BREAKING: Theresa May delays “meaningful vote” on Brexit deal again to March 12

The best bongs have to offer

>queen says stop fucking around
>carries on fucking around
thats how you get hung for treason.

it's 'hanged', you pleb, and treason isn't punished by death any more.

Twat

Brexit will get delayed, they dont want us to leave

>and treason isn't punished by death any more
Not the legal punishment anyway.

>yfw article 50 is revoked in a kino photo finish on 29th March at 22:00 GMT

Attached: ua7133D.jpg (900x900, 61K)

I remember when blood had to be shed in order to gain independence from worldwide kingdom that was built off of four blokes in a land rover. What the fuck is your problem? Man up and fix your shit. I don't want to see a bunch of England First(or whatever you cunts call it) youtube videos of whining and complaining about mudslimes. I want to see some fucking results ya fuck'n wankas.

>>yfw article 50 is revoked in a kino photo finish on 29th March at 22:00 GMT
Almost as likely as Germany voting for a NSDAP government at the next election.

Say it with me
HAAAAAARD Brexit.
Right in your shitters!!!!!

So sorry, Hitler-sempai.

Attached: offbyone.png (472x470, 304K)

No chance they'll go through with no deal, brits don't have the balls. The eu called their bluff, everyone knows the UK is pretty insignificant. They should ask to become a US colony, I think we'd give pretty reasonable terms ;)

Witnessed

It's called "Running Down The Clock" Fritz.

Through her own fucking inability to get anything through parliament we will get BRExit. Good. And. Hard.

Attached: BREXIT - Pornhub - Women fucks entire country at once.jpg (429x469, 25K)

Why are you Yanks obsessed with somehow being linked to us.

>Why are you Yanks obsessed with somehow being linked to us.
Most of them secretly yearn to be part of the British empire again, just like they yearn to be back in their mothers' loving embrace

Her point will be “Labour MPs, if you don’t approve this, we are going to crash out and you don’t want it”.

One other option is to make a deal with Labour, i.e. link the approval of her Brexit deal with a general election that is the styled as a “vote on the future relationship with the EU”. She would then also reneg on her promise to not lead the Tories into a new election... but who cares?

>One other option is to make a deal with Labour,
She already tried making a deal with Labour. They told her to fuck off.

>correcting a British chav’s grammar
>the true extend of Etonian Britain

My God.

Attached: E5ED4729-71F9-457C-9DB3-AD2491231F21.png (500x684, 178K)

I give a revokation of Article 50 on March 29 a 5% chance. I give a NSDAP win in Germany in 2021 a 0% chance.

Most likely is the EU/Ireland provides further “non-binding assurances” over the “temporary nature” of the Irish backstop. And then May gets Labour to agree to back the exact same Brexit deal that was rejected last month. And Corbyn will style that as a win, because the assurance will include statements that the UK can A. decide to stay in “a customs union”, B. in the single market and C. can start negotiating soon, if it decides so.

>She already tried making a deal with Labour. They told her to fuck off.

Not really, she has managed to bribe a few individual MP's by bribing them with "aid" for their local communities but only a few of them, nowhere near enough to make any significant difference.

Hard BRExit is on the cards simply because MP's in Leave constituencies (both Tory and Labour MP's) are reluctant to vote for any deal which will fuck Leave over and lead to their deselection or losing the next General Election.

Attached: Mr. Stop BRExit on life support.jpg (714x960, 98K)

>I give a revokation of Article 50 on March 29 a 5% chance.
No chance whatsoever. Even a delay is quite unlikely.

>And then May gets Labour to agree to back the exact same Brexit deal that was rejected last month
Again, no chance whatsoever. Theresa May could offer every Labour MP 72 virgins and they still wouldn't vote for anything she wanted.

>And Corbyn will style that as a win
Corbyn doesn't care about winning. He's a communist. He only cares about seizing power.

She never offered something to Labour. It is not a “deal” if you say “vote for my deal, suckers”. It’s a deal if you offer something Labour wants.

What Corbyn wants is a general election again. And that can be provided. A lot less likely, but a potential offer would be a “unity government”, basically a transition to a grand coalition between the Tories and Labour for a year or 18 months and a promise to hold a general election then (in late 2020) to “approve” the final negotiated deal with the EU.

90% of Labour MPs will vote for any deal rather than no deal if push comes to shove.

