So the new Combating European Anti-Semitism Act of 2017 basically puts Jews officially above any criticism, with the entire might of the US Govt defending them.
But there is a small problem with this plan: the Constitution.
We have to use the Engine of the Left against them. To do this, we be specific.
Amendment 1: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment 14.1:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Amendment 11: The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
Tl;dr: Congress cannot make a law regarding religion. When the angle of "Jews are a race" is played, then comes in equal protection under the law--the same defense here provided to the Jews can now be provided to the Patriarchy, the white males, and those of every race and background. Finally, if they fall back on "b-but its for European Anti-Semitism!" We point to the 11th which says that foreigners suits against citizens will not be honored in the USA, nor can any law be extended to non US citizens so that is out the window.
This drops the three major support points for this bill.
We have our angle, but now comes the question of action?
The good news here is this is very NPC/normie friendly. We aren't trying to stop protecting the Jews, No!
Instead, we are trying to empower Congress and the government to apply the protections in this bill to every person in the USA. No longer can it be said that the Patriarchy controls the world or that blacks commit statistically more crimes or that Mexicans are mostly illegals or that Chinese are just spies for their host country.
Use this law to defeat the divide and conquer oppression Olympics, because stating that a patriarchy of white cis males are keeping your tranny black ass down is now illegal. Using these three amendments, we can out Jew the Jew.
The battle plan is in place, so now is the time to act.
There are three tiers. Remember, the Jew's weakness is their arrogance. That, and violence, but we will get to that. They do not believe they can be subverted by the goyim using their own tricks.
Step 1: start a petition on whitehouse.gov. Frame yourselves as the most oppressed minority you can, point out that there is a large conspiracy of the dangerous alt-right to claim you are trying to take over the country and turn their children in to commies when you just want to live and let live. Petition that the protections provided to the heebs in this law be extended to all Americans, citing the 14th amendment for equal protection. Taking a position of weakness is important here--big government and (((they))) cannot help but offer more protection to the citizens--for a price. The joke here is that we won't be footing the bill.
Step 2: Infiltration-- across the internet keep up the charade seen in 1. Post on forums, not criticizing the law but begging for support to apply its protections to your sad case and everyone else because . Call your representative, and get an email group going on forums to collectively email them a la net neutrality or SOPA. Keep the position of weakness.
At this point, the word will be out, and media will have no choice but to cover it. People will know, and if the cards are played right, they will be clamoring for the same protections afforded the Jews here.
Phase 3: false flag/lawsuit: we need to then go on the offensive, targeting literally everyone. Herbs, niggers, fags, trannies, whitey, everyone. Get campaigns going saying they are each trying to destroy the world and focus on getting media attention. Then, team weakness comes in and files a lawsuit to have these protections provided to everyone.
Unironically you kind of get it, leaf: this is well defined hate speech. But what if it was constitutional? Either the freedom of speech cannot be touched, laws on religion cannot be made, laws affecting foreigners cannot be honored OR we are all equally protected by said law.
Yes. Even you. Imagine jailing anyone who called you a fucking leaf.
Oliver Morris
There is an actual laid out three fucking step plan there m8. Its what (((they))) did to achieve their goals. It is tried and true. It works. No need to reinvent the wheel.
Which the Jews will immediately dodge by claiming nationality instead of religion. At that point, hit em with the 14th. It's like a fucking unstoppable combo in a shitty fighting game, this three punch religion-equality-no laws regarding foreigners can't be countered so long its done in that order.
Nathaniel Williams
Israel is the endgame.
Jayden Hill
>Amendment 11: The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. So how do we get this shit to the Supreme Court to defeat it?
Cameron Lee
Because he has a face. He is a single mortal man.
We suffer from neither of those weaknesses if we used the proposed strategy.
And This lays out the theory and the battle plan. In order for the supreme court to choose this case out of the many presented to them, there needs to be significant popular support for them to do so. We have to make noise before we can be heard.
>To President Trump... what a fucking moron to pass this. It is dripping with contradictions to the constitution.
John Young
Marbury V. Madison.
And, to my fellow SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED folks, by having the supreme court take this on REGARDLESS of the outcome it will provide direct precedent for gun control legislation to be challenged.
Jaxson Campbell
Just reading this bill pisses me off greatly. I fucking hate boomers for being the ones that suck israels dick more than any generation before it. This shit angers me so fucking much. These kikes hate america and they hate the founding fathers. FUCK THEM
Nathaniel Gray
it's no surprise that our entire government hates the constitution at this point
Christopher Scott
depends on how many wanted it. Wasn't that the 425 house and Senate? If it's more that 3/4 vote it probably wouldn't survive a veto attempt. Just a review into a court to show its unconstitutionality or impossibility to enforce, which is both.
