More women than men?

What would happen if 40-50% of men were aborted?

We've seen and read about what happens in societies that are more male than female, and it usually leads to young men being aggressive. What would a society with 50-60 men for every 100 women look like? Assuming this was global so migration didn't matter. Are there any good books on this?

Attached: QgBesLG.jpg (1080x1080, 135K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/jul/11/women-know-less-politics-than-men-worldwide
psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

it would be paradise. female sexual market value would plummet

>We've seen and read about what happens in societies that are more male than female, and it usually leads to young men being aggressive
Gonna need a source on this

Isn't it already like this? There are more women than men, I mean.

....?
You do know the majority of the human race is female right? Also men die younger, or die in war/conflict/high risk scenarios more than women.
Really, due to so many betas in our current generation, the female male ratio in terms of dating market is like 3:1

Something like these fish that change their gender would happen. Big think.

Russia has been like this for decades, I believe.

At the very least after WWII ended, it was like this.

Best place to look would be 1920s France after millions of young men died or were badly injured in the First World War.

I can’t discern much affect on society because there are so many other factors that could account for how that period was.

It does appear like women became more whoreish not less. They had to compete harder with each other for men so it’s possible that’s why. Or it’s just the effect of the roaring 20s and the number of men didn’t have much to do with that.

Would only work if it was global. Even then woman are extremely territorial of their providers and don't usually like to share. Wars would be fought over the few men. Suicide rates would probably skyrocket for woman.

thats why russia is so based. women are a dime a dozen so ivans dont give a fuck about their opinions

only in old age, women live longer.

Cool little factoid for people... Instead of aborting the men you could just castrate them in utero and the embryo ends up growing a vaginal cavity. No penis.

Another place to look is colleges that are dominated by females. From what I’ve heard, at colleges with something like 80% women, a few chads get more pussy than they can handle and betas still don’t get any action. So from this I’m thinking very little would change and you’d just have more spinsters.

>What would a society with 50-60 men for every 100 women look like?
That is what it is like at my church
I am an autistic weirdo but I have cute girls sitting by me and talking to me every week

Yeah let's go against nature, that society totally wouldn't collapse. Stop fapping to porn user jesus christ you're fucking addicted

I love her from the Jow Forums posts. Nice HH

There are more old women than old men because they live longer
There are more young men than young women because men are born at 1.05 the rate of women
But the ratio for old women to old men is a lot higher than that

Economic collapse due to the inferiority of women.

Attached: 38150110_204332970437811_952928474182451200_n.jpg (1080x1066, 1.3M)

I believe one instance is referred to as the third order consequences of China's one child policy. Basically that families would want to have a boy (and get rid of any girls born) because they are more immediately helpful to the family and have greater earning potential among other things. This led to the young population to skew more heavily to males leaving many feeling disenfranchised because they can't find a mate eventually leasing to violence and unrest. I don't feel like looking for the studies on it but I remember learning about it in my political science class in college.

Still no gf ;-;

Boy babies are the result of female orgasms.

Girl babies indicate many unsatisfied women being used and discarded.

Attached: alexbronx.png (800x1388, 918K)

Look to China user

Attached: IMG_0409.jpg (480x360, 80K)

Society would collapse.

Just hang men for crimes and put women in brothels if they cheat or race mix. Problem solved.

In case you're into that, pic related is some good written fiction about what would happen if women would suddenly disappear.

Attached: 14365206666_4ffc51c530_b.jpg (634x1024, 306K)

this is happening in africa rite nau

Attached: sprudo-deebly-goncerned.jpg (400x400, 28K)

There'd be a whole lot more of them stinkier girl rancid egg farts in the world, that's for sure. Wonder if there's any provision for them in AOC's new green deal. Them shits can peel the lens off a puppy dogs eyes as well as the deplete the ozone

indeed, the price of pussy would crater. when the only power women have over men is done away with, a legitimate patriarchy will emerge

Attached: into the bum it goes.jpg (1280x720, 140K)

Do it!! Kill more man babies!

This, also abolish criminal justice system. Accusation = guilt.

Paradise as women are begging men for sex.

Reality, about the same because men will always be thirsty ass niggas

Ask old paraguayans what its like.

