Mathematicians Hate Him!

Why doesn't Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez use this simple trick to multiply all the money in the Treasury by 1?

twitter.com/terrencehoward/status/925754491881877507?fbclid=IwAR3PgjSyq2ZCNbRYaZkAlXSz7SieacNWuw_dtTrh0x_GQOHCl8Ivdx-UPxs

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-02-25 at 9.09.25 PM.png (568x633, 168K)

>Why doesn't Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Attached: zizek.png (400x400, 207K)

This reads like the work of a madman

Rule for Multiplying Numbers by 1
Multiplication Rule of 1 :
Any digit when multiplied with one, will give the same number as result.

only an ignant [sic] nig nog would tweet out something so fucking stupid....he needs to go live in wakanda.

how in fucking hell does 1 + (1 X 1) = 3 ? this man is a total moron and I hope he dies from a horrible car crash and his guts are splattered on the road like a chinaman.

nigger logic......this is why they're so advanced.

>pol

I mean, she already has NYC sitting on a cool $3 billion since they didn't have to discounted it from Amazon tax revenue - (because she scared them away from the city).

You have one thing one time
ITS FUCKING ONE
I HAVE ONE BANANA ONE TIME.
I HAVE ONE BANANA.

>Rule for Multiplying Numbers by 1

That part where he tries to cite the rule of Algebra that an equation has to be the same on both sides.
>He says 1x1 = 1 is not the same on both sides.
Yes it is. It is 1 ONE TIME. One 1 on each side.

How many times?
ONE TIME

It's not like it matters anyway. Godel proved that numbers don't logically real.

so, if you balance out the right side with the left , you get

1*1=1*1......

which, wait for it.........wait for it........=1...

>numbers don't logically real.

Attached: (you).jpg (1280x720, 85K)

hey so i dont like to flex this shit much online bc its retarded but im a physics major in undergrad rn and this "proof" is some of the dumbest shit i've ever read in my life. i sobered up by like 4 shots by reading the first three lines. it ruined my night

>don't logically real

fucking moron, the computer you're using to post on here uses numbers and math to create everything you see on the screen. The whole purpose to computers was to solve complex math in the first place.

>assigning three separate variables to the same number
Even without the retarded pseudo mathematics he attempted to pull this makes no sense

you forgot to account for time.

1banna X 1 time
_______________= one banna
time

What? He didn't, he proved that there can't be a consistent set of axioms for all of math.

I don't know why you posted that. It's been almost 90 years since he proved there is no logical proof to fit all numbers and mathematics consistently. If you can't logically prove a logic-based system even at the most basic level (in this case, natural numbers), the entire system is logically flawed.

Cool. The best part about your post is Godel's theorem was proven as true by a computers multiple times (most recently in 2014). If you have any way to disprove the theorem I suggest you submit it and instantly earn your PhD and Nobel Prize.

He should have simplified the 1x1 at the start before adding 1.

>can't into order of operations

who would've thought

math is fundamentally flawed which is why we cant solve the three bodies problem. 1x1=1 can only be disagreed with by a fucking cunt though.

> the basic laws of common sense
Lol

Math is cancelled
Fuck crackers

what the fuck? why do i have an australia flag? after falsely being marked as breaking rule 3 because Jow Forums is now owned by chinks

yeah if you guys care at all about the type of shit you post about on this site you need to go to /v/ right now and see that discussion about communist chinese being fucking insane is being outright censored and users banned. we have lost this site and it's time to move on

Rule of Niggers: Any nigger's I.Q. multiplied by 1 = 1

Is it really a debunking of mathematics or just the limits of language?

Counter point: 1 coal-burner x 1 wrong move = 2 black eyes

I don't give a fuck about your made up bullshit flat earth tier theories. beyond Differential equations, I really don't give a fuck about math.

>I don't know why you posted that.

Because you broke the rules of grammar along with lending relativism to the garbage in OP.

Yes, a context and a premise undergirds all languages. That doesn't give you the right to shit on Western Maths, the widest, most profound language ever devised, with this psychotic fever dream.

What do you want? To cut open one apple you have and find the number 'one' inside?

