Tucker Carlson Exposed as Globalist Elite Puppet

we lost
might as well let lots of jamals fuck my wife, sister, mother and then bring all of their extended family to the west

So much this.

I don't get it.
At one point this guy simply goes
>Yeah, you are dirty, you take dirty money
Okay? Evidence? How can someone just go live and make such wild claims and present zero evidence?
I'm so fucking done with lefty faggots in politics

I like Carlson but this wasn’t a win for him.

Checkek.

I'd rather get my news from some random Youtuber.

this is why tucker started getting so pissed
i'd get angry as well
this ginger cuck knew he wasn't going to have to supply facts. this conversation was premeditated and that's why he recorded it as well
this fucker didn't have time on air to present facts

A fair and balanced video on the theory that Trump is in a secret society mystery school..
>is trump a mason???
>is trump a member of Plus Ultra?

Find out here
youtu.be/MXURvkpUdto

Bonus Based live stream with great live callers
youtu.be/o1q6yULRGZo
,.,.,.
Stay true to yourselves and fuck supervise Mods, Jannies and Jews

What evidence does this guy have that Tucker is directly paid? He literally just threw accusations

I would be fucking pissed too.
In fact, I've had this situation happen to me before.
The problem is, for the people watching, it seems that if you don't let some random faggot smear your name and remain perfectly calm, you are guilty.
I just want to punch Ana Kasparian's smug face into oblivion.

cato.org/people/tucker-carlson

sourcewatch.org/index.php/Cato_Institute

That took literally 30 seconds.

Tucker shits on Cato CONSTANTLY, look it up on youtube you fags

If I got paid to shit on my boss to the public, I'd do it to.

Follow the money, not the words.

> Through 2015

So, the fact that he previously made money and worked for the company for six years means he's exempt from any criticisms about his conflict of interest? Come on.

Idc who tucker takes money from, have you seen the content he puts out? Most based and redpilled show on tv.

The wignat cries out "don't punch right" as he strikes you

To be fair, he filmed his side of the interaction and got Tucker to speak on it. So he at least got a % of the platform. This guy isn't looking for reasonable discussion he wanted to go viral and I guess it worked even though it'll be forgotten soon.

So this is the end of Tucker, he lost his cool. And if tucker is gone, so is trump HAHAHHA

Attached: -NSi2q-D_400x400.jpg (299x299, 20K)

>Idc who tucker takes money from
>based and redpilled show on tv.
The MSM is part of the propaganda machine that is affecting this world right now. The fact that you purposely blind yourself to that means that you, yourself are part of the problem and you may not even know it. I don't actually disagree with large portions of his current narrative, but that doesn't mean I trust his intentions at all.

You are a tranny faggot.
youtube.com/watch?v=kWLKeC8zgGU

Attached: cost of niggers.png (1026x768, 438K)

>media elites: 2+2=4
>they're using this to distract you from 3+3=6
Ok, but 2+2 does equal 4

this danish faggot essentially says you didn't support economic populism until it was cool, is this bitch 15 years old? Shows you how pathetic the left is they think Tucker got burned big time

In other words this guy is saying elites scapegoat Immigrants when the native population becomes increasingly disillusioned with the state of affairs while they skate by paying little to no taxes. While it IS deceptive and they should be paying more, that doesn't mean what they are saying about immigration is false.

That's kind of part of the problem though, isn't it user? Both are correct, but what's a more important topic of discussion?

I'll use your own analogy.
Say 2+2=4 is illegal immigration and 3+3=6 is the wealthy not paying their taxes, that could actually solve some of the major issues relating to immigration.
For many years, the conversation went sort of like this.
No, let's talk about 2+2=4, 3+3=6 is totally fine.

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm saying it's a disingenuous conversation and is not meant to resolve any issues, but act as a smokescreen and divide americans over an emotional, hot button topic, whereas I would assert that most folks who make under 200k per year would agree that the hyper weallthy need to step up instead of passing the buck onto the middle class.