Oh please; you faggots would have each other in and out of jail with all your jealous lover quarrels

basically the value of pussy fell to near zero. sex tourists would go to post war berlin like we go to thailand today

the 1950s is frequently touted as the conservative golden age. it's no coincidence it occurred soon after WWII, where large swathes of marriageable men were wiped out

Attached: 1950s.jpg (574x382, 56K)

Think about it another way, men would be out-voted massively, like after WW2, whereby the policies would swing towards liberalism, and ultimately destruction.

Caos!
It almost make me laugh all the incels there that say it would be a paradise.

The quality of men is somewhat inferior to women, more inferior men mean more inferior offspring dooming the human race.

We already have too many blacks, indians and asian in general...
There is no need for other inferior races.

Attached: 13516414_f1024.jpg (1024x681, 173K)

i think feminism and various associated societal ills would diminish as men would have less reason to put up with wahmen's inane horse shit. consequently, holes would go back to voting the way their hubbies told them to. it's not like they have much interest in or knowledge of politics to begin with

theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/jul/11/women-know-less-politics-than-men-worldwide

Attached: college makes you dumber.jpg (801x582, 59K)

But am saying we already know, as post WW1 was a degenerate collapse, and post WW2 was the beginning of the end of Western civilisation: women voted for socialism and 'liberation'. When votes matter, you can't be out voted by 2 million women, conservatism will always lose.

yes, women are communistic in nature while men are individualistic. women are also malleable and tend to bend to the will of their male partner. still, it might be that a female super majority would vote us ever closer to some socialist utopia. i guess a more pertinent concern is that, given the cucked state of the modern man, wahmen might not need a super majority to pull it off

You would have sort of after war society. Is it good or bad? I don't know. I've never lived in one

Wouldnt work because men would become stagnant and just be happy getting laid every other night. The fight for pussy is one of the fundamental motivators for a man. The trick is to see it as a biological trigger and not let it consume your life. Man were made for more, women just turn us on.

>Russia has been like this for decades, I believe.
no, Russia has more men than women up until 35 or 40, iirc

>russia
>based
Kys

Imagine the smell

Weimar happened in the 20s, so that's probably wouldn't be so great after all. Also sexual liberation in USA, what was it? 50s? coincidence? I don't think so

societies that have more aggressive men tend to have less men retard, not the otherwise

sexual liberation started in the 60s, after the birth control pill was introduced

>a few chads get more pussy than they can handle and betas still don’t get any action. So from this I’m thinking very little would change and you’d just have more spinsters.
This. This is exactly what would happen. Most women already share a small amount of Chad, Thad, and Brads. You think fewer chads and even fewer betas would change anything?

Attached: goBT7rn.png (764x313, 31K)

Who is she?

Nothing would change.

Women would still compete for the top 20% of men, meaning that 80% of men still couldn't get laid.

AWALT. A woman would rather share a chad than have her own beta.

>What would happen if 40-50% of men were aborted?
An ideal society. Honestly, this combined with encouraging women to be homemakers a little more would be paradise on earth. Less competition for jobs, less competition for women. Women would be more likely to try and become marriageable. I say this as an incel who should have been one of the ones cleansed. I honestly don't think people like me should have ever been allowed to leave the womb. Life's not good enough to justify slaving away just to never get to even hold a girl's hand.

Attached: 1515772890484.jpg (1920x1080, 679K)

HI HILLARY!

Attached: hillary fatass.jpg (367x540, 47K)

Shouldn't Brits know the answer to this question more than most of us here? I remember reading that post WW2 that so many British men died that there were many woman who would grow old without a husband

It would be the same shit.
Female hypergamy ensures the 80-20 rule, only this time it would be literal harems for Chad instead of pump and dump.
Women prefer being a third or fourth wife of Chad to even looking at a beta.

I guess you could attempt to prevent polygamy but that's probably a loosing battle.

>You think fewer chads and even fewer betas would change anything?
yes, because most women want to get married and have children. also, many betas would be upgraded to at least brad status since wahmen would not be able to be as picky as they are currently

Sometimes I wish I was aborted. But not today.

the 80-20 rule has only ever existed in a situation where both sexes are approximately equally represented. it is the way it is because there's an abundance of dick and a relative scarcity of vagina, because men want to fuck more than women do. the ratio would surely change if there were far fewer men than women

This.

psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success

Women will always mate with the alpha, even if they have to share him with a greater number of rival women.