Lucas Campbell
Channel that anger m8. This requires collaboration as one man cannot do this alone.
Yes. But remember: there are large amounts of dual citizenship folks in congress. In both houses. Who have been there quite a while, with a lot of influence on special committees.
This was them waving their dick around expecting to get out Scott free. The iron is hot. Strike!
Just imagine having the balls and the nerve to write and pass such a BILL in the US of A. Let alone anywhere else on Earth.
Isaac Baker
He's saying to use constitutional grounding as support for countering the bill.
Joseph James
this will hurt the european soros shills posting drumpf's a kike memes, they will be ID'd and outed as anti semites
Asher Walker
Yup, they are gonna try to take them both out.
Levi Thompson
>implying it is good to counter this bill it hurts the soros shills and muslim posters, jews and muslims alike
Hudson Moore
Do it and see what they tell you. I'll bet you get nothing but told to pound sand or it might even be your death.
Owen Foster
> This bill expresses the sense of Congress Congress literally virtue signalling to jews and passing a meaningless piece of paper
John Edwards
It's already law you already lost go to bed you need to go to work tomorrow to make your jew boss money
Joshua Taylor
Bureaucrats care about rules. They love leaving in loopholes that they alone can exploit. The problem was that they didn't really for see this bill being challenged, so they dropped their guard, expecting the cattle to go along with the charade.
You beat a bureaucrat by forcing them to obey their own rules.
You didn't read the bill or you didn't understand it if you did. This isn't a law, it has nothing to do with Americans or the constitution, and it's an empty gesture.
Henry Long
this doesn't affect americans, just the soros shills posting walltouch.jpg
Samuel Butler
>empty gesture no, soros shills posting 'drumpf is a kike' will be outed as anti-semites
I say again Doomshill, we will defeat the law by being equally protected by it.
No longer can it be theorized that a group of goyim are systematically trying to exterminate the Jews, as that is a dangerous conspiracy of control leveraged over a group of people.
Probably the dumbest thing I have ever read...seriously read that shit. What kind of logic is that? He sounds like Jaden Smith. >Jesus: "Hurr if I say that I am telling the truth, why don't you believe me? You must be a devil worshipper."
Dylan Richardson
There really is no other way to go about it peacefully, I like your plan.
Henry Stewart
Its simple and effective: equal protection under the law.
Or, more Jow Forums friendly, "to beat the Jew you must become the Jew".
you are an idiot we wouldn't be in this mess if what you said is true they make the laws you follow them
William Jones
You're right. This isn't a battle one man can fight alone, so I come to one of the final bastions of freedom of expression looking for good men who will wage war against the very for who has almost stripped everything away from them.
See I have a God given right to criticize whoever the fuck I want to with impunity. Some kikes doing the shekelshuffle because they scribbled some chickenshit down on a napkin does not change this.
Vastly under rated post. I always wonder when its worth it to engage kikes in their legal word play. Too little and they run amok. Too much and you realize its all in for bad faith for them anyway. Closest thing I can reason is theres no point dealing with them in a one on one or closed system, they wont change. People around the kike will be swayed however.
Jose Edwards
> myth baka. Why do you need a law to fight a myth?
Free Palestine. That's your in - many on the Left view Israel as a White Supremacist ethnostate oppressing some innocent "people of colour". Hilariously, the only difference with the typical Jow Forums view is that they aren't really White, but that's irrelevant. As long as you can reword it to be Left-friendly (ie, push the rich Jew as a class issue, oppression of Muslims as white supremacy etc) most the redpills here are applicable. Hell, remind them that they're a religious theocracy - take that anti-religious Leftist sentiment and focus it where it belongs. Hell, I still remember the Left being more "anti-semetic" than the (((Right))) up until only a few years ago. This is a real enemy of my enemy situation, and while the Left would never sulky themselves by supporting things, they don't need to know where all this great new info (and decent quality memes) are coming from. Hell, the only defense the Jews have is to say "But we aren't White, so you have to view us as oppressed PoC too!" meaning you collapse the wave function as to their ethnic membership in our nations. So it's the horns of a dilemma - they're gonna get impaled regardless.
Hilarious. I don't get why evangelicals put jews before themselves.
Thomas Green
Lel no, there's already ops to sew this in the Left underway (has been for a while, by other Jow Forums's), but many here still aren't aware of them (thanks slide threads). So I can't claim originality, simply putting it out there that this is a good situation to make use of this strategy.