If only there was a guy who was a nationalist but also somewhat of a socialist

Nice get my nazi fren.
Remember Udo Ulfkotte

>thread 183924761 about tuck and the flaming dutchman in the last 24hrs
kek, and people actually say no one shills here....

wtf I love billionaires with private jets now

Attached: LAjzc5X.jpg (1224x1632, 418K)

I see where you're coming from. The wealthy not paying their taxes is related to immigration. I'm not saying we're not fucked from both sides. But Tucker seems to me to be the best option available, so taking shots specifically at him and not the media in general is kind of a bad faith action.

I can agree with some of the things Tucker says, but I don't personally believe anyone in his position is the best choice. The fact that we are led to believe that they are the only choice is, as I believe, more social engineering.
However, I disagree that it was an attack on Tucker personally.
The way I see it, I think Carlson at worst made a bad call bringing on a guy who wouldn't play the game with him. It was kind of clear he thought he would tow the line regarding his new leaf belief that the global elite are the source of all evils. The Dutchman did his homework and was simply calling him insincere. I'd venture further that he made overtures that it wasn't just Carlson, he made efforts in the clip to reinforce that ALL Fox anchors are millionaires.
That's why I agree with the Dutchman, I'd argue that the entire MSM is currently a cancer and as Hans mentioned before
.Everyone you see on the idiot box is likely a voice that has long since been bought and paid for.

>step up instead of passing the buck onto the middle class.
step up for what?
giving more money to our satanic government?

>reeeee he has more money than me!
Shut up red

It's not the first time Tucker's blown his top at a bad-faith guest
If anything it just convinces me he's genuine. Nice try shills.

Because the typical European hates everyone that is richer than himself. This Dutch faggot doesn't hate rich people, he's just mad he isn't one. It's the reason why socialism is so popular here: "If I can't be rich working my minimum wage job, then nobody should be."

If the government was working as a vehicle for representation of the average working class citizen, to take care of our infrastructure and qualify a living wage to sustain a class of healthy consumers and the things needed to operate a civilization in the 21st century than yes, sure. However, that's another clusterfuck that needs to be untangled and should be discussed openly by an unbiased fourth estate rather than an uniformed social media platform or worse, on a polynesian coconut tasting forum.

>satanic government
Satanic government, I'm genuinely curious what you mean by this, care to elaborate?

I missed the fuckingn meme, wtf is a jannie boiz

>to take care of our infrastructure
the infrastructure is fine
>qualify a living wage
if you dont work for the government then why should they pay you?
> healthy consumers
consumerism is degenerate
>things needed to operate a civilization in the 21st century
like what roads?
they should be paid for by gas taxes
> care to elaborate?
Jews and other satanists run our government

No clicking a TYT link. Sorry shill.

Not really. When I say Gucker Carlson is the best option there is, I'm saying of all the MSM. When you say specifically Fox News you're implying that any of the left wing MSM are even equal to him, which they are not. He brought up AOC and other left wing politicians in a positive light. Dude is a faggot pinko, and not a nationalist. Which is the more important part.

Say I'm a Catholic, and an atheist brings up how Catholic priests rape kids. I would respond differently to that person because I don't believe it is in good faith than I would to a fellow Catholic speaking on the subject. Notice who hosted this video? TYT. If you are not a nationalist, I don't want to hear your criticisms of right wing politics because ultimately we don't agree.

Tucker*

end of foxnews

Attached: propaganda machine .png (615x615, 25K)

>the infrastructure is fine
Without even trying, what is Flint Michigan?
>if you dont work for the government then why should they pay you?
They shouldn't, but if the companies that rely on the American public to buy their products and keeping the world economy afloat may want to consider allowing American families to feel secure enough to have children and grow the population rather than importing them as we are currently doing. The the government may want to consider incentivising these companies to do these things.
>consumerism is degenerate
...and it's also how you are speaking to me now, the funds that bought and paid for the research to allow the development of the internet and supports the fiber infrastructure that keeps it operating.
>like what roads?
they should be paid for by gas taxes
The infrastructure is more than just roads user, copper and fiber optic lines, water systems, power grids that allow you to keep your food fresh and refrigerated rather than foraging in a ditch every day.
>Jews and other satanists run our government
I don't know much about that as I'm not schizophrenic so I'll take your word on it I guess.

it’s another name for a leaf

Uhhhh sweatie Tucker was DESTROYED with facts and logic

please let it be true. With the death of FOX News CNN/MSNBC wouldn't have anything to counter argue anymore and they'd both lose decay with it.

