shitholes.

Pretty ironic that patriarchy is clearly the more equitable choice after all the propaganda we're fed.

Ach, Hans...

You may want to look up the word clever.

>You spelt indoctrinated wrong
You spelled spelled wrong.

1590, William Shakespeare, Love's Labour's Lost, v 1

Yes, yes; he teaches boys the hornbook. What is a, b, spelt / backward with the horn on his head?

>what is the solution?
for women to stop trying to impress everyone, especially their friends

State has to do an active effort to make sure boys raised by single moms don’t become losers. That will mean a higher marriage percentage later, a higher amount of kids being born etc.

But to fix the problem you need to adress it first. We like a no child left behind policy, but for boys in social context.

>educated
>can't solve a simple romance conundrum

I don't think you know what that words means.

Attached: inigo_montoya.jpg (200x194, 5K)

>Whan that aprill with his shoures soote
>The droghte of march hath perced to the roote,
>And bathed every veyne in swich licour
>Of which vertu engendred is the flour;
Guess this Chaucer shit is all legit spelling nao too.

>give more authority in child raising to the state
>oh yeah, we'll make them WINNERS

Attached: 1549009348908.jpg (666x666, 148K)

>what is the solution?
There's no solution because there's no problem.

Citation?

Geoffrey Chaucer:
Died October 25, 1400

William Shakespeare:
Died April 23, 1616

>don't lower your standards, goyette. You don't have to be happy and fulfil your primal, biological desire to fit in a family and have children
this is so stupid. Men are maimed with money and women are maimed with promiscuity and independence, neither of which will make them happy, because we're not designed to be happy because of those things.

how is it clever if you put your own survival last for a "career" that wont give you anything back ?
Career women are pretty much the biggest idiots, since they let themselves get brainwashed to give up their biggest leverage in Society, for something worth nothing

Problem of educated and succeeding women is that their education and career does nothing to increase their value in dating market.
Men they conaider to be in their league will rather just marry younger women.

The solution is to stop educating them. Not only does it delay motherhood, it lowers the available pool of attractive men for her (women don't marry down)

back to the death camps, Kowalski

Why do women think men are intimidated by their intelligence? Do they know how silly that sounds?

Imagine if a body builder who couldn't find a girlfriend decided that women are just intimidated by his large muscles.

Maybe the reason why these women can't find partners has nothing to do with their education. After all, when was the last time you met a man who even cared about some chicks job and educational attainments?

Abolish the fed. If you abolish the fed, there wont be free college money and less women will go to college. Also if you abolish the fed there wont be as much government bureaucracy which disproportionately attracts women.

Women should be allowed to enjoy Tyrone’s ample cock and also have the helpful house husband to do the emotional support (he doesn’t have a name)

Attached: A5B31C8C-E9BC-4E0B-8BC0-C4E5162C9410.jpg (479x600, 76K)

well, taking away a Boy from a single mother getting him into an Internat and raising him in a Military style honestly wouldnt be that bad
just think about a quarter of the youth being educated in old fashioned work ethic and getting Jow Forums

This.
Single mothers raise only criminals and single mothers.

your soldiers are guarding them for your masters. I don't need to be there.
Also it will never fulfill them completely. They were lied to. Working women - more people to tax and bigger control over your children, when they're at work. I'm not against women working or having career, but if it + cock carousel consumes all their time, they dig their own graves

"Educated" is not an attractive trait for female. Are they young, healthy, fertile and well-behaved? I really doubt so, so man who wants to marry has to look elsewhere. If one needs someone educated, he can go consult with some specialist or some shit like that.

Its women that don't fucking understand they can't be a mom and have a booming career at the same time!!

There's only 24 hours in a day.

>more people to tax and bigger control over your children, when they're at work
this a thousand times, if you see the Kind of "work" most of them perform and call a career
Industry had to invent a lot of paper pusher positions just to Keep them busy
they made careers out of things nobody in history would ever consider work

>what is the solution?
I think you already know what that is, the final solution...

>being a know-it-all empowered NPC
>hurts relationships
who knew...

Career women are genetic dead ends. They won't learn anything, but to shekel until they're barren.

>Why do women think men are intimidated by their intelligence?
Because it makes them feel good about being lonely.

If they value career/prestige/money more than love, then be it. But don't blame men for avoiding such women.
Also you shouldn't blame women for avoiding you, if you put more effort into your vidya, porn and drugs, than in a relationship.
To each his own.

This. It's women thinking unironically
>tfw too smart

Because they're not really talking about intelligence or education. They're talking about money. You know this because it's never some midwestern public school teacher with a masters making 40k/yr who's having trouble getting married. It's always some coastal "consultant" making well into 6 figures.

No doubt if you wanted to date these women they'd still want you to pay for everything and they're not going to want to go out to Taco Bell. Your 45k/yr making ass is going to have to start working overtime.

