If socialism is bad then why is Bernie offering me $700000?

Capping the price of bread doesn't make it any easier to buy when no one can afford to make bread.

It's not his money, or yours.

Attached: You.jpg (322x282, 23K)

Because he’s not actually offering you 700,000 of his own money. Beware of the allure of “doing good” with someone elses’ money.

money is an evaluation of assets and production ability. if people are receiving money they didn't earn for things they do not have to trade that is corruption.

Well, I mean...
If you take all the money and distribute it evenly, then only a few are hurt but the majority are given more money than they have, so it's a win, right?

if everyone in the US had 700,000 then it would end back up where it is right now within a few years
research the fate of lotto winners

That's 210 trillion dollars a year, lol.

Bernie isnt going to give you shit except maybe a trip to the ovens for not being gay enough!

Wrong. The producers of that original wealth will have moved. It won't be created again until long after the starving masses revolt.

socialism and communism are cancerous idealogies that only serve the ruling power and lazy people.

get your ass of that fucking chair and work, if you don't want to work then make people work for you by making a business or finding a niche market.

And then the people who's goods and servces actually PRODUCE that money, would lose all incentive to do so, and that "$700,000", would rapidly decrease to $0.

Impliment socialism on a radical level like this, and both the public, and private sector would fall to shambles, and we'd be living in a third world country within a month.

Think about your ideas critically for literally one second, and they all fall apart.
One second.

Wrong. Money is just a measurement. You are giving everyone a gold star for not doing jack fucking shit. Then no one does shit, no one has a reason to do shit, shit doesn't get done and everyone starves.

There is a reason China is in a capitalist model.

But then again, if we did everything based on it benefiting the majority, then a group of people raping one person would be viewed as a good thing.

so he redistributes some wealth around
it sounds good, free money is free money
but that is either being stolen from someone or straight up devalued printing en masse
im more concerned about the next rung in the ladder because most of this country's wealth is in land and other non-liquid assets

Attached: 1544822654646.gif (360x238, 1.43M)

And within a year it would go back to normal and youd be asking for money again.

I was hoping OP would have responded, and then I would have hit 'em with the line, but these threads are never actually watched by the OP, they're just bait and bots.

Attached: 1550087719068.jpg (750x273, 40K)

And your dollar crashes as a result..

idgaf about some douches yatch if it means i can pay my student loans and rent.

>His ideas are so good he has to pay me to accept them!
Thanks for debunking your own argument bolshe

>Bernie offers outlandish false promises
>Yang offers you a realistic $1000 a month

So you give everyone $700,000. Now what? Do the business owners keep their jobs? What happens to the retards that spend their $700,000 on jetskis and cocaine? What happens to the person that owns the grocery store and makes $700k and his earnings? You solved fucking nothing you stupid kike cocksucker

thats literally retarded logic. are you in highschool? You think thats actually a substantial statement? Who the fuck do you think you are you little worm.

It will be like energy prices now. They called the kw/h price so we just get insane fucking "delivery charges." Enjoy your $5 loaf of bread with a $15 convenience fee.

Be a good capitalist goyim and build a bunker for billionaire pedophiles to hide inside while they watch you and your family die.

Attached: bunkers_crop-1152x648.jpg (1152x648, 105K)

Struck a nerve, there did I?
That's rhetorical.

Attached: op.gif (252x189, 1.51M)

This remind me right after Europeans left Africa to the Africans and all of their leaders won on the promise of, "We'll give everyone the white mans house, cars, and land!!! We'll all be rich!". Look where they're at now, nigger.

Imagine that every single member of your local drug gang, black, Hispanic or otherwise, suddenly gets a monthly paycheck of $58,333, with the promise that this is the new normal. What the fuck do you think they're going to spend it on during their first years of newfound, appropriated riches?

Let me ask you this, then - have you ever been in a Food Lion on the first day of the month that the food stamps go out in a city like Atlanta? Detroit? Chicago? Philadelphia? If you have, or can imagine what that might look like, imagine it now with guns.

Attached: db0.jpg (349x642, 29K)

True, but it would be fucking nice to once and for all finally be able to say, "We tried to help you faggots, we gave you 3/4 of a million dollars, it was entirely on YOU!". They can be rich for a year and give all of their wealth back to business owners as they'll be too busy blowing it on retarded shit, as you said, and within 2-3 years everything will be back to normal. Except now we can tell poor people to fuck off.

