So they just discovered long-lost footage of an A-bomb test, now that we're waking up to the nuclear hoax.
LMAO
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.org
twitter.com
What is that black dust that comes off of the objects before they blow away?
paint
Vaporization of paint.
Paint that’s disintegrating, either from heat or from high-energy electromagnetic radiation given off by the bomb
radiation wave hits and ionizes paint. pressure wave hits and smashes vehicle
I'd imagine it's light searing the paint.
Serious question, what’s the hoax?
That nuclear bombs don’t exist? Or that nuclear fission doesn’t exist?
Stop posting porn
There are actually people who deny that Nuclear Weapons are fake.
I can't believe I fell for the nuclear meme.
I've never heard of Nuclear weapons being fake. Tell me more pls
But why are they fake?
That looks fucking cool
>"if we dont put aside our differences with the Soviets we will be forced to blow everyone up"
Sounds like a good threat to give your masses
The radiation superheats the paint and it instantly turns to ash and smoke.
Something I can read up about this?
No cuz it doesn’t exist
Of course nuke weapons exist
Fucking morons here
how does one film an atomic bomb without destroying the camera ?
ok if these bombs are so damn powerful and fucking up cars and busses how the FUCK is there a camera out there not even moving an inch filming this?
That doesn’t necessarily imply they’re fake. It would be more realistic (namely cheaper) for them to stage false flags in order to scare the populace into submitting to their rule instead of making some ethereal boogeyman out of nuclear power.
These vehicles look like straight-up toys.
No that was just an idea that came to me. So it's not impossible someone thought the same, however nukes exist. And we need more
You stand the camera far enough away so it doesn’t get vaporized by the heat and put it in a bunker that can withstand the force of the shockwave at that distance.
We don’t need more, we need to use more.
nukes are a lie and you have autism
but some shots are from above
Ergo you will never see what happens to the detonation site on impact. Why even live?
>nukes are fake
Hi, Weev
This is a slide thread guys
no country produced nukes anymore. we're only allowed to maintain old nukes which is why we'll never have more than russia.
just stand next to it
still interesting to talk about something other than AOC, or yang or other dumb shit
What is a telephoto lens?
You people are fucking retarded, there was almost 800 open air nuke tests witnessed by thousands (the last in '93 by the french), the Nevada desert is littered with craters from underground tests as well.
Exactly. Boo hoo scary nukes. Every american has the right to own and operate nuclear devices. Its bull
Slide from what the otherwise productive discussion lol
I'm not disputing the existence of nukes, just wondering how they use the cameras
every american has the right to own and operate gas chambers too
>I'm not disputing the existence of nukes
OK, but yeah, a telephoto lens and placing the camera in a bunker behind some thick glass would probably have been the case.
>optics that can see far away do not exist
It's hard for retards to understand how things are done, a very well protected camera would easy withstand the nuke. It's not like it's placed in the center of the blast.
I’m pretty sure the threat of nuclear radiation is bullshit. Hiroshima and Nagasaki should have been a hotbed of mutants but everything carried on just fine. Same as Fukushima
fuck off sweden go back to milking middle eastern cocks
How'd the camera survive?
>the nuclear hoax.
Engineers are smart.
ive seen the video of the TNT and then nuke test, with audio from the time, "it aint real" is not valid at all.
admitedly the hiroshima buildings still standing thing is weird, but that doesnt explain that one guy being treated for radiation burns in both cities (poor bastard)
>the threat of nuclear radiation is bullshit
nice bait
>Earth is flat
>Nukes aint Real
>Holocaust happened
Wow people will believe any shit wont they
>same as fukushima
subtle bait, anyone who gave the slightest fuck when it happened knows about the cover up.
why else would protestors fly plutonium onto the prime ministers place on a drone :^) how could they have done so if there was none laying around
Wow, someone actually remembers this.
Was recording technology good at this time? Says it was in the 50s. They must've had a very powerful recorder that could view from far away outside the blast zone. I want to know what else they have that's outside the public eye.
heatwave evaporating the water sealed in the paint
notice how the tent catches fire
I'm in love with all your moms. And well, it pains me that I can't be with them. And I'm heartbroken and am lusty for a anons pretty witty mommy wit a anons old used bewbie suckle tubual that I would like to thump and luv.
its hard to forget a man in a hazmat suit pointing at a camera angrily saying nothing for 30 minutes at the site.
stay strong japan.
Many reasons
>provide plausible deniability for why the two globalist ZOG “enemies” USA and USSR never actually attacked each other or even came close to fighting a war against one another
>gives teeth to the Sampson option propaganda “support Israel or we blow up the world goy”
>crush the warrior spirit of whites with fears of a superweapon so another Hitler will never rise
>easy way to steal and plunder tax money for a fake weapons program
>provide propaganda ammunition against the small nations that remain enemies of the international banking cartel, media can claim they are “trying to build WMDs”
>They must've had a very powerful recorder that could view from far away outside the blast zone
Can you not use a search engine?
>640mm Astro-Berlin sports photography lens used by the AP in the 1950s-60s
And this was civilian tech.
Isnt that how nips just look?
Thanks for doing the work
Film camera inside of a heavy bunker. Pointing away from the blast.
Probably a dug down concrete beam with a camera setup on the backside of it, which protects it from the blast.