Betas still wouldn't be getting laid.

Yes, the ratio would get worse. Pic related.

Attached: 1528869855045.png (738x738, 614K)

>because men want to fuck more than women do
Kek bullshit. Women can't go a few weeks without getting fucked or being in a relationship. Meanwhile I've been going like this my whole life. You wouldn't imagine how filthy minded women are when they talk among themselves.

It would be nice to exterminate the 50% most cucked, feminist men.

Do this in 2 or 3 generations and all problems are solved

it would be normal for men to be with multiple women and the market would even out .

The end of civilization. Let's be frank here, women produce NOTHING of value. Most of them are either teachers or nurses. Without enough men to grow the food, harvest the food, drive the trucks, build the roads, do the electrical work or plumbing work or factory work....the output of goods and services would plummet. The stupid cunts would all be hungry and cold in the dark.

what would the world be like if women were actually smart?

You forget that a lot of those genes are passed from the women who have free reign to reproduce too.

t. brazilian intellectual

population boom, feminized men, fall of capitalism, takeover by homosexuals

Attached: jghkl.png (642x744, 978K)

Men want to fuck more than women because men are naturally and evolutionary WAY more horny by a factor of at least 10. That's an absolute fact.

Women can fuck for other reasons than being horny (but they can ofc also be horny).

You can see the exact same things in practically all other mammal species (like dogs and rabbits).

>Kek bullshit. Women can't go a few weeks without getting fucked

If this was true. Some random guy could walk down the street and fuck some random woman instantly (if women were as horny as men). There would be fucking at EVERY corner at all times.

Bro, do you even biology?

More extreme with OPs numbers, woman are everywhere there and are easy to screw

You don't know women then. You wouldn't believe how much Chad dick they go through on a daily basis. I myself maybe fap once a week but otherwise have no crazy desires. But these women literally go crazy if they don't have the dick. They used to call it hysteria. Men are more stoic and logical. Women are more emotional, sexual desire is a feminine attribute. That's why they're always talking about their boyfriends or sexual escapades. I mean they literally go on vacation to have dick buffet. I haven't had sex in my entire life, a woman would not be able to survive that. Women are definitely the more sexual sex. They have more sex ffs.

>Some random guy could walk down the street and fuck some random woman instantly (if women were as horny as men
See The reason is that women are more sexually exhausted from having more sex than men. Women are more sexual than men.

kill yourself

>But am saying we already know, as post WW1 was a degenerate collapse, and p
Imagine the shits that drop out of that pooper.

Google Jessica baby fat

Japan has a shortage of available men due to “grasseating men” who have no interest in real women. They are peaceful, prosperous, and very advanced. Muslim countries are the opposite due to polygamy. A civilization should always strive to have more available women then men. The Romans knew this. The old feminist slags and roasties want to import hordes of low iq male savages becauses it increases their market value and prospects. They want to keep the women down and oppressed, because if they’re liberated they will enter the market and date white men. If left unchecked, this will be a primary factor in the fall of the West. The only immigrants who should be allowed are intelligent, young, childless Asian women from East Asia and the Middle East. That’s it. Maybe the occasional male if he’s older and a genius that can contribute much. A civilization with high female to male ratio is peaceful and prosperous. A civilization with a high male to female ratio will enter 72 virgin mode and cease to be a civilization.

Attached: 160BA429-9EF3-4430-9C9F-9827EABA8C28.jpg (400x266, 31K)

doesnt matter because women still would only fuck the chads. the chads would just get laid even more. nothing else would change

Even with fags this isnt that common. People go to bar/club to meet up with those feeling like having a fling.
Being upfront and confident at a bar with a woman can get you laid quick.

>I have cute girls sitting by me and talking to me every week.
This and in my case even underage girls, 12 to 14 yrs mostly, and thats freaks me out. They are starving for a man

"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Feminist Sally Gearhart, in 'The Future - If There Is One - Is Female.'

You'd have a society that doesn't work, since men run literally everything.