We always here about the Holohoax but lets talk about another genocide...the genocide of the Prussians.
During the dying days of the Third Reich, the (((Allies))) and their Jewish masters engaged in a campaign that annihilated the noble Prussian nation (one of Europe's greatest powers) from history. Excluding within a historical context, why do we no longer here about Prussia today? Because the Jews and Zionists committed a large-scale ethnic cleansing against Germans east of Oder–Neisse line. In addition to this, the nation of Prussia was forcibly dissolved due to its "problematic militarism" according to kikes, slavs, amerimutts and anglos.
>The death toll attributable to the flight and expulsions is disputed, with estimates ranging from 500,000-600,000[10] [11] and up to 2 to 2.5 million.
>Many German civilians were sent to internment and labour camps where they were used as forced labour as part of German reparations to countries in eastern Europe.
>After World War II, Prussia's land was divided amongst Poland and Russia who annexed the territories.
>en.wikipedia.org
>Prussia, deemed a bearer of militarism and reaction by the Allies was officially abolished by an Allied declaration in 1947.
So tell me, when will Israel be paying reparations to Prussia?
Prussian Genocide
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtu.be
twitter.com
Right after Germany pays reparations to Poland
Next question
fucking polish rat
they did it to themselves by starting 2 world wars and killing off most of their peoples through it.
sickening truly the genoicdal demon faced rage of the jew
How long? How much fucking longer do we have to wait?
Indeed, polak untermensch rat like breeding and migration comparable to vermin and jews only has been the same problem over and over again, hence "polak chimpout circle"
the butthurt is strong over there I hear
why take it personally
Prussia is worthless.
Change my mind.
Poland is literally an invention from the jew, only created to bait Germans into killing them
Change my mind
It is a dreadful thing that Prussia was wiped out. But sadly the winners seldom see their own evils.
It's a popular uprising against the despotic rulers of Europe. In theory it was far more successful than Prussia ever was, given Poland managed to win a war against every neighbor and secure it's independence.
Mexico on the other hand is a Spain's failed abortion kid.
I'm pissed off on Russians though. They had one chance to transform Kaliningrad into a quintessential russian town with S.Petersburg archiecture and canals and yet they turned it into a shithole.
I will not forgive them that.
Oh yeah such a brave uprising and elegant defense when literally the entire (((planet))) was there to fight on your behalf. Twice.
Read Spengler's essay Prussian Socialism. Prussianism is the ideal for all Western nations to strive for.
REPLY TO ME YOU P*LE
>when literally the entire (((planet))) was there to fight on your behalf
Literally nobody was fighting for Poland. In fact UK was anti-Polish until Poland actually went fully independent so they "changed their mind"
Mexico should invest in schools, but real ones and not those that teach you how to smuggle drugs to the US and behead the opponents from the different gang.
>win a war against every neighbor
How did Poland get destroyed in the first place in the 1700s? How did they defeat the Nazis? Your facts are trash or your logic is
>Prussianism is the ideal for all Western nations to strive for.
If so then Prussia is to blame for Europe's problems.
>How did Poland get destroyed in the first place in the 1700s?
Because corrupt nobles and rulers sold it to Russians. You have to be retarded to think that three nations just attacked weak Poland. Poland if it was really managed how it used to could destroy each of them.
It was a typical land grab for money, corrupt ones got all the profits and lived in luxury.
>Nobody fought for Poland
>Literally had the entire world rape Germany to spawn Poland. Twice
Even as a secondary effect it does not detract from what I've meant, which is that polacns did Jack shit but be rape meat for Germans and the only reason they exist is because others did their fighting
Funny how you have to grasp at straws, and you're telling me to go at school
What about polish death camps tho?
And about the fighting that was happening there. Of course the destruction of Poland wasn't met with no reaction, especially from the patriots. The Kościuszko formed a new Polish army that created to stop the Russians from taking over Poland, but obviously a newly created rebel "army" couldn't really do much against the well trained and much larged and better equipped Russian army.
Damn, it's a fact that those manlet spics are in fact subhumans. It's really insulting for my IQ even looking at this.
Poland is in a very difficult geopolitical position, the North European Plain. They've done well to uphold their nationhood.
Pussy.
Reparations for what? All you have is Adidas and Skoda. Lol.
after you give back the prussian corridor and Konigsberg
fucking Russians destroying superior history
How did they start two world wars?
>tight geographical position
Yes, it is. So is Germany. For most of history all they nations were fighting in Germany. Thus the Prussian militarism. Which one preformed better?
