Evolution is mathematically impossible

If ONE meter is ABOUT (not exactly because of tolerances in the process of measuring) as long as the way that a photon would travel within 1/299 792 458 second(s)
Then a kilometer is 1000m is the way the same particle travels in: 1000/299 792 458 second(s)

The tiny, tiny tolerance in the process of measuring however, will-obviously- at a certain scale, make a huge difference. But for a worldly use, as in measuring some thousand kilometer's it will be close enough. It doesn't even need to be as accurate...
But back to the question. YES ther eis people who measured and constantly keep measuring kilometer, for kilometer.
Maybe not (always) in a whole distance, but a kilometer can be split into smalle runits, as well.
It's math. You add 10 x100m and have 1km

Attached: teaserbox_2451491599.jpg (800x600, 186K)

>i can drive for a mile
>i can drive for 2 miles
>but i cant drive from sweden to asia, thats mathematically impossible

Attached: 7980627478_3ec0e49331_z.jpg (600x636, 118K)

>type
OP is a drooling retard

btw. what do you think your car does and how you can be sure, that your (newbought) used car run 128kilometre?
Because it measured them accurately (enough)...
Also; just as a sideinfo; excavators and other machines that don't travel too much but work a lot of time; actually measure the time they run, not the distances they travel.

I did calculations for this, 2.6 heptillion mutations are occurring every second on this planet.
Vox is controlled opposition by the way.

Most if the bad mutations don't get passed on unless they also cause an advantage in someway.

what you don't understand is that we know the mutation rate of base pairs across generations, as well as the fixed mutation rates, and we have mapped the entire genome of chimpanzees and humans so we know the number of genes separating them.

and if you use simple math, you realize that there isn't even remotely enough time for the "last common ancestor" of chimps and humans to diverge so dramatically, let alone for all of biological life to diverge so absurdly much.

the number of fixed mutations per generation in humans is almost 0. for the millions of genes required to fix the characteristics that separate us from chimps would take hundreds of billions of years.

Considering a change in one nucleotide can cause your body to improperly store fat and lead to death, you are wrong.
Partially useless features are done away with, macrostructures take time. This is why enzymes work as fast as they need to, not as fast as possible.

>Hurr durr, I can't see the mutation, therefore it didn't happen
I suppose atoms don't exist either.

Just drive to Stockholm, you'll be surrounded by 'asian' peoples

lol
/thread

i didn't say we can't see the mutation, i said there's not enough time for that many mutations to arise and fix to separate us from chimps in the purported timespan.

>not one mathematical proof ITT

wow so if i add or take genes a way it must not work huh
wow i wonder how downs people walk.......
maybe you can tell us your personal story

>"I don't understand something, therefore it must be supernatural."

Attached: hurrrrrr.jpg (998x1300, 83K)

2.6 heptillion mutations on the planet per second.
Multiply that by 102 if you want biomass preindustrial era.

>types
This has no taxonomical meaning.

Are people with downs syndrome actively sexually selected for?

>moves asia into sweden
where's your god now?

If theres such thing as DNA, why would everyone assume it would have to be TOTALLY different for every living thing?
Why would it contradict creation, that the creator simply created DNA and makes similar beings, have a much closer DNA?
by that way, check how "close" human and banana DNA is....
So DNA taught me, that humans are banana.

too bad your argument couldn't evolve any teeth

Attached: 1551404939734.jpg (400x534, 200K)

Retard

Were do you lay the line that divides one type from another?

Your definition is stupid bc it's completely arbitrary

Another good one is, that a Tornado goes over a airplane scrapyard, tears all the planes apart and "accidentally" build a full functioning airplane out of that, again.... With just enough time and chance.... You know. And if you close your eyes deep enough, you can be everything you want todelooo.

>and for bad mutations to go away

who said they did

>He took the bait
>He didn't even realise that he proved my point

>talking to a brick here...

Attached: k.png (645x381, 109K)

>wolf to pug in 10k years
>yeah okay
>6500k years from primeate to man
>lol fuck that

nice slide thread

lol what

Attached: Image 2019-03-01 at 4.52.28 PM.png (333x234, 92K)

a newborn baby has approximately 54 mutations compared to their parents. approximately 0 mutations fix per generation. how many generations do you need to turn into a chimp?

This is why no one likes you Germany.
This is the only reason.

I‘m starting to think that young earth creationism and resistance to evolutionary science was deliberately imbedded in modern Christian thought in order to subvert and destroy it.

>how many generations do you need to turn into a chimp
depending on the race of the parents, none

>Why would it contradict creation, that the creator simply created DNA and makes similar beings
I 100% agree that this proves a creator, because it's a logical information system. Monkies and humans look similar so we have similar DNA. Similar DNA achieves similar characteristics. Similar DNA does not prove relatedness -- it's a false equivalence.

>people come from monkeys

Attached: brainlet (13).jpg (812x1024, 61K)

The difference is that a dog and a wolf can make a hybrid of they mate. A fucking chimp and a human can’t.

The comparison argument strikes again

>i was just pretending to be retarded
lol, never thought anyone would actually use this argument!!

>tfw first proto-human
>tfw first primate with fused chromosome
>tfw no gf

Attached: 3CB60259-AEE8-40A8-8394-B0CF012E982A.jpg (353x400, 20K)

>people came from dirt

Attached: 1531738260390.gif (480x480, 2.56M)

>Comparing human managed breeding over ~20,000 years to the environmentally dictated evolution of all life on Earth over several billion years
This is either bait or you are completely fucked in the head.

>Bible was right again.
Says the swede while slurping jewish semen

>people came from space rock

Attached: hirarious.gif (320x200, 1.9M)

>6500k
>Six thousand five hundred thousand?