Also, a delay may be impossible because of the opposition of some EU states, while a revokation of the Article 50 letter can be done unilaterally (and is way more in the interest of e.g. Spain, Malta, Ireland, France etc. than a 3-9 month delay which puts them in a real bad spot).

>She never offered something to Labour.
Nonsense. She literally met Corbyn for talks, Corbyn demanded that May implement Labour's Brexit plan, May said that was not possible, so Corbyn told May to stick her deal up her arse

>A lot less likely, but a potential offer would be a “unity government”,
Nonsense! The British Conservative Party would NEVER enter a power-sharing agreement with the Communists. There would be a civil war by lunchtime.

I want a diamond hard Brexit now just to harvest the #FBPE tears and it's their fault for being such whiney entitled fucktards

Attached: Hitlers.jpg (500x325, 19K)

>90% of Labour MPs will vote for any deal rather than no deal if push comes to shove.
Nonsense! Labour want a general election because they think they can win, and their best hope of an early general election is a no-deal Brexit. They're going to vote against May's deal regardless of what happens before 29th March.

Name one substantive thing May offered Corbyn. One thing.

May’s Brexit plan and her deal is in all substantive ways the opposite of Labour’s official Brexit position. A deal would e.g. be to start negotiations on EEA membership... or promising a referendum in 2020 on the outcome of the future relationship negotiations (e.g. EEA membership vs. a negotiated FTA solution). As that referendum would not be a rerun of fhe first (the UK would already have left the EU) and would be a binary choice between the Tory position (Canada FTA Plus Plus) vs. the Labour position (EEA/Norway or EEA light / “customs union”), this would be a real concession and a way to get the majority of Labour MPs to vote for the deal.

>Labour want a general election because they think they can win

Not while Corbyn is at the helm. The plebs are stupid, but they're not stupid enough to put Corbyn in Number 10.

A no deal Brexit will not mean a general election. In a no deal Brexit, Labour lost, the Tories won. Tories would unite again because the whole debate would be over for good.

Labour wants the whole mess to be extended as long as possible. Corbyn wants Brexit too, he hates the EU. Which is why the Labour position is to just get a “single market / customs union” relationship with the EU, sort of like a bespoke Norway/Switzerland hybrid solution.

>Name one substantive thing May offered Corbyn. One thing.
She offered him talks without preconditions. Corbyn still told her to fuck off.

>blah blah referendum
Politically impossible. Any referendum on Britain's future relationship with the EU would be hijacked by the globalists, and converted into a referendum on re-joining the EU. The government knows this and that's why no-one is seriously considering a second referendum.

Remaining in the customs union is also politically impossible, since the first referendum explicitly stated "If you vote leave, we will leave the EU and the customs union"

>A no deal Brexit will not mean a general election
A no-deal Brexit means an IMMEDIATE general election, because it means that Theresa May will have to resign on March 30th, and the new leader will not be able to form a government without a new election

Talks about what? They talk in the parliament every weak. I talk to my dog and my two kids every day too. How is that a “substantive thing” to offer?

You cannot have both, a referendum on the future relationship and one about rejoining the EU... just as the 2016 referendum didn’t morph into a referendum on “how to reshape the EU”.

>Talks about what?
By "talks", I mean private discussions on a deal that both parties could support. This took place in January.

>You cannot have both, a referendum on the future relationship and one about rejoining the EU
Yes you can. This is what the remainers actually want - a referendum where the choices are "accept this deal" or "rejoin the EU".

Absolute BS. A no deal Brexit would completely unite the Tories and not a single Tory MP would end up wanting an election that they are likely to lose until a lot of water has run over the no deal Brexit. A no deal Brexit on March 29 pretty much assures no new elections until 2021.

Yeah, Tony Blair changed that law.
Pure coincidence I'm sure.

Again, May offered Corbyn absolutelt nothing. NOTHING. If she did, Corbyn would be all over it in public and parliament. They talked for 20 min, a show off, then Corbyn insisted on his EEA type Brexit, which is the complete opposite of all red lines of the Tory party.

>A no deal Brexit will not mean a general election.

Fritz is right. The last election was a farce caused by Treason May's incompetence. The Tories need BRExit to be over, no transition period, no backstop, just fucking over. Hard BRExit gives them that at 11pm on Friday 29th March 2019.

