TOP CONSERVATIVE WRITER CALLS FOR REPARATIONS FOR BLACKS

Even conservatives are starting to support reparations - why is Jow Forums so far behind the curve on this issue? If Trump wants the black vote, he's going to have to do stuff like this. Like it or not.

>The Case for Reparations
>By DAVID BROOKS

>I’ve been traveling around the country for the past few years studying America’s divides — urban/rural, red/blue, rich/poor. There’s been a haunting sensation the whole time that is hard to define. It is that the racial divide doesn’t feel like the other divides. There is a dimension of depth to it that the other divides don’t have. It is more central to the American experience.

>One way to capture it is to say that the other divides are born out of separation and inequality, but the racial divide is born out of sin. We don’t talk about sin much in the public square any more. But I don’t think one can grasp the full amplitude of racial injustice without invoking the darkest impulses of human nature.

>So let’s look at a sentence that was uttered at a time when the concept of sin was more prominent in the culture. The sentence is from Abraham Lincoln’s second Inaugural Address. Lincoln had just declared that slavery was the cause of the Civil War. He was fondly hoping and fervently praying that the scourge of war would pass away. But then he added this thought:

>“Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s 250 years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said 3,000 years ago, so still it must be said ‘the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.’”

nytimes.com/2019/03/07/opinion/case-for-reparations.html

Attached: 20150208201320001_hd[1].jpg (1920x1080, 88K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Brooks_(commentator)
timesofisrael.com/david-brooks-opens-up-about-his-jewish-and-christian-bisexuality/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>There are a few thoughts packed into that sentence. First, there is a natural moral order to the universe. There is a way things are supposed to be — more important than economic wealth or even a person’s life.

>Second, moral actions are connected to each other. If somebody tears at the moral order by drawing blood through the lash of slavery, then that wrong will have to be paid for by the blood of the sword. History has meaning. It’s not just random events.

>Third, sin is anything that assaults the moral order. Slavery doesn’t merely cause pain and suffering to the slave. It is a corruption that infects the whole society. It is a collective debt that will have to be paid.

>Fourth, sin travels down society through the centuries. Lincoln was saying that sometimes the costs of repairing sin have to borne generations after the sin was first committed.

>From these thoughts we can appreciate the truth that while there have been many types of discrimination in our history, the African-American (and the Native American) experiences are unique and different. Theirs are not immigrant experiences but involve a moral injury that simply isn’t there for other groups.

>Slavery and the continuing pattern of discrimination aren’t only an attempt to steal labor; they are an attempt to cover over a person’s soul, a whole people’s soul.

>That injury shows up today as geographic segregation, the gigantic wealth gap, the lack of a financial safety net, but also the lack of the psychological and moral safety net that comes when society has a history of affirming: You belong. You are us. You are equal.

Attached: 1497669769848.gif (215x194, 475K)

he's a Jew. Jew's are trying to destroy whites before their end. accelerationism has begun.

>Nearly five years ago I read Ta-Nehisi Coates’s Atlantic article “The Case for Reparations,” with mild disagreement. All sorts of practical objections leapt to mind. What about the recent African immigrants? What about the poor whites who have nothing of what you would call privilege? Do we pay Oprah and LeBron?

>But I have had so many experiences over the past year — sitting, for example, with an elderly black woman in South Carolina shaking in rage because the kids in her neighborhood face greater challenges than she did growing up in 1953 — that suggest we are at another moment of make-or-break racial reckoning.

>Coates’s essay seems right now, especially this part: “And so we must imagine a new country. Reparations — by which I mean the full acceptance of our collective biography and its consequences — is the price we must pay to see ourselves squarely. … What I’m talking about is more than recompense for past injustices — more than a handout, a payoff, hush money, or a reluctant bribe. What I’m talking about is a national reckoning that would lead to spiritual renewal.”

>We’re a nation coming apart at the seams, a nation in which each tribe has its own narrative and the narratives are generally resentment narratives. The African-American experience is somehow at the core of this fragmentation — the original sin that hardens the heart, separates Americans from one another and serves as model and fuel for other injustices.

>The need now is to consolidate all the different narratives and make them reconciliation and possibility narratives, in which all feel known. That requires direct action, a concrete gesture of respect that makes possible the beginning of a new chapter in our common life. Reparations are a drastic policy and hard to execute, but the very act of talking about and designing them heals a wound and opens a new story.

(end)

He's a very prominent conservative, not just a 'Jew.'

I identify as a nigger. Now wheres my gibs?

Attached: 1552022538984.jpg (621x702, 68K)

Id tell you to sell your own soul but you dont got one. Not even the devil wants you.

"Brooks is Jewish"
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Brooks_(commentator)

bro, your a transgendered female nigger jew. now you get extra!

The first livelong slave in America was a white man. He was owned by a nigger. It's true.

>He's a very prominent conservative
David Brooks? He's been a running joke as a fake conservative a long time. I think he voted Killary and Obama twice.

>timesofisrael.com/david-brooks-opens-up-about-his-jewish-and-christian-bisexuality/

remember folks

Attached: 1463574803424.jpg (587x534, 105K)

>Reparations — by which I mean the full acceptance of our collective biography and its consequences
Nobody pushing for reparations will ever, EVER explicitly define how they should work in a practical sense. Its an idea that can't ever be anything more than hollow virtue signalling.

Try to address the argument, not the speaker.

Brooks is a turbokike

>David Brooks
>Conservative
KEK

You will join the Jew in the ovens. Laugh and say it could never happen. I dare you.

Attached: 9346738941260.jpg (2935x2238, 1.76M)

FUCKIN SWEET, now I can build that PC I always wanted!

Reparations? What a way to solve a problem.
Make other generations pay for something that, at the time wasn't illegal.
Nice way to keep the fire burning isn't it.

America's most left-wing conservative

maybe tied with Kristol

Attached: 1550340782970.jpg (1455x1037, 328K)

David Brooks is a filthy seditious kike. 600k white men died for his pets to be free to never work again

Attached: 1493357897064.jpg (580x345, 80K)

I self-identify as a Somalian woman. Give me reparashuns. (i can't type so good either becuz kompyuta is raciss)

reparations is just wealth redistribution for blacks. get the fuck out commie.,

also blacks dont deserve reparations any more than you deserve reparations for your feudal serf ancestors.

How do we deal with people like them?

Hahahahahaha! You think David Brooks is a conservative!

>top conservative
>literal Jewish Bolshevik

Fine, let the joos pay.