Open borders, no guns, ChiCom plant.
>realistic

...So what you're saying is it would help kill them off to drop crates of money, drugs and guns around black welfare neighborhoods?

This, it’s not true by an order of magnitude at least. Who makes this shit?

How many times are you going to post this and be debunked, retard?

$700,000 in assets does not equal $700,000 in liquid wealth. You're a literal economic retard, and a complete failure at life, and should commit suicide. The human race is better without complete failures like you.

Attached: brainlettttt.jpg (800x450, 45K)

but you get $1000

Trust the plan.

>millennials actually believe this bullshit

Question: How are you going to take billions of dollars away from billionaires?

Question: Who is in charge of keeping an accounting of all of those billions?

Question: Who is in charge of distributing all those billions?

Question: Once everyone has their $700,000™, who will be in charge of controlling the cost of goods and services?

Under socialism, I own the means of production. Therefore, I'd like us to begin producing me a 135ft yacht, a 12,500sq ft home, a Mercedes Benz AMG CLS 53, a Cadillac Escalade ESV Platinum, and my own football team. Thanks, Bernie!

He's counting assets like real estate and businesses as "wealth" that can somehow be worth the same amount. OP has a room temperature-level IQ.

Those three people that hold all of that money will just emigrate to a different nation that doesn't Jew them as much. Our economy is solely propped up by a dozen people or so.

Thanks for the pasta. I can’t wait to start larping as a rat bastard commie, kid.

>my rights and freedoms are only worth 1k.
You dont deserve to call yourself an American.

I'll take 700k in either

I legitimately don't get what thats supposed to mean in this context.

>muh orange man who sold my foreskin to israel is worth more than 1k
lmfaoooo

I'm no kike, my dick is intact.
>orange man bad
>give country to yellow man

Wow now everyone can own an expansive beach house!

Attached: 1536195371723_0.jpg (180x192, 16K)

It's not worth 700k if it's distributed, numbnut. Based on historical precedent, you might get 50k (if you're lucky).and then a massive famine 2-5 years later,.

Good lord, this is why Jow Forums is considered low IQ.

How much did your gender studies degree cost you?

Is this what leftists actually think? You believe everyone will be rich under socialism instead of being so poor you're forced to eat house pets and children like every other time it's been tried?

Attached: .png (500x555, 481K)

>no wall, entire country bends over backwards for kikes, no gf, robots are taking our jobs
vs
>all of that but you get 1k a month
looks like anyone with a brain is voting for chinky, drumpfter

Hey let's just have everything be free and nobody will have to work! All we have to do is just take anything we need from rich people!

Everybody has a price...I guess that's yours...what an asshole...

Ayy lmao

lol meme flaggot.

When did i say i support trump? Shill harder chang.

First of all, there isn't $700,000 to give to everyone in the US. There isn't even $70,000. Even if we somehow could collect all the wealth in the US and then give each man, woman, and child an equal share, we would each get a one-time payment of only about $58,000. And that's it. There would be no more wealth for you after that.

Oh, and that $58k one-time payment ignores the $22 trillion we owe in debt. In fact, we wouldn't get a payout at all. We would actually owe the banks $6100 each. Yes, every man, woman, and child would have to pay the banks $6100 for the pleasure of adopting socialism. Welcome to abject poverty, everyone. Thanks, Bernie!

Attached: 1536180770541.jpg (360x402, 28K)

>He's not.
FPBP.

Be AOC
Proclaim to pay new hires $52k
>its paid for by tax payers
>AOC still takes her $175k salary instead of the $52k "living wage"

That is how real socialism works.

Attached: 1425065378096.webm (1280x720, 2.25M)

How the fuck do you arrive to a number like that? If the average earning of an american family is, say, 60k, how the fuck do you redistribute it to obtain 700k?

If people understood economics and basic math, there would be no communists.

He thinks people like the Rothschilds will stay put in the country, sell all of their assets, and hand over their entire fortunes and prices wouldn't be inflated at all.

Attached: 1520453577388.gif (480x270, 3.9M)

I doubt its going to be 1k a month. I've heard him say a year at one point. Also, do you honestly think all that money is going to come with no strings attached?