Why is it, that nowadays Oxford historians are gushing so much over Prussia? Now that the Anglo has destroyed it, he's suddenly fawning over it and Americans still gives their military Prussian literature to read.
Of course they still continue to belittle the Catholic Habsburg Empire. Is this some strange Protestant/Anglo hate-love for Prussia?
Blaming Germany (or Prussia) for both the world wars is a bit silly. WWI is complicated, and Germany does not perhaps bear the most blame. WWII was largely, but not wholly, started by Germany, which was aggressive to its neighbours and reckless in its diplomacy. But here too things are not easy to untangle. WWII is in some ways a continuation of WWI.
Poland is worthless.
Clean my toilet.
Germany is worthless
Steal my bike.
Preussen were Germanic, why shit on your own?
geopolitical, political is key word, from the very beginning Poland was between powerful German state and Russian hordes
to strive means it's not achieved idiot
Yes, Germany too, though it is at the end of the plain, and there it is sandwiched between France and powers to the east. And yes, Prussian militarism is understandable, and does not spring out of the ground, as it were.
>Which one preformed better?
Of Poland and Germany? Not easy to answer. Poland has long fought to maintain its independence, and its history cannot be reduced to the partition.
No it wasn't. Unless you want to claim the HRE was a strong political nation (it wasn't). And Germany was stuck between the Russians and the French. They are in the same situation. One adapted better than the other.
Why would someone make the claim that either prussia or germany, starte WW1 or WW2, respectively?
Do you find something wrong with prussia? If so, what?
Old Prussians were actually Balts. My forefathers fought against them on the Austrian side in the war of brothers.
Of course I'm not excusing the Allied war criminals for dissolving Prussia.
Socialism, statism, Kulturkampf (persecution of Catholics) and the initiation of the war of brothers.
And Germany's can't be contained to a single war either. The point is dispite being a divided nation Prussia managed to partion Poland with the Russians. Then once united the Germans went toe-to-toe toe with half the globe. I'd say it's the Germans that faired better. However, we should not forget that the Polish contributed to these successes. Both in holding back the ottomans and in that the original Prussian land was sold to the Germans by Poles.
Maybe a little feeling of guilt? An attempt to rejudge? Don't know. But the old bonds between England and Prussia were once warm and friendly (before the Kaiserreich). Things turned cold when England saw a threat to its sea-power.
This. Prussia was a masonic kingdom, the forefather of some of the most problematic ideologies, one of the countries that took in the Jesuits after the order was dissolved. Good riddance, honestly.
Not sure I understand the question. It is rather normal these days to blame the Germans for the world wars. Vae victis, and all that.
because this is what happened
As you say, the Germans are in a bad geopolitical position, and that must always be taken into account in any analysis of success and failure, aggression and peacefulness, and so on.
> I'd say it's the Germans that faired better.
The trouble with that belief is that things don't look good now, do they? Going toe-to-toe with half the globe is not a wise thing, and wisdom is to be reckoned amongst the martial virtues, though again allowances must be made for Germany's position. How much choice did it have? No doubt it could have chosen to do things more wisely, but the choices weren't easy.
It is a simple Question. Which act are either respective nations accused of committing, that required a world war as a response?
I could look up the info, but I am busy and you seemed to be educated on the topic.
Not an answer.
>war of brothers
Can you give me a quick rundown on what -specifically- was done? Wikipedia is being -wikipedia...and I dont have time to go down a 'link rabbithole'.
Thanks to all anons in advance.
World war is not a planned response, it is a development, things rolling out of hand. But it is a hugely complex matter. A war between the powers in Europe was on the cards for a while before it broke out in 1914, especially because of the naval race between England and Germany: powers jostling for position and power, weaknesses beginning to show themselves (Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire), and so on. Blaming Germany alone for this is silly.
>Blaming Germany alone for this is silly.
That is my instinct -though I have no evidence to back it up, as I have not yet read up on the conflict. I get that it is a complex issue -most things involving that many people are. But, as you stated previously ' It is rather normal these days to blame the Germans for the world wars' -so, what is the reason given by historians for either Prussia or germany starting the war -there must be one -what did they do to justify the world wars, in response?
If you dont know, thats ok -ultimately, at some point in the future, I will do my own research, but right now, im just looking for a quick answer.
