Tucker's logic: there is no point to tax the rich because they know the loopholes
Millionaire Funded by Billionaire
Other urls found in this thread:
fortune.com
breitbart.com
en.wikipedia.org
cnbc.com
en.wikipedia.org
archive.4plebs.org
twitter.com
Here I am again to ruin your shill attempt.
1/2
The Dutch faggot claimed Fox, Tucker, and Trump were controlled by the Koch Brothers; when the Koch Brothers literally spent millions of dollars trying to oppose Trump's tariffs and immigration restrictions (nationalist policies).
fortune.com
The entire "argument" was the Dutch fag screeching "TUCKER RICH!!!" "FOX RICH!!!", and not letting Tucker get a word in.
This BS is being pushed by Antifa and Reddit because they hate Tucker for being subtly white nationalist. Are you forgetting all the leftist smear articles calling Tucker a "sinister white nationalist propagandist", or how Antifa literally tried to break into Tucker's house and assault his wife?
2/2
The Dutch faggot is literally a supporter of total open borders, and he works for an organization funded by (((Soros))).
en.wikipedia.org
>Utopia for Realists: How We Can Build the Ideal World[11] promotes a more productive and equitable life based an three core ideas which include a universal and unconditional basic income paid to everybody, a short workweek of fifteen hours, and open borders worldwide with the free exchange of citizens between all nations.[12]
He never mentioned the Jewish billionaires that fund the left and like (((Soros))) and (((Bloomberg))); he just mentioned the Koch Bros and and Rupert Murdoch because they're white and conservative.
Antifa and Reddit are literally spamming Jow Forums with this shit in order to get us to stop supporting Tucker; and they're doing it because they hate any remote trace of white nationalism.
That implies we should target and get rid of the loopholes. Why exactly is bad about this statement?
Do the open borders leftist shills reading this board actually fear international billionaires having their loopholes taken away from them?
Shills are claiming the Breitbart article is fake in the other shill thread, so here's the CNBC link again:
cnbc.com
That implies there is nothing we can do about it so just let the free market do its magic
you cant tax the rich in the system we have, the rich dont get a w-2 in the mail. anyone who says raise taxes is a fucking moron who doesnt understand how the systems set up. - or theyre smart enough to know they can get idiots to vote for them and make themselves rich off the taxpayers.
ya i think tucker has pissed some people off. now i have to watch him more
>another shill thread
Hillary lost
being trans is a mental illness
liberals got 8 years of uninterrupted control and ruined the US
get over it
Brilliant.
Carlson isn't controlled by Koch. He's controlled by Rupert Murdoch, a ZOG billionaire.
To be clear, we absolutely should be taxing the rich.
I wish I was a billionaire so I could fund millionaires
Tucker is a Millionaire who is controlled by Billionaires.
Rupert Murdoch
He’s a millionaire because he earned it being based
He’s funded by a billionaire because billionaires own large news networks
All fields
not at all its what the politicians we vote into office say theyre going to do every election. then they get in office and sell out. why in the fuck is owning a private jet that flies you around the world to golf a tax write off if its owned by an LLC you fund with investment returns? how in the fuck did conservative voters get blamed fo this loop hole? democrat voters are to fucking stupid and to numerous for us to solve our problems, we cant move forward because were to busy trying to stop you idiots from dragging us further down, and its happening that way by design.
Murdoch is a white goyim. Try harder.
>Muh Discord Tranny
Where are you getting this, nigga
Jesus, you kikes are shilling hard against Tucker
The worst part about this whole thing is that now when Tucker take down another cringy leftwing cunt all the shills will come out of the woodwork with the same talking points. It's literally nothing but when a lie is all you have you lie big.
AND
REMEMBER
TO
SAGE
AND
REPORT
(((White)))
In other words, he is being a good boy to his boss
en.wikipedia.org
>Early life:
>Keith Rupert Murdoch was born on 11 March 1931 in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, the son of Sir Keith Murdoch (1885–1952) and Dame Elisabeth Murdoch (née Greene; 1909–2012). He is of English, Irish, and Scottish ancestry. Murdoch's parents were also born in Melbourne.
Why do you think his name gets trashed by the left constantly, instead of Jew names? It's because he's a white male, and therefore a target. Guy's literally descended from British royalty.
Your thread got rekt, just give up nigger.
here you go faggot
check it out yourself
archive.4plebs.org
fuck the government; they don't deserve any more money -- doesn't matter if it's from Shaniqua on the corner or Bill Fucking Gates
it's a legitimate point.
adding new tax laws only benefits people who can afford tax attorneys.
what we need is a radically simplified tax code, either a flat tax or a simple stratified system with no deductions or exemptions.
If I have basic income, then why would I need to waste 15 hours a week working?
You don't understand, niggers will just magically want to work under UBI because racism will be gone and the leading party will have a red and yellow color scheme.
It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now. This is because investors efforts to avoid tax liabilities make certain types of less productive activity more profitable than other more valuable undertakings and this inhibits our growth and efficiency. Therefore the purpose of cutting taxes is to achieve a more prosperous, expanding economy.
Regardless of his reasoning, the rich shouldn't be taxed.
No, it doesn't.
If we raise taxes on the rich they can keep more money overseas which will help impoverished third world countries and their developing economies. As a bonus it will mean less domestic investment which will mean less jobs for people who work jobs who will turn to the democrats for a better safety net. It’s win win for leftists.
Thanks.