Jow Forums cannot refute this

Yes leaf, tell us all about how great socialism is. Hold on, let me go make an egg sandwich with my $0.99 dozen eggs and $0.50 loaf of bread.

Attached: 1472321672958.png (473x500, 28K)

>You get something for nothing.
Right now I'm getting nothing from something.

>Same can be said for a tremendous amount of bullshit jobs that add no value to society but eat up a lot more resources than UBI would have.
Such as? Name one non-government-related business that stays in business without being productive. Protip: You can't, because you're retarded.

Attached: 1507525871501.jpg (978x1114, 349K)

Why are you encouraging people to participate in the kike fiat scheme where we delude ourselves into thinking the currency has value because it keeps circulating, despite it being devalued annually?

hes not a capitalist.
just another crazy rich asian.

He must not know the definition of capitalism

When are we gonna get a candidate who runs on stopping all immigration and cutting all foreign aid to Israel and Africa?

Envy and the lure of free stuff are a hell of a drug. Kikes learned that a long time ago.

the second everyone gets ubi the ubi=0

I guess as soon as they start promising to steal from fellow whites on our behalf.

Attached: 1496734899557.jpg (339x355, 39K)

It's a lefty tactic.
Appear centrist to appeal to moderates, get elected, swing back to the far left.

not an argument, nothing to refute

>forced redistribution of wealth = centrist moderate

Attached: 1472907893612.jpg (252x291, 29K)

It's when the means of production are privately owned. He knows the only way capitalists are going to keep control of property is if they keep the population comfortable

I agree. Whatever it takes to topple the US political and economic system I support. Yang has my vote.

Hah we have $ 0.8 dozen eggs and $ 0.38 for a loaf of bread.

Please explain how universal gibs incentivizes productivity and is any different from welfare on a large scale.

>It's when the means of production are privately owned
Correction, Capitalism is the government allowing private ownership of the means of production. That doesn't necessarily mean all production is privately owned. There have been many socialist businesses in America (worker ownership of the means of production/forced redistribution), and they fail every time. Hmm, I wonder why..

Attached: 1473160087120.jpg (590x578, 31K)

>incentivizes productivity
Who said the point was to "incentivizes productivity"? People are tired of slaving for corporations and paying taxes to a cancerous government.

I unironically support this because it'll make everything crash and burn. Acclerationism and destruction of the system is the only way forward

I’m no more of a fan of corporations who don’t give a shit about the average American than you, but if you don’t want more taxes, don’t vote for the candidate who wants to give even more free handouts than already exist. Chances are *you* will be the one paying more to uphold and find that very system than others do, but they will be receiving the same amount as you. Sound good?

>expecting them to have actually thought about this logically
You're giving them way too much credit. They envision the current system but without the price tags. Their video games and tendies will continue to be produced, but it will be "free" (stolen from hard workers), and their mom will stop nagging them because it's now socially acceptable to "resist billionaires" by sitting at home and playing video games...

Attached: 1472441746361.png (420x420, 267K)

Fucking hell forgot to tag you ^^

>Wrong. Rooted in maternity leave, choice of professions, overtime, and other choices aggregated over time. White men work harder statistically.

No, the gap still exists, even when controlling for external factors like maternity leave, hours worked, experience or occupation, even though it's smaller than the unadjusted wage gap used by many feminist media. It's widely accepted fact among the experts.

It's because very few women negotiate for a higher salary at the time of hiring.

Women are less intelligent and ambitious than men and will never catch up even with immense handouts.

(((hello fellow capitalists)))

The government does not need to be involved. This guy, and Bernie, and that big toothed spic cunt can give away as much of their own money as they want. The generous liberals can set up a foundation, collect voluntary contributions from other generous leftists, and give the money to whomever they please. I am all in favor of generous people giving others their own money. I am against the government robbing some people to pay others.

Did he read Fanged Noumena?

Attached: NickLand.jpg (171x266, 12K)

i would say yang is controlled opposition, but he's literally not even opposition. he's a leftist that for some reason has taken to pretending to be a centrist

Yes, the government jobs are unnecessary, and should be eliminated. Businesses do not pay unnecessary people, they keep the smallest possible number needed to get the job done. Paying a bunch of excess people to collect paychecks and surf the internet is something only government can afford. BEcause they don't need to earn the money, they just take what they want.

Low IQ leftists actually believe that printing money creates wealth.

UBI can only work when all other forms of welfare are abolished, and Yang is not going to do that.

He's gonna crash

>Jow Forums cannot refute this
He's Asian.

Top kek quite the opposite, capitalism historically needed impoverishment so to create labour precarization and predate on it. Could be that late capitalism has changed some rules and they don't give a shit anymore about the labour part, they control things in a much upper level. But necessary? For capitalism? Never.

The currency actually does have value though.