People who want to blame Germany for everything point to Germany's support for Austia-Hungary against Serbia. This prompted Russia to declare war on Germany, which in turn forced Germany to declare war on Russia and France (France was allied with Russia and Germany was surrounded by each, see the Schlieffen Plan). At this point it had escalated from AH slapping Serbia back in to its place in to a major European conflict. However it was not a World War until Great Britian joined, who brought her commonwealth colonies like Canada, Australia and India with her.
That's the trouble: there is no quick answer. Blaming Germany is more a thing in popular culture (media-nonsense and the stupid beliefs that it spreads through society) than in historiography. Any historian worth his salt will take a nuanced view, especially of WWI. Historians still tend to see Germany as the foremost cause of WWII, and that is right in light of the recklessness of Hitler. But still it is not a simple matter of Germany being fully to blame, and the rest of us being innocent parties. The Nazis were reacting in part to the loss of WWI and the foolish and vicious after-war punishments it suffered. It's not much of a wonder that they sought to reassert themselves and regain their honour.
>turned Germany into a world power
>countless scientific achievements
>most powerful military in the world
>beacon of tradition and unity
Prussia was one of the few European nations immune to leftism. They were destroyed to ensure that Europe was broken after the war.
Based
It's really funny when you think about it. Each time, I repeat literally every single time, when Prussia/Germany attacked Poland they had Russian help.
Im not memeing, they're that shit.
Both Poles and Hungarians were in alliance with the HRE in the defense of Europe against the Turks. Prussia wasn't really sold to Germans, it was a fiefdom that reverted back to HRE. The Kaiser carried the title of Prussians Administrator all throughout before that.
The Polish military successes are quite impressive though and they had more of them in the long run, some 300 years streak. Prussias punches above its weight in the 7 Years War, but get's humilated by Napoleon and picks up again after that.
>Can you give me a quick rundown on what -specifically- was done?
Bismarck preempts Lincoln in 1866 and centralizes Germany under Prussian rule without Austria by provoking a war with the latter one.
Soviet cultures picking at the corpse of Poland is not “helping”. Germany obliterated the Polish army, the Soviets used it as an oppprtunity to claim their slice.
Thanks.
Vultures not cultures fucking gay autocorrect
Are you claiming Prussians funded the Black Hand?
Britains secret war guarantee to Poland is slowly being acknowledged as more important. All of the territories annexed/ liberated by Hitler were either a part of the Second Reich or were areas populated by Germans who wanted to be a part of the new Reich.
What did they do to provoke a war with austria?
I bet you didn't know it but the plan was to hold up near Romanian border where we had some defences set up just for that ocasion.
Plan West it was called. Soviet invasion ruined that.
Never forget the Wilhelm Gustloff.
10,000 mercilessly killed by Soviet subhumans, 5,000 of them children.
en.wikipedia.org
>MV_Wilhelm_Gustloff
>As Wilhelm Gustloff had been fitted with anti-aircraft guns, and the Germans, in obedience to the rules of war, did not mark her as a hospital ship, no notification of her operating in a hospital capacity had been given and, as she was transporting military personnel, she did not have any protection as a hospital ship under international accords.
what now?
In their modest form, Hitler's land-claims were reasonable (and were to some degree seen as such in Britain). But thereafter, and with his recklessness, war was the only outcome.
Austria and Germany would've started WWI regardless. Austria wanted all of Yugoslavia, Germany wanted more colonies, and they both wanted to create a continental order with themselves at the center instead of the French.
Blaming Serbia for WWI is as stupid as blaming Poland for WWII because they wouldn't give up Danzig. Eventually the Germans would've demanded more of Poland regardless.
it wasnt the kikes you dumb fuck it was the jesuits. ww2 was orchestrated by the jesuits and they decimated prussia because it was a major hub of protestantism
Ah yes, protestantism. A literal heresy which allows women priests.
Take a look at this map Richard, notice anything? Yes, majority protestant countries are also the most cucked ones. Interesting isn't it?
In the 1970s Fritz Fischer released a book on the German Empire, claiming the Kaiser was bent on grabbing world power. That is called the "Fischer Thesis" and it still get's brought up from time to time.
The most famous point that is blamed on the Kaiser is the so called "naval arms race". The policy of the British Empire was to keep a navy that had the size of the two political powers after it combined. So the Kaiser is blamed as militarist and a provocateur for allegeldy threatening the maritime supremacy of the British Empire.
Then of course there is the "blank check" the German Empire handed to its Austrian counterpart after the assassination in Sarajevo.
All in all, the various alliances and systems of entanglements have come again to the forefront of discussions in recent years. The "encirclement of Germany" had long been a point historians brought up in the defense of Germany.