A language, a territorial sign regime (if you want to bring Math down to that level) can't just be changed by anyone's subjective interpretation. The meaning of a language doesn't exist in a mind. It exists in the world and pervaids Beings.

1 banana x 1 time = 2 bananas (one banana)

best is his reasoning
> there's 2 things on the left, and only one on the right

Attached: 1496461653885.png (600x783, 384K)

>it ruined my night

Just look at these functions of e for a while.
Very beautiful. Soothing.

Attached: e.png (607x550, 40K)

You own one banana to one jew. In one day you own two bananas because of interest rates.

ya'll mind if i hit that y=e^x

When the entire system is broken, it's an unironic possibility. Implausible, but not impossible.

Both really, as what is math but logically-expressed language?

There's no need to be so upset that what you thought was concrete truth is flawed.

>That doesn't give you the right to shit on Western Maths, the widest, most profound language ever devised, with this psychotic fever dream
I didn't know I was Kurt Godel. You'll be pleased to know I've been dead for 40 years tho.

Ok smartass, then tell me another way to solve 3 body problem analytically

>When (a) and (b) are positive integers, that (a) is to be added to itself as many times as there are units in (b)
Seems like you could clear him up by telling him 1 times 1 means one 1. He should be able to understand that, I think.

point out a specific flaw.

>Both really, as what is math but logically-expressed language?
Something needs not to be perfect to make sufficient predictions.

1 x 1 is still 1

Attached: screengrab-20190225-214407.jpg (720x1339, 263K)

(((Gödel)))

Attached: 129232-004-C53AA1B2.jpg (242x300, 8K)

>Godel

Godel didn't prove 1x1 = 2, did he?

Yes, you user, are very ham handed insinuating one is just as good an answer as two?
Are you Black?
Did you take a few Post-Modern courses in College?

I made the point you are trying to make better than you.
You don't speak about things things with care and you shouldn't talk about them in public.

Are you seriously saying 1x1 = 2?
Then fuck off with your relativist point you thought you understood but can't explain here.
I already articulated your point and showed it has no bearing on what 1x1 equals.

what a moron. when using order of operations in the equation below you get 2. but that is completely different that 1 x 1.

I already did. Math (and natural numbers) is logically inconsistent. When a system built from logic isn't logically consistent, that's a major flaw.

They would cease to be predictions, but approximations. In a system predicated on giving the one true solution that is not okay.

I'm not saying it is. I'm saying it could be and no I had no time for post-modernism in college. I don't know why you brought that up either. Godel long predated Post-Modernism.

>There's no need to be so upset that what you thought was concrete truth is flawed.
He's just pretending he has the goods that undermine Western Civilization. He's a nigger. Probably with $200,000 in debt.

Hey, Nigger?
Have you noticed the Math is still penetrating the truth of the universe at an exponential rate?

Calculus updates neural network weights.
You should go tell the people pouring trillions of dollars in AI systems "what they think is truth is flawed."
Go give them the redpill.

>I'm saying it could be
1x1 could equal 2

Explain to the thread when one thing can be multiplied by one and you get two things?

Gödel was a kike trying to break people's minds.

no point out a SPECIFIC flaw.

when I use a transducer to sense weight. When I use a rotary encoder to find the position of a shaft. When I use a thermocouple to sense the temperature of a furnace. the signal comes to the controller as eithere 4-20mA or 0-5volt signal. When I program this equipment I have to use an equation (generally a linear one cuz I'm lazy and two points is enough testing for me) but nonetheless this equipment that we expect to work, that could KILL people if it fails that I'm entrusted with programming, I entrust math to work every time. And guess what, it turns out that in the real world math is very useful.

your faggoty theories are not marketable and you'll never have a job nigger.

refer to my calculator post you turbo nigger.

Thanks for including your facebook tracking id in the link, we'll be putting that to good use.

Attached: 1535947419110.gif (500x281, 1.29M)

>1x1 is 2 ones

Attached: 682715B7-6763-43FB-B8E8-188A8EF9D424.jpg (1200x1000, 166K)

Have something to sooth this taste.

Attached: haveaneasyone.png (343x233, 3K)

What are you going to do with it?
Look on facebook where I posted the same thing?