After that they can deal with the problems as they arise, no more indecision. Force May to resign, get a new leader by the party conference, then focus on uniting behind the new reality with the distraction of Europe removed for the first time in 40 years.

Under the Fixed Term Parliaments Act the next election is not scheduled until May 5th 2021, which will give the Tories enough time to recover and win.

I doubt that Corbyn will hang on that long, but it is entirely possible, he's proven a lot more resilient and hard to oust than I thought he would be. Any general election with Corbyn as leader is lost to Labour.

Attached: Fucking tick tock BRExit clock.jpg (1920x1080, 672K)

>Absolute BS. A no deal Brexit would completely unite the Tories
Possibly, but the new Prime Minister (whoever it is) will feel obliged to call a new election before passing laws, because without an election the new government will have no legitimacy.

>not a single Tory MP would end up wanting an election that they are likely to lose
Very unlikely indeed. Labour under Corbyn couldn't win the last election, even though he was very popular then. He's not very popular now.

>A no deal Brexit on March 29 pretty much assures no new elections until 2021.
I've screencapped that. Come back here in April so I can mock you for being wrong about everything.

>Force May to resign, get a new leader by the party conference
Not necessary to wait that long. When May resigns at 11.01pm on 29th March, the two factions in the Tory party will probably agree a compromise leader that neither side hates. The leadership election can take place within a couple of days, in that situation.

This
Bunch of fucking self-aggrandizing soporific dullards
Like the whiny kids who would never admit they've lost at any game you play and run off with their football if they're having a a bad game

>will feel obliged to call a new election
There is a fucking universe of difference between "obliged" and "required".

No PM will call an election before 5th May 2021 unless they believe they can win a majority. If they can't then they will bluff it through with bollocks about "the country needing a period of stability" or some such cock wank.

>When May resigns at 11.01pm on 29th March
May isn't going to resign until she is forced to do so. The failed "coup" of the Hard BRExiteers like JRM gave her 12 months grace from further leadership challenges. She will stubbornly (and incompetently) blunder on in the hope of some dramatic and positive upturn.

A. there won’t be a no deal Brexit, I am 95% sure

B. in case of a no deal Brexit, there won’t be a general election for at least a year, likely longer

C. most likely scenario is assurances from the EU and a botched greement between May and Corbyn on Labour involvement on the future relationship negotiation. This, coupled with a 2 month extension (right before the EU elections) for final ratification of the deal in all relevant chambers on both sides will get this over the line.

Screencal this

Attached: 828D6299-24C8-496F-B5A8-45CD6F1356F7.jpg (1000x1333, 104K)

Because they own our intel services ever since when we asked for their Nuclear Nazi secrets

The thing is, there are lots of signals some underhanded shit is being planned to stop Brexit at the 11th hour. Ministers making noise about not letting a no deal Brexit happen.

I'm convinced there will be enough rebels to delay Brexit indefinitely.

Is it the same slavery deal she proposed last time? Because that deal was worse than no-deal and everyone knows it.
Why do you think it was rejected the first time?

>No PM will call an election before 5th May 2021 unless they believe they can win a majority.
The entire media (apart from the Guardian) is against Corbyn because of the Anti-Semitism crisis in the Labour party. If April/May is not the best time for an election, then what is?

>I'm convinced there will be enough rebels to delay Brexit indefinitely.

If there were enough rebels to delay BRExit indefinitely then they would have already done so.

The simple truth is that there is no consensus for any of the choices on the table and no ability to bring forward more appropriate options because of EU intransigence.

>May isn't going to resign until she is forced to do so.
Officially, she has 12 months' grace. Unofficially, all her cabinet ministers will quit if she doesn't, and that will be the end of it. She can't run a government without a cabinet.

The trouble is that the last time they went for "a compromise leader that neither side hates" we got Teresa May.

30 MPs are for no deal, 620 MPs are for a deal. The ratio is even worse in the Lords...

Your entire government exists because the monarch allows it.
If she wants to dissolve your parliament and take back direct control she can do so at anytime.
The only thibg that prevents that is the fear of public backlash but your government is proving so incompetent the time may be coming soon where the people beg the queen to restore the monarchy

>A. there won’t be a no deal Brexit, I am 95% sure
It's very difficult to say what the probability is. There is too much information that we don't know.