Well in this case they say "annual income", so I am not sure how selling off all their assets, even if that mean money magically being worth the same, could be a sustainable. Maybe assuming they had the quotient of a 7th grader was too generous.

You just describe socialism.

Attached: 3545.jpg (700x700, 178K)

No, what people (and you) lack an understanding of is human nature. If it was just economics and math, with no cultural elements or individual responsibilities (or inequities, etc) both systems would end up functionally similar.
It's the reality of people and cultures and life that make one system an effective tool for extracting value with a little misery, and the other an effective tool for extracting misery with a little value

Inflation, even this amount of money will be pure gold. socialism is exactly how to solve problems with minimum amount of money. But it is possible only for countries who have serial fabrication system - it helps to distribute production over the time. so there is no socialism for money even if people who own it will give it immediately

Rich people win in all economic scenarios
But in a capitalist system, the power follows the money which follows effectiveness and luck
And in a socialist system the money follows the power which follows the manipulative and clever
These are questions worth arguing over in ways that create understanding

I thought communism allowed me to steal money from other people.

Attached: 1551475348266.jpg (1000x854, 117K)

>capitalist system, the power follows the money which follows effectiveness and luck
Living in a capitalist system, I guess child-blood-slurping satanists are more effective and lucky than I am. There will always be monopolization of power wherever one's freedom is based on an cumulative token (money). Think outside the box and realize that neither capitalism or "socialism" will ever work to benefit all equally because they both use the monetary system.

>You just describe socialism.
>getting paid for building someone something is socialism
You don't know how capitalism works.

redistridut the weald of hole wurld XD

>If socialism is bad then why is Bernie offering me $700000?
Is that even enough to buy a house?

Don't forget the future
>cost of living increases
>"Living wage" declines/doesn't change to reflect current costs
>AOC salary increases
Can't have the ruling class starve now. They need to be paid more to pass that new "living wage"

Fixed it for you, friendo.

Attached: 1551757711324s.jpg (250x248, 37K)

>Hey lets just cause a huge inflation without raising the labour output, that will be super cool

>While declining the labor output
It won't be going up.

>all those homeless people buying houses now driving up the prices, fuck those selfish pricks

If everyone had $700,000, then $700,000 would be worthless.

With money that no one cares about acquiring because the government will just steal it again? Trade in goods or gtfo.

* buying a loaf of bread with their monthly income

Who would sell you a house for even worse monopoly money than we have right now
?

Stop trying to bring logic into a discussion about communism

Most working people would stop working and then you'd have inflation the likes of which God has never seen as all that money chases fewer and fewer goods (because fewer work to make the goods) that are ever more and more expensive (because the few that still work now command unprecedented salaries/wages).

Basically everything in America is the bastardized version of the orginial

Attached: 1535230492218.jpg (457x1024, 92K)

Right, sorry. When do we kill all of our brothers who just weren't quite as dedicated to equality?

Because OP is a faggot loser and just like Bernie never produced anything worthwhile in their entire existence.

>inflation
>the sum of money hasn't changed

Attached: monoplies.jpg (638x550, 38K)

>Wealth
>divided equally
You're talking about houses, cars, acres, food, raw goods, not just money. Most businesses would lose the ability to operate or pay employees. Goods would be seized by the state but it's not like you'd get to see much, since they now can do whatever they want with it.

>Polarization good
Americans are literally an npc tier

Attached: 1542880853036.jpg (1024x780, 120K)

Money is NOT intrinsically valuable (not even gold really).
Money simply HOLDS value.
That value holding capacity is directly proportional to the amount of VALUE that exists in the world to be held by it

and inversely related to the amount of money that exists to hold all that value.

Increase the money and each dollar (or peso or whatever) now holds less value.
Decrease the money and the reverse happens.

The more valuable things that there are to buy the more value the money holds.
The fewer of those things the less value there is for that money to hold.

And maybe this is the crux of the matter.
Libs simply lack the abstract thinking ability to clearly make this distinction.

Attached: 1542880835459.jpg (1024x756, 114K)

Attached: 1542880817389.jpg (1024x759, 86K)

Because then you turn into a third world country and instead of laughing at you for your opposite political views the left puts you in prison.
That and also inflation that turns to starvation.