Cross species breeding?

it is the best we have and the strongest indicator

Didn't africans mix with an unkown hominid?

Niggers getting mixed with literally any other race/sub-species is an improvement to niggers, but also a penalty to the other race.

Attached: 1FD12544-99F4-4665-80BC-2C4CB3E39B60.jpg (225x225, 55K)

Yes they did
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interbreeding_between_archaic_and_modern_humans#Archaic_African_hominins

denisovans are in blacks, not chinks

>but it's not that significant
one of the biggest predictors of success

>IQ is not intelligence
no one claims it is. Its meant to be a good proxy for g, which is actually intelligence.

neandrathals?

no retard

Im no homo im 100% purest whitest neanderthal master race

>3% to 5% of the DNA of Melanesians and Aboriginal Australians and around 6% in Papuans deriving from Denisovans.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denisovan

From what i had read just the Pygmies and the Sans have evidence of some significant admixture

no, africans did not mix with neanderthals retard

This is if you believe the out of Africa myth central to the dogma of the atheist religion

>neanderthals and humans shared the same ancestor
>'hybrids'
fucking hell Jow Forums is retarded.

Then who did?

Melanesians, Papuans and Aboriginal Australians are not black

europeans and gooks

We're only 3% Neanderthal. It's probably adaptation to a climate where you actually have to preserve food and build shit.

How could anyone resist this

Attached: b7378294ebad83a91aca6c28dc7a6740--human-evolution-humanoid.jpg (736x981, 58K)

the europeans and asians did

yes they are black, google it

I thought jews were neanderthals?

>Neanderthal
Neanderthals gave us advanced mathematics skills, information processing, logic, analytical intelligence, concentration skills, obsession–compulsion and Asperger's syndrome. That's why non-whites are so stupid, they don't have these genes.
nature.com/articles/453562a

Skin color is diferent then race ratard, black africans and melanesians are separeted populations

based

>bred homo sapiens
Are you sure ?

Attached: homo_erectus.gif (1200x630, 386K)

ok, what the fuck does that have to do with anything? their skin is literally black.

Those are Australoids, and they're far removed from any other human population.
Some southern cone Native Americans have lots of Australoid genes, though.

Look for videos with Edward Dutton - I think he did one on Red Ice.

youtube.com/watch?v=iSDnQ1RwF0Y

He explains how we got higher intelligence, and why the world's is going down. But don't let me distract from folk theories pulled out of your butt, as an excuse to fight each other.

Chimpanzees aren't unknown

Ayooo, we wuz erect n shiet.

>Another possibility is that Neanderthals didn’t go extinct. Instead, they were absorbed into the human lineage. You’ve probably already heard that between 1.5 to 2.1 percent of the DNA in humans outside of Africa comes from Neanderthals, but recent revisions to the human/Neanderthal mating timeline suggest this interbreeding was going on a lot longer than previously thought. Rather than being eliminated, we may have just merged.

Black is used to refer to the african populations not to the melanesian ones.

I would bone a Neanderthal woman!

Attached: Female_Neanderthal.jpg (564x550, 89K)

yes i see what the misunderstanding is now

Tbh that guy is strong enough to rip our arms off

You are forgetting the micro evolutionary aspects of the northern environments.

If your stupid you starved and your children died.

It explains a lot of thing. Even Jews. You Jew the wrong people, they show up to pay with steel instead of silver. So the least intelligent Jews ended up bleeding to death in the streets while their children heads bashed in and wives rapped to death.

Adversity breeds intelligence. Not fake adversity like niggers and no Gibs. Like you and your family will die if you are not cautious, adversity.

and yet neanderthal lithic technology was almost acheulean mode B tier, doesn't seem like they had better concentration, logic, information processing or even mathematics skills to me. Archaelogy>>>>anthropology/genomics every time.

