Why does Jow Forums hate Socialism but vehemently defends National Socialism?

Because they are being ironic you dumbass. How new are you?

What is their policies on private property and free speech?

Attached: 1519420422711.png (578x566, 12K)

especially if milkable

I see the local retard strikes again

Sacialism is national socialism

Because the tumblr raiders and glowers are stupid, and think that in order to pretend to be a Nazi, they have to scream "BOY I SURE HATE SOCIALISM" constantly.

Attached: 1396846096083.png (468x750, 648K)

No we arent idiot..

Attached: 1310911-Adolf_Hitler.jpg (411x550, 48K)

>nationalism is another word for socialism
Your retarded.

Attached: 7aadaf89b6794bde2edc365aa2c2ccfbf6a18ee39344ef7f9922df411857aa1b.jpg (588x800, 211K)

No is only ironic when it comes to edgy nazi jokes everything else is genuine.

The brain doesn't develop properly when subject to starvation due to communism.

actually they are pretty much the same, except one is nationalist, and the other is internationalist. fascism is socialism mixed with nationalism. if you read the things the nazi party stands for, it sounds like it came right out of bernie sanders mouth, minus the hating jews part.

>why does Jow Forums hate an ideology that wants to end the existence of our race, but vehemently defends an ideology that glorifies our race and wants our race to live on stronger than ever
It truly is a mystery.

Because socialism ignores the Nation's interests and the people living in it. And only opens the ass to foreign interests.

Because pol is full of young republicans trolling, LARPers, and people one step away from being stormniggers. It was tried and failed, moving on.

What the fuck does he think a nation is? What an idiot.

Private property is allowed. You are allowed to make more than other people. Hard work and rewards are incentivized and encoured. You may pay higher tax rate than someone who works a construction job if you are a CEO 10k/day. Free speech is allowed but platforms will not be given to communists or subversive entities.

Those anons are fucking stupid.

Liberty or your momma's death.

good question

Jow Forums is no stranger to hypocrisy

>subversive entities
That's Chinese-brand free speech for you.

The NSDAP allowed private property, there were massive privately owned heavy industries in Germany. Hitler ousted Strasser because he wanted factories to be worker owned.

This is the complete polar opposite of Marxian Socialism.

Try actually reading a book instead of regurgitating some gay Sargon horse shoe theory take.
Marxian Socialism is radically egalitarian. NatSoc isn't.
Marxian Socialism states that class is the driver of conflict in human history, NatSoc states in direct opposition to this that race is the driver of conflict in history.
Marx's end goal was Communism, a totally stateless society, no private ownership, everything communal, there is no class or racial distinction between people. Again, NatSoc is the literal opposite of this.

Fuck off to reddit with your low IQ nonsense.

Liberal democracy etc is being tried and in the process of failing as well to be fair

Do you even individualism bro? Lmao fuck off back to plebbit you fucking collectivist cuck

...

Specifically speaking here, a fascist government simply has control over private corporations in order to benefit the nation and its peoples, fascism also practices protectionism economically

>letting Jews own a newspaper, publishing house, or broadcast network so they can start undermining your social order
You're actually retarded if you think this is acceptable. Principles cannot hold a nation together.

>Why does Jow Forums hate Socialism but vehemently defends National Socialism?
Because Marxist Socialism and National Socialism aren't the same thing.

Only the truly retarded think they are.

Capitalism is a tool that is as good as it's user. National socialism still applies capitalism but in a more protective fashion.

National Socialism utilises the state to prioritise the protection of the country's identity, people, tradition and heritage.

Marxist Socialism is just free gibs for doing nothing regardless of how much they care for the country, encouraging immigrants to come in and abuse it.

National socialism is nationalism without usury and socialism without gibs for the unproductive. Literally the perfect system of government

I hate niggers. I don't give a fuck about socialism.

>pretty much the same
Holy shit this hurt to read.

Attached: heart-attack.jpg (378x301, 14K)

Equality is a lie

State dictatorship.

Any SOCIALISM is EVIL. Those who think that it can be slightly massaged into something good - like Democratic S or National S -- are fools who don't understand the core of the rotten ideology.

You can't force people to be something they are not. Any system based on assumption that people will suddenly stop being who they are is doomed to fail.

I was saying that socialism and fascism are similar. i was not comparing marxism and fascism.
most socialists allow for private corparations and private ownership with government regulation. Some extreme socialists wanted an end goal of communism, but most dont want this. Socialism is fascism without the hating jews part. Use your brain, or fuck off memeflaggot

Jow Forums doesn't. This board is socially conservative and economically liberal.

Deviants will be shot.

You're just regurgitating words you're not even familiar with and you should be embarrassed about it, reddit.
Marxian Socialism is Socialism. You were trying to compare Marxian Socialism and Third Position platforms.

Socialists do not believe in private ownership at all. Ever. Allowing industry to be owned by the few inherently creates an oppressor/oppressed relationship, it creates class distinction between the owners and the workers. All Marxian Socialists everywhere in the world believe in ending private ownership of businesses for the purpose of moving further towards Communism. The very purpose of Socialism as explicitly stated by Marx is a transitional period before Communism is established.
And yes, Socialists are radically egalitarian, you stupid redditor. They rely on the talking points of racism and sexism constantly because equality is at the very core of their rhetoric.

Try gaining some actual political knowledge instead of watching your Sagon videos. Newfags spouting off ice cold takes is just pathetic.

>Why does Jow Forums hate Socialism but vehemently defends National Socialism?
You only get banned on /leftypol/ for disagreeing with the state

Attached: Spock_ThisShit.jpg (200x159, 8K)

Attached: The Red Network.png (1002x1086, 2.6M)

DEEEE-
*inhales*
LEEEETE DISSSSSS

Because they literally don't know what NatSoc is. If they did support it they would be calling for the entire Trump's family to be thrown into the oven.

