JESUS was a NATIONAL SOCIALIST

21 Leaving that place, Jesus withdrew to the region of Tyre and Sidon. 22 A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is demon-possessed and suffering terribly.”

23 Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.”

24 He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.”

25 The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said.

26 He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”

27 “Yes it is, Lord,” she said. “Even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”

28 Then Jesus said to her, “Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed at that moment.

>The Minister of Propaganda using propaganda

wow

He was extremely interested in politics; his whole sect was about challenging the Pharisees (and by extension, Roman rule).

5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:

6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

22You worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.

Difference is that they were the truth.

The fuck is this?
What bible have you been reading?

Attached: 477989ad29ef76d9940cfce04bb6579b3a45f5ba539ec565d356a4fc9b0933e5.png (1440x2560, 717K)

Jesus would have fought the cancer that are political parties, regardless of ideology.

>Which Bible are you reading?

The semitic scripture about worshipping a penis-mutilating middle-eastern Jew deity; the same one as you.

First one: Matthew 15:21-28

Second one: Matthew 10:5-6

Third one: John 4:22

Even of they were made for the greater good.

I am aware but which version?

Attached: d7eb830e6da28f4dc498ca61299f0d5d6589c5c5f1063a7a85b707169251d6e2.png (1440x2560, 306K)

Behold those digits, see also the verses
Matthew 14:13-21 and 15:32-39

No such thing, political parties are all about conflict, create division in a population to get votes, all they make is issues and never solutions.

Goebbels was strongly anti-Christian, as were Hitler, Himmler, Rosenberg, Bormann, the vast majority of the SS, and others.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirchenkampf

"There is an an insoluble opposition between the Christian and a heroic-German world view". - Goebbels

Finding salvation in Christ isn't being a kike, faggot. Israel is the "Church" of Christ and His Kingdom is in Heaven and not of Earth.

This site references a dozen plus versions, the language usually doesn't differ a ton.

biblehub.com/john/4-22.htm

Jehova is an imaginary character from Jewish mythology and the circumcised semitic rabbi that you worship was not a God.

I worship? Not sure if you're a pagan faggot or a kike, but you're deliberately cherrypicking verses from the Bible. I know they're often posted here, but what do you have to rebuke Christ's words in Revelations 2:9 and 3:9?

We can't expect God to do ALL the work.

Attached: march.gif (412x286, 1.2M)

You'll also recall that the Canaanites worshiped demon gods and sacrificed their infant children by throwing them in a fire. This woman in asking Jesus to cure her child rejected her idols and chose to follow the Lord, and for her faith Jesus healed her daughter.

>I worship?

Didn't you just say that you find salvation in a circumcised semitic rabbi?

>Those who say they are Jews, but are not Jews

Sounds like Christians. They claim the Jewish God as their own, they claim the scripture and the prophets, they claim to be the TRUE new Isrealities, but they reject the mark of the covenant between man and Jehova (circumcision) and decided that its no longer necessary.

At any rate, why would you think I care about the details of semite scipture? It doesn't mean any more to me than Shinto or other foreign religions of foreign lands and foreign people.

bumpo

Is there proof for that? Never could get that proof from Christians or even jews

This is clearly false- the woman already had faith in Jesus. She journeyed to him specifically because she believed that he was the one who could banish the demons from her daughter. Her faith was not enough- her faith got her told to go away; her faith got her called a dog. It was only after she compared non-jews to dogs begging for scraps from their jewish masters that he agreed to help a demon-possessed little girl.

>Is there proof of that

Are you saying Jews sometimes lie about non-Jews and attribute fake atrocities to them? Ridiculous! Cool it with the anti-semitism.

So you're saying that Goebbels was an unprincipled liar?

If you don't mind, I'd like to use this thread to ask something.
What is the name of that US-citizen whose photos are sometimes posted, that lead/was an activist in a fascist/nazi movement in the US?
>had dark hair
>often seen smoking from a pipe
>photos were in black and white, probably from before WW2
>often with a scowl, IIRC

Because, like Che, Jesus hated niggers and fags?

Pretty much. I can't help but notice that both pagans and kikes attack Christ (albeit for different reasons) yet steer clear of attacking the Jews' scripture. Sure, it's easy to call them rats, but to actually dig at their pedigree is something I've never seen the biggest shill attempt...

We're discussing the Christian faith, no? I respect Christ's words because such an accurate depiction of kikes had rarely been put to paper. Besides, the Covenant is between man and the Messiah. The "old law" was done and accepting Christ as the Messiah was the new law. Seems simple enough though I am cutting it short big time (no pun intended).

That user clearly stating that Jesus tested her faith.

haha, pretty clever. I'll give you that, but child burning was all the rage back then, user. Kikes did it many times before and even to this day to varying degrees (again, no pun intended).

Yes

George Lincoln Rockwell, user.

He was literally the opposite. In fact, he's very similar to Marx, which does make sense since they're both Jews.

Nsdap united the people under one banner though.
I think you meant democracy.

Well, so far, you've criticized Jesus and Goebbels as liars and hypocrites.

Care to state your political leanings and faith?