ALL of those faces you see on TV are paid actors, user. Surprised?

>Without even trying, what is Flint Michigan?
Some shity city I dont live in and is not the responsibility of the Federal government
> keeping the world economy afloat
dont care because I am not a globalist
>and it's also how you are speaking to me now
I buy stuff that is useful and I can afford
If I cant then I cant
> copper and fiber optic lines, water systems, power grids
should be private and definitely not federalized
>I don't know much about that
probably because you are not a saved christian

No he didn't. You making 6 000 000 threads won't make it so.

>Not really. When I say Tucker Carlson is the best option there is, I'm saying of all the MSM
I'm asserting that the entire MSM is worthless at this point, fake tits on a dead horse.
>When you say specifically Fox News you're implying that any of the left wing MSM are even equal to him, which they are not.
I'm only referencing Fox News because that's where the confrontation happened, but no I do not assert that the rest of the MSM is in any way, shape or form any better. They all provide a system to keep people angry at their neighbors rather than working together for the betterment of the country and by extension the world around it.
>He brought up AOC and other left wing politicians in a positive light.
I don't necessarily see it as a positive light, but they were some of the first to campaign on the idea that the global wealth inequality is an issue that needs to be addressed, which they were.
> If you are not a nationalist, I don't want to hear your criticisms of right wing politics because ultimately we don't agree.
I'd like to think that I'm not binding myself by labelling myself as ultimately they aren't constructive when you're trying to work together to fix this country. I can disagree with you and still work shoulder to shoulder with you if we have common ground and you act in good faith to help the community you live in.

Tucker doesn't get paid by Cato though, so words are literally the only thing you can follow
If he is divested from them for nearly four years and there is vehement criticism going back and forth between Cato and Tucker, it's clear their interests are not aligned. Come on. I mean, literally come on. I thought your side was supposed to be intellectual.

>Everyone you see on the idiot box is likely a voice that has long since been bought and paid for.
Then why is this pinko historian so compelling to you?
>That's why I agree with the Dutchman
Do you not realize there is dirty money billionaires propping him up?

>Some shity city I dont live in and is not the responsibility of the Federal government
So, you're a selfish person who can easily dismiss the suffering of others because they aren't within arms reach, you're a saved Christian?
>probably because you are not a saved christian
I was raised Lutheran/Catholic and while it's been a while since my confirmation with the church to my knowledge Jesus was big on treating your neighbor as you yourself would want to be treated.
>dont care because I am not a globalist
Globalism exists to prevent global nuclear war, or did we forget what happened back in the 1930s-40s? It's not perfect, but I'd rather my children grow up here than a blasted hellscape.
>I buy stuff that is useful and I can afford
If I cant then I cant
Sidestepped my point entirely, you're using the internet, you're reaping the benefits of a globalized economy whether you intend to or not.
>should be private and definitely not federalized
Not even in the ballpark of what I was talking about, but for what it's worth, I don't disagree entirely but I also don't agree that an unfettered market would incentivize them to maintain these systems. I don't believe it's as black and white as you'd like to believe.

>all of the MSM is garbage
And my point was Tucker is the best of the garbage
>global wealth inequality
Read:white people need to pay brown people. I have nothing in common with these people, any rhetoric they have about wealth inequality is negated by the anti-white rhetoric they constantly push. They aren't my comrades and never will be.
>work together to fix this country
How can I work together with someone who wants to abolish ice and let in every refugee who floats up to the shores? Our views on race and immigration are so diametrically opposed there literally is no common ground. Tbh if we could be free to form our own communities the way we see fit maybe something could happen, but repealing the civil rights act may as well be reinstating slavery to these people.

