Are people seriously believing 5G is dangerous for your health or is it just a meme I don't get

It may be dangerous but it is most definitely stupid.
It needs direct line of sight to work.
Your phone will have multiple antennas where only one is active depending how you move your hands at that point.
And for what? for more bandwidth!
I already can stream videos bidirectional on my phone via LTS. Why do we need more bandwidth? We don't!
Nobody needs 5G.

It would be fine.

Yes.
Infrared light has lower energy than visible light. Standing in front of the TV remote is less dangerous than going outside on a cloudy day. What makes 4G (etc) so dangerous is that it uses high levels of energy, which could rattle loose some bits of your DNA, giving you cancer. People who dont wear sunscreen or use tanning booths are more susceptible to skin cancer because the Ultraviolet light screws them up.

We don't "need" cars either.

why do people who have no clue about physics have an opinion? just look at the fucking posts in this thread lmao

Infrared radiation is a heat radiation. Humans emits infrared radiation too. Could be dangerous if you put your hand in an open fire.

That's 2.4ghz. very close to your home wifi router.
Why aren't you saying wifi is trying to kill you?

Ionising radiation begins at ultraviolet.

Foillhatters will sincerely believe all manner of nonsense. But there are comparatively few of them out there.

Trolls will post any irritating shit, belief is not a part of it.

You could ask that same question about any Jow Forums-culture conspiracy. Welcome to postmodernism. Welcome to Jow Forums.

5G is supposed to use the human body as an emitter/receptor. you basically become a 5G antenna.

>Do you seriously believe that large amounts of chemicals don't cause health problems or are you just retarded?

Never go full retard, bro.

Who knows. You want to experiment on yourself?

Can you point where in the 3GPP 5G standard exactly the body is being used as an antenna?

become a bedroom electromagnetic shield installer for
easy money

It’s just doomers and delusional Christians crying about the latest boogeyman in their head

are you retarded?

How did we get this deep into a Jow Forums conspiracy thread with nobody posting about (((them)))?

So no?

Also can you explain exactly how that works? The wavelength of 28ghz is very small, how does the body transceive it?

do you know what an antenna is? do you understand that visible light is electromagnetic
the light of a candle is also electromagnetic, it carries more energy than 5g waves, by the order 100-10000. have you ever seen somebody get worried about candle light?

Yes, please explain this to me in very simple terms with references.

it gets absorbed by the skin. he is bullshitting.

I know I just want to hear his explanation.

are you dumb or a kike desu? it's the whole point of the technology.
it's developed in Israel, you should know, kike.

It's between 2.4-5.8 GHz
No it's not you fucking retard.

>Uses body as antenna
>Internet of things
>Causes cancer
Providing that all of this is true, how does one escape 5G?

Attached: help-me-out-fren.jpg (300x242, 42K)

It's pretty much a meme.
5G is as dangerous as using Wi-Fi.

Power lines and electrical appliances that emit non-ionizing EMFs are present everywhere in homes and workplaces. For example, wireless local networks are nearly always “on” and are increasingly commonplace in homes, schools, and many public places.

No mechanism by which ELF-EMFs or radiofrequency radiation could cause cancer has been identified. Unlike high-energy (ionizing) radiation, EMFs in the non-ionizing part of the electromagnetic spectrum cannot damage DNA or cells directly. Some scientists have speculated that ELF-EMFs could cause cancer through other mechanisms, such as by reducing levels of the hormone melatonin. There is some evidence that melatonin may suppress the development of certain tumors.

Studies of animals have not provided any indications that exposure to ELF-EMFs is associated with cancer (9–12). The few high-quality studies in animals have provided no evidence that Wi-Fi is harmful to health (7).

Although there is no known mechanism by which non-ionizing EMFs could damage DNA and cause cancer, even a small increase in risk would be of clinical importance given how widespread exposure to these fields is.

Numerous epidemiologic studies and comprehensive reviews of the scientific literature have evaluated possible associations between exposure to non-ionizing EMFs and risk of cancer in children (12–14). (Magnetic fields are the component of non-ionizing EMFs that are usually studied in relation to their possible health effects.) Most of the research has focused on leukemia and brain tumors, the two most common cancers in children. Studies have examined associations of these cancers with living near power lines, with magnetic fields in the home, and with exposure of parents to high levels of magnetic fields in the workplace. No consistent evidence for an association between any source of non-ionizing EMF and cancer has been found.

cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/electromagnetic-fields-fact-sheet

The same source where you found that pic.

tin foil?

lmao why rae you typing so much? candles also emit electro mangetic light
every body which has a temperature emits electro magnetic waves
every single candle emits EM waves

imagine not understanding the nature of electromagnetism in 2019

The amount of retards on Jow Forums that can't be bothered to look up scientific studies on this and just read the conclusions is staggering.

why would you need a study to understand this? are you a retard?

Wouldn't normal colored light also cause mutations then?

