Elizebeth II Not Royalty and Scammer

Royal blood means nothing.
It's a trick they pull on us and we fall for it.

I used to work at a place that had a lord as a director, the amount of arselicking the other staff did to him was embarrassing..
"Yes your lordship."
Bunch of idiot cunts.

:*( really?

I like it

the true red pill is realizing that democracy, communism and republics were a mistake, Monarchy is the only true order to society

Attached: 1523203580540.png (198x201, 87K)

Brah, the entire history of Britain is littered will illegitimate rulers where blood is concerned.

Did they kiss his signet ring? Kneel with head bowed when they brought him a report? Did a lackey tap a staff on the ground and loudly anounce his arrival when he came in for his morning coffee? Jesus christ that's going to be the cringiest thing I've read alll day.

Kek here you would get laughed at if you wanted people to call your lord, where did you work at before?

It wasn't far off that, it made me sick to see it.
It was an insurance company which long ago went bust.

>Since there is DNA evidence that the current royal family members do not actually have any British Royal blood the Queen is not actually a real Queen.
She's directly related to King Athelstan, the man who united all of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms into this country you've probably heard of called England, and to Alfred the Great - one of only two men in English history to hold the title of 'the Great' (and for good measure).

Who the fuck are you? An Australian? Kek. Desert shithead.

Attached: Alfred-to-Elizabeth-II.gif (1288x2185, 218K)

What did you call him? Did you get a 'look' or shunned for not bowing down and kissing ass?

Why does the DNA test say otherwise?

Most people only know King Alfred because of the show Kingdom of Heaven, myself included. It's just hard to give a fuck about a country that has turned into a giant prissy getting raped by Muhammad and the EU.

>Since there is DNA evidence that the current royal family members do not actually have any British Royal
Shouldn't take a fucking geneticist to figure out the British royalty died with House Stuart's deposition.

Who on God's green fucking earth either told you or gave you the impression that anyone else besides you gives a shit about the opinion of some fucking hispanic on English king's in a country that hasn't even managed to last 300 years?

You know a medieval king from what fucking gay TV show? Yeah, fuck off back to Aztec land buddy.

Jewish men are manipulating it all.

Yep. Also that deal with Hitler back in WW2 just in case they won. Sneaky.

"Your Lordship."
As in "your lordship would like a cup of tea.?"

Not really no, they knew I wasn't going to be an arsekisser, the guy often looked embarrassed by all the fawning, but he was as stuck in his role as everyone else.

>Come into work with face covered in woad paint
>I bow to nā man!
>Gets dragged out by constables

Find the guy with the real blood and make him the new leader!

Isn't Anglo history is full of monarchs being overthrown and somebody else taking the throne? I mean they were all so inbred that everyone vying for the throne were all cousins anyway, but it's hardly a surprise that the monarchy can't trace its blood back to any antique legitimacy. Legitimacy was earned by military conquest of your rivals and killing everyone who didn't bend the knee, as then as now.

Or find this guy. He must be the true king of England.

Attached: stick.jpg (885x118, 32K)

Based feudal poster

>Isn't Anglo history is full of monarchs being overthrown and somebody else taking the throne?
They were all related by blood to someone or another when it comes to aristocratic houses feuding.

1600+ the only guys overthrowing and executing kings was parliament.

Attached: Death_warrant_of_King_Charles_I.jpg (1000x471, 151K)

He lives{lived?} In Australia.
But refused to have anything to do with it.

no shit, they are german or something, everyone knows about this, its about the bloodlines that run back thousands of years, britains was wiped out.
why do you think the fucking sex pistols say
>god save the queen
>she aint no human being
:^) and got arrested for singing it on the themes?

Here's a weird fact, the old name of the river Thames was the river Isis..!

Isis is an egyptian godess before the terrorist organization
funny fact: the agency in the show archer is called isis, again before the terrorists exist.
even funnier fact: israel secret intelligence service

Imagine what her butthole looks like. I wonder if she masturbates with a royal diamond dildo or something. Maybe she has a Sybian machine or some custom sex machine to fuck her with. Maybe an ass and pussy licking squad to make her cum every day.

I'd sentence you to death for that I hope you know.

disgusting nobody wants your (((sax-coburg-gotha))) jewish royals

Yes I knew that, it just seemed a weird name for a British river..
Egypt don't have river called river Freya.

The groom of the royal stool.

Anyone else believe the claim that the true royals of any ancient nation were all red heads?
From Egyptians, Romans, and Europeans. Maybe true for the South Americans too.
Also they might have been cone heads too.

Royal blood is usually overrated unless it has some cool fantasy and/or scifi attributes such as utilitronium nanobots, except for utilising the "blood bond" system where family supports family etc which is exponentially helpful due to nepotism.

