NEW TERM: "Judeocorporate Media"

I saw someone use the term 'Judeocorporate' media and thought - isn't that actually a great term? People freely talk about how 6 mega corporations control most media but they always seem to ignore the fact that the same ethnoreligious minority absolutely dominates most of the manor media companies.

What do you think, user? Should we use the term? Should we try to sneak it into comments on normie sites that still even allow comments?

Attached: 91A1FE15-81D8-4CAC-AB24-AB541861EAAB.jpg (7509x2880, 3.86M)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/154611989/
transudationism.blogspot.com/2008/07/mental-recession.html?m=1
jaegerresearchinstitute.org/articles/coward.htm
theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/07/10/minority-rites-modern-lessons-from-the-bolshevik-revolution/
nationalvanguard.org/2016/02/white-faces-of-power-an-open-letter-to-the-new-york-times/
newobserveronline.com/jews-boast-of-owning-hollywood-but-slam-gentiles-who-say-the-same/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

bumpstock
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/154611989/

Attached: C8390428-8E58-4F4B-860F-4C53A8F77BE2.jpg (380x380, 53K)

It rolls well off the tongue and people are use to boomers saying Judeo-Christian

Its pretty interesting to google search the term. It seems like a natural term that would come up a lot. Doesn't seem like a lot, but kinda interesting what I'm seeing
>The modern Federal Government has rendered inoperable genuine representative government and authentic democratic practices, partly through the reification of a traitorous plutocratic elite, partly through the perpetuation of a one-party political system – which it has deceitfully decorated with the proscenium trappings of a multi-party political system; its nefarious objective being the casting of shadowy illusions of political alternatives – and partly through an odious, seditious, and wicked alliance with Judeo-corporate powers that control the flow, presentation, and selection of information to European Descended People.
>^this
transudationism.blogspot.com/2008/07/mental-recession.html?m=1

>Judeo-corporate
user, I'mma be honest witcha: I like it.

>Just as Hollywood movie star, Leonard Nimoy, cautions us to "never forget" the Holocaust, we should also "never forget" that the judeo-corporate Mainstream Media (which includes the MPAA studio/distributors) marches to beat of the same military-industrial complex. Corporations connected to this Complex spend endless billions on TV ads AND weapons sent to Israel, covertly or overtly. Yes, psychopathic, zionist, neocon-militants have not only taken over Hollywood, but are in process of taking over Washington, DC.
jaegerresearchinstitute.org/articles/coward.htm

By the way, try searching using Yandex and compare to Jewgle... Jewgle is censoring (or at least manipulating search returns) more than one might even presume them to be doing.

I'm using this from now on

>wake the normies/boomers

And then what are they going to do? Israel's cock is flung so far down their Goyim throats

Military Injewstrial Complex.

>using jewgle
>after the year of our lord 2000
The quality of results fell off a cliff that long ago. You used to be able to find damn near anything back when it was just a crawler attached to the PageRank algorithm, as long as you understood how to formulate a query.

What search engine should we be using to avoid jew'd results?

Well, they always keep changing, so you have to keep changing as well. ixquick used to be an aggregate over non-jewgle engines, and that would find you things pretty quick if jewgle was being a dick about it.

I presume that the future direction would be to aggregate over engines offered by major competing nation-states, because they'll have different agendas for information control, just like how you would get your news.

I prefer the term Judeo-Marxist. It implies everything that needs to be said. Judeo-Marxist media, Judeo-Marxist culture, Judeo-Marxist ideologues, etc.

People can call the left communist all they want, but without mentioning the Jewish involvement and leadership of said people then you're only half-way diagnosing the problem.

Attached: nyt.jpg (671x1500, 177K)

Is duckduckgo at least better to use than google or yahoo?

Attached: Jews Speak.jpg (779x424, 105K)

Judeo-Marxist is redundant.
Judeo-corporate goes to the fact media control is by jew-run corporations... its enough to say that they are cultural Marxists in *ideology*. As to *control* I think J-C is more apt.
>I prefer 'neo-Bolshevik' to describe what far Left anti-White Jews are espousing: destruction of white (European) ethnic nations and preventing 'Whites' from having any group identity while urging all other groups to hate and resent Whites ('whiteness' just means whites). Jews project most of all. They cry anti-Semite at absolute facts to equate facts they dont want us knowing with 'hate.' The Bolsheviks were *anti-Russian* and modern neo-Bolsheviks are *anti-EuroAmerican.
theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/07/10/minority-rites-modern-lessons-from-the-bolshevik-revolution/

They bought some hilarious ads on Jow Forums which included secret squirrel searching for clop clop porn. For that reason alone, it's usually my immediate second choice if something else isn't working.

No. It is Jew run.
Yandex is not as good as google but has gotten better fast and is not run by Jews.

