A brother and sister decide to have sex for fun just to see what it would be like...

A brother and sister decide to have sex for fun just to see what it would be like. The girl is on the pill and they wear a condom.

Is it right or wrong?

This may seem trollish, but it actually determines your political views. Vote here: strawpoll.com/3p9aeh9a

Attached: tumblr_p6fz6rzgfs1x565cyo1_640.jpg (600x400, 72K)

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.com/ws3dsgb6
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Kill yourself desTINY

Incest is degenerate.

This.

Attached: F6922806-99BB-48C1-B498-7A011344DE1A.jpg (640x514, 19K)

Snow is her uncles son. So they are cousins.

i dunno why incest and bestiality are even illegal, they are legal in russia btw, close relatives cannot marry though

i agree but degenerate and illegal are different things

No because contraception is gravely contrary to the natural law

The destruction of familial ties is the ultimate end of incest.
So yes op it is wrong and woefully degenerate

Begone Yuri.

Attached: 1550598615396.jpg (480x480, 38K)

This guy gets it.

I'm not saying it's right, but this was a question that differentiated Liberals and Conservatives in the studies of Jonathan Haidt, a moral philosopher.

Liberals think it is gross, but approve, since the brother and sister approve and there is no chance they will have a deformed baby.

For some reason, conservatives dissaprove, even though it wont cause a pregnancy and they both want to try it.

Why is this?

It's her brother's son. Rheagar is her brother.

>No because contraception is gravely contrary to the natural law
Who are you to dictate natural law? Humans are natural, they invented condoms.

That can be fixed.

"sex" that's not reproductive is not sex and is by definition wrong, aberrant behaviour

at its essence, while being non-reproductive, the act is still fueled by the reproductive drive and should be judged accordingly -- it is as perverted and sick then as it would be in all other circumstance

dumb dilemma, judge things by their essence

My sister gave me a blowjob a few times growing up. Not even larping.

Weird

>is it wrong to have sex with your sister
is this a question sane and healthy people ask?

What about a married couple that's already had some children?

Lefties believe sex is just a bodily function like breathing or peeing. Conservatives know there’s an emotional component to sex, therefore such an emotional (romantic) connection to a family member is inappropriate.

How old were you?

Legally criminalized everywhere

From a nature point if view wrong, there is a natural repulsion you feel so to make sure no degenerate offspring arises

Sex outside of marriage is morally wrong and societal a disaster

What do you mean whit for some reason. If it is in your will that I should kill you that doesn't entail that it will horrify the rest of us breaking the weak social consensus that keeps society afloat. I tolerate the degenerate shit you do as long as you don't get into shaky territory. If you get there I don't have a reason to tolerate anything you do anymore.

Because inset is degenerate and makes thanksgiving awkward.

It's neither here nor there. There is nothing wrong with it, it's just awkward. People will think they are strange.

>is this a question sane and healthy people ask?
Yes, you've never had a serious academic philosophy discussion, clearly. You often start with ridiculous propositions but try to argue why they are wrong or right.

Its not sex so it's ok.
Anyone who has only ever used condoms has never actually had sex and is still a virgin. Your penis has never actually touched the inside of a vagina so it doesn't count.

Those who encourage it are what?

Haidt also answers that so why are you posing the question to pol?

As long as you aren't planning to make retard children, you can go fuck your sister all you want you sicko.

Teenage years. First time it happened I was a freshman in high school, so 15. It stopped when she went off to college.

Have some more. I wish I could.

Attached: 1551320994958.jpg (494x519, 32K)

its wrong to go to all the trouble of fucking your sister and wearing a rubber. gotta feel each other, i mean we're family, nothing cums between family

I live in a cabin in the woods and I don't socialize much anymore so I don't meet women except family members. Would bang them all, honestly. I doubt there's anyone in this thread who wouldn't bang a hot family member given the opportunity and a guarantee of discretion. Calling other people out for breaking minor social mores is one of the easiest ways to gain 'social credit', so insecure losers often employ this method to feel better about that themselves, and this completely explains so-called 'incest aversion'.

I guess. We never had sex, so it was pretty harmless.

>Yes, you've never had a serious academic philosophy discussion.
in real life, with people i can see, sure. on Jow Forums, with trolls and idiots, no.

>Is it right or wrong?
depends.. is she cute? then it's right
if she's ugly.. then it's wrong

>you've never had a serious academic philosophy discussion, clearly
Based on being disgusted by your ridiculous question? People don't need to think about this kind of thing, you're just spreading filth and maybe even corrupting some weak people. Fuck off with your degenerate bullshit.

You're supposed to be turned off by family members. It's not something enforced by social convention, it should be your natural state to not be attracted to family.

Tell it to the nobility.

Rollering for get

and look where that got them.

False and easily disproven by observing that no such effect occurs between family members who do not initially know they are related. In fact, the exact opposite is true - family members are MORE likely to be attracted to each other. It's called 'genetic sexual attraction'.

You mean like Hillbillys and Pakis?

