So much projection and smugness. He wouldn't EVER give a speech in Davos if he didn't parrot exactly what his EU/Israeli overlord told him to say.
He's a shill for the omnipotent, supra-national technocracy that his masters conceptualize. He takes their dirty money, just like Tucker takes dirty money from Neocons and Zionists.
His smugness, saying that he went there to speak "truth to power" is unbelievable. And to cite Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to make a point on politics was so fucking retarded, after that point all he had were his pathetic ad-hominem attacks.
"MUH KOCH BROTHERS" is the only argument you need to hear to know you're dealing with a total shill with no truth to tell.
I'm not defending Carlson, even though I never heard him defending Zionism, I know he's funded by hardcore zionists and Rothschild money. But this other guy is as bad as it comes, the worst kind of shill. Basically Cenk with blonde hair.
He names Koch but he doesn't bring up Soros? Interesting I wonder why.
Isaiah Williams
>"MUH KOCH BROTHERS" Go back to t_d, macaco
Henry Flores
Both Soros and Koch are just individuals that finance an agenda. They're not a problem as far as I'm concerned.
They're just pawns in the big chessboard. Whenever shills use them as points, I know they have basically nothing to say.
Jaxon Roberts
you literally couldn't even finish reading what I wrote, you fucking retard.
Mason Sanchez
tucker is a god
Carson Williams
cult mentality helps nobody, try seeing truth for yourself. He's not flawless.
Aaron Johnson
he was always a shill for the wealthy elites
he's just trying to steal bernie's populist thunder now
Ayden Diaz
You're pretty deluded if you honestly believe Tucker got the better of that exchange.
Cameron Rodriguez
Do you have ears and a functioning brain?
Of course you don't
Nicholas Phillips
Bergman is funded by someone guaranteed. And the fact that he also pretends he isn't a millionaire either is truly amusing.
Noah Mitchell
The other guy is a shill for wealthy elites that are so powerful, they want to extort money from less-powerful elites that have no government positions and no Rothschild-EU-Israeli connections.
Do you honestly think this bald cuck just went to Davos without an invitation, or that the organizers didn't read what he had to say beforehand, and THEN approved him as a speaker in the event?
Austin Harris
It's hard to find any information on this Bergman character, but apparently he's a 'historian' which is a fancy way of saying a professor. He's pro open borders as well, which is why the clowns at Davos invite him and parade him around as opposition. Tucker really should have done his homework in case this guy pulled something which he ended up doing.
Mason Taylor
Tucker is a globalist shill working for Globalist Murdoch and living off the globalist Fulbright Fortune. He is a Heritage Foundation shill and member of the CFR. Grow up
Levi Turner
and the other guy is some independent truth seeker that just stumbled in a Davos speech of all things?
Grow the fuck up, you mental midget. You didn''t even read what I fucking wrote you ADHD pothead moron.
Aaron Price
HEY GUYS Unrelated but I'm looking for the image of a magazine spread with Hillary Clinton doing various 'human things' with a title Hillary Clinton Is Just Like You or something like that
He absolutely is. Yeah, the man for open borders is thinking about your welfare.
David Foster
Are you kidding me dude LMAO You're fucking jewish, aren't you? This shameless deflection was so fucking semitic.
STAY ON POINT, YOU FUCKING KIKE RAT.
Charles Howard
>man who cares about helping the poor wants to help the poor oh my god the horror!
Charles Watson
enough, I'm muting this fucking retard.
Adrian Martinez
I don't get Tucker's reaction (and for that matter, the historian for focusing on this). Has he really not talked about taxing the rich or been critical of the rich? Has it been some kind of secret he's wealthy and Fox is wealthier than him?
This is weird and kind of shady (and childish) but I don't see how this is so damning.
Julian Lee
The non-stop interrupting, the ABSURD smugness and the infinite ad-hominens and projections got to him. Can't blame the guy.
>MUH REASONABLE DISCUSSION
Hudson Robinson
they don't like it when the narrative is questioned. Fox uses a lot of arguments that seem logical without context: "why aren't anarchists more peaceful, why are Democrats so rich and corrupt??"
the historian didn't tow the narrative, he instead put Tucker's "anti-capitalist" views into context by reminding the audience that globally it is the right that promotes capitalism and pays Tucker and other Fox anchors to promote capitalist views.
Henry Foster
Also how Tucker started flailing when he talked about the historian never having seen Fox, what the fuck was that?
The whole thing is just baffling. Perhaps Tucker has never talked about explicitly taxing the rich but so much of what he's said is just short of that. The historian was wrong to frame it that way. But why the fuck did Tucker flail like he did? Does reveal potential some pettiness and dishonesty on Tucker's part, but this isn't the first time I've been disappointed in him (like his retarded, unworkable idea to ban smartphone use for children.)
William Thomas
>the historian didn't tow the narrative, he instead put Tucker's "anti-capitalist" views into context by reminding the audience that globally it is the right that promotes capitalism and pays Tucker and other Fox anchors to promote capitalist views.