Attached: 1545622198259.webm (1280x720, 2.78M)

>second choice
What is your first choice? I use Ecosia just for something different than the mainstream google, yahoo, bing, etc but I know I need something better

fake quote

>dear diary OP is faggot

I kinda want to

I know this makes the infopic larger, but I think it's more convincing when you include the nonjews in there major lineups as well. It's still overwhelmingly jewish, and that's the point we want to convey.
As it currently is, A normie will just look at it and think "oh they picked out only the few jews out of hundreds of employees" You have to show the insane ratio that actually exists.

>What do you think, user?
I think the term "loxism" or "loxist" needs to be constantly trending.

>Jewgle is censoring
in hindsight, that was probably the goal all along. "if we can become the absolute best search engine, so that it's impossible to even compete, then we can control and shape people's perceptions."

>checked

And it's a solid term for news and entertainment media since it is hard to find even a handful of major new websites, newspapers, or movie studios that arent' owned and/or managed and/or very disproportionately staffed by Jews.
>go ahead and try to find relatively major news sources woth no Jewish control
>It is stunning how obvious Jewish control is and that people believe it is some sort of racist myth. Think of the brainwashing necessary to not see the obvious truth.
>spend a moment pondering this level of fucking Orwellian hypocrisy (pic and link related):
nationalvanguard.org/2016/02/white-faces-of-power-an-open-letter-to-the-new-york-times/

Attached: DF4B935C-B624-4637-B22E-16C78380F96E.jpg (471x471, 80K)

Most of the time I'm looking things up in the course of my job, so I want to see what a normie would find. For this purpose, startpage does the trick more often than not. It's basically just a cached google mirror.

If it's something a little more particular, I'd rather shift over to wikijudea or amazon, or some other website devoted to a particular domain of interest because it's trying to sell something more technically specific to a dedicated market segment.

That's a great point. It's more honest/fair.
I personally would distinguish between 'anti-Semites' and unironic nazis, and White Identitarians/Counter-semites.
I dont want to kill anybody or promote any lies
>I just think Jews use their power to harm the wellbeing of my country and my ethnic kin. I know they do.
I grew up hearing endlessly about the importance of diversity... but no one ever mentioned how non-Jewish whites are **under-represented** at the too schools and news media while Jews, and only Jews, have managed to remain super over-represented, while also preventing non-Jews from discussing it as 'anti-Semitism'
> While BRAGGING about their power themselves
newobserveronline.com/jews-boast-of-owning-hollywood-but-slam-gentiles-who-say-the-same/

Attached: 961DD205-E159-43A5-9721-3DB1C4920E8B.jpg (300x532, 42K)

>startpage
Thanks for you replies. I will look into this more and likely start using it. Google flat out skews my results, they have figured out I am a Trump supporter and give me a bunch of right wing sites instead of the actual source of the news.

That's the worst when they start building a profile. Amazon's personalized search for other music you might like was really, really good back in the late 90s. But that was back when the internet was for and by geeks. These days it's a real trap if you can't just get search results without a hardcore prior on them.

I use different browsers and IPs to get around it, but it really is overdone these days. I'm impressed that JewTube still lets me find things that I want most of the time even when I'm just using my all-purpose browser and IP. For everything else bad about it you could say, I'll admit it's way less broken than you would think if you know how to query.

Will implement. Carry on, user.

Thats a great term. Reminds me of "judeocommunism" term which was and is widely used in Polish politics.

One thing that's fucked up about the modern internet is how hard it is to find an original source of a claim. Like how it's just articles quoting other articles quoting other articles and you have to go through several to find the original quote. Skewed search results create additional hoops to jump through. Like with that maga teen disrespects tribal elder bullshit most sites don't have the full video or they say they do but really its just a link to another site.

Lugenpresse (19th century word for 'lying media') has been getting some good traction again over the last few years. as such, i like the term Judenpresse, but i don't know what a normie would make of it

Attached: lügenpresse.png (499x374, 250K)

Yup yup. But cross-referencing multiple alleged sources is just intelligence 101 if that's what you're after. One of the benefits of higher education is that you get used to blowing through other publications and the publications that they cite before you cite them. Although it's disappointing how many people aren't all that rigorous about it anymore.

Judeo-Bolshevik works better in my experience, simply because the internet is crawling with autistic commies who leap on any use of the word 'Marxist' and turn it into a tiresome debate about semantics which no one reads

Will use.
I dont comment on normie sites as I get predictably banned for #hatefacts like black crime rates and migrant rapes... curious if anyone uses term if they get comment deleted.

How about judeo corporate mafia

Its always fun (but also disappointing) linking a right wing news site to a never-trumper and they dismiss it as fake news when the source is CNN or AP

I don't see why anybody would give credence to CNN or AP unless it were carefully cross-referenced. Those are both information warfare outlets. CNN has been crap for much longer than muh trump and muh (alt)right wing conspiracy were a big deal, and AP is a central control mechanism for the overall narrative because everybody just picks it up and repeats it. You wouldn't even need to get into the CIA underpinnings of them, or of google, to see how they operate.