After the UK planned to revoke her British citizenship, do you think America should follow suit?
I’ve seen an awful lot of tweets of condolense and support for these “lost refugees” from the hardcore left on twitter and not much talk of it here. It is a barebones issue simply summed up with “NO” or were these girls truly indoctrinated beyond their control?
It’s funny we act like women are equal in all mental facilities until the time comes where less than adequate brainpower is benefitial (aka I’m a helpless, dumb woman. I didnt know ISIS was so bad)
YES not just for women, for anyone. you leave the West to join a terrorist group that wants to destroy the West? go directly to prison.
Jonathan Wilson
Fucking kill them both! Treason!
Christopher Murphy
They should have revoked her oxygen supply not her fucking passport. She'll be given Swiss, German, Swedish or whatever citizenship and end up on a boat here.
Ryan Smith
Implying the Cucks will actual go through with it and not reinstate it because Muh diversity
also this
Daniel Thomas
There's nothing they can do about these ISIS returnees because most of them don't have dual citizenship. In the case of the retard in the image to the right, Bangladesh disputed that she is a citizen of Bangladesh, thus this will mean her citizenship cannot be revoked and she cannot be deported to Bangladesh due to international law prohibiting nations from making people stateless.
Connor Miller
There are plenty of instances where European countries try to deport terrorist back to their country of origin, only to be faced with the host country refusing to accept them back. Nobody wants these scumbags.
Levi White
Kill them then. Problem solved.
Caleb Sanders
Because killing them is a viable political solution in our day and age, thanks for the suggestion.
Zachary Reyes
Was she raped by an ISIS fighter and had his kid?
Asher Allen
This crisis exposes a flaw in most countries constitution, that prevent the government from revoking citizens of citizenship, even if they have a dual citizenship. Effectively meaning they're stuck with them.
John Jenkins
She was married to an ISIS fighter whose now in a Belgian prison. She wasn't raped by anyone.
Kayden Richardson
who's*
Lincoln Lewis
Why is this a debate?
Australia straight up revoked the citizenship of every faggot over there, if they're not dual citizens we just made them stateless. Why is it impossible for America and Europe to decide who enters their country?
Josiah Powell
Ah. Realistically she should just be sent back to Syria in a liberated area and assigned a new husband and raise the child normally.
Wyatt Morgan
You're completely wrong. Australia is a signatory of the 1954 Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons, and the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness. When you sign a signatory, you make them apart of your internal laws.
Australia has signed up to both conventions. In doing so, it has committed to take specific steps to reduce statelessness. These include granting citizenship to people born in Australia who would otherwise be stateless, and refraining from depriving a person of their Australian citizenship where this would render them stateless.
Ryan Baker
I'm fully aware you have the case of Neil Prakash, an ISIS recruiter who made stateless, but he can simply take Australia to court and the decision to make him stateless would be rendered invalid.
Ayden Thomas
don't care lol
We already did it. They can go to Sweden now.
Bentley Morgan
who was made
Luke James
>Taken to court by a mass murdering terrorists in a Syrian/Turkish prisons for eternity Ok Sweden.
Robert Butler
You tried and Tony Abbott was faced with a cabinet revolt when he attempted to make terrorists stateless. Your take on the issue just screams naivete and disillusion because you think you can just do whatever you want. That's not how political institutions work. And yes you ignoramus, a terrorist can take the government to court.
You're pathetic, continue living under the illusion that Australia is based when it's just as cucked as any other Western country.
Noah Davis
You're pretty out of date with your news articles there.
Don't worry, they will end up in Sweden so you can ask them about it yourself.
Connor Watson
It's good, but I don't understand why this one case has been made a big deal of.
There have already been loads of ISIS fighters that have come back here and they didn't revoke their citizenship. I think the only reason they did it with her is because she also has Bangladeshi citizenship, as it's illegal under (((international law))) to cause someone to have no nationality
Asher Price
lmao, fuckn salty sven over here lads
Carson Rodriguez
If ISIS shitholes are so good why doesn't she stay there??
Kevin Sanders
they should defend themselves against assad, brits or not
Justin Anderson
>leave the West to join a terrorist group that wants to destroy the West? go directly to prison. Prison? >flag Oh, right. The meme is real
You cant send them to Syria they'll have to be imprisoned in a western country. Sending to any middle eastern country would be an automatic death penatly in their court system
Daniel Smith
the west has thousands of isis supporters we should reduce the number not add to it, its that simple.