I know Jow Forums is a real cracker barrel but this is a bit much

Attached: bgz10710mcj21.jpg (1002x2284, 249K)

More polfags and twitter blue ticks should read haidt. Based thread, OP.

at its essence, it's the act of reproduction within a natural union perverted only to the extent that conception is made impossible -- so you be the judge of where it scales among all other aberrant behaviour in the world lol

it is a perversion, but it's necessity of modern living for a whole list of reasons

in natural state of being without perverse incentives, you wouldn't be socialised to make the compromise, it'd be the opposite - more children would actually ease your living

The fact that leftists don't and can't see why is evidence that their brains are not functioning correctly.

Ever read Oedepis Rex?

Attached: 2B7551BA-3A8B-4651-B4DB-67F69DBF6F2A.jpg (1418x812, 199K)

>>disagree with me? Well this proves your brain work bad. Checkmate

Ok Fernando

As long as it causes you to waste a considerable amount of energy, there will be selection against incest. Reproducing and having a monogamous relationship with your sister are not fit and they will be considered immoral. Casual sex using birth control without the intent of making babies might eventually become a normal thing. It might actually become a method of reconciliation.

This. It's not like laws are the only things that keeps the society from degenerating into chaos.

I ain't marring no virgin. If she's not good enough for her family she's not good enough for mine.

He asked if it was "Right" or "Wrong"

WTF does "NO" mean.

What if they only have oral and anal sex?

Kys

Because Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Because having sex for fun with someone who isn't your spouse is degenerate.

Post vid or you lying.

My friend had sex with her brother unprotected recently. She told me about it and I just about blew a load in my pants.

Nice. I haven't done it but I know it happens. Seen it.

It means the question was wrong

you

have

to

go

back

>female
>losing virginity before marriage
Are you stupid? Plus you're mentally ill if you're attracted to your immediate family. It's against human nature

What others said
Whatever sex is fun cool shit
No kids awesome
But they’re fucked longrun
The girl is going to have major issues with boyfriends
And the boy will have a hard time letting go
It’s a timebomb

>artificial invention is natural because it was created artificially by humans.

Guess his IQ

>The girl is on the pill and they wear a condom
Wrong, if shes on the pill then no need for condom

I believe she is actually his Aunt.

Why would I have a vid of it? It happened when I was in high school. I didn't get my first iphone until my last year of college.

The only way this works is if you don't believe in a God.
If there is a God = all nature is artificially created
Therefore, human creation = natural

>it actually determines your political views
kind of a stretch

Is she a stripper now or addicted to meth?

as long as you don't have a kid I don't see a problem desu.

He uses the condom
>they wear a condom

Attached: image.jpg (960x720, 195K)

My older female cousin gave my brother and I handjobs and blowjobs when we were young, though neither of us knew what she'd done to the other until recently. My brother also gave me a few handjobs and blowjobs a couple years after my cousin had. Not larping, dead serious.

No.

Both. Why is that a problem?

Similar- female cousin and brother.

Is it ok? Define ok. Legally yes, but it’s disgusting.
They should not go to jail but it’s definitely fucked up.

Not me

It was okay until
>My brother also gave me a few handjobs and blowjobs
What the fuck, dude?

they dont though, because its not the womans responsibility

Incest is the final nail in the coffin of the "family".
What was once a proud institution has become nothing more than fetish fuel for degenerates.

Attached: 1550830799257.webm (1440x508, 1.75M)

> not larping

Good Goy....*rubs hands*

I think he can read IDs nigger

It's wrong because the mere act of having sex with a sibling increases intimacy between the two, which means a stronger bond and you'll likely want nothing besides it. It will become a norm, and in this norm, there's a higher likelihood of a inbred pregnancy. That's why it should be avoided.

>consenting adults
>no chance of having a child

Why not ?

In my country it isn't illegal to have sex with your siblings, it is however illegal to marry and to have children... same for people with down syndrom.

You can marry your cousin since the genetical risk is divided by 1000 (approx.)

Attached: a7f917107682fc8d0cdd5c66e5dadeb9.jpg (1028x1300, 503K)

I'm not larping. I don't know about the other guy, sounds kinda bullshit. I knew exactly what was going on.

I was a relatively young kid, not sure exactly how old, and he's 4 years older. I didn't choosa to have it happen. If I could undo it I would.

How about this?
strawpoll.com/ws3dsgb6

nigga be like, dis ho forgot to put on her ass dis mornin

Idiot. Just because you didn't have any fucked up shit happen in your family doesn't mean I'm lying.

...

>Pic of shitskin touching white woman's ass
>Flag
Why am I not surprised.

>Sounds kinda bullshit. I knew exactly what was going on.
How old were you? I can't remember exactly, because he only did it to me when we went on vacation in Montana (we went every summer for two weeks) and he did it two years in a row. There's nothing else to distinguish those two vacations from any of the others, it was a long time ago, and I was pretty young.

>he's 4 years older
It's not so much your fault, then. Your brother is a fag and molested you. Unless you never tried stopping him.