I can't help but notice, how similar Putin's situation is to that of the Kaiser.
>I can't help but notice, how similar Putin's situation is to that of the Kaiser.
Please elaborate
because most of it has been infiltrated by freemasons and jesuits, it wasnt until the reformation and 1648 that everything we consider the modern era came into existence.
It's just the germ mans way of doing things.
>Oh look you're fighting with the Ottomans? Let's attack you and spread our lands.
>Oh you are liberating yourselves from the turks? Time to attack you.
No surrender, no backing down. Faggots like you can be salty as much as you want.
Why do people post dumb ass questions without context? Read a book and study for yourself if you sincerely want to understand history. You won't get it in 15 minutes.
its because were being set up for another jesuit world war only this time itll be america that goes fascist and subsequently get decimated
You faggots couldn't make up ur minfs during a critical moment in European history.
So you got DPed by Hitler and Stalin.
You fucking deserved it.
Cope harder Polish rat.
Soviets raped just as many Poles as they did Germans.
Encirclement (or the threat of it) by aggressive "peace-keeping" powers.
w..we dindu nuffin!!
Yes its a shame germans genocided them in medieval era...
>lost to birds
also
>supposed mortal enemies the nazis and the communists work hand in hand in conquering a country which is smaller, less industrialized and less polulated than any of them are
>still takes them nearly as long as it took germans to take over france which had bigger military and bongs helping them out
wew
Pretty obvious now that you say it.
>Y..y..you should have surrendered...
Spoken like a true leaf.
>a whole country is responsible for a single terrorist organisation filled with bosniaks
>remember germany dindu nuffin
Plus constant demonization.
Maybe the pipelines are analogous to the Berlin-Baghdad railway and perhaps Putin's assistance to Assad could be compared to the Kaiser supporting the Moroccans or the Boers?
The funny thing is that our media talks about the aggressiveness of Russia, and yet it is NATO that has been expanding to the east since the fall of the Soviet Union, despite promises that it wouldn't.
Reminder bankers (Anglos) started WWI
youtu.be
>us building a pipeline which ruined polish plans of building a gas port which would import and process liquid gas from all over the world isn't bad
>us building a pipeline which will further monopolize russian control on energy sector in the EU isn't bad
>us building a pipeline that'll give the russians ability to influence european politics thanks to the threat of shutting down transit or increasing prices isn't bad
shut the fuck up
Those are interesting points of analogy.
The demonization of the Russians here is crazy. It has not, however, quite reached the rank of our propaganda against the Germans in WWI . . .
>We need to make the world safe for democracy
>Putin backs Iran, which is the worlds leading terrorist state
>911 was bad
>t. democracy
Yes, Poland......... make them pay big time............ 1 trillion or more............ reclaim what they took from you........................
also force them to disarm, no more military.............. and occupy the Rhineland........ go, Poland, nobody will get in the way of your dreams!
"Making the world safe for democracy/freedom/etc" has been the excuse since the French Revolutionary wars. I miss the good old days when a king would declare a war honestly: because we want to nick your stuff.
Bismarck set an ultimatum to the states in the German Confederation to kick out the Austrians and construct a big German state. The states refused and Bismarkc marched his troops into one that was administrated by the Austrians.
You'll get your wellfare from Berlin anyway.
That's why I'm so scared. Now even the nuclear treaties between the USA and Russia are gone. Can't anyone see where this is leading?
>Can't anyone see where this is leading?
Self-righteousness and smug complacency blinds them to almost everything.
Nuclear war is a decent outcome at this point, better than becoming enslaved to a ZOG AI and being forced to worship the antichrist.
Russia's navy has become a coastal protection force. All of the ships launched in the last decade are corvettes or light frigates.
Australia, Spain, Norway, Korea, Japan, Italy, Germany, Britain, France and the USA have re-equipped with modern blue water destroyers. Canada is the odd man out, but as they are run by the bastard son of a communist its understandable that he follows in the footsteps of his ideological homeland.
Also Canada will begin to build a new blue water fleet as soon as Turdo is gone.
But we're innocent peace-keepers! We need to project our peace-keeping power . . .
A bit drastic. Certainly we need to destroy the system.
I blame Putin too. You can't negotiate with these crazies since they only seem to respect force.
Yes, but if we fail that's certainly better than to see Europe overrun with African hordes.
That's even more analogies to the Kaiser. The Russians actually decreased their military spending last year.