>B. in case of a no deal Brexit, there won’t be a general election for at least a year
I will bet you £1,000,000,000,000 right now that there will be an election immediately after a no-deal Brexit

>most likely scenario is assurances from the EU and a botched greement between May and Corbyn on Labour involvement on the future relationship negotiation.
Why do you think the Conservatives and the Communists are going to reach some kind of deal? This has never happened before in human history; why do you think it will happen now?

Its punished by death if a million people march on Downing street and hang her from a lamppost.

>30 MPs are for no deal, 620 MPs are for a deal. The ratio is even worse in the Lords...
Actually about 90 MPs are for no deal, if you include the DUP. The remaining 560 MPs can't agree on the deal they want, so it doesn't matter that they think no deal is a bad idea.

tory boys trust funds , she creates space france imports the migrants for the tory boys get their trust funds replenished from the financial credit crunch

>If April/May is not the best time for an election, then what is?

Treason May is the most useless and incompetent PM in living memory, but the decision of whether to call a general election or not remains in her hands and hers alone.

She was badly burnt by the last election, but the truth is that the polls were for her when the election began and she simply put forward manifesto proposals that were suicidally stupid.

She won't go to the country again until she has to (i.e. 5th May 2021) or until she is certain of winning a working majority. That won't happen any time soon.

That's why there won't be an early General Election. The only thing which would change that is a massive upswing in the polls towards the Tories.

This is entirely possible if she accidentally scores a Hard BRExit.

Attached: BRExit - Matrix of potential future economic relationships with the EU.png (2934x1789, 464K)

Yeah parliament wants a deal, just not May's...
If that is all that is on the table then no deal is a sure thing.
Brussels fucked up by closing the door on negotiations.
You guys were hoping to force britain to rescind article 50 but that strategy is about to explode in your face

>She can't run a government without a cabinet.
Err...then she would just select a new cabinet. Politically damaging obviously, but with a few assurances about transitional teams and only staying on as PM for as long as necessary she could make it work.

Pretty much what she's already said in fact.

Attached: Theresa May the new Britannia.jpg (1266x1600, 294K)

>Why do you think the Conservatives and the Communists are going to reach some kind of deal? This has never happened before in human history; why do you think it will happen now?

Because there are lobbyists, people with companies, with investmentsm true real interests. Those are the people MPs actually listen to. And they all don’t want a no deal Brexit because it causes disruption and thus money. Rich people hate loosing money.

The DUP isn’t for no deal. And show me the otger 80MPs. Even the ERG isn’t all behind no deal.

>>She can't run a government without a cabinet.
>Err...then she would just select a new cabinet.
How? Brexiters won't join it, Remainers won't join in, former ministers won't join it five minutes after resigning.

How is she going to fill the cabinet? Is she going to fill it with members of the House of Lords?

Name one thing that MPs actually object to in May’s deal. The freaking Irish backstop? Really? Nobody fucking cares about the backstop, it’s a McGuffin, an irrelevant thing that doesn’t even work technically, so neither side ever wants to see it actually put in place. It’s like the MAD scenario during the cold war, sure it was possible, but nobody said “hey, let’s just stop talking to the Americans and launch our nuclear missiles, it’s the best solution there is”.

>Because there are lobbyists, people with companies, with investmentsm true real interests. Those are the people MPs actually listen to.
Normally I'd agree with you. But Labour has been infiltrated by the communists, and the communists are not in the pay of the (((lobbyists))), so your argument doesn't work.

Politicians can only be pushed so far with money.
They will bend quite a bit for lobbyists but not if it means tanking their own chances at reelection.
The People voted to leave and all these attempts to manipulate Britain into remaining are just souring the British people against the EU.

>The DUP isn’t for no deal.
Nonsense. The DUP have repeatedly stated that they prefer no deal than a border in the Irish Sea.

So why did the last vote end up with the largest vote against the government in British parliamentary history?

Fuck off Fritz, you don't understand how the UK parliament works so don't try and comment on it.

It doesn't matter a tinkers cuss what the MP's don't like. What matters is what they will vote for and they haven't shown any appetite to vote for the only deal on the table, which is May's cobbled together EU approved BRINO deal.

Since May can't put forward anything substantially different I can't see the numbers changing enough to give a majority for anything.

Plus the only thing that MP's care about is deselection or losing their seat, both of which are likely for MP's in both Tory and Labour constituencies where the Leave vote represents more than the margin of victory at the last election.