>people come from a magical sky daddy snapping his fingers

Understandable, however the DNA is close enough that the same viruses that affect chimps affect us to a degree. Again, 65 million years vs 10k. Also, chimps are deviated from the parent species, they theoretically have twice as much genetic variation between us and them when compared to the founding species.

>How Can Mirrors Be Real If Our Eyes Aren't Real

Nigger tier response. Evolution is not nearly as accurate as measurements. Stop being a faggot.

I just did it to illustrate ten thousand compared to 65 million years.

checked

totes tru

Attached: 666.jpg (1920x1080, 86K)

This might be a troll but the idea sounds interesting, in and of itself, but have you got any writings that actually presents that idea well?

Devolution isn't a thing

thats not true, i see it all the time

Attached: mm.jpg (640x394, 30K)

>Durr monkeys kinda look like people so they must be who we come from
idiots.

>only one humanoid species evolved naturally with evolution for billions of years and then seeded this and other planets with their DNA

Attached: 12314144.png (898x790, 279K)

>He still doesn't get the point
Comparisons help for explaining complex things to simple minds

Can I get a food analogy

You do know that most evidence of the human evolution is complete bullshit and have been debunked many times yes?

>I 100% agree that this proves a creator, because it's a logical information system. Similar DNA does not prove relatedness -- it's a false equivalence.
How high are you?

Exactly that is why whites are unique. Of the common ancestors of todays human races some intrebreed with wolves. From this union the white race arose.
The ones who didnt became negros and when they kidnapped and raped white woman they created sandpeople.
Just look at the furry map for proof, also that is why uncucked white religion praised wolves instead of some desertjew.

See, I solved every problem you had.

>Asians obviously were white who had a fling with squids. Look at hentai tentacle porn.

>Syria fucked itself into retardation
More like the Soviet Union collapsed and all of us who were talented had to travel to work and maintain the same standard of living as before.
BTW even today the standard in Syria is higher than Europoor.
America is still #1 though.

OP is correct.

>the Bible
Have fun kissing nigger rapefugee feet, Svendullah.

1/10 failtroll

Hello Shlomo!

You can also get viruses from birds, swine, dogs, and even plants.

It‘s because all life on earth comes from the same source and shares a certain degree of DNA. We share more DNA with chimps than we do evergreen trees, but we still share DNA with evergreens.

> whelp some aspect of the world i do not comprehend
> that settles it lets take joseph's wife's son's word for it

Apples yes
Bananas no

Genetic "evolution" is sorta real. It is guided by a higher power, be it spiritual or extraterrestrial in nature.

>birds and bees both fly, so they are the same to dumb atheists
the picture itself is an amusing representation of how a religious person views evolutionary taxonomy

Wolves have been breed selectively you unbelievably stupid fuck. Do you think that monkeys did the same extremely selective and calculating breeding?
You absolutely cannot be this fucking retarded mate.

Another possibility is that it is not random...

Evolution actually goes through phases of rapid and slow evolution.

When new niches become available this triggers fast evolution. When the environment is stable evolution is slow. This process is not constant and occurs randomly.

You can’t map out a timeline of our common ancestors based on the current rate of gene mutations brainlet.

Attached: D6DA01E9-FB68-4598-8933-12510CDA31B5.jpg (250x246, 12K)

>One burger: yes
>A king of burgers: no

why?

no

its

Apples yes
Bananas yesyes

search for "the final nail in the coffin of human evolution" on youtube. he cites the papers where he gets the information about base pair mutations, fixed mutation rates and genome differences between chimps and humans. the evidence is quite interesting because it's not really "debunkable".

>Gos is just a flying spaghetti monster
Says the atheist while he's fucking his transgender "girl" friend.

Lmao bong education very nice. Didn’t know it’s impossible to measure a kilometer. Go jump in the Thames.

>People evolved from a single cell. WE WUZ T-REX N SHIEET

Attached: bottomless.jpg (645x729, 81K)

>Evolution actually goes through phases of rapid and slow evolution

>random

choose one

Read youtu.be/NArlXzSFt2Y

/thread

Because there is no evidence of it ever occurring. If it could occur, surely the ancestors of dolphins would have devolved back into fish instead of evolving into aquatic mammals etc. etc.

the calculation is based on average mutation rates. unless you're talking about some unknown period where the fixed mutation rates were so enormous that mutations fixed every generation to form new characteristics and appendices in hundreds of years.

You can’t predict when a meteor will strike and wipe out 90% of all species you fucking dolt

>The point
>You

>Random
>Completely uniform in rate
Pick one

lol you cant catch a virus from a plant are you serious

> Do you think that monkeys did the same extremely selective and calculating breeding?

considering this is actively practiced today, yes. Women tend to choose mates that demonstrate certain aspects and avoid others that either show them or don't show them; you should be very familiar with this. This was recently exhibited with the assimilation of Neanderthals to humans. They tend to be roughly the same height, yet with better bone density and bone scarring shows that they were stronger as well. Think of the Neanderthal is Chad and the Human as the virgin to human females. The Neanderthals had better facial structures as well.

This poster has it right.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=oYp5XuGYqqY&t=5s
What we perceive as a causal continuation of events, is actually just the interface for how Demons and Angels see reality and is by no means dependent on that previously perceived event.

Think of Logical consistency the same way you perceive lines on a 2 dimensional service to convey a story.

Attached: hqdefault (3).jpg (480x360, 78K)

Evolution is such a ridiculous theory - I can't believe it's still taken seriously.

The amount of variables involved in "random mutations" being the physical driving force of evolution is utterly absurd.

Attached: charles-darwin[1].jpg (634x640, 37K)

Yes that is what I’m saying. You are basing it on recorded gene mutations.

Watch the video