No one takes my suggestion seriously.
Women already share Chads for dating/hookups. Allowing them to share them for marriage as well is the next logical step. It's not ideal but it would be better than what is going on how (low birth rates, single motherhood, etc).

Attached: 1541395582214.jpg (331x331, 51K)

imagine how many more migrants you could support with the money taken from army of civil servants. A thing to consider.
Poland s keeping an army of those as well. And their work is utterly pointless. I could provide countless examples, cause I personally know people who work as civil servants.

Women aren't intelligent. They're dedicated, there's a difference. I've never actually met a single intelligent life in my entire life. Not even joking.

Attached: 1550653044517.jpg (402x813, 146K)

Yeah, the "tfw too smart" meme is definitely a chick thing

Attached: tfwTooSmart.jpg (767x878, 334K)

>No one takes my suggestion seriously.
that's' because you're canadian, and your suggestion was so utterly stupid and cuckish, that even Jow Forumsacks didn't take the bait and would rather pretend they didn't see it

Your suggestion was shit for reasons that should be obvious to you, which was why it's ignored.

This is how you get a real beta uprising. Monogamy is a huge stabilizing factor in society. 100 million men who can't drain their balls are going to fuck shit up.

It's honestly more about male's status, educated women are not interested in lowly educated men making good money from a trade.
They want husband who is superior to them both economically and in social ladder.

>imagine how many more migrants you could support
id rather buy a bit of delousing gas from the leftover money

I want a man who is more educated and makes more money than me.
But I also want equal pay and education as men.
So I will spend years increasing my education and salary.
Which results in me shrinking my own pool of eligible partners.
And at the same time lowering my own value to men who want young fertile wives.
Why can't I find love? I am so educated but can't figure it out.

Doesn’t matter, if they are better educated than you they not only earn more but are on a higher level socially than you

No woman will marry a guy lower than him socioeconomically

Terrible idea, this will just increase the disparity between upper class elites and working class people outside the cities

This
telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/10249494/Why-boys-are-better-at-exams-according-to-Oxford-University-chief.html

I don't see any alternative though if women don't want to settle. Or if the marriage is unstable if they do try to settle.
Polygyny at least minimizes damage.
Vidyas and waifus could be enough to prevent a beta uprising.

I spent years dating educated career women. I switched to a trad girl who adores the shit out of me and never looked back.

Because it's a really fucking stupid idea, only being able to marry one person is a pretty big factor in what helped move us forward as a civilization because it motivates men to do more stuff - rather than sitting on their arse all day if all the women are already taken.

I'm certain polygamy would just lead to successful men building harems of nubile babes, the career-roasties would remain mostly unmarried.

>Putting up with multiple bitches shit
Sounds terrible for everything except the group sex.

My mom left my dad because of Oprah, and she used to be like "I won't settle for someone that's less intelligent or less successful than I am", and me being like 15 was like ok mom that's cool why not
Fastforward 5 years and she shacked up with a married man with literal hepatitis C who was balls deep in debt and had a string of failed marriages. My dad was a band director and a really good guy who later died from giving up after the divorce rape and ensuing (((child support))) that they hit him with, while my mom kept like everything good they had built together and left him with all the debt.
Shit's fucked up beyond belief, and my mom's not a typical roastie (well maybe she is). She's got 2 master's degrees, generally woke on race and IQ, hates welfare leeches, Christian, etc, but she is an absolute piece of shit as all women are when left to their own devices.
I hate her so much.

This is kind of a chicken-egg situation but I'd say that a low status high net worth individual is going to have an easier time pairing off than a high status low net worth individual.

If you're a millionaire hanging out in realm of 30k/yr pussy you might as well be a god. You could line up 30k/yr pussy for days and never run out. High status people are going to run a credit check on your broke ass and never call you back.

In a sane world your mother would have been stoned to death.

like in saudia arabia? based abdul

Yeah the most valuable men would mostly want harems of young women, but there's only so many of them.
The next tier of men would have to compromise.
Generally speaking, polygyny lowers the amount of available women for men, and vastly expands women's options.

The problem is that these women think that education makes them more valuable partners, whilst in practice it is often the other way around. The primary thing that women bring to the table is their youth; young women are able to have many healthy children and young women are usually attracted to older men, which means that older men typically have the option to choose younger women.

This is not necessarily bad for educated women, because it means that they can find an older partner who will provide for them when they are still studying. The problem is that they usually don't. Most people who are in college don't think about settling down yet, so college women are not inclined to seek serious relationships and instead casually date others, usually their peers.

This means that the more education a woman has, the later she will start seriously looking for a husband, because more education means more years spent in college. Which means that they will be less youthful and have to compete against more youthful women. Career women think that if they are 35 and have a house and a stable income they will be able to find a good partner, but that only works for men, not for women.

F for dad

>what is the solution to a shortage of eligible men
You won't need to demand eligible men when they're all dead.

Attached: le thinking black man.jpg (600x494, 30K)

das rite mohammed

Women choose who they fuck, men choose who they marry; change the marriage/divorce laws or shut the absolute fuck up and watch civilization burn

Nah spelt is an English spelling.