Note to self: work on synthetic royal blood with some form of said attributes.

Also:

blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/11/08/fairy-wrens-teach-secret-passwords-to-their-unborn-chicks-to-tell-them-apart-from-cuckoo-impostors/#.XHpHj4gzbIU

>This is one of many incredible adaptations in the long-running battle between birds and their brood parasite. As these evolutionary arms races continue, the parasites typically become ever better mimics, and the hosts typically become ever more discerning parents.

I saw a pasta on Jow Forums about imposter ant queens mentioned in "the selfish gene".

Nature, red in tooth and claw.

UFO sightings throughout most of recorded history.

Put it together and go figure.

Makes sense

>Royal blood means nothing
Sure. If being a shape shifting reptilian humanoid is nothing.

Aren't they Germans?

The real royals have eyes that glow in the dark.

Attached: Burning_Bright_-_Bengal_Tiger_-_2016-02-10_13.55.21.jpg (113x114, 15K)

No. You just read something that people just to push around the room like dung beatles.

Queen Victoria was the grandmother of the last Emperor of Russia and the German Kaiser. Aristocratic families have always married their children to other aristocratic houses in political marriages. For royal houses that meant marrying into other royal houses. So part of Elizabeth's ancestry comes from an aristocratic German house.

That's where the confusion comes from.

youtube.com/watch?v=SG4Ec9nEwwk
The real kang of UK is an Australian lmao

Edward IV was the product of cuckoldry.

It's so common here to be a an 8 foot tall reptoid half human monster we barely even notice them as they vampirise small children.

They are like interbred Pakistanis, claiming benefits taken from public money for their spastic kids.

Its literally a hit piece. Look at it. It's all
>edward MAY have been born due to illegitimacy
>oh his mother cheated
>some other guys sperm impregnated this woman
Do you know how many wars have been started over shitty claims like that in history? Today it gets you views.

Elizabeth can trace her ancestry to Athelstan and Alfred. That's blood.

>cuck your own royal family
>complain you don't have a real leader anymore

>can trace her ancestry to Athelstan and Alfred
but what % of the avg brits on the street can, as well? Is this even uncommon?
It seems like a massive deal to me, the direct line was broken. I wonder if (((tricks))) are afoot

>some other guys sperm impregnated this woman
Are you retarded? I bet you watch cuckold porn or some shit if you're this deranged.

Edward IV's birth timeline points to cuckoldry as the only answer.

Her ancestors gang hired bigger bullies than the opposition.
That's how you become royal.
If I got a team together and wasted all the current 'royals' I then can be king and any complaint can just be ignored.

Its top comment on that video and its something I learned about so many years ago on the Act of settlement, and I can't believe someone hasn't mentioned yet but
>the current Queen is Queen because of the 1701 Act of Settlement, which restricted the Crown to the Protestant heirs of Sophia of Hanover, granddaughter of James I of England and VI of Scotland.

Basically to 1. disinherit all Catholic heirs to the throne and 2. stop any future century old wars from occurring over lines of succession.

I guess the next argument is "why does parliament get to decide?" but its right of conquest. If you don't count right by conquest, William the Conqueror's claims fall right down and then neither that Brit living in Australia or Elizabeth II is king or queen. Parliament executed the king, and overthrew the next one, and then established who the monarch was in law and its stuck through precedent.

I'd say that's good enough. Truth be told, parliament wanted to establish very clearly they didn't give a shit about blood in 1688 and most people feel that way today.

>t. usurper
Go put your head on a spike.

Attached: Byrhtnoth's_Plaque_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1462906.jpg (640x428, 78K)

>Her ancestors gang hired bigger bullies than the opposition.

I've always wondered why revolutions don't just go after the hired bullies first?

They do, it's called civil war.

i'm talking about a little more clandestinely than that, my dood.

Your monarch can be directly traced to a cheating whore.

Attached: 1550668856773.jpg (499x658, 177K)

Yeah, I guess. She can also be traced to the guy who unified the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms into England, the guy who started the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, the guy who conquered Wales and smashed Scotland so hard they called him the Hammer of the Scots, the woman who was Queen and Empress, and everyone in between.

You're bound to have some nutters in there. Implying it's true.

I may be wrong but since George of Hanover , I don't think we've had a genuinely English monarch..?

underrated

>when you cuck an entire nation
Fffhahahahahahahahahahahahahhaha

>implying kings and queens need to be of the same nationality or ethnicity as their subjects
That's not how kingdoms work. The first Belgian King was a German if I recall correctly. And after Bulgaria was freed from the ottomans by the Russians I believe a hessian noble got to rule there. Kingdoms don't necessarily care much about nationality or ethnicity. It's all about the king having a kingdom and everyone inside is his subject.