>Niggers are pure bred homo sapiens

baaaaaaaaahhahahahahhahahahahahahahah *wheeze* HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA *INHALE* PPPPPFFFFBAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

they did have those skills, they were just completely lacking in social skills. they lived in small isolated groups and were basically autists. that's why their technology was shit, because they didn't have the ability to socialize and carry/spread technology forward.

that is Shakira, dumbass

kek

nice one

that literally looks like a modern black man

so you are saying they didn't live in large enough groups to stimulate higher levels of intelligence...but they were intelligent. Right, makes sense. And that still doesn't explain why already advanced and intelligent early modern humans would benefit at all from mixing with neanderthals, and on top of that they both share the same fucking ancestor. Of the two species clearly humans had the greater potential to develop cognitively.

nullsetnationalist.wordpress.com

Attached: 1551770573706.png (1200x1200, 1.38M)

are you saying Shakira is a sexy Neanderthal?

Attached: Shakira.jpg (640x360, 38K)

>our IQ is 100

Attached: 1434022326001.png (1067x1024, 80K)

They might have been even more socialized than thought before.
Neanderthals just evolved into Whites and Asians
And Africans aren't even human to begin with
youtu.be/FMc81qpCQ3g

im pretty sure its accepted amongst genealogists that the neanderthals were (because of skull and brain size) basically autists and thought differently to homosapiens, it's probably not correct to say they were more or less intelligent, simply they were able to grasp more abstract concepts.. perhaps they were more imaginative. i wish i had the study to share with you guys but i don't. i think it also mentioned they might have had better eyesight too.

there is an austrian on here (or swiss? i cant remember) who goes by the name The Drunk Geneticist, he has all the links

Slavs are Neanderthal/Denisovan mutts.
Eurasians are Neanderthal/Denisovan mutts.
Whites are Sapiens X Neanderthal
Blacks are Erectus
Pic related is a mutt of all of you and yes, in some rare cases, hybrids are better.

Aspies. The poster you talk about it Austrian.

Japs are not purebreed. They have like 2-4 different ethnicities.

Looks Jewish

Nigerovians

Attached: SVT_Grotesco_Blanda_Upp.gif (480x270, 2.28M)

I've heard about that, it was speculated they liked tripping balls on mushrooms and thats the reason they started creating art in their caves.
But I wonder, where the fuck did they even come from? I might only heard the pleb version of human history. But all I can find is "the great migration from africa" but for some reason Neanderthals were already there and noone seems to explain why and how.

>jew smirk
>shitskin
Wonder (((who))) made this one, I'm betting it is the same as the fucking nigger one they claimed WE WUZ ENGLICH about a couple of years ago.
Out of africa is utter nonsense, out of asia + multiple origin theory makes far more sense. Given that the oldest modern human remains have been found in Europe and Asia pre-dating the claims of niggers leaving africa 50,000 years ago by a quarter of a million years at the very least, one wonders why you are trying to push niggers as being "homo sapiens", when they never were and never have been.

TL;DR: Mutts are superior.
/thread

Attached: 1551775696135.jpg (1200x630, 77K)

Several primates, not necessarily hominids.
The negro is homo erectus plus chimp/gorilla.

Brain size has very little to do with intelligence, in fact larger brains in early hominids (like paranthropus robustus vs homo habilis) means it eats more vegetation. What I'm trying to tell you is that EVERY bit of evidence tells us they WEREN'T the abstract innovative thinkers, but that early modern humans were. They don't have much art, they don't make shell beads, they can't exploit many food sources, they can't socialize in wider circles. They had physical advantages for their climate, not mental ones. They got injured badly because their style of hunting was dangerous and inefficient.

some kind of earlier homo like heidelbergensis evolved into both branches, neanderthals were a dead end. North African humans who spread into europe and asia were smarter, probably because they have a more varied environment to survive in and let's face it they took the initiative to leave in the first place, at a time when Africa was looking like a dryer less tempting prospect to stay in.

i was joking but, iberian peninsula and ME you find some neanderthal remains, and she's both iberian and ME[libanese] descent, so probably yes.
Also she doesnt like jews.
Hips dont lie.

Neanderthals are Jews.

Go back to listening to that arab-greek shill on twitter.

Scandinavia's IQ, if you exclude the shitskin immigrants and only go by pure-blooded nordics, have around 107 iq on average.
Take a look at how France's average has reduced within the last couple of decades, now it changes yearly because of third world invaders being forced in by (((politicians, NGOs and media))).

Then we should just use geographical technological achievement to determine the overall intelligence of races.
Oh, hang on, it has come out to be more or less the same, and nogs and abbos aren't even on the fucking chart since it starts with the wheel which they never managed.

