I don't understand how anarcho capitalism would work irl

This. LiBERGtarians too. Anarchy is a word that means WITHOUT (((RULERS))), it doesn't mean without goverment or without rules.

real anarcho capitalist academics will promote complex contracts which are essentially governments.
>africa is functional ancap/ancom depending on region.

How would it work, OP? Much like your picture; much like it is today, like your picture. You will never enjoy this.

So are you saying that as long as the concept of money exists, someone would always hold power and control over you as an individual?

q predicted this.

as long as capital exists this will be so

call the mossad then

>not considering the demand for a state.

Well, you sell some shit, buy drugs and some child sexslaves and somehow it works out.

Attached: copyright.jpg (600x584, 73K)

it wouldnt.
next.

It doesn't, someone else forms a collective and fucks you. You need some sort of collective provision for the defense of a state to have a society.

hahah lets ban machines

It would end like it has every time in history, with the formation of a government.

Attached: 1538000318283.jpg (720x781, 70K)

>prosperous societies eventually fall into complacency
woooaaaahhh really?

The ancap ball meme made me realize that most people want the State to rule over them like a bunch of submissive bitches. Aristotle was right when he wrote about natural slavery.

Attached: GCA.png (410x267, 111K)

holy fuck ancaps are dumb

Attached: 1549322770583.png (1000x432, 165K)

We need to build covenant communities and let the sheeple make their own choice

>hard drugs
>pet rhino
>child slaves

Sounds pretty good to me

Attached: pepe_gun_ancap.png (634x758, 67K)

not an argument

Attached: 831A2398-16BB-4EB7-8BC9-6.png (4000x4000, 230K)

fuken saved

Attached: Pirate.png (500x500, 50K)

>you're a leech that wouldn't make it without being a theiving cunt.
Oh yeah that's a comprehensive alternative framework

You never made one, silly cunt.

Attached: 1532386557867.jpg (1000x600, 80K)

>I'm a one trick pony yeeehaw!

These people are worse than sheep

Sheep might follow orders but they don't defend their owner like statists do. I thought it was a Us vs Them battle but unfortunately I was wrong, most men are slaves by nature.

child slaves violate the right to self-ownership
while ancaps do support self-defense, ancaps also support private security
ancaps don't support intellectual property rights

and if a drunk neighbor bangs on your door, doesn't pose a threat, but talking to him doesn't make him go away. You just shoot him? Police help in situations like these. You could just shoot him, but then their family just slits your throat the next time you leave your house.

Tell me about how Sumeria arose and how you would have modeled it differently Enkidu...

...

It would work if you consider a constant state of civil war "working".

The state exists to regulate violence. AnClaps clearly don't understand this and think that if you privatize violence, then society will function more efficiently.

The reality is that this "society" would look like Somalia, or any other country that is engaged in civil war between several factions.

YOU SHOOT THE FAMILY TOO IF THE COME FOR YOU

Sheep need a sheep dog to herd them, most people herd eachother, we have outsheeped the sheep. Humans aren't like that naturally though they need a steady flow of propaganda crammed down their throat
this

you're not talking to a real ancap. This thread is a butch of ancoms and socialists aka economic incels who are larping as ancaps because they're sexually frustrated.

Killing or shooting a non-violent drunk man on your property violates the NAP because while you have the right to property, you don't have the right to take or threaten to take a non-violent person's life. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evictionism

pic related

Attached: 1486886389075.jpg (540x552, 47K)

Don't forget baby trash day is on Tuesdays...we DON'T want you just THROWING the unwanted ANYWHERE.

Nah if he trespasses on your property you have the right to neutralise him, the point is you don't have to and in most cases there's no reason to.

but who enforces the NAP

Based and civilized

Attached: ancap pepe.jpg (340x568, 50K)

>Police help in situations like these
There would still be police just they would be privately owned

It wouldn't.

There's a difference between wanting to be ruled and knowing that the vast majority has to be ruled.

à base de pills rouges

Attached: 1467399434338.png (420x420, 9K)

Or you can just call neibourghs... If you want to do same little talk

Attached: 1490912884388.png (648x1342, 288K)

GURRRRRR THERE'D BE NO GOVERNMENT ADN PEOPLE WOULD STILL BUILD ROADS AND ORGANIZE AND PAY FOR POLICE AND HAVE LAWS AND HAVE LEGISLATIVE AND JUDICIAL BODIES AND . . .
Wait, that's just government explained.

anarcho-capitalism and voluntaryism are separate things. Voluntaryism is moral philosophy, and if implemented, would be a utopian anarcho-capitalist society that follows the NAP, but anarcho-capitalism won't necessarily be voluntaryist because the law would be determined by consumer demand, and that's not guaranteed to follow the NAP. However, privatizing the courts and police would mean it's very likely there would not be victimless crimes. David Friedman explains it is possible for markets to generate unlibertarian laws in AnCapistan. youtu.be/S4CcannofnY?t=301

The private sector can send self-driving cars outer space, but they can't build roads?

I don't know any anarcho-capitalist philosopher who advocates that. I prefer Walter Block's view on evictions.

you missed out taxation faggot

you think they'd let you use the privately built roads for free?

taxation isn't determined by whether or not you use the service.

>straping a piece of metal to a rocket and shooting it to space
>building and mantainig a road infrastrucute
Those things aren't comperable

because collecting payments for individual services would be impractical and tedious. Also hard to keep track of what services are used by an individual.

>what is a toll
commie retard

Probably not with modern technology.

Wouldn't putting toll booths on ordinary roads create chaos in traffic

I'm not just talking about roads you retard. There are many services that are unaccountable for. And are you gonna put a toll booth at every intersection?

not really

>I don't mind paying taxes and obeying the law made by criminals because most people need to be ruled!

lol give me a break

Hey, you're at making shit up. Not so good at reading though.

>not really
Yes it would. Unless single corpopration owned all the roads in the area, you'd have checkpoints every few kilometers, and just like on ordinary toll roads, it would create kilometers of waiting lines.

If you defend the State without being part of it then you are a submissive little bitch, no matter what reasoning you use to defend your master, you are still a bitch.

And if you think shit won't devolve into the worst you can find in your favelas and then some without someone enforcing laws over them, you're fucking deluded.
Most people run on base instincts, a monkey like you should know this.

Would watch if he didn't sound like such a phlegmy neckbeard

Attached: 1551270955990.png (890x876, 444K)

>what is joint stock

We have a colossal State and high crime rate. We have the highest number of people being murdered on this planet.

I keep hearing these retards telling me that the State prevents crime, what a joke.

> anarcho captialists trying to defend itself against a neighboring unified state

Your destined to be slaves

> it doesn't mean without goverment or without rules
Uh, you sure about that? Any government will be infiltrated, in time, by you know (((whom))). Even NatSoc. Anything organized and hierarchical will be infiltrated and destroyed from within.
Which is why I perceive anarchy as the only solution. Not some "flavored" anarchy like ancap, but true, hardcore, batshit insane anarchy. As in shooting anyone you don't trust on sight. That is the only way to evolve.
And yeah, that would mean the death of billions, but again, it is the only way forward. Complete chaos and insanity is the only way to avoid rot and stagnation.