Thomas Butler
I'm going to start a military uprising in belgium, loose, and get a 'get out of prison' card, dream on
>After the UK planned to revoke her British citizenship, do you think America should follow suit? There is a big chance that the courts will reverse that decision because making somebody stateless violates some form of international law. People argue 'it sets a bad precedent', blah blah blah.
Yes, the United States should definitely follow suite because if Britain violates international law blatantly, we'll get boycotted unless by some miracle countries like France and Germany followed us (which they wouldn't). If the US breaks international law blatantly, other countries will follow the US.
Christian Sullivan
Let them burn in an airstrike. I hope their children die in front of them.
>Maddie is coming home. Dude she is dead her parents killed her
Thomas Nelson
Britain revoking the citizenship and putting Javid up front as the face of it is just playing politics and
Gabriel Garcia
That's what the Portuguese want you to believe.
Christopher Foster
>After the UK planned to revoke her British citizenship, do you think America should follow suit? What does that mean? She's going to get a citizenship of Istanbul. You can't revoke a citizenship from a person who only has one citizenship, but you can do so with dual citizens.
Zachary Harris
>Britain revoking the citizenship and putting Javid up front as the face of it is just playing politics I know. It's impossible to be optimistic about this when, first of all, we haven't heard what the courts decision is, and most importantly because we should be revoking citizenship belonging to people named 'Javid' too.
Nathaniel Nguyen
and .... is just plain sophistry
Wyatt Nguyen
Trudeau is writing her cheque for $10 million loonies
Cooper Hill
she's got nowhere else to go though, Sajid tried his hardest but his hands are tied. In these times, we've all forgotten what it's like to be human
We just don't give a fuck though. This is why you guys are cucked - what's agreed to in peace time, when we're thinking in terms of immigrants from civilised nations doesn't apply any more when the whole situation is different & literal enemies of the nation want to exploit the system. Fuck em, not our problem. We also lock "refugee" women and children in prison camps, and an awful lot of boats sadly sink themselves in the south China Sea lol. No. Fucks. Given. Get on our level Swedistan.
By Leftist shill outlet SBS no less. Thank me later for educating you.
Charles Gonzalez
Not only should they be executed for being traitors, it should be done publicly to really send the message that this shit will not be tolerated.
Andrew Morales
>I’ve seen an awful lot of tweets of condolense and support for these “lost refugees” from the hardcore left on twitter This is not a left or right wing issue. She was born in the UK. She is a British citizen and should be allowed to return. Whether or not the state then decides to criminally charge her it's a different matter. The British government is behaving like a retarded child. The whole Brexit process has made our political elite delusional and they think international laws no longer applies to us. Initially they claimed she was entitled to Bangladeshi citizenship so wouldn't be stateless, but Bangladesh has already denied that and said they will not give her citizenship just because her mother is from there. Nobody disputes the fact she should be charged, what people are worried about it the dangerous precedent this will set. Right now this seems like a straightforward matter because this is related to terrorism, but imagine if countries around the world start adopting this stance for common criminals to. >Mexican enters the US illegally >commits a crime there >when the US tries to deport him, the Mexican government revokes his citizenship and now the US is forever stuck with some stateless "ex-Mexican" The only reason why this has been allowed to go on for so long is because she is in Syria which at the moment is essentially a failed state outside Damascus. Had it been a more stable government this would have resulted in a messy diplomatic row.
at the very minimum she should have been handed over to Assad and the Syrian government since she committed crimes there idk why everyone is forgetting this
But if it were up to me she'd be publicly burned at the stake
Benjamin Garcia
Australian laws aren't subject to UN approval, Sven. Violating the convention to reduce statelessness isn't a legal argument.
To challenge the decision, he would need to prove that under Australian law he has no other citizenship. This is unlikely. While Fiji denies Prakash is eligible for citizenship, under a plain reading of Fijian citizenship Prakash is eligible. Fiji is just trying to give him the flick, too, but we did it first.
Andrew Wood
If you let em in, you have to try them for treason, so then you'll pay court fees along with there jail exspense. It's be ok if we had Labour camps, stick em in a chain gang and force them to work off there debt to society
Gavin Sanchez
We had the IRA, doesn't matter if there western or not. It's a fundamental principal
Oliver Russell
When can we stop paying these desert shiters child benefit? They literally believe you are paid to have a baby over here, which is why they have so many.