>Does interspecies breeding raise intelligence?
Not necessarily. What raises average intelligence is a high amount of competition under conditions where intelligence gives and advantage. That is usually the case in areas that can support a high number of people, leading to advanced civilizations where mental skills give a bigger or additional advantage over physical skills.

This is explained in the out of asia theory.
Look for the book "Erectus Among Us", it is banned in most western countries now, you might have to use a proxy to access the site.

The last neanderthal and denisovan holdouts were probably the smartest, cleverest, most adaptable ones. The homo sapiens groups that bred with those outside groups of hominid relatives ended up smarter on average as a result.

Abbos got to Australia 30k years ago, wh*tes barely managed it 200 years ago. Africans were traversing vast distances across the Sahara when whites died en masse in deserts like in the 2nd crusade or Alexander's disastrous Gedrosian march.

No.Pure Neanderthal would be like 200.

off the top of my head, i can't remember but the best explanation went something like this

- very old ancestor destined to evolve into early human
- very old ancestor lives all over africa, europe and nearby
- very old ancestor evolves into proto-neanderthal and spreads across eurasia
- far east ones become denisovan
- far west ones become neanderthal
- meanwhile in africa
- similar situation
- north african tribes (likely already unique from the tribes who the majority of niggers descend from) move out of africa
- mixing occurs outside of africa
- later on proto-niggers also leave africa

Supposed to be around 10% for north american red indians. Never verified it though. The real percentage fluctuates far more than the average they provide, the same as iq, average does not mean true ranges.

no
jews=reptilians + ash cans

All the reconstructions are 90% imagination, that is why they are being frequently used to subvert facts.

Read encyclopediadramatica
Go to how to troll Jow Forums
See exactly what you did
Go fuck yourself OP

Niggers are homo hiv aids dispensers and neanderthal mix. They are of their father the Devil

Attached: 1519939793559.png (550x741, 648K)

Every time I see this old Shakira video I am reminded of one of my fiancees, a wild haired hot-blooded blond:

youtube.com/watch?v=Dsp_8Lm1eSk

>humans evolved

Attached: 1532435234705-2.png (1000x1000, 259K)

>Abbos got to Australia 30k years ago,

are you REAAALLLY going to use abbos as some sort of praise for black achievement ? REEEEEAAAAAAALLLY ?

and what happened once they got there hmmmmm?

In the out of asia theory, neanderthals were the second or third wave to leave the starting area in what is now southern china. The neanderthals were a tribe that went northwards, and over time adapted to the colder climates. From there, they spread eastwards into north america, and westwards across russia and into northern europe, then filtered down through europe.

very true

Attached: 120% ayylmaocephalic.png (474x506, 405K)

any shared sequences with neanderthals originate in the ancestor species like heidelbergensis. There is zero evidence for interbreeding with neanderthals.

she's not natural blonde.
She had troubles wtih (((them))) after she release a Schwartzsonne necklace

That's the absolute opposite of what I learned. They had higher empathy and were far more social, and their tools were more advanced than the other proto-humans of the time. Where did you read this utter shit?
Think about what you are writing, now consider the subsaharan african, who has no neanderthal dna. What you described was the negroid, no social skills, no moral code, no tools.

Not it isn't. Not even Japan or Taiwan is 107 you idiot. Your so called high IQ pure blooded nordic invented the least historically.

>There is zero evidence for interbreeding with neanderthals.

source

kill yourself for repeating that meme

nobody was talking to you fucking kikeoid scumbag. get the fuck out of here.

where do you think Sydney came from? Captain Cook reported that the natives had 'high glass towers' and 'iron bridges' and moved in horseless carriages. Epidemics spreading from the rank europeans had wiped out these noble peoples by the time euros returned and reduced them to degenerates, so the British took over these cities and thats how the industrial revolution began.

Homo sapiens, neaderthalensis and florensiensis interbred.
Niggers did not, since they are not the same species and they had literally no exposure to any other hominid.
Divergent evolution. Literally check the alelles that code for neuronal architecture and cerebral physiology.

t. PhD candidate, computational phylogenetics. I have been getting roadblocked for 2 years, cannot get my dissertation approved - the model is complete, the logit is robust and succinct, the datasets are in the several hundreds, the error% is sub .5