Bullshit word-salad propaganda.

Socialism of the National variety is the only one that matters.

Sounds exactly like socialism. I guess you'd think North Korea is a perfect NatSoc country.

Go back to 2004 with your indefensible "muh statism."
Blood and soil makes a nation. If the government is incapable of defending these two things then there is no country to speak of.

The answer to these questions discloses the actual secret of our anti-Jewish policy and our uncompromising fight against Jewry; for the Bolshevic International is in reality nothing less than a Jewish International.

It was the Jew who discovered Marxism. It is the Jew who for decades past has endeavoured to stir up world revolutions through the medium of Marxism. It is the Jew who is today at the head of Marxism in all the countries of the world. Only in the brain of a nomad who is without nation, race and country could this satanism have been hatched. And only one possessed of a satanic malevolence could launch this revolutionary attack. For Bolshevism is nothing less than brutal materialism speculating on the baser instincts of mankind. And in its fight against West European civilisation it makes use of the lowest human passions in the interests of International Jewry.

>Holy shit this hurt to read.

It's part true, both draw from Marxist theory but apply it differently.

Nazis see Jews as the oppressor class where Communist think the "Borgeiouse" are.

Bolshevism is explicitly determined on bringing about a revolution among all the nations. In its own essence it has an aggressive and international tendency. But National Socialism confines itself to Germany and is not a product for export, either in its abstract or practical characteristics. Bolshevism denies religion as a principle, fundamentally and entirely. It recognises religion only as an “opium for the people.” For the help and support of religious belief, however, National Socialism absolutely places in the foreground of its programme a belief in God and that transcendental idealism which has been destined by Nature to bring to expression the racial soul of a nation. National Socialism would give the lead in a new concept and shaping of European civilisation. But the Bolshevics carry on a campaign, directed by the Jews, with the international underworld, against culture as such. Bolshevism is not merely anti-bourgeois; it is against human civilisation itself.

In its final consequences it signifies the destruction of all the commercial, social, political and cultural achievements of Western Europe, in favour of a deracinated and nomadic international cabal which has found its representation in Judaism. This grandiose attempt to overthrow the civilised world is so much more dangerous in its effects because the Communist International, which is a past master in the art of misrepresentation, has been able to find its protectors and pioneers among a great part of these intellectual circles in Europe whose physical and spiritual destruction much be the first result of a Bolshevic world revolution.

Are you legitimately retarded? That is written in simple English by a D.A.R who was self-educated.

>National Socialism?
group: citizens of the nation-state
>Socialism
no group

badda bing badda boom.

Property should be in a certain sense common, but, as a general rule, private; for, when everyone has a distinct interest, men will not complain of one another, and they will make more progress, because everyone will be attending to his own business. And yet by reason of goodness, and in respect of use, 'Friends,' as the proverb says, 'will have all things common.' Even now there are traces of such a principle, showing that it is not impracticable, but, in well-ordered states, exists already to a certain extent and may be carried further. For, although every man has his own property, some things he will place at the disposal of his friends, while of others he shares the use with them. The Lacedaemonians, for example, use one another's slaves, and horses, and dogs, as if they were their own; and when they lack provisions on a journey, they appropriate what they find in the fields throughout the country. It is clearly better that property should be private, but the use of it common; and the special business of the legislator is to create in men this benevolent disposition. Again, how immeasurably greater is the pleasure, when a man feels a thing to be his own; for surely the love of self is a feeling implanted by nature and not given in vain, although selfishness is rightly censured; this, however, is not the mere love of self, but the love of self in excess, like the miser's love of money; for all, or almost all, men love money and other such objects in a measure. And further, there is the greatest pleasure in doing a kindness or service to friends or guests or companions, which can only be rendered when a man has private property.

cont
These advantages are lost by excessive unification of the state. The exhibition of two virtues, besides, is visibly annihilated in such a state: first, temperance towards women (for it is an honorable action to abstain from another's wife for temperance' sake); secondly, liberality in the matter of property. No one, when men have all things in common, will any longer set an example of liberality or do any liberal action; for liberality consists in the use which is made of property.

>Jow Forums has sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.
That includes National Socialism. nobody here unironically supports it. Anyone who insists they do is messing with you

Attached: TheTruthAboutSocialists.png (474x355, 173K)

Because a unified homogeneous white country could make any meme economy or government work. A nation is as strong as it's people and that's all that really matters. Government and economic ideologies are only important in so far as they keep the animals happy or controlled.

I don’t defend either, but gassing the kikes suits everyone’s best interests.

how fuckin stupid you are? Boomer piece of shit

i'm not pro natsoc

but national socialism has the benefit of being homogenous rather and canw work with a high iq like China.
socialism doesn't work at all.

Because socialism cannot be done under nationalism. Hey I'm a socialist too. That's just how nazis are. You have to fight them.

There's no such thing as nazis anymore buddy. You're just being used as a tool of oppression for a corporate fascist government that wants to destroy and replace you. You're a volunteer member of the thought police.

Because the only flaw with socialism is welfare leeches and those are usually foreigners from third world countries.
A white ethnostate would work well with socialism, provided it stays white and the resources of the economy are put to use to benefit that white population and nobody else.

because their NPC programming dictates that things are wrong or right depending on what the board's common consensus is. Hitler is held in high regard here, therefore socialism is OK if he does it. AOC is seen as a whore, so they assimilate the information and condemn her brand of socialism because their peers told them to

You take memes and edit them a bit and then you say that those are made by you and now you steal National Socialist propaganda. I can’t....