Women sit around universities gasping at "white privilege" and cheering for all of the affirmative action and mass migration. Since they push policies geared towards making western nations impoverished and stripping white men of any financial future, if they want the marriage thing, then they'd better be accepting of the lower standards inevitable within society.

The solution is to realize that by rejecting family, they already lowered their standards a low as it goes.

Modern marriage is a dead farce, however. It was always a property contract and women will never ever go back to it meaningfully barring sexbot competition or some other form of objectively superior waifu competition.

If shes so smart why cant she find a husband?

Doesnt sound too smart to me haha

Attached: le happy merchant.jpg (582x434, 18K)

Lol my girlfriend graduated from fucking Duke and the other day I got her to admit she doesn’t read (other than work, is a Professor) she’s hot as fuck but won’t play me at chess because she knows I will win

Make higher education less accessible. Create special courses in schools for girls in housework.

because "educated woman" usually means "obnoxiously opinionated, pretentious, ego-driven bitch"

Chads don't want shit second hand roasties for their wives. Okay? If anything they'll marry someone more educated and wealthy than them and just fuck around because they know they can.

My thoughts exactly. If they're not already married by the time they're 30 they're dead.

>Educated
>Doctorate in Feminist Dance Therapy Theoretical Psychology
Yes, totally educated.

Make divorce close to impossible, ban abortion across the board and make it punishable by prison time, and get rid of affirmative action recruiting.

Even doing one of these will go a long way.

Attached: American future.jpg (808x1024, 100K)

Sucks man, thanks for sharing. This probably plays out more than we think.

>arranged marriages
TERRIBLE idea

Do you really think having a marriage arranged is going to stop women from slutting it up before they're married, and cheating afterwards?

This only benefits the woman, the man will still lose half his shit in a divorce. At least if you choose who to marry, judge poorly, and lose your stuff it's on you - I would flip my shit if the same scenario played out except instead of my own poor judgement it's some uncle trading me off so he can get a promotion at work, and I have no recourse.

I honestly dont care for them, theres nothing less attractive than a woman over 30yo who is career driven.

>but they shouldn't have to lower their standards
Then there's only 2 options:
1) Bring in more successful men from foreign countries. This would be a very horrific form of neocolonialism and the brain drain would ruin many poor countries.
OR
2) Do whatever is possible for men to do better than women without harming women.

Since we all know the leftists won't support the latter idea, its obvious that they're just using this as justification to steal intelligent men from foreign countries. Such an act is worse than merely stealing the wealth of such nations.

No, the crisis is that you've transformed life into a careerist hell for men and women

isnt love all about inner values?
apparently, its all about the $$$ for cunts after all, eh?!

>all about the $$$
Nah it's also about status.

There is old saying.
If you want to be a general's wife, marry a lieutenant.

>more successful men from foreign countries
Will not opt for these bitches.

good one ivan

This is why I invested in cat food and cheap wine companies.

>educated
>women
What's going on here?

Attached: WomenAtWork.jpg (1200x630, 143K)

The problem with this mindset is that if a woman is a 10/10, has a good career and makes lots of money, then there simply is no man nor has there even been or will be that will live up to her standards. It would have to be some greek god-looking, ruler of the universe type with a vibrating cock the size of your forearm - preferably two of them, and you don't find many of those.

And let's not forget the fact that when this kind of woman is done playing career and decide they want to have children they're most likely closing in on forty years old. The handsome, educated, big-cocked chads with a thick wallet will most likely go for a model with less mileage.

>for a "career" that wont give you anything back ?
career gives status & money which = status.
self-esteem is #1 for woman. if she thinks she is high value because she has X now, then she will put of Y of the future because it may harm X.
marriage and kids puts career at risk, so they won't risk losing what they have, even though the future value of that career will diminish and future value of kids will rise.
they find out too late to do anything about it.


>Why do women think men are intimidated by their intelligence?
it's a valid point. you can easily find a woman who has been on a date where the guy has shown signs of being intimidated by the woman's job or "intelligence". it's easy to say most men don't dare, which is true, but it is the ones that do care about such a thing that cause the meme.

As someone who just got out of a relationship with an “educated, status-driven, coastal city” girl: it was a nightmare.

She rarely showed emotion or was loving. She was cold and always looking to fight over stupid shit like politics, which despite posting on Jow Forums, I usually avoided. She was never able to make herself vulnerable or rarely even smiled. She was obsessed with social status, fueled by retarded shit like Instagram.

The odds are she’ll either marry an extreme cuck or become a genetic dead end. Travel, brunch, instagram, and virtue signaling will never lead to true happiness.

It's not about the solution - this is women we're talking about. They just want to complain. Solutions are like kryptonite to them

My view is to change culture to have essentially baby contracts. If women opt to do this they will have a baby with some dude.

The government will pay to get her in the workforce after the kids reach 14. She can also renegotiate the marriage with the dude.