Interstellar: why abandon Earth?

This ironically. The movie doesn't make any sense because it's propaganda designed to make you see the earth as a ball. Sorry if you're just now finding this out. This is one of the hardest red pills to swallow after all the pedo shit and the holocaust.

Attached: 1550275285438.png (604x680, 362K)

The point about love in that movie was good though.

Yes, thankfully there is some takeaway from all the confusion. I like how they made the fake moon-landing into a red herring as well.
If the average person knew how NASA was formed there would be A LOT more questions being asked.

Attached: 1548656694777.jpg (1560x1680, 792K)

The thing that isn't mentioned about those National Socialists is that NASA was actually created by zionists and those people were likely forced to help participate in faking space travel and whatnot.

Werner was part of Plus Ultra with Walt Disney.

Attached: 1543879995960.jpg (672x480, 125K)

Horsepucky
This is the earth

Attached: DWgSSVuW0AE0X5U.jpg (1200x684, 116K)

The primary problem was a form of blight that was destroying all crops, even the ones that were being kept in the super secret NASA base. The only way to escape it was to leave the planet.

religion of science saying "we" aka the elite and privileged must leave to space to live out "our" new society

>why abandon Earth?
>Why take the impossible odds of outer space habitation when you can just go underground or into the ocean?
>Why not build underwater cities and farms?
> Or subterranean housing?
Because humanniggers.

Attached: 1548882525234.png (1128x1002, 105K)

Nothing evil seems to go without (((their))) touch.
Here's the better version of your pic

Attached: 1548691129235.jpg (1080x810, 543K)

Attached: 1542679470934.jpg (1222x973, 590K)

from what iv'e concluded the left for a few reasons
crops were failing of various kind
food production was dropping and mass hunger was imminent
nasa and other scientific agencies tried solving the problem but couldn't leading the public losing faith in them and defending them
nasa defunded could no longer work to fix the problem
so the only real way was to take a select few babies in pods and a small crew to begin civilization anew on a new planet
nasa wasnt expecting to solve the gravity equation the
also ayy lmaos showed up to guide them

Attached: tesseract.jpg (263x192, 11K)

I think the really interesting part is what the movie never actually directly told us though, at the end when cooper finally makes it back to realspace and gets taken aboard the station, his daughter is dying around her 80's or 90's, we're led to believe there's likely more than one station obviously.

But the population density of it is absolutely abysmal, most of the room is for growing crops, and it seems to be about the same density as the countryside, we could infer the other stations are about equal, or that maybe they're packed with people and just send the food to the other stations, but by the time his daughter discovered the secrets of the black hole that he sent back to her, she was already in her mid 30's, this only gave about 40-50 years to build everything, all the infrastructure, the rockets to get into space, the stations themselves, from infrastructure that was literally 'so' non-existent that people thought the moon landing fake, the idea that they 'saved the day' is laughable in the end, there is no way to save 7 billion people in only 40-50 years even if you had the entirety of the human race bootstrapping space colonization to do nothing but build these stations non-stop.

And keep in mind civilization was already in an advanced stage of collapse at this point, what likely happened is that they managed to build enough stations for a handful of people, a few hundred thousand, maybe a million, and the rest just stayed on earth to die, the only happy ending is that humanity didn't go extinct, but by the end of the movie 99.9% of everybody in the beginning of the movie is already dead, the ending is way darker than people actually realize and i'm surprised most people never even realize this.

>also ayy lmaos showed up to guide them
No aliens, it's humans from the future. Yes it's a paradox but deal with it.

you're incorrect
everyone attributed the wormhole to the beings
while traveling trough the wormhole the beings created they met the beings who appeared as gravity distortions
also the beings were closing the moment of event horizion when the protag went in

Attached: i_dont_know_about_that_one_chief.gif (320x320, 858K)

Can you please rephrase your post in English? Sadly it's the only language I speak.

you must be a moron if you think that counts as a argument
you prolly never even seen the movie
go back a crawl into your cesspool of degeneracy

Attached: FIRE_THE_MISSILES.gif (265x175, 103K)

I was not making an argument. I was asking you to post your response in an intelligible form of English so that I might respond to you properly.

if we can't fix the shit mess we created here on earth, we deserve to die out

Yeah I didn't get this, just build undersea, Rapture like cities

FPWP

The move was retarded all around. Don't expect any sense from Hollywood movie, it's all just one big attraction sprinklered with a tinny bits of science here and there for flavor.

He raises valid points.

Wooow, you all are very short sighted. The reason for going else where is that earth can literally be DEMOLISHED beyond habitability. Why not have a place to go?

Also, consider the fact that with outer space habitation you have a chance to get away from the cultures inherent to Earth.

So, filtered air in a small closed environment in the super secret NASA base didn't work, but air in humongous colony ship somehow didn't have this problem and everything magically become fine?

I've only seen the movie once so my memory is vague but wasn't their plant diseases fucking up all the crops except corn? The abandonment of earth was due to the fear of losing corn and therefore all forms of food. The hope was starting over fresh on a farmable planet.

>Use said underwater or underground technology
>Develop technology / Tools / machines that aid us in having higher quality air
>continue being a surface dweller

I thought the corn induced madness in the movie was kinda goofy.

Would you say more or less likely than space particle metahumans traveling to the future through a paradoxical wormhole created by themselves in the future, for the past, allowing themselves to become the metahumans of the future, and thus manipulating the Nth dimension to create a wormhole in the past through which to travel to the future and achieve their final, metahuman form, giving them the ability to create a wormhole, allowing themselves to travel through space time and assemble, then relay the necessary data through space time, to launch the population into space and form gigantic space colonies and occupy the galaxy?

Every other object in the observable universe is round, but the earth is flat. Got it

Just lights in the sky

Attached: Mars Planet Nikon P 1000 Italy Roma 15.12.18_0.webm (852x480, 1.49M)

Attached: 1546116513620.webm (960x720, 993K)

Attached: 1522813069655.webm (960x540, 1.66M)

Attached: 1522350558143.webm (1280x720, 1.97M)

and FIAT money

looks like a piece of black paper and a hole in it.

This new learning amazes me sir bedevere

From what I recall it was some kind of plant disease causing mass deaths. Think the plague except for plants. Could we possibly find a cure for all blighted plants? Possibly, but remember there are two factors to this: develop a universal cure (about as easy as curing all forms of cancer with one cure), and figuring a way to inoculate ALL the plants affected. Not an easy feat, possible with the world's combined resources.

I'm not saying the movie wasnt dumb, it was in a lot of ways but it wasnt as simple as "durr hurr go underground/into the ocean" since either situation there could be an inadvertent introduction of the blight.

I want to add also that it's much more difficult to have undersea colonies than outer space ones. We know more about space than we do about our own oceans. An area with no atmosphere is much easier than building somewhere with several atmospheres of pressure.

>everyone attributed the wormhole to the beings

At first, yes, but later on Cooper speculates that in the future humankind becomes the so called beings.

>while traveling trough the wormhole the beings created they met the beings who appeared as gravity distortions

No. Later on it is revealed that it was Cooper, he was the gravity distortion that Brand reached out to touch. Just like it was Cooper with the sand pattern and bookcase.

Apparently you either didn't watch the movie or your ADD got in the way.