>The only reason this man is not in charge of your municipal water system is because he became an actor.
Thanks affirmative action

"Remember the basic laws of common sense" - Carl Friedrich Gauss

>projection and ad hom over proven theorems older than his great grandparents
WEW

>Math is still penetrating the truth of the universe at an exponential rate
Factually incorrect. Math can merely explain some aspects but even that is questionable. Truth is even more questionable considering it's constantly changing. Are you so naive to be stuck in the enlightenment philosophy that objective truth is obtainable?

You're telling me an Austrian Christian was a jew?

I'll get back to you in a few years.

And when you produce these equations for your exact answer, you give yourself some wiggle room for error, yes? A plus and minor here and there. Every scientific paper and real-world application does. Now, why would you need that wiggle room if it were so exact? It should give you the exact truth, but it does not. In fact, random error is a fact of scientific application. Replication can certainly narrow it down, but it will never be exact. Never TRUE. Merely an approximation within an acceptable range.

That ain't shit. One set of train cars added to one other set of train cars yields one long set of train cars.
>1 + 1 = 1

Attached: sip_em.png (553x596, 88K)

1x1=2
I can prove this because
if 1x1=1
then 1x1+1=1+1+2
yes 2=2
how fucking retarded is this idiot??

I thought I read that in the Principia

>enlightenment philosophy that objective truth is obtainable?

Nah. Kuhns, Popper, and pragmatism.

>assigns different values to a, b, c
>adds '1' to 'a' and 'c' literally raping raping the aforementioned set premise
>suddenly shocked when 1 has a value of 3

Okay, I'll try my hand:

A nigger robs
A jew scams
A white works

While a nigger robs, and the jew scams, the white works, but... is it really?

Nigger = a
Jew = b
White = c

While a robs, and b scams, c works. But "abc" are just letters and don't mean anything so...

While c robs, and c scams, a and b work.

HOLY FUCKING SHIT WHITE PEOPLE ARE SCAMMING THE JEWS AND ROBBING NIGGERS! ZOMG I USED MATH!

>basic laws of common sense
go fuck yourself you stupid fucking faggot

I wouldn't worry about it

This is bad logic

The mathematic equivalent of proving the earth is flat and claiming the firmament is real

I feel dumber for having read it

Eech

Attached: Babylon.5.S03E22.DVDRip.XviD-SFM.avi_snapshot_34.45_[2018.11.20_16.53.47].jpg (576x320, 85K)

BASED LEAF

no nigger I measure the point at 4mA and 20mA, create a linear equation from those two points, call it a day. it works user. try not being a faggot sometime. we don't all live in a lab. when I have 16 machines to program in a single day why am I going to give a shit if the accuracy of the thermocouple on the quench tank is off by half a degree?

>Factually incorrect. Math can merely explain some aspects but even that is questionable.

All of Science is built on Math.
Computer Science is built on Math.

You're playing word games. It's not interesting and you don't explain your points at all. You just project relativist nonsense everywhere.

Come at me, bros.

how do i get a job where i can talk about mAs and quench tanks and the thermocouple accuracy

hol' up.. so when you pay a nigger 1 time.. it should count as if you paid him 2 times?? hmm

honestly I bet you're too dumb to know what "mA" means

mA stands for miliAmp, I'll give you that tidbit since you're such a blithering turbo nigger.

and if you don't know what an Amp is cut your balls and dick off and get in the kitchen you aren't a man.

by the Identity Property. The number 1 is called the "multiplicative identity."

>1x1=1
>Lets add one to each side
>add

What the fuck kind of voodoo mathematics is this?

Attached: BAFAA004-FC13-4396-B297-982ED706417E.gif (434x512, 2.6M)

>when I have 16 machines to program in a single day why am I going to give a shit if the accuracy of the thermocouple on the quench tank is off by half a degree
Because someone's life depends on it. You said it yourself. You just agreed with me btw. You're okay with the approximation and don't give a shit if it's true. You KNOW it isn't true and you're okay with that. When someone tells you it isn't suddenly it's a problem.

Both of those accept the limitations of math and have for a very long time. Shit, one of the first things you learn about in CS is the importance of fucking float values.