Are you kidding, the left has been in recent years the biggest promoter of capitalism and Tucker has criticized free market capitalism in recent times to a degree unheard of for a mainstream American conservative pundit.
Parker Clark
The video cuts abruptly to Tucker telling the guy to go fuck himself, so I'd imagine NowThis is just being NowThis
Jackson Evans
Tucker anti-capitalist views? You never watched Tucker in your life, obviously. What are you doing here?
Jason Davis
This Rutger guy is a faux anti capitalist. He supports open borders and a welfare state, the more cheap labour coming into a country the better for him. He sounds like a typical neolib.
Alexander Ortiz
>Are you kidding, the left has been in recent years the biggest promoter of capitalism "the left" meaning what? mainstream democrats' politics would be considered moderate or center-right in most of the developed world. Again, see how this argument changes when given context?
>Tucker has criticized free market capitalism tucker can "criticize" whatever he wants while working for a pro-capitalist network where 99% of hosts are very conservative and pro-capitalist. It's controlled opposition because the rich people who control Fox don't want left-wing ideas catching on the way they have in the Dem party w AOC and Bernie. So they handpick a conservative host and pay him to pretend he's anti-capitalist while blaming immigrants for problems, something absolutely no leftist would ever agree is right.
Like Bregman said, why is "anti-capitalist" Tucker a part of the libertarian CATO institute?
Gabriel Reyes
You're literally pulling this" anti-capitalist" garbage out of your retarded ass to derail the discussion. That's the most retarded shit I've read today.
Jace Morris
I don't get the "your a millionaire funded by billionaires" comment. I mean he is a talkshow host on at prime time for one of the big media companies. They are all making big money. Isn't Anderson Cooper making like 14mill a year and nobody watches his show?
Asher Price
How fucking clueless can someone be to call Tucker Carlson an anti-capitalist? Dear fucking God, get a load of this moron.
Julian Watson
go ahead and filter me Juan Carlo like you said you would 10 minutes ago
David Sanders
I'm phone posting now LMAO. I didn't know it was you. Consider it done.
David Cruz
Banning children from using smartphones is a great idea. It literally rewires their brains. Ever wonder why so many in Silicon Valley are sending their kids to tech free schools? They know.
We need to beat the A.I and the Satan-Grid system!!! How can we?? >Subscribe to CHN He is the most Based Voice we have! Nobody else gives the anons credit for their hard work! Hes had on many based anons from anti-EUROPOL pedo hunter anons to operation Lazarus! >he supports Drumpf but isnt afraid to criticize or even make a video claiming trump is a Mason youtu.be/MXURvkpUdto (((Mason))) videos attract CRAZY comments
His last live stream from today was Epic! First real one back where he was in his element. Topics were SMOLLET and other fake race crimes, but also rothsxhild news and montana being sold to canada to pay off debt, too much to remember it was fucking fluid like rants and bants youtu.be/o1q6yULRGZo
If your not a shill, faggot, tranny, mod or sharblue check him out >YES he names the jew >YES he names sabatean Frankists >YES hes a based Christian channel with very good bible studies
>"the left" meaning what? mainstream democrats' politics would be considered moderate or center-right in most of the developed world. Again, see how this argument changes when given context?
I'm simplifying things, but I'm referring to how in recent decades, multinational corporations openly uphold and promote distinctively liberal ideology. They of course often don't do this out of any earnest belief in these things, merely to increase profit margins (again, simplifying), but I'm not sure where you get the idea it's distinctively the right that promotes capitalism.
>tucker can "criticize" whatever he wants while working for a pro-capitalist network where 99% of hosts are very conservative and pro-capitalist. It's controlled opposition because the rich people who control Fox don't want left-wing ideas catching on the way they have in the Dem party w AOC and Bernie. So they handpick a conservative host and pay him to pretend he's anti-capitalist while blaming immigrants for problems, something absolutely no leftist would ever agree is right.
Yeah a network where 99% of the hosts are "very conservative and pro-capitalist" (these really aren't compatible with eachother) decided to run a controlled opposition by having someone that says things contrary to the overwhelming majority of the mainstream right for decades and gets relentlessly pilloried for doing so, and also criticizes Trump in a way only Ann Coulter has really done so.
Yes, you have a supposed "anti-capitalist" figure who's funded by billionaires, but Tucker's views have evolved over time and remains to be seen whether he'll stay with Fox forever. At this point calling him out for this is akin to the whole "how can you be critical of society while partaking in aspects of it?" train of thought.
>Like Bregman said, why is "anti-capitalist" Tucker a part of the libertarian CATO institute?
He left it in 2015.
David Kelly
>Banning children from using smartphones is a great idea.
Putting aside the fact it's insane nanny state garbage, it's simply unworkable. I like Tucker but it's an awful idea and does nothing to assuage mainstream conservatives he's a "big government socialist!!!"
Also the time he flailed with that female circumcision apologist was pathetic, but that's par for the course for Americans.