Go to your doctor and ask fo a tinf foil anti-5G hat.
Stay indoors all the time and wrap you entire house in tin foil.
Cutting off your ears also helps prevent them from picking up 5G signals.

Attached: Tin foil hat.jpg (600x350, 27K)

EMR has been linked to lethal brain tumors in multiple medical studies, and has been known to break the blood brain barrier even in levels that 3 and 4g emit. Communication companies are now installing these antennas all around our cities while dismissing these findings, and have funded counterstudies that cook the books by omitting people over 60 from the statistics.
But we're fine with that because megacorporations and the government would never do anything shady, right?
By the way Israel has already banned wifi in schools, but Im sure it's nothing and the US regulations for EMR being more than 10 times theirs is just a coincidence about how free they are.

yes, but its not ionizing. electromagnetic waves arent bound to something "electrical" or a "device"

a flame also emits electromagnetic waves

>he doesnt use a landline for internet
u o

Sigh, shut up mountain jew.

> needs a study to understand basic physics

you are not white

I'm not writng it, just posting from this source:
Yeah, but people on Jow Forums are pretty stupid and there are a lot of shilling going on that 5G is dangerous.

The cell phone industry is that largest on earth, you bet your fucking ass there's gonna be a lot of misinformation and collusion in Scientific studies regarding RF, MW and IR radiation.
5G goes up to 60GHz, which is at a level where it can separate bonds between cells, this is something you don't fucking want.

>b-but the sun puts out tons of radiation!!
Yes, but it's evenly distributed across the spectrum. Having a massive spike in 2.4GHz, 5GHz and 60GHz is never a good idea.

Electrical engineers:
Retarded nutters on the internet:
OH GOD THEY ARE FRYING OUR BRAINS

you can't "falsify" any studies on this topci. because the theory behind it is the theory of electromagnetism you mongoloid

you can literally calculate the energy with : E=h*f

and you'll understan dthat every single candle is 10000x more dangerous than every electrical device

but you aren't bothered by candles because you are a brainlet that can't into electromagnetism

> massive spike

lmao , you are clueless. stop posting

5G never goes over 5.8GHz you fucking retard.

I have a Mechatronics bachelor. Most people I know (95% whites) don't know shit about basic physics. I have stopped bothering to discuss things like physics with people. Most are hopelessly ignorant.

5G defines multiple different bands, there is a high frequency standard for used in crowded city spaces. Not that this matters. It could be the high frequency option didn't make it in to the standard though, I don't check up on these things often.

t.Whitecoatlicker

5G is the final step to make the internet inescapable. These 5G towers will beam you consistently with 24/7 penis pill adds. Slowly crippling our brains and microwaving our minds with digiwaste. Soon people will be dropping to ground in a frothing seizure. Why? Because they didn't download ublock for their brain and a bunch of pop ups assaulted their neuroelectric things with those ads that advertise a game you know is fake because the ad is just SFM porn with PLAY THIS GEAM YOU WILL CUM INSTANTLY. That poor bastard was hit with the fuck an ugly chick tonight barrage. Case closed Johnson. All because some LoL champ needs that extra gig speed to rig his digg:DD faster to a few more tabs of Japanese pissing spy girl cam hole while dishing out brainturds to throw at the social media wall.

You're fucking retarded, a candle will put out an evenly distributed spectrum of EM radiation, not a fucking spike at 60GHz, or 2.4GHz, etc.
Nice reddit spacing, fucktard.

>5G will use spectrum in the existing LTE frequency range (600 MHz to 6 GHz) and also in millimeter wave (mmWave) bands (24–86 GHz).
- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5G
Get fucked swedcuck.

If you want to make the case that 5G will have absolutely no affect to your health, then go ahead and disprove the studies below for me:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530389
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30247338
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/740f/f5d2b12fe382e5bbda57ec1e656341dcdbf8.pdf

t. South American peasant manlet

You are thinking of the 5ghz wifi standard.
We are talking about the 3GPP 5th Generation standard.
Try to keep up, Sven.

lick some more coats

It's literally the same strength or even weaker than WiFi. Fuck off conspiritards.

youtube.com/watch?v=lCIAcZov5Hs

> distributed spectrum

correct, but considering the proximity of candles and their much higher frequency (order 1000-100 000) this becomes meaningless

how many people do you know that have a candle on their night table? or put candles on their christmas trees etc.

that is much more radiation than any electrical device or any radiation emitted by all electrical devices combined

That's why there are warnings at towers and base stations, because the potential damage is only VERY close to the transmitter. Like almost touching it.
Now, you're going to say BUT 5G Has more base stations!!!
That's because high freqs dissipate over a much shorter distance than low freqs. So you receive less power unless you are close.

It's bad for your brain. Israel doesn't want it but they're fine with you frying your people minds.

