What would a world without Jews look like?
How would pur life change?
What would a world without Jews look like?
How would pur life change?
>What would a world without Jews look like?
Same as now except there would be a nation called Palestine.
>How would pur life change?
I really dont know about purs life.
Better, I guess. I wouldn't be in some weird type of house arrest and 8 hours of sleep per day would be the norm again.
>Palestine existing ever
No jews? Well the zionist agenda would go away. That would be nice. Efforts could be made to make wholecome cultures of all kinds again. Efforts to do so nowadays are dangerously close to fade entirely.
>no communism
>no WWII
>no porn
>very little degeneracy
>no Zionism, no new order
>European hegemony would still be a thing
And plenty more.
Not utopia, but much much much better. It needs to happen lads, this time for real.
European hegemony?
Yes. No WWII means colonialism mostly stays, no anti-racism dogma, no multiculturalism etc. Europe would be still controlling the world and exploiting third world as it should, why leading it into more civilized phase.
that does not sound fair though, so people from outside Europe should be happy the Jews have foiled European hegemony
without Jews humanity would have a different source of suffering(or the current sources of suffering would have a greater effect)
i.e. every single human is, was, and always will only get his own karma, and if enough humans share the same karma, it will take a larger shape. i.e. neither leaders, nor secret societies can neither deprive you of your karma, nor give you that which you don't deserve. so if you are unsatisfied with your life, change your behavior, and your life will change after some time.
>a nation called Palestine would exist
I'm sure you mean the Kingdom of Jerusalem.
Honestly, it'll just be another race of quasi-intelligent parasites looking to exploit the niche. Possibly other Eastern Eurasians, or the more likely the Chinese or Indians.
>doesn't sound fair
I knew answering to a memeflaggot was a mistake.
>happy that foiled European hegemony
Top kek. No, they exchanged it for never ending chaos, civil war, strife, hunger and sickness. Sometimes for China too. Quality of life was thousand times better for those people when Europeans controlled colonies.
>muh historical determinism
Get fucked Hershel. You just have to spread this disgusting crap even when trying to sound nice. Truly, there is no saving of you fucks.
Look no further than the medieval times.
A perfectly christianized society where a peasant, in favorable conditions, worked 150 days a year and had the rest of the year to enjoy the family, raise his numerous children, children that'll know they'll be able to accumulate wealth, learn a trade and become someone in a society free of usury, as back in the day, even a serf could buy his own freedom and enjoy a social mobility in 2019 we can only dream of. They might've died at 40 due to lack of antibiotics, but all the essential goals a human should reach in life were obtainable. We are living in hell, and don't even know it. Thank the illuminist deceivers, who made us forget how sweet life could be, just to lay the foundation of the new world order.
>They might've died at 40 due to lack of antibiotics
That's a meme bro. Those averages are usually made with counting infant deaths, ie.: two people, one is 70 and other dies during the birth, average age is 35. Human longevity changes very little across the history, only various tied aspects like higher rate of infants dying, more frequent wars/plagues etc. change it. With rest of your post I wholeheartedly agree, nicely put.
And of course, enlightenment niggers were very frequently hook-nose tribe, as always.
what? Czech colonies? So you exchanged peace and progress once you were under German/Austrian control for so many centuries, amirite?
Show flag you pencil-necked hooknosed goblin dorkoid. Do it now.
Beccaria, Diderot, Hume, Kant, Montesquieu, Rousseau, Adam Smith, and Voltaire, all Jews, indeed XD
very close to you, Peter Novak
Stop pretending you misunderstood me. It's a fallacy that shows you have nothing else to say.
And also stop copypasting names from Wiki and google who was Adam Weishaupt, read Libido Dominandi and stop debating something you obviously have to google to even engage in.
no, not true, and even Weihaupt was no Jew. You are acting like Cartman when things do not go his way "everybody I do not like must be a Jew"
>Weihaupt was no Jew
Top kek, stay shilling.
>"Born in 1748 in Ingolstadt, a city in the Electorate of Bavaria (now part of modern-day Germany), Weishaupt was a descendant of Jewish converts to Christianity"
>nationalgeographic.com
i would have a foreskin
Are you retarded? Have you actually read that debate and what I have posted? His parents were ethnic Jews who converted because that was how you did it back then, when you wanted some better business. Religion-wise, he wasn't therefore Jewish, but ethnicity-wise he was, as Jewishness is inherited by maternal line.
Also note that I posted National Geographic and your "source" is autistic Wiki debate, where some blogger on "conspiracyarchive" provides exactly zero sources too. Again, read some literature where you can actually get some solid info - Libido Dominandi is a great start because it elaborates Illuminati and Enlightenment very well, but also from a rather interesting standpoint of history of using sex as political control.
A world without jews would be a world without news. Why choose a world without jews if all you feel is the blues while watching the news? Don't get the jews bruise.