Jesus only challenged the "leaders" of Judaism in Jerusalem for their corrupt practices.
Jesus says zero about challenging the authority of Roman rule.

> he refused and told her to go away
Yeah, he was testing her faith. When she still had faith (the very next verse), he held her up on a pedestal as a prime example of true faith to his disciples. Way to take shit out of context, faggot.

>"salvation is of the jews"
John 10:16
"And other sheep I have which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear My voice; and there will be one flock and one shepherd."

>Jesus directly ordered his apostles not to go into non-jewish lands or preatch to any non-jews

Wrong. Jesus ordered them not to do this until after he would be crucified. Which, as his crucifixion grew nearer, is why he said "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit," in Mathew 28:19.

Again, you've taken one verse out of context to support a false argument.

You are a kike.

Attached: 1539382173684.jpg (720x879, 117K)

This. Also, to answer OP, Jesus is apolitical.

Truth.

George rockwell lincoln guy was a hero along with william dudley pelly and pierce except one got (((assassinated)))
James mason is debatable with siegefags sometimes spamming.
>read seej
And charles mansion is also a debatable figure.

Jesus by all definitions was a commie...

Yep.

Thank you

Then how did Jesus raise people from the dead and heal diseases like leprosy with his touch - if he was not God?

Jesus was a gay boy.

>The old law was done

Jesus was circumcised. All of his apostles were circumcised. All of his followers were circumcised. The man he dubbed the Rock of His Church refused to even eat meals with uncircumcised people. And Jesus never spoke a single word against circumcision, ever.

The ONLY person to ever decide that circumcision wasn't reauired was a man who never knew Jesus, who came along after he died, who got kicked out of the Holy Land by Peter and who had to find a way to make the religion more appealing to the Greeks he was trying to convert.

If you're going to simply claim "the old law was done"- where does the cherry picking stop? Are the 10 commandments no longer relevant, or will you arbitrarily decide to keep that part? Circumcision wasn't simply a practice or a tradition- it was THE mark of the covenant, the act by which you spiritual semites believe your Jew God began his pact with mankind when his angels appeared to Abraham- by ordering them to mutilate the genitals of themselves, their sons, and their slaves.

>called Jesus a liar and hypocrite

Where?

Attached: 4867983467834.jpg (600x941, 104K)

Prove it faggot or why would commies cause the holodomor.

He didn't, this is semitic mythology.

>sand person
>national socialist

Can you prove if was a mythology?

Wrong. They just saw the shortcomings of Christianity with their Aryan mythos. All 3 were practicing Catholics.

Gas yourself.

No problemo.

As was the custom at the time to quote Grandpa Simpson. Funny that a kike would be criticizing Paul, but it makes sense since he saw Jews for what they were, too. You're greatly invested in something that you write off as important as Shintoism. I'd rather you just say you're a kike spreading disinfo.

By choosing to portray Jesus as someone that didn't want to save souls, but merely wanted them to be as Jewish as him.

Why hide?

Later in that same book, Jesus feeds four thousand people with "seven loaves and some fishes". Is that passage literally correct? if your answer is no, then why should the passage you quoted be considered literally correct, especially since you have posted from a translation of a 400 year old translation from books which were 1000+ years old at the time, describing events that were 1,600 years old at the time.

It's worth noting, for instance, that the word "Jew" did not exist until long after the death of Jesus, a semantic argument which hinges on that word would be like an argument about dinosaurs which hinges on the word "airplane"

Can you prove that Zeus didn't turn into a bull, come down from Olympus to fuck you in the butthole, then wipe your memory of the event?

hide?

Another solid point.

Your flag, user.

I've never implied Jesus was a liar or a hypocrite. Jesus never gave a shit about non-jews and never pretended to. What you mean is that the words of Paul, who created Christianity, don't match up with those of Jesus, which is completely true,

Well the flag itd show is incorrect anyway plus the swastika is aesthetic

Your pilpul is showing, Jew.

Convenient, but it doesn't matter in the long run.

Of course its all semitic mythology.

there are two aspects of this posts which make it ironic. first, that "near easterners" were mostly not shitskins 2,000 years ago (particularly and indisputably Levantines such as the Israelites) and second that Hitler and Himmler loved mudslimes of all stripes

>Nsdap united the people under one banner though.
Not really, they managed a very fast growth and had a lot of supporters but also plenty of detractors.
>I think you meant democracy.
They are the same, cant have democracy without some sort of political parties forming, true democracy is the true cancer.

People should never have had a say on the runnings of a country, they are stupid, selfish and gullible, the only true form of government is monarchism.

>If you don't worship the Jewish God, read Jewish scripture, pray to a circumcised middle-eastern rabbi, and name your white children after jews, then you're a jew

Semite reasoning will never not be hilarious.

Be honest- are you named after a Jew?

Well he told people to leave their land and family and follow him several times. This was later applied during muh crusades.

I mean be whatever you want but I think of christianity as a sandpeople religion. I guess you could be a positive christian or something but I still dont consider it european

can you prove to me that anything outside my mind (a word I define as "that which thinks 'I am'") actually exists? can you prove to yourself that anything outside your mind exists? if so, then please share your reasoning, thank you

>hinges on the word Jew

Not at all. You can use whatever word you want for the Jehovans.