Attached: 1517604101394.jpg (215x255, 6K)

The bulk of that radiation is being absorbed by the air around the candle, and escapes via convection. The amount of IR and Light that hits the person next to it as almost nil.
If it did put out as much as you think it did, any phone or wi-fi device within 15m will be disconnected due to interference.

40 year old leaf here

Best post of 2019 so far, thank you burger, I can now sleep with a smile

Literally just don't use a phone. It's that easy.

Modern companies want to spend billions opening themselves up to trillions of dollars in damages through civil suits once the cancer starts to break out.

"5G NR can include lower frequencies (FR1), below 6 GHz, and higher frequencies (FR2), above 24 GHz and into the millimeter waves range. However, the speed and latency in early deployments, using 5G NR software on 4G hardware (non-standalone), are only slightly better than new 4G systems, estimated at 15% to 50% better."
From the same source, note that it says: "5G NR can include" and not that it DOES include.

Something something inverse-square law.

you are wrong. the reason why candles and light in general dont interfere with radio waves is because of the different wavelength.
what matters for the energy -> ionization -> cancer/mutations is frequency.

IR and light is absorbed by the skin, and ugess what kind of cancer is the most common? skin cancer.

It's not that i "think" it emits as much , you can literally calculate it very easily.

You can also measure a current stemming from candle light (photo effect) to prove that a candle flame is indeed electromagnetic.

>5G never goes over 5.8GHz you fucking retard.
Moving the goalposts now are we, swedcuck?

Remember 20 years ago when people were claiming cell phones would give you cancer and brain tumors?

Basically nothing has changed.

They will in highly populated areas, that's the whole point.

> thinks that waves with a frequency of 5 ghz are dangerous
> doesnt think that waves with a frequency 100000 times higher and thus 100000 times more energy are dangerous

imagine being so retarded

Are you sure? People certainly act like they have brain damage these days

And that "n order to support increased throughput requirements of 5G, large quantities of new spectrum (5G NR frequency bands) have been allocated to 5G, particularly in millimeter wave bands.[47] For example, in July 2016, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) of the United States freed up vast amounts of bandwidth in underutilised high-band spectrum for 5G. The Spectrum Frontiers Proposal (SFP) doubled the amount of millimeter-wave (mmWave) unlicensed spectrum to 14 GHz and created four times the amount of flexible, mobile-use spectrum the FCC had licensed to date.[48] In March 2018, European Union lawmakers agreed to open up the 3.6 and 26 GHz bands by 2020."
5G won't be using more than 5.8 GHz until 2020, then it might use up to 26 GHz.
And that's a big MIGHT.

cancer skyrocketing is nothing?

Modern retardation is the result of the internet and its proliferation of ironic stupidity misinterpreted by otherwise uneducated mongoloids.

Didn't realize literally nothing but cell phones ha e changed in the last 20 years.

Proof of skyrocketing cancer? Specifically EMR related cancers?

Doctors 70 years ago: smoking isn't bad for you, it's actually healthy!

Kankermongol.

I dunno, 3W of spread IR and Visible light (97W escaped heat via convection), vs 2W sharp spike of pure 60GHz
Go get your head checked if you think a candle is more dangerous than this.
Also, you should learn about the inverse square law, the phone is usually carried on the body for a lot of the day, so you're effectively absorbing most of it, compared to a candle 1-2 metres away, so it's even less than the above figures.

2020 is next fucking year and 5G in LTE frequencies aren't fully rolled out yet.

what an awful, awful post

Just play it smart. Invest now in the biggest pharmaceutical companies which focuses on cancer treatments and laugh all the way to the bank later.

It's in the microwave range. Since it attenuates so much through atmosphere, they will need to have transmitters on street corners (rather than every several miles in a single massive tower).
Pic related is a 5G lamp post. Get used to seeing these almost everywhere.

Attached: 3372__500x550_lamp_post.jpg (500x500, 69K)

LMAO what world do you live in where you get a 2 W 60 GHz spike?

and there is no such thing as escape via "heat convection" for electromagnetic waves, since they all travel at light speed.

you simply dont understand what an electromagnetic wave is, thats why you are worried about electric devices and not devices that produce much more and much stronger electromagnetic waves

yes, the inverse square law, is exactly the reason why you shouldnt be worried while using electric devices, because not only are the high energy antennas far from you (unlike light sources) but the small emitters in normal devices are extremely limited as to what they can output

while light sources are extremely close to you , and should be of much more concern

looks like a normal lamp post, eerie

youtu.be/lCIAcZov5Hs

And there is no current plan on using more than 5.8 GHZ for 5G, it's just being freed up if there will be a future need for those bands.
Even if it would use a 60 GHz it's not dangerous for humans, or life at all in that matter.
Staying out in the sun for 1 min would affect you more than using 5G in a lifetime.

No more dangerous that other wireless technologies.

No reference scale in that one. It's bigger than it looks.
Here's another common design.

Attached: la_smart_pole.jpg (275x414, 28K)

Thats utterly dumb.