Why are people punching right on Curt Doolittle?

Why are people punching right on Curt Doolittle?

All he is advocating for is separation which is inevitable. If you think it isnt, you aren't thinking hard enough.

>Load up Curt Doolittle Propertarianism
>Find loads of tiny videos from literal who's "warning you about Curt Doolittle"
>NWG had Curt on before
>Now NWG attacking him with a 2 hour video randomly
Ive never seen anyone else on the altright get attacked like this.

Do we have controlled opposition here?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 113K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/channel/UCIGlVALFPYRROlXk511Cfhw
youtube.com/watch?v=Nrva3O4XVtA
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

To be fair you need to have a fairly high IQ to understand propertarianism

Doolittle gets shit on because he's retarded.

His whole system of Propertarianism is basically just describing what we want, without defining a mechanism to accomplish it.

>SJWs won't be allowed to silence speech, it will be illegal.
>Parasites won't be able to leech off the system, it will be illegal.
>Politicians won't be able to lie, it will be illegal.

It's cure-all snake oil.

So he has to single-handedly lead you to the promised land too?

you arent paying attention to the dialectic;
they arent attacking his theoretical system of government
they are attacking his envisioned endstate.
Curt thinks separation is inevitable and that it will happen
Everyone is attacking him saying this thinking is dangerous and that we need to keep voting R basically and "look how far Trump got us"
Its covert plan trusting

I have literally never seen anyone on Jow Forums talk about this dude. He's kind of autistic and discredits subjective experience too much for a lot of continentals, who tend to be more radical than analytics and so more likely to interface with the sort of stuff that Curt writes.

Based

Link to your blogs, Youtubes, and Reddit profiles please. I read some of his stuff years ago and forgot about him before finding a talk he did through some friends-of-friends-of-friends on Facebook. Curious to see how far the idea tracked, I was nearly sure it would peter out due to his autism driving people away.

Ive seen Curt describe himself as an aspie on several occasions; probably some truth if not actual truth.

Doolittle's appearance on Radical Agenda and TRS a year ago or so is quite good; but there is a load of good YouTube content with Doolittle.

You just have to get through the first 10 controlled search results "warning you" of the dangers of Curt

Not a single person has atttempted to propose a possible solution like Curt has. Not Sencer, not Enoch, no one. Attempting to codify anti-(((parasitism))) into law is not a bad idea. Fuck usury too. FINALLY SOMEONE has attepted to provide a solution and finally taken a fucking lead with this shit. Everyone else just has youtube channels. That's it.

Attached: 1.jpg (310x163, 5K)

Some guy made a youtube channel popularizing it and it has like 30k subs

You're probably talking about John Mark

youtube.com/channel/UCIGlVALFPYRROlXk511Cfhw

I sort of lost interest in it when I realized he punched above his weight with regards to religious topics. I broadly understand the tenets of his ideology. He had a good pasta for it that I've since lost track of. I couldn't recite it from memory, but as I remember his whole testimonialism was closely related to Duchesne's work and overlapped with Taleb's idea of skin in the game to a degree.

It's been a while, but I thought Curt sort of shied away from calling his system prescriptive. I know he's advocated for insurgency but the majority of his content hasn't involved an actual plan of how to take power, just a description of "how the world works."

I've seen at least one person claim he's a fed on that basis, which I sort of doubt but also wouldn't be surprised to learn. He was living in Kiev for a time but he still has American citizenship and travels there as well as London, so the fact that he hasn't been vanned yet is sort of concerning.

He's currently writing a book that he aims to be the model for the future of common law for the United States after a collapse, revolution, or white people simply begin dissociating from the Union by moving to rural locations and start building high trust communities. I am not aware of anyone else doing anything like this, even though it's a long shot.
youtube.com/watch?v=Nrva3O4XVtA

>thread about almost unknown modern philosopher
>does not explain anything about who he is
>does not explain anything about what his philosophy is
>does not explain anything about what Propertarianism
>does not define acronym for NWG before using it (random youtube channel with a very small following)
>asks people to provide an opinion on said undefined unexplained people and subjects
Holy shit, you massive fucking faggot.

I like him, it's good motivation for the right-wing to have an end-goal in mind. A new system with a new constitution.

Like if you combined the Propertarian constitution with the white ethno state that'd be good.

I am concerned this is unironic. I listened to TruDilTom speak about it once and couldn't follow at all.

The Distributist's criticism still stands against Curt Doolittle. Curt, stop posting on Facebook like an autiste and finish your book you fat lazy fuck.

It's just boomer-spiel semantics

I like his points about inevitable separation the most, not the autistic details of governors and taxation
if you dont know anything im saying, i cant help you

> describe himself as an aspie
I've noticed he looks up when thinking while speaking - is that aspie? It endears him to me, I do the same.

my aspie experienced is mostly linked to cwc which the only thing i learned was that RANDOM CAPS is a good example of auteest behavior

>if you dont know anything im saying, i cant help you
and this is why your thread is now dead

take it as advice for self-education, there are plenty clues in this thread and names.

if anything here interests you, load up google, type the name, press enter

His videos are a great breakdown of propertarianism for us with IQ's lower than 140.

I have an IQ of 141, so I can't really support nor refute your statement.

Attached: zxoyr.jpg (500x303, 26K)