WTF I hate Libertarians now

He voted against Trump's executive order on the border wall.

I don't know why though.

thats slightly unbased

Attached: 2u4o2q.jpg (275x183, 25K)

dailycaller.com/2019/03/03/rand-paul-vote-no-trump-emergency/

Hi memeflag plebbitor

Fuck off kike shill. We stand with Rand.

Ofc this is all a bullshit media thing, both rand and Trump are puppets

>Why is a libertarian voting against a national emergency being declared to bypass traditional law making?

The logic is solid, but I'd still call him naive for assuming this won't fuck us.

He's the hipster of the Senate. Generally goes along with the consensus but every now and then he simply knows better than everyone else and needs to deviate from the mainstream for attention and a feeling of superiority.

>now

because hes a constitutionalist, he has always said the executive has had too much power and he stood by it.
In every way which the democrats voted against the executive order because of their lack of principal and their interest in partisanism and "resistance", rand voted out of principal.
I dont think the outcome is the best outcome in practice, I have deep respect for his reasons for his vote.

He's always been a subversive anti white gnome

the system needs to be subverted.
maybe you havent noticed.

why has nobody ever tried to limit the executive power in america by the way? it has happened almost everywhere in europe

Rand is no Ron.

I've been an ardent supporter of Ron Paul since around 2005. I also think Trump is a shabbos. This emergency declaration and wall issue and how rand voted makes me realize that Ron would've voted the same way rand did. I'm so tired of this shit. When will we have a government that actually protects us? At the very least Trump looks like he's trying to protect us.

We need a reset and a way to force the government to put Americans first. There comes a point where the constitution is less important than the defense of a nation. Martial law is needed to scrub the subversives. Rand would vote against it, so i know he's either stupid or compromised. Any politicians who allow this shit to continue against us is for (((them))).

Ironically the founders knew this and gave us a way to fix things. Its in our charter. Yet they've also made it illegal to utilize that right. We need a new 1776 to simply restore what we've lost.

I have no evidence, but if you were asking my opinion it was because both parties were really looking for the same things. Despite the pro wrestling style shit talking.
As long as it was one of the In-group (on either side) getting into the presidency, it became expedient to just let them do whatever.

and the "in-group" getting elected seemed to be 99% certain until the moment hillary lost.

that sounds like yet another reason why two-party system is so terrible

I know that if a popular uprising started to occur the jews would find a way to infiltrate and use that to earn them shekels the same way they always do to Christians. Why do you think they have organized military and intelligence actions against muslims since the 50's? The muslims see the jews for what they are and on an individual level know jews are always bad therefore make it hard to cuck their leaders. So they make war, overt or covert, against Muslims because they need the muslims to cuck and they won't.

Most here don't realize it because they're infatuated with anime titties but muslims in general are what we should aspire to be like because they're one of the last remaining large groups willing to name the jew and largely their families are intact, their women aren't fucking whores, and their men try to provide and they'll actually enforce that. Remove the child rape and the few other fucked up parts of their culture and they'd absolutely be correct in how to live.

Based.

i dont disagree.
if you were asking my opinion, i would say, preventing the state(s) from acknowledging party affiliation in any way would be a huge step forward.

it would be interesting to say the least though in current political climate it would be pretty easy to tell dems and repubs apart, except for maybe moderate dems if you still have those

Yes, I'm saying that it's morally correct to throw fags off of buildings, stone adultering women, force women to be respectable, keep jews out of all of our communities, be decent, submit to a higher power, subject yourself to a decently clean life, and as a strong father, raise a decent family. That's most muslims.

The most important part of that, to protect future generations is to keep the fucking jews out.

> it would be pretty easy to tell dems and repubs apart.
not when youre looking at a ballot.

>> no one in congress playing by the rules
>> thinks he can win by playing by the rules

Yeah hes out.

>Rand would vote against it, so i know he's either stupid or compromised.

This.

are you saying people vote based purely on party affiliation without knowing a single thing about the candidate?

im not saying I know how often it happens. but im sure it does, im sure this is less prevalant for things like president.

as you go down, to smaller positions, senate, house, governor, state house, sheriff etc..
the likelyhood that the voter has literally no clue about who they are voting for goes up considerably.
you can probably search for "downballot voter"
its a thing.

>Trump exploits his ability to declare a national emergency to advance his agenda by circumventing congress
>next Democratic president declares racism a national emergency and interns all white males in WW2-esque re-education camps

thats slightly worrying, suddenly the literal shitposting war between the parties makes much more sense

He’s wants to free blacks from prison and import Mexicans but also doesn’t like Israel

Accelerationism

Rand takes a Libertarian position = U hating Libertarians now

Dumb cuck

Actually he has very high principles that interfere with pragmatic actions. He understand that by allowing Trump to shift funds without Congressional approval, future Presidents will do the same but likely for reasons that we would not care for.