Sure whatever. Itd show my isps country not mine Ive already tried it its annoying.

Um, the Old Testament? Seriously, the entire history of the Jews before Christ is them fighting or generally being at odds with demon worshiping pagans who practice human sacrifice.

What are your standards for this proof?

>El Che
>The West saw Che as a Menace
>Jesus
>Romans saw him as a Menace

Wel nietszche and hitler could love them because they felt exotic and distant to them, almost unreal.
In the 21st century theyre very real.
Also i never implied i agree with hitler 100%, why should i?

No, sorry to disappoint you.

No biggie, user. I will say you're right in the flag being aesthetic.

I'm off to bed so I'll leave you all with something to ponder. Goodnight, anons.

>How come God lets Satan get away with everything?

Because as with the Jews, the gift that they give can never be fully repaid. You are forever trapped as their slave. No matter how much you sacrifice to them it will never be enough. As described in the Old Testament, the Jews just kept inventing new laws and sins which kept people trapped in an endless cycle of sin and sacrifices (to the priests).

To end this trickery once and for all, Christ had to become the perfect sacrifice that the Jews and Satan couldn't deny and would free humanity from their grasp. As long as you have Christ then Satan, Jews, Muslims, Marxists and every other authoritarian has no power over your life. All you have to do is described in the 10 Commandments. The 10 Commandments are not laws, but instead are your God given rights. Nobody has the right to lust for your riches, women, or nation. Those who claim you have to sacrifice to their god or pay taxes to achieve salvation and be considered a good person is a liar.

>But aren't the 10 commandments from the Old Covenant whereas Christ is the New Covenant?

Christ was the example of the perfect life on Earth. He's what you are supposed to try and be while in this life. Also, don't kill yourself. The Bible set its examples in the most extreme fashion. Sacrificing your life by using it to build a family and a future is a better description.

And before anyone says I'm a Christian, I'll say that I find Christianity fascinating especially how it overlaps with parts of Stoicism.

>he was testing her faith

No, every time she was tood to go away and she persisted it showed she had faith that Jesus could help her daughter. He didnt reward faith, he rewarded her saying that she was a dog of her jewish masters. Until then, he refused to help a possessed little girl.

Holy hell there are so many things blatantly wrong there. Even the first fucking point that Jesus was non violent was wrong. Unless flipping over tables and whipping people isn't a violent act. Although It's riotous violence. Jesus was against senseless violence. Very different things.

Do you plan on giving your sons Jewish names?

Jehova and Satan are imaginary characters from Jewish mythology

Also I guess youre sorta right i mean i bitch about how the people who invaded spain were whiteish apart from few in number constantly when they call us mongrels so... yeah

>managed in very fast growth
Depends.
youtu.be/OmpILhjEIdM

Attached: 22c9215e03c765fa351580fac6dbb4218cbb074795240b373750241c68ddaba3.jpg (782x1073, 270K)

The very fact that Jews hate Jesus, and Jesus eventually hated the synagogue of satan (jews) is pretty damn good reason enough for anyone to be christian.

Mainly because the mudslimes were keeping to them selves at the time.

He would align himself with the communists. The only two things he would disagree with them on is their liberal beliefs about sex and their atheism. Considering his willingness to save a slut condemned for her vile deeds, he would most likely get along famously with the more pacifistic communist groups that didn't try to push atheism too hard. His moral preaching was very much about the blessedness of the poor and wickedness of the rich. He promoted living an impoverished humble life and spoke strong words of condemnation against the rich. The only people he hated nearly as much as the rich were the Pharisee sect that he viewed as self righteous hypocritical heretics. Even his Apostles when creating the first Christian community, they chose a communist style of economics as seen in Acts 4:32-37 and Acts 5:1-11. Like the communists he exalted the poor, weak, effeminate, and oppressed over the rich, strong, masculine, leaders. His early followers preached racial equality, despite it being an offshoot of a very racist religion.

Attached: 1546536509498.jpg (939x1024, 232K)

>We're going to make all the nations of the world worship the Jewish God and pray to a circumcised semitic rabbi, you kike!

The difference between you and the Jews could fit on the head of a needle.

jews have a peculiar pattern of preaching egalitarianism TO OTHERS.

This is ridiculous. Its like saying because Sunnis hate Shiities we should all be Shiites.

How about European people don't join a side in a semitic religious civil war?

Of course Jews hate Christians, Christianity is a messianic sect of Judaism. Competing sects worshipping the same god always have conflict. Prior to the world wars the 30 Years War between catholics and protestants was the bloodiest in European history.

"Jews hate Christians, therefor we should worship the Jewish God, read the Jewish scripture, honor and believe in all the Jewish prophets, and name our children after Jews" is retarded beyond words.

Ah yes, I also remember when I was 13. What would your alternative for the Europeans to do instead be, oh enlightened one?

the swastika with the cross looks sick

Jesus is fiction. Hitlers atrocities are documented beyond a shadow of a doubt. This is the difference.

my response would be anything non abrahamic and indoeuropean in nature.