That's a lot of constituencies...

Attached: Vote None of the Above in your elections.jpg (2560x1920, 702K)

You clearly dont understand the British hans

Guess what, May got 200 votes for her deal. You really think there aren’t enough party stooges in the Commons for a cabinet? Really?? Jesus.

>Name one thing that MPs actually object to in May’s deal.
youtube.com/watch?v=WOR9tZFYl1I

>Guess what, May got 200 votes for her deal.
About 150 of them are government ministers. Obviously they can't join the cabinet five minutes after resigning. Where do you think this cabinet will come from?

Bye EU. Hard Brexit incoming.

> No hard feelings.

Au revoir, auf wiedersehen, adiós.

Attached: britons brexit needs you.jpg (1024x500, 95K)

There are no communists. Wake up. Labour is run by special interests. Tories are run by special interests. LibDems and the SNP are run by special interests.

It’s just different special interests, e.g. Siemens and Nissan and BMW and Peugeout and HSBC etc. are lobbying Labour... while construction businesses, universities, the agribusiness, the military industrial complex etc. are lobbying the Tories.

It’s not money. Lobbyists provide connections that can provide jobs for friends and family and party members etc. for LIFE. Direct money payments are for idiots, connections and life long commitments are worth millions and can feed entire family and political clans.

Attached: 1466636334507.jpg (620x620, 192K)

>There are no communists [in Labour]
Yeah, apart from all the actual communists. For example

youtube.com/watch?v=C5WbwHO8msU

>they prefer no deal than a border in the Irish Sea

Considering that nothing in May’s deal says there will be a “border in the Irish Sea”, your statement that this means they push for “no deal” is entirelt bs. The DUP will vote for the existing deal if the EU puts out official assurances that there will be no insistence on “further checks in the Irish sea even in the event of the backstop”.

>About 150 of them are government ministers.
Ignore all of the "ministerial" dross. The cabinet consists of the PM and 21 ministers. I'm sure even Treason May can fill 21 jobs from the backbenchers who are happy enough to stab each other in the back for the opportunity, BRExit or no BRExit.

As for the rest of the "government" jobs. They are largely grace-and-favour jobs. It would be problematic, but not critical if they were left vacant.

>>There are no communists [in Labour]
Maybe not communists in name, but certainly communist in nature.

Attached: Well that didn't work - an abbreviated History of Communism.jpg (500x746, 116K)

>Considering that nothing in May’s deal says there will be a “border in the Irish Sea”
Ummm, that is exactly what the Irish backstop says. You have read the agreement text, haven't you?

Not quite. Nobody else was stupid enough to want to be in power during Brexit as it is rightfully seen as a poisoned chalice. This moron was the only person dense enough to not see what she was getting into.
It's the same reason Boris Johnson put up such a pitiful attempt at a leadership bid when Cameron stepped down, same with Liedsom.
They only put their hat in to keep their air of legitimacy. To keep themselves in the public eye and show that they are always considered for these big roles
As soon as May took the lead everybody else went
>yeah fuck it I guess she wins
and May, an old, childless, demagogue fell for it.
And now nobody will dare take it off of her because who the fuck would be so stupid? It would be like taking charge of the World Trade Centre on 9/10. No thanks.
She'll stay in charge until Brexit has, or hasn't, happened, until the fallout has calmed down a little bit. At that point people who actually want power will strike.

The goy will pick the right opinion, vote again!

Attached: Boob-501829.jpg (620x413, 48K)

BREAKING NEWS - EU HAVE SURRENDERED
EUROPEAN NATIONS TO REJOIN BRITISH EMPIRE
theguardian.com/politics/2019/feb/24/brexit-could-be-delayed-until-2021-eu-sources-reveal

sauce on pic?

JUUUUUUUUUUST

>being this young
That bitch was massive on limewire and kazaa back in the day. I was fapping to her when I was literally 12 years old.

youporn.com/watch/12107233/dancing-teen-in-pink-belt/
I forget her name but here

Admitting to downloading cheesy pizza of a chav Leeds cunt. I hope you get v&

Attached: 4Chan Party Van.jpg (680x544, 53K)

This isn't CP you dumb cunt. Anyway I was fucking twelve years old. We're talking fucking 18 years ago.

ty senpai