Im doing research on this resolution and need some hard facts i could use against this resolution without seeming to have hatred towards gays. What is the eu exactly doing and what are the cons of pushing lgbt on people
Redpill on the LGBT agenda pushed by EU
Benjamin Carter
Other urls found in this thread:
m.youtube.com
medium.com
archive.org
archive.org
archive.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
pastebin.com
twitter.com
Jordan Lee
Bump
Joshua Barnes
Aaron Perry
Pro tip NOTHING you say other than its normal to lick shit out of someone's asshole is going to be construed as anything but being hateful to gays. It's like the holohoax, you'll be branded. So live like Sam, go full retard and attack the truth of their choice of degenerate thinking and behavior.
Parker Anderson
It's the T in LGBT doing it. They've taken over the whole movement. Please read
medium.com
Elijah Campbell
"I hate gays. How can I show people how much I hate them without saying it?"
The answer is you can't.
Jaxson Ramirez
archive.org
archive.org
archive.org
This is essentially the LGBT+ propaganda playbook.
Gabriel Young
Gavin Rivera
Jaxson Long
Adam Brooks
Im wearing this hat at a bar right now and I don't give a fuck. I've had a lesbo confront me before saying "why are you wearing that? And I said to troll people and because I hate faggots."
I'm just praying that someone will actually touch me so I can rip their face off
Lucas Johnson
I just need a good example as evidence to prove that promoting lgbt shit in society is bad and has negative effects. I dont care what people do in their beds but i dont want a degenerate ass society
Colton Hernandez
Oppose it on basis Muslims find it offensive
Christian Hall
Hunter Morris
Like any proof of Europe, no the Us being affected by lgbt push in mainstream media
Xavier Ward
>The answer is you can't.
Down in my parts we whip it's ass if we think it's queer. Beating a queer with a spiked baseball bat is in no way different than beating a child molester with a spiked ball bat.
Isaiah Martinez
Jose Johnson
Caleb Phillips
this one covers p much all points and every angle. mostly US based sources though
Gabriel Hall
Christian Fisher
Landon Sullivan
Cooper Clark
Caleb Sullivan
Austin Bell
I've had about enough of all minorities.
Jayden Allen
Reminder - LGBT endgame is and always was the acceptance and normalization of pedophilia.
In 1989 two Harvard faggots developed a blueprint to brainwash America into accepting homosexuality (and subsequently, all of the other RSTLNE sexual debauchery). This book is their blueprint.
This is taken from After The Ball - How America Will Conquer Its Fear & Hatred Of Gays In The 90s.
archive.org
Grayson Lewis
Correct.
The best argument you could use is not dropping fact bombs on people all at once. All that does is drive them further into disagreement and will become even more combative and resolute in their dumb beliefs.
You could start by questioning the forced sexual hormone therapies (by parents) on literal children and how pumping 8 year old boys full of estrogen is an obvious ethical problem. Once you've done that, you can drop your first fact: A boy that has not gone through puberty does not have enough penile tissue to properly make a "vagina" surgically, and hormones introduced before or during puberty prevent maturation of the penis (potentially permanently).
This isn't going to seem like a strong oppositional fact to begin with, and indeed it isn't, but it's not intended to be. You are merely trying to get them to question transgenderism and encourage them to look deeper themselves. Once you've dropped a few hints like this, many people (not all) will begin to research further on their own. This will probably take time, but changing an indoctrinated mind takes time.
You also should consider that when dealing with a public audience, facts and data almost never work as a tool of persuasion. You instead need to figure out what kind of person/people you are dealing with, and formulate a mode of argument based on the type of appeal they are most affected by. This could be emotional, moral, or, more rarely, logical. You might think that's disingenuous but the reality is that emotional or moral pleas are usually more successful than factual ones in with public audiences.
Cameron Parker
Nicholas Hall
Caleb Hughes
Jordan Peterson
we all have m8. nice digits.
>
Justin Nelson
Chase Turner
Christian Moore
Adam Butler
David Morgan
Gabriel Phillips
Jaxon Reed
Ryder Perez
Matthew Flores
that poor kid, fucking hell man
Logan Lewis
Camden Gutierrez
Wow, I didn't know opera was so gay.
Justin Lewis
Nathaniel Harris
James Parker
Ian Johnson
Isaac Gutierrez
There's that name again...
Christopher Sullivan
"POPULATION CONTROL
He was very active with population control groups, the population control movement, and population control was really the entry point into specifics following the introduction. He said the population is growing too fast. Numbers of people living at any one time on the planet must be limited or we will run out of space to live. We will outgrow our food supply and we will over-populate the world with our waste.
ENCOURAGING HOMOSEXUALITY ... ANYTHING GOES
HOMOSEXUALITY ALSO WAS TO BE ENCOURAGED.
"People will be given permission to be homosexual," that's the way it was stated. They won't have to hide it. And elderly people will be encouraged to continue to have active sex lives into the very old ages, just as long as they can. Everyone will be given permission to have sex, to enjoy however they want. Anything goes. This is the way it was put. And, I remember thinking, "how arrogant for this individual, or whoever he represents, to feel that they can give or withhold permission for people to do things!" But that was the terminology that was used. In this regard, clothing was mentioned. Clothing styles would be made more stimulating and provocative. Recall back in 1969 was the time of the mini skirt, when those mini-skirts were very, very high and very revealing. He said, "It is not just the amount of skin that is expressed ... exposed that makes clothing sexually seductive, but other, more subtle things are often suggestive.".. things like movement, and the cut of clothing, and the kind of fabric, the positioning of accessories on the clothing. "If a woman has an attractive body, why should she not show it?" was one of the statements.
Lincoln Morales
There was not detail on what was meant by "provocative clothing," but since that time if you watched the change in clothing styles, blue jeans are cut in a way that they're more tight-fitting in the crotch. They form wrinkles. Wrinkles are essentially arrows. Lines which direct one's vision to certain anatomic areas. And, this was around the time of the "burn your bra" activity. He indicated that a lot of women should not go without a bra. They need a bra to be attractive, so instead of banning bras and burning them, bras would come back. But they would be thinner and softer allowing more natural movement. It was not specifically stated, but certainly a very thin bra is much more revealing of the nipple and what else is underneath, than the heavier bras that were in style up to that time.
pastebin.com
Thomas Anderson
shocker
Bentley Cooper