I know that already. Where does it say that he's directly paid by them though?

Tell me more, Jew.

Attached: Tucker der Fuhrer.jpg (734x869, 211K)

>Tucker doesn't get paid by Cato though, so words are literally the only thing you can follow
But he was, for six years and that makes a massive conflict of interest.
>If he is divested from them for nearly four years and there is vehement criticism going back and forth between Cato and Tucker, it's clear their interests are not aligned
If that was the case, then why is he featured prominently on their own website user? It's a show.

knew a dutch guy once. jeez i hated that entire after knowing him. jeez those people are fucking ugly and stupid. what idiots decided to inhabit land that is below sea level?

Why does this guy look so disgusting? His shoulder-to-head ratio is extremely feminine.

Why is only this 8-minute clip available? Can somebody, especially a Dutchbro (can't find shit in English), provide the full debate? Smells like selective omission.

>And my point was Tucker is the best of the garbage
user why do we have to settle for lower standards? The rest of your claims are largely fueled by popular right-wing talking points which as we already established are complete garbage. I don't treat a person as their perceived based on their skin color or political ideology, but rather how they act one on one. I don't presume that every white person hates every brown person because they're brown because that's what the MSM says, just like I don't assume every brown person is a leech that only wants to steal from me for my effort.
My point in all of this is that the media is working to wedge people against each other, for really arbitrary reasons that cannot ever be substantiated. Until the fourth estate has been cleaned up, you can't trust a word they say, you can only trust what you yourself have experienced and try to make the best with that information.

>Works for a company for six years.
>For free because he's a fucking communist I guess.

I don't have his paystubs user, but it also doesn't take a huge leap of logic to see that he's benefited from the past relationship and his current claims are more masquerade.

TYT is funded by one of the biggest Democrat doners. Yeah sure they aren't bought and paid for at all. Btw Bergman advocates for open borders which is why the oligarchs at Davos invited him in the first place. Fuck that balding low test dutch faggot.

Attached: 1550714953474.jpg (512x768, 49K)

GTFO shill

How has he benefitted? What is he getting?

/thread

I dunno, he's just a millionaire by chance I guess.

So Bregman would like the US to revert to an economic system that was used in the 60s and so-called progressives who hate anything to do with the past are hailing him as some sort of hero?

Attached: Thinking_Face_Emoji_large.png (480x480, 101K)

>settle for garbage
My point is when you attack the best of the garbage it comes off as disingenuous. And besides Tucker is the only one on the MSM pushing in the right direction. He talks constantly about how elites use low skill immigration to undercut the wages of the working class, how he's not really that in favor of elite tax cuts etc. For the reach that the MSM has with the sheep, he is a net positive.
>muh skin color
Race is not limited to skin color. Here's a hint, if you want to converse with someone like me on here use the term "race" instead of "skin color". I didnt wake up one day and say "wow I hate everyone who is darker than X shade of skin color". There is IQ, Aggression, tribalism, etc. Look at events like the OJ Simpson trial, the Convington Boys, Michael Brown/Trayvon Martin. All of these events were perceived differently by different segments of the population and the dividing lines were overwhelmingly based on race with a few white shirking virtue signalers.
>it's a right wing talking point
Just a nice term to dismiss what I say. "I'm just a partisan"---NO. I recognize human nature/human biodiversity and everything I've seen in this country and from other countries points to the fact that diversity has been Americas weakness, not its strength. When was the last time you saw a race riot in Japan? Norway? Are these countries better or worse off than Brazil?

I miss O'Reilly.