>ad hom
I really got under your skin, didn't I?

industrial electrician? controls engineer? not glamorous work user it's rather dirty getting your hands all inside the electrical boxes, I work in maintenance. I'm like one step up from the production floor niggers.

I got to the same conclusion when I was 7.
The next day I learned I was wrong and I moved on.

if you can understand that stuff sohuldn't you be able to get a much much higher/cleaner job?

That reads like that pasta why slug more slug

whites btfo

Attached: math is racist.png (1389x1550, 1.62M)

>Shit, one of the first things you learn about in CS is the importance of fucking float values.

And if you use Linear Perspective to calculate the apparent size of the sun to prove the Heliocentric model of the earth true and the flat earth theory false you can't use the numbers to determine anything because it's a float and "the truth is flawed".
You're not very smart. You like to play smart alluding to something you don't understand but you think makes you cool.

Absolutely anti-logos

are you fucking retarded? nobody is going to die if the quench tank water is half a degree hotter than is recommended. Do you know what a safety factor is?

and it doesn't matter where the encoder is saying the ram is, ram can't move when someone breaks the light curtain.

boy how does it feel to never have stepped foot in a place of work in your entire adult life?

also you didn't get under my skin, I just assmed a nigger like you wouldn't know anything about the properties of electricity.

BTW, what does VDC mean? I'll wait for you to answer. though you'll probably just google is like a nigger.

uh, I guess, I mean I always wanted to get in design, but we don't all get to live in a fairytale.

>Some call them the Annunaki, the Sky People...
>they gave that poor misguided people a false axiom upon which to build the world...
>that would allow for a measure of growth and productivity for that civilization but would inevitably lead to failure and its inevitable collapse.

Attached: 1538183163333.gif (193x178, 154K)

Is he just shitposting or believe the shit he is posting?

If he believes it, no wonder he didn't became war machine since he can't into math.

>(a+b) = c
>"Hurr associative and commutative law"
>"...When a and b are positive integers a is to be added to itself as many times as there are units in b"

The fuck is he smoking, that would totally break all multiplication, nobody ever said multiplication should work that way. That would make 5x5 = 30 and 100 x 1 = 200 and 1x0 = 1

dude knows words like associative and distributive but literally doesnt know how multiplication works

Since amazon doesn't have to pay taxes there, NYC is now sitting on exactly 0 billion dollars in additional tax revenue

>I wouldn't worry about it

Post my name if you can get it from that link.

That's the whole point here. You can't. You literally cannot. You can give me an approximation but you can't give the TRUE position. The truth isn't flawed. The truth can't be flawed. The flaws are in the approximation given by a flawed system.

>ad hom and projection
Do any of you have any actual arguments or is this all I'm gonna get?

>Do you know what a safety factor is?
Please don't make me repeat myself. We've been over this. You are well aware you don't have the exact value. You aren't interested in the true value. You approximate and call it good enough. That's what the fucking safety factor is, you triple nigger. When I tell you this, you get butt flustered when you've been aware of it the whole time. Last (You) you're getting.

What the fuck is wrong with you seppo? You have an American flag and you linked to my post.

We'll be colonizing Mars next year with that new and enlightening information.

He misused associativity and commutativity.
t. PhD in math.
Cringe.

Of course you racist bigots wouldn't understand this stuff
This is some advanced stuff here
You need to have a masters and a Ph.D. in nigganometry before you can understand this man's genius

Attached: Black_Scientist.jpg (620x480, 46K)

Fuck me. I didn’t notice it was a gif and I was halfway through reading it when the face started moving. Scared the shit out of me.

>You can't. You literally cannot.

Your point is just about accuracy not relevant to the problem? You must be trolling at this point?
You aren't White.

I can measure Apparent Size of the sun and see that it stays the same size all day and doesn't double at noon.

You talked for so long about a point you didn't understand you are now saying you can't measure if something did, or did not double in size.

yeah I don't have the exact value because of the limitations of the measuring device, not the math.

All Godel proved is that our current understanding of mathematics will leave certain inconsistencies in very abstract theories that wouldn't even make sense outside of a theoretical academic setting and some questions regarding these theories will be unresolvable.
Don't worry youreselves guys, 1 + 1 still equals 2.

also VDC = volts in direct current

satan

How's your $300k starting salary treating you?