>can easily dismiss the suffering of others
they need to fix their own problems
giving money to their corrupt government is not going to fix anything
>your neighbor as you yourself would want to be treated.
I dont want to be taken care of by a satanic government
>or did we forget what happened back in the 1930s-40s?
We got involved in a war we didnt need to be in?
>Sidestepped my point entirely,
you talking about the need for consumers
I dont care if I can no longer consume things
the lord giveth and the lord taketh away
> I also don't agree that an unfettered market would incentivize them to maintain these systems.
My great grandfather used to own a power company

Kind of hard to argue against really...

Link to video?
A lack of pre-natal T exposure. It explains his facial hair and political views too

youtube.com/watch?v=6_nFI2Zb7qE

>smooth tonged

kek, no, anyone with even an ounce of brainpower knows this queer has been a hack since well before he even joined FOX.

>A lack of pre-natal T exposure. It explains his facial hair and political views too

Attached: 1546534025234.jpg (576x1024, 50K)

>A lack of pre-natal T exposure. It explains his facial hair and political views too

Attached: thisiswhatasoyboylookslike.jpg (1200x1195, 201K)

>A lack of pre-natal T exposure. It explains his facial hair and political views too

Attached: 1536069998952.jpg (808x773, 95K)

>I didnt wake up one day and say "wow I hate everyone who is darker than X shade of skin color". There is IQ, Aggression, tribalism, etc. Look at events like the OJ Simpson trial, the Convington Boys, Michael Brown/Trayvon Martin.
But user, do you personally know every single person on planet earth, how can you make that claim to yourself honestly? My take on it is that it's another tool for the wealthy to drive the poor to each other's throats while the wealthy continue to acquire wealth on the backs of their labor without giving back as the social agreement states. I don't hate a person because of a statistic, that's making assumptions about people based on their race and I personally don't live that way.
>I recognize human nature/human biodiversity and everything I've seen in this country and from other countries points to the fact that diversity has been Americas weakness, not its strength. When was the last time you saw a race riot in Japan? Norway? Are these countries better or worse off than Brazil?
I can't really argue with you on that user because I don't subscribe to the notion that one race is greater than the other, but I will ask you when was the last time you saw a race riot in your neighborhood, or for that matter, anywhere other than the MSM?
I'm not trying to convince you to change your ways user, far from it because it takes a lot more than some random asshole on the internet to do that, I'm just telling you that assuming the worst in people, like I used to do, just gave me anxiety. In years since, I've been led to believe that a lot of that was caused by the MSM barraging me with images of my neighbors killing each other over their skin color and what red hat they are wearing and my question is what is the intention and consequence of doing that?

So, you're a bad Christian that was born into wealth, so fuck everyone else because my interpretation of my religion makes it ok.

literally all of us make our money from billionaires or millionaires

>So, you're a bad Christian
How does not supporting a secular government make me a bad christian?

Looks Jewish
Not full Jew, just a bit Jewish

checked

You lefties think he's racist or horrible regardless of what he says, while people here won't think that. So what's the point of even making these threads?

You're obviously lying about Tucker being a shill for corporations or total free market capitalism, atleast in the last few years. You're not convincing anyone except the shills that fill these threads.

Attached: 1550702948151.jpg (471x532, 43K)

>Higher inheritance taxes

Honestly think there's absolutely no tax more heinous & objective theft than inheritance tax. Not even rich, at best I'll get a share of a house in 20 years. If I was loaded and had millions to give my children when I'd die, I would do everything in my power to ensure not a penny went to inheritance tax.

>they need to fix their own problems

That part, the part about not taking care of your neighbors and treating them as your family.

The government of Flint is not my family
It is not my responsibility to give a corrupt government money to fix problems it created

>You're obviously lying about Tucker being a shill for corporations

He works on Fox news and has worked for the Cato institute for six years. So now he's saying the honeyed words that you desperately want to hear, but you don't question why he's saying it and for whom?

The people of Flint are your brothers and sisters in the eyes of god user. You've convinced yourself that they aren't, but it doesn't make it true.

why are you shifting the blame?
the government of flint stole from those very same people, then ruined it for them....

the fuck is wrong with you?